Archive for category How Things Work
An elderly German lady on the site above was given fifty minutes to declare the Holocaust was the biggest lie in history.
On GERMAN television!
The German police smashed up her apartment and arrested her.
They did NOT arrest the personnel of the station.
These are thugs.
They only jump on old ladies.
Here the media jumped on an old man named Bob Whitaker. The SPLC sicced their dogs on me.
As far as I know the young lady who put my slogan on the “French women are for African men” sign has not YET been thugged.
THUGS AND COWARDS!
A PC Lynch Mob!
I wrote an article on the 1932 German election that brought Hitler to power. There are a number of critical, history-changing analyses one could make from what happened there in 1932.
But it all came from one simple piece of ARITHMETIC: The Nazis got over one-third of the Reichstag members and the Communists got over one-sixth.
Over one sixth plus over one thirds adds up to a MAJORITY. In order to form a government in 1933 you had to have a majority of the elected Reichstag to form a government, you Had to include either the Nazis or the Communists.
The response to this simple piece of arithmetic really depressed me.
Not one single comment had any relation to the point.
Not even close.
I am about to do a piece about “Native Americans.”
But one of the basics in understanding why America is not a Nation of Immigrants is, God help us, simple arithmetic.
In this case it’s called geometric progression. On the average, each seventeenth century immigrant produced several HUNDRED offspring living in America today.
But when I mention this I have to wade through responses about how the person had ancestors who got here in 1688.
And the basic, the arithmetic, gets totally lost in the SOC.
The problem is the same old one: people are so tied up in whether I am offending them or dealing with something somebody said that they do not read what I am trying to tell them.
This is especially fatal when Arithmetic appears here. The point is simple but you have to pay attention to exactly what I said, not what you are used to.
You have to have you head on straight when arithmetic is used.
It can make terrific points, or the arithmetic can be lost in a tide of SOC.
If you want to see The Silence at work, look at Wikipedia’s piece on Ross Perot.
It is a long series of put-downs and awkward incidents in Perot’s life.
If you mention Perot to anyone today, he will either not recognize the name or repeat one of those put-downs.
You can tell it causes real pain for Wikipedia to repeat the one unique thing in Perot’s life that The Silence wants minimized.
They do not devote a sentence to it. It is part of the sentence: “In June of 1992, national polls showed Perot leading the sitting President and the Democratic nominee with 39 percent of the popular vote!”
This never happened before or since.
But because of the cloud of crap everybody throws out when Perot’s name is mentioned, The Silence covers this critical history with drivel.
And everybody repeats it.
Perot came out of nowhere. In an interview on Larry King at CNN, King asked him why he himself did not run for president.
Larry King was not a popular show back then, but the mail this question generated was overwhelming, with demands for Perot to go on the ballot.
The idea did not come from Perot.
Wikipedia then makes up a figure of gigillions of his own dollars the power-mad Perot put into his campaign.
A man who had no idea he was going to be drafted is portrayed as power mad.
But others have spent more than Perot did without any effect at all.
To someone who is as familiar with MediaSpeak as I am, Wikipedia gave out the usual dirt to cover the one point The Silence must avoid:
In June of 1992, national polls showed Perot leading the sitting President and the Democratic nominee with 39 percent of the popular vote!
Nothing is as important as this is to a Party seeking to overthrow the establishment.
When Perot got up to 39 percent, the Almighty USSR had simply fallen apart.
“Not with a blast but with a whimper.”
In fact, not even a whimper!
Perot’s platform was Saying the Unsayable.
He refused to accept Business As Usual in politics.
He Said the Unsayable to both the left and the kept “opposition.”
In the national debate, both Perot and his vice presidential candidate were asked about abortion.
Instead of trying to get the “dissatisfied” vote of anti-abortionists, they said what most voters think: It’s not an issue with them.
At a time when the Internet was new, Perot proposed to do something that scared politicians half to death: Perot wanted issues to be subjected to a spontaneous poll online. He wanted the PEOPLE to get in on it!
Perot’s Lesson is hidden behind bits of dirt about him just as grassroots rebellion is hidden under Abortion and the chasing down of Whites is hidden behind details about Hitler’s mustache.
The only other real threat to the ruling parties was Wallace in 1968. He got less than 14 percent of the vote, but his American Party is still more active than other third parties.
Perot’s party was destroyed by Pat Buchanan. It gave him its nomination in 2000.
Buchanan had won the New Hampshire primary against Bush.
Then Buchanan turned into a harmless theocrat.
He accepted the Perot Party nomination and then spent all his time attacking abortion and evolution.
His polls started up at a respectable – for a third party – several percent of the vote and then dropped like a rock.
He ended with a vote down where the Prohibition Party gets today, and falling.
The American Freedom Party can become important only if its theme is: “We ain’t going to take it anymore!”
Perot was gotten out of the campaign by the thugs going after his daughter, something any BUGSER can clearly understand.
No Marxists. No theocrats.
No one EVER mentioned that EVERY Communist country had to keep its people in by deadly force while all Western white countries had to keep people OUT.
In 2010 Alvin Greene, a complete unknown, won the Democratic Senate nomination in South Carolina because the ballots handed out at black churches got his name at the top.
I have never heard a single example of Viet Cong atrocities on any national media or on any entertainment program.
I have never heard anyone but me mention publicly that Alvin Greene won the statewide South Carolina Democratic Senate nomination because the voting instructions handed out at black churches accidentally had his name at the top.
During the decades in which network television ruled, presidents and vice presidents were impeached, big time evangelists went to prison, and there was corruption in every place where there was Big Power and Big Money….
Except in the Media. Cronkite, Rather, and all the other big timers never had a breath of anything LIKE scandal.
Please READ this draft, which I had to squeeze out of me. It is one step in introducing a whole new realism, developing article by article.
The Old Stormfront Illusion
BUGSERS begin with a crash course in reality. The ones who really got things started here largely came from Stormfront. We were all familiar with what was then The Stormfront Illusion. The Stormfront Illusion went this way:
Anti-whites, who they usually called Jews or liberals, were obviously wrong, so the way things worked was that righteous, heroic people like themselves should be out on the street by the million overthrowing the establishment and holding a Torchlight Parade after the Great Victory.
This is not a joke. This is not even an exaggeration. READ the old Stormfront and you would find every member yelling a demand for “everybody” to get out and Take Control.
This was the audience that Stormfront had to appeal to. There were tens of thousands of people there having fun and doing nothing.
I came to Stormfront as the only person who had ever actually ORGANIZED mass marches which were neither leftist nor depended on my personal ownership of God Almighty like the pro-lifers, a real march of thousands in real cities.
For Stormfronters reality was a total turnoff.
Not one of them would actually get out on any street because the anti-white thugs would beat hell out of them. Besides, why send money to group if you have to do the work yourself? So they bitched and sent money.
Not one of the heroic Stormfronters would mention any fear of the anti-white thugs.
I deeply hope that Don Black’s attempts to make Stormfront get real are successful.
One of my themes is that no war hero in all of history ever made the slightest difference in a real war.
In my day, at least, basic training contained no lessons about how your particular weapon fit into the General Picture, the Strategic Picture, of the war being waged and guided at the level of national strategy.
All wars have been won or lost on the basis of a very, very, VERY simple strategy: Everybody shoots at the enemy.
You wouldn’t be under fire and say, “Well, why should I shoot unless I understand how my particular weapon fits into the General Strategy?”
I personally saved the Hubble Telescope in 1977 when the Carter priority was defunding the space program. In the political wars, how did it happen that I was shooting in that direction?
I knew that our race could be saved by space colonization, BUT ONLY IF PRESERVING THE WHITE RACE WAS MADE AN ACCEPTABLE SUBJECT OF DISCUSSION AFTERWARDS. So I made contacts in the space colonization/science fiction constituency.
I personally stopped a ruling by the IRS to dictate racial quotas for each PRIVATE school. One writer in the New Right Papers pointed to this action as the active beginning of the New Right which elected Reagan.
For the moment, space colonization is considered passe. But getting the “Reagan Democrats” into the 1980 election was a direct result of the New Right, and it brought down the USSR.
I was a major obstacle to the attempt by “Pro-Life” groups to outlaw in vitro fertilization, which has since led to births of tens of thousands of White children WANTED by Whites who wanted to have children. I risked my job by telling my boss on Capitol Hill that I could not work for that, which is something you only tell your boss once on the Hill.
I think he refused to support it, despite his heavy dependence on Pro-Life for support, because of my political instincts. And, an odd thing to mention in the context of Capitol Hill, on my morality in risking my job to take that stand.
Now here is the second half of this article:
Can you imagine trying to explain these interconnections on Stormfront?
What in the HELL did saving the space telescope have to do with JEWS?
I would have had to devote more time to EXPLAINING my actions than I spent SAVING the damned thing!
People who raise money were also flummoxed by what I spent my time and nerves on.
So far I have been on the losing side with space colonization. To use this to save my race would require a COMBINATION of space colonization and legitimization of the discussion of White survival.
Bringing down the USSR not only required a combination of the Reagan Democrats with Republican conservative voters, but it also required the Reagan Administration to expose the true primitive state of the Soviet Union, which would require the thinking up of a whole program which would do that.
That last part would require a separate article to explain it.
Jerry Pournelle came up with Star Wars and put it directly in Reagan’s lap.
In a last desperate move, the USSR demanded a Nuclear Freeze and the entire political left came out demanding it. Among other things, Teddy Kennedy was reported by the CIA as meeting with Soviet agents in South America to STOP SDI, which HE labelled Star Wars.
I was essential to these things in ways that are impossible to explain, just as you will never see Pournelle connected with the Star Wars strategy.
Which bullet will win the war?
What will the war lead to?
Ask THAT question in the middle of a firefight and you will be lucky if your sergeant does not shoot YOU, but just fill out papers for this nutcase to be hospitalized under the old Section Eight.
The things I did were not the result of Anti-Communist Strategic discussions. Those happened at conservative lunches while we did the jobs ON THE FRONT.
Cut the crap and JUST SHOOT!
I enjoyed reading Carson’s “Arrest-Proof Yourself” for a reason peculiar to myself, just as I enjoyed Holland’s “Trust Me, I’m Lying” for another underlying theme.
The underlying theme I saw in “Trust Me” was from my having lived through the years Holland clearly thought of as The Good Old Days. His information from how blog info is not even meant to be truthful was interesting. His grief about the news monopoly blogs are replacing is HILARIOUS.
One of Holland’s gods, Walter Cronkite, would make regular speeches about what morons like Holland thought were objective. He made it very clear that his duty was to BE biased, to select the news he reported. Like an old-timer, Holland moans about the true and objective and checked-out news of his youth.
Holland’s “icon” is Jon “Stewart” on Comedy Central, whose show is a “Revival Meeting for Political Correctness.” Jerry Falwell should sue “Stewart” for stealing his whole approach and his whole vocabulary.
Carson didn’t make a fool of himself, because one of his main themes was laid down almost forty years ago by a truly great writer.
Carson explained the hunger for arrests today on the basis of law as an industry.
The crime rate peaked back in the 60s, when Batman kept repeating the “rehabilitation” crap because by then it was already funny. Like Mommy Professor, he would repeat that he caught Penguin and Cat Woman, not for punishment, but for rehabilitation.
Today, fifty years later, what every college student believes in has long since been a JOKE out in the real world.
A mere forty years ago I made a shockingly novel point: I said that the Military Industrial Complex indeed did have a political agenda based on government money.
But I then detailed how ALL government expenditure, including the Education-Welfare Complex, also produced its own political agenda which Mommy Professor sells daily.
Simply put, when teachers want a pay raise, it is not entirely because that would be good for the kids. This doesn’t sound surprising today, but before my 1976 book came out, standard commentary NEVER mentioned that anything “social” or “education” could have ANY money-based constituency.
So a lot of Carson’s book was uniquely familiar territory for me. He was a cop and FBI and is now a big money defense attorney.
Carson points out that the ONLY criterion a street cop has for promotion and pay, and even retention, is the number of ARRESTS he makes.
As I did for the education-welfare establishment, Carson details the huge amount of money generated by the system for every person who goes to jail.
Any other outlook is as zombied out as Batman talking about rehabilitating.
And he makes it clear that jail is not prison, and that the ONLY criterion for a good cop is how many people he sends to jail and how many to prison.
Carson also underlines a point I made to you when BUGSERS discussed what to do if the FBI or other officers showed up. A lot of people came up with smartass lines to use on the investigators, and I begged you NOT to smartass them.
Now you have it from an ex-cop and an ex-interrogator: if you face the real thing, try to save your ass, not make bragging points.
To say that Carson agrees is pure understatement.
Carson drops the crap that “part of the reason” the War on Drugs continues, the disaster of Prohibition cubed, is that those hundreds of billions of dollars spent on it has a constituency.
Carson does not use the term bullshit, but early he makes it clear that this insane program, far more disastrous in a year than the whole War in Vietnam, is ENTIRELY because people from judges to cops depend on it for their livelihood.
It is a scary book, but worthwhile. But you can also see that persecuting a bunch of amateur political fanatics, no matter how effective they are, is not likely to be a real-life major police priority.
If you ever saw the movie of Arthur C. Clark’s 2001 AD you see it begins with two groups of monkeys battling at their border. An extraterrestrial thing comes down and inspires one troop of monkeys to grab the first weapon, the horns of a dead deer, and win the battle with it.
This is puzzling now, but at the time it was understood by the whole audience. It was based on a book called African Genesis by Robert Audrey.
It is important to realize that the point Audrey made with that book he soon declared to be absurd. The idea that some African apes who first used deer horns as weapons were the direct ancestors of man was incorrect.
No one but Audrey himself even noticed that error.
Before African Genesis became a runaway best seller among the literate – especially the science fiction nerds – Mommy Professor’s enforced doctrine on animal behavior was so clumsy and stupid that it I have now forgotten.
One Soviet newspaper in the 1950s had a picture of a workers’ riot in Chicago. All that Soviets noticed in the picture were the fine clothes mere workers in America were wearing.
Audrey’s book had a similar totally unexpected effect: It showed those trapped in the Intellectuals’ Paradise what serious thinking about animal behavior LOOKED LIKE.
Before African Genesis became popular, animal behavior was just a subtitle of Political Correctness. Political Correctness has the Innocent Animal to compare to the Evil Man, and the Evil White Man contrasted to the Innocent non-Whites who live WITH nature, not AGAINST nature.
No one dare mention it, but there is really no difference whatsoever between Mommy Professor’s image of a Native American and his image of any other wild animal.
Audrey, who got rich as a Hollywood writer, populated his anthropology with fascinating animals, each of which had a personality and motivations no academic could have imagined. He was a trained anthropologist, but he had spent his time in the field.
Like the failed Soviet propaganda picture, what Audrey brought out had absolutely nothing to do with what it was intended for. The Soviets wanted to show American worker discontent. But in doing that they also showed the living standard of American workers.
In exactly the same way, the point Audrey was aiming at was absolutely forgotten as he took us through the world view of a real, honest-to-God anthropologist.
“Modern anthropology,” as only National Review still calls it, was the social anthropology of Franz Boas and company.
Social anthropology is not very interesting, but we all know it. Social anthropology says that animals and Indians are, though it is not stated that way, mindless innocents.
In Modern Anthropology, White supremacy is debunked by a declaration that all men are exactly alike. No race is unique.
At the same time a main theme of Modern Anthropology is that White people are UNIQUELY evil.
Everybody has been coached in these conclusions so often that they can repeat them in their sleep.
The result is that, since we all now the punch lines, Modern Anthropology is very boring. The history of life Audrey discussed was totally fascinating to those who had been bored sick by tome after tome of Official Anthropology.
That picture of an American labor riot was supposed to show Russians how angry American workers were. But what the Russians saw was that under Communism they were in rags that no American worker would be seen dead in.
Audrey wanted to put forward a new theory on the origin of man, but what his readers saw was the lost world of real anthropology, how fascinating the world of real evolution can be before the Marxists make it straight doctrine and, just incidentally, boring as hell.