Archive for category How Things Work

Mommy Professor in India

In India, Mommy Professor wears a towel on his head and a diaper on his ass.

For two thousand years Indian Mommy Professors have been considered to be the Height of Wisdom. The Brahman sits in his diaper while around him children collapse in hunger, and every University rings with his praises.

When the Aryan warrior class invaded India and set up a culture, the warriors, the Tschatriya, were at the top of the Caste system. “Caste” means color in English, just as is the Indian Sanskrit term for caste was the same word as “color.”

Just before India began its slide into sub-third world status, the Brahman became the top caste.

The Brahman are the Priests, the Intellectuals.

The Mommy Professors.

The Indian civilization developed Kung Fu, Buddhism, and the aquatic rice we associate with Oriental countries and “the paddy culture.”  photo blueeyedbuddha.jpg

Buddhism originated in India, and Buddhists point out that the Buddha, “had eyes the color of blue lotus.” The man who brought Kung Fu to China also had bright blue eyes.

In a coincidence that is not historically unique, India’s Aryan conquerors devoted themselves to Wisdom, became brown and collapsed into a starving mess with only little brown Wise Men to show for it.

In the end period for White India, you might not have recognized the group that would be Wise Men of Colored India. They probably looked a great deal like Mommy Professor today rather than the little guy in the diaper with the begging bowl.

Mommy Professor in the White World has on a coat and tie and gets his money from taxation backed by force. When the Warrior Class gave the Brahman the top notch in the color system, the Brahman was probably as well financed as Mommy Professor is today.

In the future colored world, Mommy Professor will be trying to peddle his Wisdom on the streets, as anyone who reads Genseric’s “The Bubble” below will understand.

19 Comments

Bob Whitaker Writes an Exclusive!

Agatha Christie wrote a story in which Detective Poirot took the side of a nasty American in England against two very nice old English ladies.

In the story Poirot explained his position this way:  The American was an outsider in England and HE was an outsider in England:  “I take the side of the other Outsider.” Agatha Christie obviously approved of this.

How many times have I heard someone interviewed on the street who says, “I am an immigrant, so I am for immigration.”

Joe Sobran, one of the strongest opponents of mass immigration later on, Joe Sobran, told me personally that most of his life, “I thought that, since my family were recent immigrants, I should be for immigration.”  photo degaulle.jpg

A sane person patriot would NEVER allow anyone to immigrate if that person took it as giving the whole world an invitation to “come and get it.”

As only I have pointed out, the endlessly quoted inscription on the Statue of Liberty was written by a lifelong, dedicated Zionist, Emma Lazarus. If someone wrote an inscription on a statue in the harbor of her Israel inviting EVERYBODY, Jew or Gentile, to move in, our “Founding Mother” who wrote The Inscription would have shot them dead on the spot!

Every nation is a Nation of Immigrants. But the fact that France derives its name from a Germanic tribe does not indicate to any sane person that France was thereby obligated to bring in every German who wanted to come in and take over from then on.

In a country where excluding anybody is labelled “Nazi” it is very interesting that the adjective “exclusive” means “classy!”

The fate of every nation depends on two things:

1) The people who are INSIDE that nation; and
2) The people who are OUTSIDE of that nation.

In fact, the term “nation” means a certain type of people living inside certain borders.

Imagine an Exclusive Club making someone a member who promises to run out the door and invite everybody in!

 

 

 

25 Comments

Explaining the 1932 German election to Americans (and Aussies).

I taught this stuff so I forgot how complicated it is.

Let me know if this does not explain it.

Some BUGSERS have trouble with how Germany’s government was formed in 1932.

In the United States the president and congress are elected separately. 

However, in most places there is a single election for the single ruling House, like the House of Commons in Britain.

Americans are used to an orderly, timed changes of government. Our elections are in November, but the old congressmen and the old president stay in office until January, the “transition” period.   It used to be that those elected only took office in March, four months after the election.

This makes the way they change governments in Europe very confusing to us.

In Britain, there is only one election, and that election is for every Member of Parliament on the same day. If that election goes against the party in power, every office from Prime Minister down to MP (Member of Parliament) changes.

Right after Election Day, if the party in power loses, a new government must be formed.

This has happened many, many times. The moment the Labor Party got a majority in the House of Commons in 1945, the Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, suddenly had to leave Number Ten Downing Street, their White House.

In the European form of government, the old government disappears at the top and a complete new government must be formed.

Here is the part that confuses Americans: The new government must be supported by a majority of members of the one elected House selected in that one election.

Nowadays, no one party ever gets a majority in the British Parliament. So they have to form a coalition in order to form any government or elect any prime minister. I have long since lost track, but the last British Government I remember was a coalition of Conservative and Liberal Democrat Parties.

Back in the fifties, the Governments of France and Italy were standing jokes. They would form a new Government every few DAYS, as members of Parliament formed new coalitions and then fell out with each other.

To Americans, this would be a weird way to run a country store, much less a GOVERNMENT!

I repeat: in this Bizarro way of running a government, there is no government unless it is backed by a MAJORITY of the one elected house.

There is no end to the number of disasters this can lead to. One of these disasters occurred in the Weimar Republic after the election of 1932.

Between the two, the Communists and the Nazis, they had a MAJORITY of the total membership of the newly elected ruling House.  photo 3-1933election.jpg

The ONLY House Germany has forms a government!

You could not form a government without a majority.

Basic arithmetic: If two (2) parties hold a majority, one of the two must be included if you are to form ANY new government. So the 1932 election meant that ANY new government must include either Nazis or Communists.

I did NOT say the Nazis and Communists got together. What I said was that those people who voted Communist caused this situation, as Nazi voters did.

The new government HAD to include either Communists or Nazis.

Hitler owned a third of the Reichstag. A government required a majority vote. Hitler formed a coalition with other right-wing German parties.

No, the Nazis and the Communists did not come together. When Hitler took power his coalition then Hitler formed a coalition with the tiny right-wing National Party. Kicking out the Reds made the Reichstag arithmetic even better. With a sixth of its members kicked out, Hitler’s third got even closer to a majority. There were 83% of the delegates left, and Hitler owned 33% of those delegates.

A snap election was called, during which the Reichstag burned down and the Communists got blamed. The Nazis ran against politically handicapped opponents in March. This further improved their numbers.

Hitler was at last able to declare a State of Emergency and he then threw all the other parties out of the Reichstag and Germany was run by the Nazis in that State of Emergency until May of 1945.

Is this understandable?

22 Comments

Be Careful What You Ask For – the 1932 GERMAN Election

In the 1932 German election, the Nazi Party got exactly a third of the vote and the Stalinist Communist Party got exactly one in six. Together the two totalitarian parties got half of the vote and a bare majority of the seats in the Reichstag.

This produced a milestone in history: The next German government would have to include Communists or Nazis. Hermann Goering presided over the Reichstag because the Nazi constituted the plurality.

Please note what history never mentions: It took two to tango: The Communists elected Hitler every bit as much as Nazis did.

How did the German Jews vote in 1932?

If you take out the Nazi third, that leaves two thirds of the electorate. If Jews voted proportionately, one in four would have voted for a Stalinist State.

But the fact is that Jews traditionally vote for the left, the far left. Even William Buckley said that “Jews live like Episcopalians and vote like Puerto Ricans.” The Founder of Commentary, the Jewish conservative magazine stated flatly, “For most Jews the term ‘conservative Jew’ as an oxymoron.” photo warongermans.jpg

Until I wrote this article, no experienced political analyst would doubt that in 1932 Jews voted at least 2 to 1 for the Communist Party.

Which in this story as it turned out, was the same as voting FOR Hitler!

Be careful what you ask for!

German Jewish voters in 1932 WANTED concentration camps.

They DEMANDED an absolute dictatorship.

They saw the Terror Lenin bragged about and called it good.

The 1932 Jewish electorate asked for it and they GOT it, secret police, concentration camps, the whole nine yards.

Be careful what you ask for.

And where in this story do we find the SuperJews, those who know all and determine all?

What the German Jews did in 1932 was not exactly penetrating SuperKnowledge. They voted for concentration camps and secret police, and they GOT concentration camps and secret police.

But those wonderful concentration camps and secret police got THEM, not the goyim Stalinists were after.

And it is impossible to analyze the 1932 German election without concluding that a higher percentage of Jews voted for dictatorship and concentration camps than German gentiles.

Is this All-Knowing Jewish Genius at work?

Or is it a people with a grudge being maliciously stupid?

This 1932 election is bad for both Jews and monomaniacal anti-Semites.

Neither Jews nor monomaniacal anti-semites want German Jews portrayed as a group of morons whose hatred of those around them exploded in their faces.

Audio Bob

62 Comments

Endgame

As I have written a mere hundred times or so, every blogger tells you where things are going right now, and that is critical FOR BLOGGERS. But as a guide to anything BIG that is GOING to happen, it ain’t worth doggy poop.

I remember hundreds of newspaper headlines that everybody was talking about for weeks. Then I remember mentioning them a month later and getting that totally mystified look everyone who remembers yesterday’s big headline gets.

And compared to a blog, newspaper headlines are written in stone.

And here I am not only ignoring the Latest News, ignoring the Latest Blogs, but thinking about history, a time when things actually HAPPENED.

I believe it was HD who recommended “Believe Me, I’m Lying” by Bryan Holiday. It is by a rich man who made his money manipulating blogs.

It is, in our terms, a book by a successful practitioner in the field of “Why is This Information Produced?” As I have said many, many times,  BUGS is an exercise in what NOT to do if you want a successful blog, just as my career in politics that produced so  much was an exercise in what NOT to do if you want to make General of SES in the civil service or popular staffer with job offers on the Hill.

Changing history is NEVER done by a person seeking popularity with any “in” crowd.

This makes my approach totally uncool.

My aim is to legitimize the argument for White survival. In fact, Europe was worried about its falling birthrates in the 1970s and proposals were made to subsidize people who had children. One of the big arguments against this was, of course, that, “Hitler did that.”

But nobody questioned the fact that Europeans were concerned about Europeans dying out.

Another thing that is not new is for the people who are going to make the changes getting no attention right now. The Free Soil Party, running on the later Republican platform of forbidding the spread of slavery, got less than one percent of the vote in 1848.

In mid-20s, the Nazi Party got less than one percent of the German vote.

In 1932 Time Magazine still thought Adolf Hitler was a monarchist!

Lenin took power in the vacuum of Kerensky being unable to form a stable government.

We are in the age I predicted when non-Whites are no longer looking for anti-white Whites to represent them.

Newsweek just went out of print a few years after openly giving up news and becoming solid and openly leftist. It closed down with a cover story blasting Obama.

And an endless Hell hath no fury like an insider who can’t get anybody to take his calls any more.

In the future, anti-Semites will be a dime a dozen. A voice for the saving of my OWN race is almost absent. Like Arabs, black leaders, and an endless list of others, one more Hate Jews outfit contributes nothing.

In the future, the only voice that represents Whites will be unique.

Holiday explains this perfectly and in detail. He got so rich manipulating blogs that he can tell bloggers the truth and not give a damn.
 photo springtime4hitler.jpg
What sells on blogs is anger.

What turns off bloggers is not having an oven-ready solution.

His big point is that these precooked formulas are 100%. The competition on blogs is so intense that there are NO blogs that violate this rule.  Even in the peak years of the Yellow Press some newspapers survived providing SOME quality.

Not so in the blog age.  No blog gets impressive numbers without adhering to all the rules.

If you are pro-white and you want a blog to make it, it has to incite ANGER. It has to hit responsive notes. Being pro-White cannot compete with the good old Hate Jews.

If you want to plant ideas for future thought, Holiday will laugh his ass off at you.

But Holiday would be the first to tell you he has no interest whatsoever in The Endgame.

3 Comments

There is a Difference Between a Classroom and a Battlefield

When BUGSERS started quoting the Mantra to David Duke, he kept saying, “It’s BOB WHITAKER’S Mantra.”

This property right seems very important to him.

I have run into this problem for decades.

I am only capable of truly HATING one group, and that group is White gentile TRAITORS.

Jews are people who have decided to take an alien loyalty.

So are anti-white Catholics. They have were fighting for assimilation – assimilation — long before it was of any interest to Jews.  That is the traditional intermarriage program Sarkozy said he would use force to speed up.

My objection to talking about Jews is that it makes us ineffective. Wordists, Jews and other groups have different loyalties from mine, and they act as enemies of my race. When Emma Lazarus wrote the inscription on the Statue of Liberty, everyone knew that she was a lifelong, dedicated Zionist. This country she so poetically gave away was not HER country.

Can you imagine Emma Lazarus’s reaction if Robert Whitaker wrote an inscription for a monument in Haifa telling the whole world to come to Israel?

But it is perfectly understandable why a Zionist would be glad to give away America.

But what little information we are able to produce is not for a classroom.

In a war of survival for the White race, the value of information is whether it WORKS.

In the actual war, talking about Jews gives the other side something they can grasp hold of. They are ready for it. photo westpoint.jpg

In wartime, any statement, no matter how true for a classroom, is abandoned the SECOND it ceases to be effective IN THE WAR.

Also, there is my respect for Dr. Duke himself. He is attacking Jews. If that will work, he does not need MY amateur help.

A Jew or a fanatically blind Catholic is not a traitor.  He is entirely different from me.

I know David Duke.  However he regards me, I know he is a heroic and dedicated man. My opinion of him (or of anybody else) does not depend on his opinion of me.

Someone who bases their opinion of others on their opinion of him is not someone who can give objective advice, and objective advice is all I have to offer.

But I DO take it personally when someone uses my name or the precious effective memes we have developed to throw them away on Jews.

Our memes WORK. But you can destroy our effectiveness if you just use our memes to get in some cheap shots at Jews.

This is not a friggin’ classroom.  This is a WAR.

I DEMAND that anyone using BUGS ammunition get OFF, totally OFF, the Jew Addiction.

Only a true retard would not understand THAT by now.

Audio Bob

142 Comments

Ending the Rule By Billionaires

Hitler said in Mein Kampf  that he had no interest whatever in economics or economic theory.

When Hitler took power, he almost magically ended the German Depression, which was, even in the 1930s, the world’s worst.

Roosevelt, whose basic ideology was economic, was still struggling with the Depression in 1940. Under the New Deal the Depression would have gone on another ten years at least.

Communism is based entirely on an economic theory. The entire Soviet system finally collapsed simply because the system was ridiculous.

China still had people starving until the last twentieth century under Communism. Japan had long since achieved a Western standard of living.

China is still very poor compared to Japan.

Hitler was a wizard in economics because he just used what worked. What destroyed him was the area where he DID have an ideology, the Lebensraum Doctrine. As Lenin obsessed with economics, Hitler was obsessed with his military.

There is, as usual, a simple rule here which academics get paid to ignore:

You can’t solve real problems with solutions that are fixed by some old ideology you are obsessed with.

Hitler ended the Depression which brought him into power, and he did it efficiently and quickly. In 1936 it was generally agreed that he was the most popular leader any country on earth had.

Now let us jump abruptly from the 1930s to today.

If we take power, the first thing we would do is solve the problem of Rule by Billionaires. photo billionaires.jpg

We are the ONLY group who would end the rule by billionaires without getting obsessed with it. All the other solutions to the billionaire problem are part and parcel of socialist nonsense that would screw up the economy and almost certainly leave the leftist billionaires in control.

Our billionaire extermination program, like all successful big moves like this,  is a practical step on the road to what we are really after, which is to punish, purely for PREVENTIVE purposes, traitors who have used their success to destroy our kind.

We have no interest in redistribution or economic ideology. So our solution, heavy rewards to those who report what those rich people were doing all these years to our race, right back to the earliest anti-white movement, will not be based on some halfwit economic philosophy.

Audio Bob

24 Comments

What a Coinkidink!

 photo japanesediversity.jpg
One of our BUGSERS told me that David, as speaker, interrupted him as soon as he said, “Africa for the Africans…” and said “I know what you’re going to say, and it doesn’t WORK!”

Meanwhile, for the first time in two generations, anti-whites have begun to attack JAPANESE lack of “diversity.”

http://thewhitevoice.com/fsfsfsfsfsq41/2014/5/24/japan-begins-pushing-diversity-japanese-privilege

Funny how they would launch their campaign now.

Could it be connected to the Mantra, which Dave declared “doesn’t work,” and gives the same bum’s rush any anti-white would give it?

34 Comments