Archive for category History

Mommy Professor in India

In India, Mommy Professor wears a towel on his head and a diaper on his ass.

For two thousand years Indian Mommy Professors have been considered to be the Height of Wisdom. The Brahman sits in his diaper while around him children collapse in hunger, and every University rings with his praises.

When the Aryan warrior class invaded India and set up a culture, the warriors, the Tschatriya, were at the top of the Caste system. “Caste” means color in English, just as is the Indian Sanskrit term for caste was the same word as “color.”

Just before India began its slide into sub-third world status, the Brahman became the top caste.

The Brahman are the Priests, the Intellectuals.

The Mommy Professors.

The Indian civilization developed Kung Fu, Buddhism, and the aquatic rice we associate with Oriental countries and “the paddy culture.”  photo blueeyedbuddha.jpg

Buddhism originated in India, and Buddhists point out that the Buddha, “had eyes the color of blue lotus.” The man who brought Kung Fu to China also had bright blue eyes.

In a coincidence that is not historically unique, India’s Aryan conquerors devoted themselves to Wisdom, became brown and collapsed into a starving mess with only little brown Wise Men to show for it.

In the end period for White India, you might not have recognized the group that would be Wise Men of Colored India. They probably looked a great deal like Mommy Professor today rather than the little guy in the diaper with the begging bowl.

Mommy Professor in the White World has on a coat and tie and gets his money from taxation backed by force. When the Warrior Class gave the Brahman the top notch in the color system, the Brahman was probably as well financed as Mommy Professor is today.

In the future colored world, Mommy Professor will be trying to peddle his Wisdom on the streets, as anyone who reads Genseric’s “The Bubble” below will understand.


Explaining the 1932 German election to Americans (and Aussies).

I taught this stuff so I forgot how complicated it is.

Let me know if this does not explain it.

Some BUGSERS have trouble with how Germany’s government was formed in 1932.

In the United States the president and congress are elected separately. 

However, in most places there is a single election for the single ruling House, like the House of Commons in Britain.

Americans are used to an orderly, timed changes of government. Our elections are in November, but the old congressmen and the old president stay in office until January, the “transition” period.   It used to be that those elected only took office in March, four months after the election.

This makes the way they change governments in Europe very confusing to us.

In Britain, there is only one election, and that election is for every Member of Parliament on the same day. If that election goes against the party in power, every office from Prime Minister down to MP (Member of Parliament) changes.

Right after Election Day, if the party in power loses, a new government must be formed.

This has happened many, many times. The moment the Labor Party got a majority in the House of Commons in 1945, the Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, suddenly had to leave Number Ten Downing Street, their White House.

In the European form of government, the old government disappears at the top and a complete new government must be formed.

Here is the part that confuses Americans: The new government must be supported by a majority of members of the one elected House selected in that one election.

Nowadays, no one party ever gets a majority in the British Parliament. So they have to form a coalition in order to form any government or elect any prime minister. I have long since lost track, but the last British Government I remember was a coalition of Conservative and Liberal Democrat Parties.

Back in the fifties, the Governments of France and Italy were standing jokes. They would form a new Government every few DAYS, as members of Parliament formed new coalitions and then fell out with each other.

To Americans, this would be a weird way to run a country store, much less a GOVERNMENT!

I repeat: in this Bizarro way of running a government, there is no government unless it is backed by a MAJORITY of the one elected house.

There is no end to the number of disasters this can lead to. One of these disasters occurred in the Weimar Republic after the election of 1932.

Between the two, the Communists and the Nazis, they had a MAJORITY of the total membership of the newly elected ruling House.  photo 3-1933election.jpg

The ONLY House Germany has forms a government!

You could not form a government without a majority.

Basic arithmetic: If two (2) parties hold a majority, one of the two must be included if you are to form ANY new government. So the 1932 election meant that ANY new government must include either Nazis or Communists.

I did NOT say the Nazis and Communists got together. What I said was that those people who voted Communist caused this situation, as Nazi voters did.

The new government HAD to include either Communists or Nazis.

Hitler owned a third of the Reichstag. A government required a majority vote. Hitler formed a coalition with other right-wing German parties.

No, the Nazis and the Communists did not come together. When Hitler took power his coalition then Hitler formed a coalition with the tiny right-wing National Party. Kicking out the Reds made the Reichstag arithmetic even better. With a sixth of its members kicked out, Hitler’s third got even closer to a majority. There were 83% of the delegates left, and Hitler owned 33% of those delegates.

A snap election was called, during which the Reichstag burned down and the Communists got blamed. The Nazis ran against politically handicapped opponents in March. This further improved their numbers.

Hitler was at last able to declare a State of Emergency and he then threw all the other parties out of the Reichstag and Germany was run by the Nazis in that State of Emergency until May of 1945.

Is this understandable?


Be Careful What You Ask For – the 1932 GERMAN Election

In the 1932 German election, the Nazi Party got exactly a third of the vote and the Stalinist Communist Party got exactly one in six. Together the two totalitarian parties got half of the vote and a bare majority of the seats in the Reichstag.

This produced a milestone in history: The next German government would have to include Communists or Nazis. Hermann Goering presided over the Reichstag because the Nazi constituted the plurality.

Please note what history never mentions: It took two to tango: The Communists elected Hitler every bit as much as Nazis did.

How did the German Jews vote in 1932?

If you take out the Nazi third, that leaves two thirds of the electorate. If Jews voted proportionately, one in four would have voted for a Stalinist State.

But the fact is that Jews traditionally vote for the left, the far left. Even William Buckley said that “Jews live like Episcopalians and vote like Puerto Ricans.” The Founder of Commentary, the Jewish conservative magazine stated flatly, “For most Jews the term ‘conservative Jew’ as an oxymoron.” photo warongermans.jpg

Until I wrote this article, no experienced political analyst would doubt that in 1932 Jews voted at least 2 to 1 for the Communist Party.

Which in this story as it turned out, was the same as voting FOR Hitler!

Be careful what you ask for!

German Jewish voters in 1932 WANTED concentration camps.

They DEMANDED an absolute dictatorship.

They saw the Terror Lenin bragged about and called it good.

The 1932 Jewish electorate asked for it and they GOT it, secret police, concentration camps, the whole nine yards.

Be careful what you ask for.

And where in this story do we find the SuperJews, those who know all and determine all?

What the German Jews did in 1932 was not exactly penetrating SuperKnowledge. They voted for concentration camps and secret police, and they GOT concentration camps and secret police.

But those wonderful concentration camps and secret police got THEM, not the goyim Stalinists were after.

And it is impossible to analyze the 1932 German election without concluding that a higher percentage of Jews voted for dictatorship and concentration camps than German gentiles.

Is this All-Knowing Jewish Genius at work?

Or is it a people with a grudge being maliciously stupid?

This 1932 election is bad for both Jews and monomaniacal anti-Semites.

Neither Jews nor monomaniacal anti-semites want German Jews portrayed as a group of morons whose hatred of those around them exploded in their faces.

Audio Bob


Ending the Rule By Billionaires

Hitler said in Mein Kampf  that he had no interest whatever in economics or economic theory.

When Hitler took power, he almost magically ended the German Depression, which was, even in the 1930s, the world’s worst.

Roosevelt, whose basic ideology was economic, was still struggling with the Depression in 1940. Under the New Deal the Depression would have gone on another ten years at least.

Communism is based entirely on an economic theory. The entire Soviet system finally collapsed simply because the system was ridiculous.

China still had people starving until the last twentieth century under Communism. Japan had long since achieved a Western standard of living.

China is still very poor compared to Japan.

Hitler was a wizard in economics because he just used what worked. What destroyed him was the area where he DID have an ideology, the Lebensraum Doctrine. As Lenin obsessed with economics, Hitler was obsessed with his military.

There is, as usual, a simple rule here which academics get paid to ignore:

You can’t solve real problems with solutions that are fixed by some old ideology you are obsessed with.

Hitler ended the Depression which brought him into power, and he did it efficiently and quickly. In 1936 it was generally agreed that he was the most popular leader any country on earth had.

Now let us jump abruptly from the 1930s to today.

If we take power, the first thing we would do is solve the problem of Rule by Billionaires. photo billionaires.jpg

We are the ONLY group who would end the rule by billionaires without getting obsessed with it. All the other solutions to the billionaire problem are part and parcel of socialist nonsense that would screw up the economy and almost certainly leave the leftist billionaires in control.

Our billionaire extermination program, like all successful big moves like this,  is a practical step on the road to what we are really after, which is to punish, purely for PREVENTIVE purposes, traitors who have used their success to destroy our kind.

We have no interest in redistribution or economic ideology. So our solution, heavy rewards to those who report what those rich people were doing all these years to our race, right back to the earliest anti-white movement, will not be based on some halfwit economic philosophy.

Audio Bob



There is a Trappist monastery in South Carolina. It is famous down here in such a Bible Belt state.

That Trappist monastery has been here for generations.

It is located in Monck’s Corner, South Carolina.

This has always caused a certain confusion. Monck’s Corner is not named for the monks at the Monastery.

On the contrary, General/Admiral Monck was a fanatical Cromwellian, anti-Catholic to his bones.

But the Trappists are a symbol of something the Catholic Church has outgrown and we must all outgrow.

No longer do the Trappists whip themselves, starve themselves, and all the rest. It is no longer allowed.

If the Catholic Church can reject all that crap about God loves it when you torture yourself, anyone ought to.

It is time we outgrew the idea that God is a great excuse for self-hatred and for treason.

Governor Beasly tried that kind of blasphemy, and we destroyed his political career.

To repeat, in November 1998 Beasley won the governorship, and even our opponents admitted his win was the result of getting the “Confererate flag vote.”

But he wanted to be the vice presidential nominee in 2000, so he had to switch from his sworn support of the Rebel banner on top of the State House. And he had to do it as long as possible before the 2000 Convention.

So in December 1998, the most convenient time possible, he announced that GOD had told him to switch sides. photo beasley.png

I was the only person to call him a blasphemer publicly, but he never won another office in the state.

Today those who betray us routinely use that Good Old Fashioned Blasphemy.

Puritan or Catholic, our Traditional Values have included the idea that if we suffer, it makes God happy.

And that, boys and girls, is exactly the place from which racial self-hatred grows.

The pope has outgrown it, even the Calvinists have outgrown it.

A guy who worked under me on Capitol Hill had been pro-white, but he went for that “The Orthodox Church” fad, and said he had decided to sacrifice the white race to it.

Ever since Constantinople, the Orthodox Church has had the Emperor or head of state as its “supreme bishop.” Real Orthodox Churches are Greek or Romanian or Russian for a REASON.

This cult has guys growing beatnik beards to look like like Eastern priests and claim to be the truest of all the billion Only True Faiths.

This guy asked me if I wouldn’t “abandon your racism” in the Name of Christ.

I replied with six words: “I do not believe in human sacrifice.”

And I do not commit blasphemy.


From Chained Books to Data Deluge

I have talked about The Era of Chained Books repeatedly in these pages.

As with other things I repeat, there’s a reason. photo chain-1.png

In the fifteenth century a wealthy College at Oxford would have maybe twenty hand-copied books and a full-time Librarian. The books were very costly, and were chained to the wall.

Education consisted of being able to quote books in the Greek or Latin it was written in.

The few who found access to the Words were taught the Classical Languages, how to read them.

And they learned to quote the Words. There their work ended.

In the Google Age, that is where intellectual work must BEGIN.

“Intellectuals” belong to the Age of Chained Books, and Mommy Professor still lives in that age.

Whatever Momy Professor might be, the last thing he is is an intellectual.

Today’s intellectual is a sleuth, an interrogator.

His job is not to collect information, but to sift the truth out of the deluge.


Never Take a Wordist’s Word

As with so many others my faith varies.

I have said many times that my Christianity always rested on what Jesus said it rested on, the Golden Rule.

My faith, or my lack of it, is not an excuse to avoid taking my own moral stand.

It is not Wordism.

Jesus said that the Golden Rule IS “the law and the prophets.”

I cannot hide from my own judgement and my own honor behind the Bible or any other book.

When BUGS began as a Southern Nationalist column in 1998, one of its big issues was keeping the Confederate flag on top of the SC State Capitol building. photo confedflag.jpg

In the end, it was the money people who took our flag down. The reason for this is now a joke.

The NAACP threatened a boycott of South Carolina if the flag was not taken down. This scared the businessmen, so they forced the Citadel to stop waving the Rebel Flag.

Then Bob Jones IV, for many years a top flag supporter, switched sides.

He quoted Saint Paul.

Actually that same quote from Paul had been in his Bible for over nineteen centuries before Bob Jones had begun his decades of support for that same flag.

But he was a good Wordist, so his word meant nothing. I can’t begin the count of “Christians” who have given me their word and then reneged on it and quoted some scripture.

From my decades of experience, I warned you about the people who are ready to take their toys and go home, TTGHs.

Each TTGH is a bomb set to go off in your movement.

Get RID of them!

Wordist “Christians,” “National Socialists” to whom ideological purity is holy, no Wordist will ever do FOR you what he can do AGAINST you.



When I was in professional politics, it was not the liberals who truly, personally hated me.

Those who really HATED me were the Nasty Little People, the NLP.

This came up a lot when we were going out and setting up press reviews for real populist uprisings, like anti-busing marches and protests against dirty school textbooks, the Independent Truckers’ Strike and on and on.

The grassrooters loved us.

But when a protest got to a certain level of publicity, their leaders realized that this was the first and last time they would be in the limelight. They must have decided we were going to take their movement from them.

No way we could or would do that, but they, these small-time, temporary leaders, were the ones who hated us with a sincerity Goebbels would have admired.

William Buckley and his protégés really hated me, though that is the LAAAHST thing Buckley would ever have admitted, even to himself.

His partner and life-long friend, who sat in an identical office on the top floor, was William Rusher, and I was HIS protégé. It made for a really unique civil war at National Review.

Rusher’s crowd produced a review of my first book, which had a Foreword by Rusher, that was titled, “Read This One!” photo finlandstation.jpg

Then Buckley’s crowd produced a front-page article attacking me called “To the Nashville Station,” comparing me to Lenin arriving at the Finland Station in 1917.

Then after the coalition of conservatives and “Wallace Democrats” I had advocated all that time won the 1980 landslide, it turned out the Buckley side had been for it all the time.

The Buckley crowd is now neoconservative, using the REAL definition of that word.

They are what they have always been, the opposition that those in power want.

They have found a way to make a living on the permanently losing side. They go to pieces when some Big Time Leftist says something nice about them.

I am getting some totally second-hand reports about how many AMPWs are going from looking down on us mere peasants to getting red-faced about the Mantra.

Like I said, I am getting this second-hand.

But it sure sounds very familiar.