One writer in my New Right Papers anthology talked about an experience he had in the USSR when it was still ruled by Social Progress. Apparently to show the flaws in capitalist production, he was shown the hula hoops. There was a giant warehouse containing millions of hula hoops the USSR had produced at the time of that craze in the 50s.

They still had them. It is an example of what I said before, that Communists have no way to figure out what consumer goods to produce, so they produce whatever the market economy produces. But to them, what they were showing him was how his wonderful market economy produced things nobody wanted.

But the hula hoop was not a planned event. They just grew and manufacturers produced them. Then the craze died and they stopped producing them. That’s what you get when Mommy Professor doesn’t do your planning for you.

To my writer, that was an example of how stupid the planned economy was. But to them, the fact that they couldn’t give the damned things away to their citizens demonstrated how ridiculous this capitalist product was.

My point is that the Soviets had no more idea what was going on than the CIA did. They had more agents there than we did by a LONG shot, “the KGB is everywhere.” The CIA budget is a secret, and I can tell you as a staffer for the ranking member of the Internal Security Committee, formerly House Un-American Activities Committee, that if you saw their expenditures you would be as lost as you are now.

But between the Defense Intelligence Agency, the CIA and the others, we spent billions on knowing what went on inside the USSR, from qualified experts.

Lots of information was produced, tens of millions of words poured out, but nobody saw the USSR coming down, here or there. This never seemed to bother anybody, and certainly nobody in the Intelligence Community was ever criticized for it or lost a night’s sleep over it.

So back to one of our basic questions: Why was this information PRODUCED? Why were all those people paid so much and no one ever asked why they didn’t see the whole thing coming down? If Pepsi-Cola went out of business, went out of business next week, and no one in the Coca-Cola Company had any idea it was happening or why it happened, I guarantee you there would be a LOT of empty seats to be filled in the Executive Suites in Atlanta.

We know all those executives and experts WERE hired, and we know they had not the slightest hint the USSR was going to disappear overnight. We also know that those who haven’t retired are now promoted and well-paid in the Department of Homeland Security.

In fact it was exactly those same executives and experts and the people they hired and trained who were in charge on September 11, 2001. By now almost all of those who missed on the Soviet Incident AND on 9/11 have gotten fat pensions and/or big-pay jobs as Advisors in the private sector. But their spirit, and their level of competence, lives on in those they made experts to succeed them.

And no one notices.

Anyone who actually knows anything about the Communist economies, euphemistically referred to by the UN Statistics books as “Centrally Planned Economies,” has got a good laugh at what Lenin and his fellow Intellectuals and Idealists ran into when they started to plan production.

For instance, they had to have quotas for glass production. They tried stating it in pounds of glass, but what came out from the terrified managers was glass slabs weighing hundreds of pounds and useless for anything.

And yes, Virginia, they actually TRIED the alternative: stating the quotas in square inches. You have probably guessed, but they didn’t, that glass came pouring out a fiftieth of an inch think and very little of it was ever anything but shards when it was actually delivered.

The problem with Communism was never the long debate about Moral Relativism argued by William F. Buckley in his long Latinate words that impressed conservatives so much. The problem was that Communism is SILLY.

If you listen to my latest interview with Truck Roy, you will hear his question tome about Communism. My reply was, “What will you PRODUCE?” It’s too basic not to be shocking.

Truck Roy, like anybody else, said, ”Food, consumer goods.” I don’t know ANYBODY who was EVER ready for that question.

The answer is that Lenin and Company knew what “goods” were. They knew what “goods” were because they were what people wanted. But are you going to produce the same goods FOREVER? A Communist planner always assumes there will be market economies out there showing him what production to plan.

Hell, even when they had lots of markets to imitate, they couldn’t find the right WORDS to put the quotas in. Factories in the USSR always stacked up huge piles of parts they couldn’t use. The Russian economy was a total shambles under the USSR, always. The people always lived like third-worlders while their reports to the UN showed them catching up with the USA in per capita income.

It is amazing. The entire economy of the Soviet Union, more than three hundred million white people, never produced ONE SINGLE consumer good anybody outside the USSR could put on the market!

Nobody notices. The CIA reported the growth statistics put out by terrified Soviet managers as the truth. Some of us spent some time inside those countries, and we couldn’t believe anyone could say that. But the Ivy Leaguers didn’t go to the USSR in anything but first-class seats, and they sure as hell didn’t go into the department stores I went into.

The CIA’s Ivy League view was exactly like the John Birch Society’s view. The USSR was a Giant Conspiracy run by Evil Geniuses who were using slave labor to catch up with the United States. The concept that the USSR was SILLY was as alien to them as it was to the Intelligence Community.

No one SAW the Soviet Absurdity. No one noticed as it toppled over.

And nobody considers that odd.

Early one morning, for some reason I forget, I got off at the Metro at Union Station and came up to Capitol Hill. This meant I had to walk up to the Hill, go in on the Senate side, and take the underground trolley to the House side where my office was.

When I walked in on the Senate side, the “black” senator from Massachusetts, the blue-eyed one, had come in just ahead of me. The policeman had to search my briefcase unless I was with a member of congress. I showed him my staff ID and he asked, “Are you with Senator Brooke?”

Brooke was well on his way and I could have nodded and gone on in. I said, almost, “NO!”

Most of us men have special fear of being called queer or child molesters and so forth. We always fear that SOMEONE will believe it.

In politics I have always had the same sort of queasy feeling about being considered one of THEM:
Little White Bobby trailing after his liberal Republican Black Idol.

ICK!

My actual views would strike the average yuppie or Mommy Professor as a lot more perverted than homosexuality or even NAMBLA membership, but that doesn’t bother me. My feeling of creepiness has to do with being mistaken for something Bob Whitaker considers perverted and sick.

I would be shamed to be considered Senator Brooke’s Little White Worshipper because that is a sick idea TO ME. However untrue it is, if the guard believed it, I would be shamed in MY OWN eyes.

It is what I call intellectual shame. It is not logical. I could respect another senior staffer if he was hired by Brooke for his merits, and if he really was a liberal Republican. Hell, I ain’t prejudiced. Some of my best friends were members of the Ripon Society.

But the idea of someone thinking I was one of them gives me the same chill a guy gets from being thought a homo. As they kept repeating on Seinfeld, “I am NOT gay.”

“Though there’s nothing WRONG with it.”

This is not a creepy feeling that only belongs to old right-wingers.

I think most people normally get this feeling when someone tries to classify what they think of as their own ideas. I have had liberals scream at me when I repeated that what they had said was a standard liberal position. What can you say when someone has five times in a row quoted standard political positions.

I am SHAMING them by saying they sound like a tape recorder, though they do. But I find that the ones with a sense of that shame are now the exceptions.

What gets to me about yuppies and other Mommy Professor Products is their total lack of simple intellectual SHAME. How can they be such walking, talking mental clones and it doesn’t even bother them?

As Anne Rice said, these are the sort of people who ask each other, “Are WE still boycotting grapes?” Four of them on a single block will have the same bumper sticker.

Most of us really dislike it when it turned out that the person we are talking to has heard the JOKE we are telling before. These people tell you that the highlight of their life was when they were heroically out marching with a thousand other students shouting for something very single professor had advocated in class.

They called it a Campus Protest.

Protest against WHAT?

This is straight out of 1984 or Red China. How can you be brave independent members of a Campus Protest against Racism when anyone who says anything non-PC on race will be lucky just to be lynched
By minority students while white students cheer them on?

“We CARED in those days. We marched on campus.”

In 1984 every time the government announced another Five-Year Plan had been a success “spontaneous demonstrations” would break out, the signs already prepared. Orwell was not exactly prescient about this. The same thing happened all the time inn Stalin’s Russia.

But how can you BRAG about marching for a Politically Correct cause on a Politically Correct campus?

Stalin’s slaves did it, but I never heard one of them later claim he was BRAVE to do it.

Once again, I ask you, “Does this sound familiar?”

Have you many times wondered how someone could have such a lack of intellectual SHAME that he claims he was brave to go out and agree with everybody else?

I hope Brian will put this piece the next day after “Experts and Madam Olga.” I have pointed out and will point out again and again that futurologists have nothing to do with the future. It is time to propose some examples.

I pointed out that Ben Franklin, who was the original and ONLY expert in his time on electricity, was absolutely sure that electricity would never have any practical use. The terms he developed were the ones I had to learn when I got my ham license two hundred years later.

The development of what is now called Cold Fusion would change our world the way electricity came to dominate it in the centuries after Franklin died. Right now there are European experiments trying to develop sustainable fusion reactions, like the ones that exist in every active star. It is being done, but the energy produced is a bare fraction of energy put into it.

It was big day when scientists announced that the fusion energy produced was a billionth of the energy required, and another big day when the ratio went down to a million.

Fusion energy is like the suitcase bomb, a topic of abstract discussion but never actually happening.

We live in the fusion age the way Franklin did in his. Communication in his day, as in Caesar’s, was a fast horse, or, under very limited conditions, the heliograph.

And NIGHT! We have no idea today what NIGHT was in Franklin’s time. In scriptoria or libraries the chairs were aligned to get the most out of the sun’s light. Candles were expensive and their use destroyed the eyes of men like Pepys.

One science fiction movie I remember in the 50s had a man go far into the future and find that the technology of writing had taken a giant step: the pages of the huge book he opened were thin metal. In science fiction stories, the businesslike space travelers would have clipboards to write their notes in.

To take just one example, fusion power would change everything about space settlement and getting space materials, Right now the idea of building anything self-sustaining in space is a LONG way away because we have to get things out there.

With fusion energy, “out there” would be as close as Mexico is now, and as the power developed, it would become closer. Space colonies would develop like any other settlements.

But you can’t know what ELSE will develop. The locomotive and the telegraph united the East and West Coasts in a way Franklin would have thought absurd to predict EVER happening.

Throw in a version of a suitcase bomb and the small population needed in each space settlement, and you will have some pretty exclusive communities out there. Diversity is already reeling from the development of the American Prison Yard.

It has been a while since The White Rabbit has graced the front page of BUGS but this news is too irresistible.

This was spotted somewhere in the American Heartland. In addition to the sign they passed out copies of the mantra.

http://www.newsnet14.com/2010/04/03/white-rabbit-message-goes-viral/

General Comments Archives

General Comments I
General Comments II
General Comments III

The old one is getting long and acting up, so I’m opening up a new one.

As with Edison, we must take apart an old Wise Saying, “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.”

The enemy of your enemy CAN be your ALLY. Temporarily. On a case by case basis. We like to see supporters of Israel, the people who have dedicated themselves to ridding the earth of our race, taking a hit. The only country on earth which goes on record as calling the Holocaust a hoax is Islamic. We cheer them on.

In college the most active supporters of my seat in the Student Senate were Arabs. I buddied around with them They were my friends on a PERSONAL basis. It is no surprise to you that I have had friends that give a new meaning to the word “diversity.”

The people around us think they can only have friends if they profess a drooling love for the whole unique and “amazingly sophisticated” virtues of each person’s special race and religion, while at the same time stating that all races and cultures are exactly the same. They note a little distance from minorities, but set that down to their innate Evil and Prejudice, thought all races are innately the same.

If such a drooling, fawning schizophrenic was pawing at you, you would be a little distant, too. Blacks and Jews certainly ENCOURAGE this kind of person, because he is a major ally in their goal of getting rid of whites. He is the enemy of their enemy.

But is this groveling mass of self-hatred a FRIEND?

I have worked with and been trusted by a vast array of people, but, unless on some spy mission, I never distorted my personal loyalties and biases to them. My relationship was easy. I don’t know what they REALLY thought. I have had many white “friends” who pretended to like me but hated my guts.

But my alliances and trusts tended to WORK. Whether it turned out they liked me or not was something people insisted on telling me. Codependence is to something someone in my position could afford.

Not only is the enemy of your enemy not automatically your friend, friend is an entirely DIFFERENT relationship.

Moslems can be on your side. I certainly did them a lot of good when the Soviets were in Afghanistan. But that was because the Soviets were my enemies, not because the Mujadin were my friends.

If you want a perfect example of what happens when you mistake people you see as enemies of your enemies as friends, look at the drooling, rolling-on-the-floor-peeing-on-themselves respectable conservatives. Leftist fought Hitler, so they were friends. Leftists got mad about 9/11 when it was fashionable, so they are friends.

Respectable conservatives are always bragging about how some of their best friends are liberals. That is their excuse for never pounding on a point that makes leftists uncomfortable. As soon as a leftist says something is off limits, respectable conservatives get off of it.

But we easily drift off into the error of thinking that the Hannitys and Buckleys are our friends, since they are the official opposition and say things that make sense when it fits their agenda. They are indispensable to our established religion.

Each time you think some Wordist is your ally, think about respectable conservatives. You may lose your lunch, but you won’t lose your principles.

I have pointed out that Marxism IS NOT “a belief in THE class struggle” any more than Christians are the only people who believe in evangelism.

Marxism believes that the value of any item is “the amount of objective labor time in it.” Marx said that a diamond, for example, is worth more than water when you are thirsting in the desert because of the objective labor time spent to get a diamond. This is a basic of Marxism, and this is an example of the way you can embarrass the crap out of those irritating people who think they are sophisticated just by telling them how silly what t hey think is so sophisticated really IS.

Respectable conservatives get paid specifically for not knowing or mentioning these basics.

This objective labor caused a serious problem for Soviet planners. You see, if it doesn’t matter whether a good is in one place or another it means transportation has no objective value whatsoever.

And in RUSSIA transportation is a big deal.

What about skill? Marxism scientifically determines the value of each unit of labor by adding the fraction of time. Holy Objective Labor Time, to a particular piece of work. So if you train for three years and work for thirty years, you add ten percent to each piece of work you did during the thirty years.

Soviet history described Marx as “the scientist who discovered surplus value.” Today, a major scientific organization in Britain, I forget which, lists Marx as a scientist.

This “surplus value” is the difference between what a laborer needs to live on, subsistence, and the cost of the good. Since only the worker produces anything, and that only when he is actually producing something, all other costs, including transportation, constitute “exploitation” according to this “labor theory of value.”

If you actually know any economics, the word “subsistence means nothing. Do you mean “subsistence as the amount of calories one can survive on? Do you mean the cost of a diet that will allow one to work his best?

To Marx, the latter question had no meaning, because there is no “best” in the Labor Theory of Value. It is the amount of Objective Labor TIME that makes something valuable.

Value is important in the socialist phase of Marxist history. You can always tell a person is a Marxist when he refers to Communist states as “socialist.” A documentary on Jim Jones of Kool-Aid Fame said he studied “progressive socialists” like Marx and Lenin, both of whom would be surprised to find they were no Communists.

To Marx, communism is the inevitable but EVENTUAL result of his evolution of society. For a Marxist to describe anything on this earth as “communist” would be exactly like a Christian describing someplace as LITERALLY, Heaven.

The Marxist world contains socialist states, no Communist ones.

The socialist state must be planned, and Marxist Labor Theory of Value is the Scientific Basis on which this planning is to take place. OK now to the point of real Marxist theory no respectable conservative will not mention most of all:

Marxism says the communist society will arrive because it is based on the Rousseau Assumption that animals and savages are peaceful, even the ones who have to kill for food. Animals have no class system. Animals have no borders or wars.

One cannot be a respectable conservative unless he follows a form of Wordism that makes these exact same assumptions so completely that no one on either side even mentions them.

Like every other “sophisticated” group, Marxists can best be embarrassed by an uncompromising reminder of what they are REALLY advocating.

When you remind them of it, complete with quotes, all they can do is sputter what Mommy Professor tldaught them to:

“You’re IGNORANT!”

A few posts ago, Bob announced that Kelso had set up a new forum, Whitenewsnow.com.

In addition to the “hostage” stamp, Kelso has given Bob and us our own sub-forum called Bob Whitaker’s place.

Thank you, Mr. Kelso!

I’m sure a lot of you were wondering about our sudden disappearance from the internet. Don’t worry folks, BUGS isn’t going anywhere for a long long time.

Well, what happened?

The hosting company suffered a power outage, and as the servers were coming back online, the storage system desynchronized and started throwing errors. They purchased a better server, which will give us faster access to our new pages and your favorites. Then they loaded every website one at a time, which is why we were down so long.

In short, BUGS is back online and better than ever and to our loyal commenters and readers, we thank you for your concern and support.

-The BUGS staff.

Episode 13 has been released.

Follow the White Rabbit is moving to www.whiterabbitradio.net The old site will be removed in one week.

Recently, I stumbled across a Stormfront thread asking the question “Can non-Christians be White Nationalists?” I thought the answer was simple enough but it appears people are much more delusional than I realized. In this thread I saw bickering, arguing, and childish name calling, but really, what more could one expect from Stormfront these days? No, this isn’t what got me interested in this thread, and even writing this. What sparked my interest was the sentiment that, despite one’s genetics, your religion can dictate your race. This astounded me that people would believe this. Religion is an idea, people’s loyalty to this idea do not change their racial make up. If I start quoting the Qu’ran, the Irish blood in my veins isn’t magically transformed into Arab blood by the will of Allah. And yet, this is what people seemed to be implying.

I took this as something of a call to arms, I tried to explain that this was simply idiotic and goes against every fact about race we know. Someone’s race cannot be changed; their DNA lasts with them for their lives and is furthermore passed on to the generations. Once adherence to an idea, whether it may be Islam, Christianity, Paganism, Atheism, Democracy, Communism, Socialism, or even White Nationalism, doesn’t change their genetic make up. As I put it, if a full-blooded Irishman named Seamus O’Brien walks into the new Mosque down the streets and declares the words of Mohammed to be the will of Allah, can someone explain to me how he is anything other than an Irish White man?

The fact of the matter is simply this; an Irishman is all he is and all he ever will be. Regardless of what idea he clings to, his race stays the same. Now, the problem develops that by adopting this new idea, his race takes second place. In our example, Seamus now identifies as a Muslim, not a White man or an Irish man. His culture, folk, nation and family have all taken a backseat to his newfound idea. This is insanity and serves as a huge problem in recruiting Seamus for any kind of racial belief system. He has a new group, a new set of peers, a new law code, a new history. Underneath his turban Seamus is still the Irishman he’s always been, but he is now a slave to the idea that is Islam. Anything short of race is just that, an idea, an abstract thought, a concept, and by clinging to an idea, you lose any sense of racial obligation.

Now after I made this point, I was immediately attacked. Apparently there is a line that once one crosses gets your status as a White person revoked. Again, this is just foolish. The issue of White youths who act like non-Whites, and that as a White Nationalist being loyal to these people was bad. Bad? It is bad to be loyal to people of your own race? Isn’t this the cornerstone of White Nationalism? I then realized what we know as White Nationalism is nothing more than an idea, it’s just as prone to wordism as any other ideology, and in fact all it is wordism. These White Nationalists refused to accept their fellow Whites because these youth’s ideas (that of multiculturalism and diversity) clashed with their idea of White Nationalism. So in effect, what we’ve learned is not even White Nationalists can think racially, but rather think in terms of “my ideology vs theres”. Now I will be the first person to stand against multiculturalism and diversity, these are two very sick and evil things (they are, after all White genocide), but these things are just ideas. They are silly ideas that require some form insanity to believe in. That said, to exclude Whites who believe this and somehow insinuate they are “less than White” is just as idiotic and stupid.

This may seem like common sense, but to the good people (and I use that sarcastically) at Stormfront, I had just made the greatest sin of all. The realization that the world of racial politics is simply a microcosm of the greater struggle began to set in, that these people will cling desperately to their ideas, their books, their flags, their personality cults, and be the first to ship their race up the river. What is wrong with this picture? Pro-Whites who are against Whites, simply because their ideas clash with their holy religion of White Nationalism

I just pulled a few comments out of the spam queue. The oldest is from July 18th.

Apologies to Al Parker and 1Reader.

As a college student, for the sake of your grade, you often submit to do many assignments that you would rather not partake in. One such assignment was the literary deconstruction of a 20th century poem. It wasnt long before I realized the absurdity of this demand by reviewing the history of why people started literary criticism.

In the renaissance, when the classical works were rediscovered, you only had the works to interpret from. You judged form and substance to gain what the author was trying to convey, and you wrote an essay on your findings. Most 20th century authors are still alive or have written later works to clarify just exactly what they wanted to say. However you occasionally come across authors, such as Bob, with works that say exactly what they mean. Yet this relic of the renaissance tortures students to this very day.

A few weeks back when the majority of the articles were Bob’s, I performed a readability test on the blog and I found that the ease of reading was on par with popular novels. This astounded me, since the same index said my writing was as easy to read as an academic paper. I started searching his books and articles for ideas and maybe find a way to help make my writing easier to read.

Bob says that it takes practice. I believe him but I wonder just how much Mephistophilis had to do with it.

Right now, I’m in the process of reading “A Plague on Both Your Houses” and two things have jumped out at me. The first is that Bob has been saying roughly the same thing for thirty some odd years. The second is the form and evolution of his style of writing.

Plauge, as far as formating goes, it is the antithesis to WOL. The paragraphs are long and there are no line breaks, which help to keep the eye from wandering. However, I found the tone of the book to be a bit more forceful. direct. energetic. Bob before he was tired.

WOL has a house style that is unique. For a decade the house style has been the same; short sentances, short paragraphs, lots of line breaks. Bob did this because he found that unorthodox writing styles help capture the attention of the reader better.

He was right.

Join us April 25th at 3:00 PM EST

Contact mustang303L to be included

I’ve added a private messaging system to the blog. It should be avaliable under your user page when you click on profile.

Sorry we missed you!

Join us next week Saturday at 3PM EST. Contact Mustang303L over skype to join in!

The Shari Rule is this: “The better Shari’s comment the more she apologizes for it.” I have fussed at Shari for this, but she doesn’t take me anymore seriously than other women do.

Oh, well, this time there was a slight deviation in that Shari apologized up front instead of at the end:

“For what it’s worth, I’m getting some positive replies. “

This is a report from the front, which is what I am really looking for. Naturally while others run on endlessly, when Shari has exactly what is important here, she gives it half a sentence. But at least it IS a report from the field.

I see BUGS as something special. But when I write about that, it tends to bore readers. Readers like my pronouncements on the state of the world better. This discouraged me, because we already have plenty of urls dedicated to how the world should be.

When I simply bugged out, so to speak, Brian, unasked by me, used his tech powers to go ahead without me. First he started putting in comments in the main section, and then he started something entirely new: the Skype get-togethers.

And THAT, ladies and gentlemen, is the kind of taking charge all my boring discussions about the nature of a SEMINAR were all about. I keep repeating that BUGS is not about the Final Truth of Professor-Leader Whitaker. It is about showing you how to get into the fight from someone who has spent his life BEING SUCCESSFUL in it.

BUGS is not about hammering out The Only True Faith inside BUGS, but how to win the battle out there. If you read some of our comments from Lord Nelson or Prometheus or Simmons, you will see that someone who not part of BUGS would not understand it at all. Those are real BUGS comments, the ones dedicated to how we fight the actual battle OUT THERE.

There is no reason for me to dedicate my limited energy to one more forum about the ideal world.

Brian is my new inspiration.

Thanks, man!

Where is the revolution?

Before last night, I had never been asked this question. But then again I don’t have frequent conversations with folks sitting on the front porch waiting for a Torch Light parade. I assumed the person asking the question was NOT being a smart arse. And I still do not know what his intentions were. It is easy to misread people online. That is a question for someone who is either blind or being a smart arse. I think the better of our race. So I assumed he was blind.

Five hundred years ago all hope was lost because this country was full of Indians. Of course, we would never be able to do anything about all the Indians. Opportunity to deal with the Indian situation would never present itself?

There was never going to be an American Revolution in Colonial America. White folks were going to take shite till the end of the world. All hope was lost. There were too many loyalist in the suburbs and these Indians had us outnumbered. They are coming to take all our muskets!!! oh no …all hope is lost.

When it comes to our race. One of these “all hope is lost” scenarios presents itself with frightening regularity. In fact, BUGS could author a General Theory of History based Aryans saying “All Hope is Lost”………and that is how we got to top of the food chain over the last 4000 years. We could deduce it down to an equation: Aryan = Perpetual Crisis = Aryan.

In the late 90’s, I got online for the first time and read about the Jews. All hope was lost against them. No one would ever stop the Jews. I believe there is a clear pattern that has developed with our folks. A rather obvious pattern. This week I goaded my liberal friends on the Jewish Question. The Liberals sound identical to the White Nationalist ten years ago. The whole planet talks about the Jews everyday. An Antisemite in 1975 could only see 2009 in his wildest dreams. Now it is happening in front of our faces. Bob called the moment in 2001 after September 11th: “the next holocaust has started”. He was right.

Aryans are sitting/straddling the whole top of the planet at 10% or so of the worlds population. We have weapons our ancestors could only dream about. And we have a fanatical core that has been created by the good ole fashioned lady……..mother nature. We have the most revolutionary communication technology the world has ever seen. Thomas Pain could only dream of something like this internet. But for us, there will never be any big openings anywhere. We will all brown out. All hope is lost. The jews will get all of us first. Oh my. An obvious pattern? Probably.

So where is the revolution?

This last week. I was watching the nightly news. I saw Tom Metzger on my nightly news talking about all the young radical racists he sees daily. I have seen the likes of him on the history channel discussing the Klan etc. But not on the midwest nightly news discussing the fanaticism of white youth…….and they were taking him seriously. They did not sit and rip the man down. This was a new scene. They were listening as he described what he was seeing every day among the white folk.

But of course it’s the end of world for us. All hope is lost.

Our race is full of technological ability. No one on earth doubts this. Unfortunately, we have not invented an Alarm Clock that gives out loud Jungle Calls at the starting point of the Revolutionary Gunfire. And unfortunately the Swiss have not come up with Cukoo clock that sings Tannenbaum at the start of the Torchlight Parade.

So where IS the revolution?

It’s right here.

And it is starting right in front of our faces. The whole system that holds up the status quo is collapsing.

A few members of BUGS are having conference call on the mantra and other topics at 4pm EST today.

If you would like to join in please contact Mustang303L over skype. If you do not have skype, you can download it here.

Edit: I’m sorry that we couldn’t bring you in Joe. We’re still adjusting to the interface and technical problems kept appearing.

We had a great time tonight and we’re looking forward to doing it again next week Sunday at 3pm EST. Make your arrangements now to be included in the next chat.

When I dropped out for weeks, Brian filled the hole  with selected comments from BUGS people.   In other words,  MY people don’t sit around bleating to each other, “What we do when The Leader is no longer with us?”

You see that Prometheus’ “Keep It Personal” has been inserted twice.  Brian and I did it separately and so close together we coincided.  I asked him to leave BOTH in, because it demonstrates a critical point about us.

Prometheus, Brian and me:  We all see the basics.

That is precisely what our enemies try desperately to get us off of.  BUGS is a Gyroscope.

Despite what I keep telling them, some people think you’re smart.  From time to time I get requests from them to put me in contact with certain of “my people.”

You are here for BUGS, not as ”my people.”  No way I will freely identify you to anybody. 

Somewhere on my board, your e-mail address appears. But I think you know me well enough to realize it would never occur to me to use it or give it out.

So I have to ask you to do something else for me.

Send me an e-mail if you are WILLING FOR ME TO CONTACT YOU that way.  I can then tell you directly who wants to get in touch with us and why.  I will NOT send your e-mail address to them.  I will send THEIR  e-mail address to you with an explanation TO YOU.

Then if you like you can contact them.