Archive for category How Things Work
One of my themes is that no war hero in all of history ever made the slightest difference in a real war.
In my day, at least, basic training contained no lessons about how your particular weapon fit into the General Picture, the Strategic Picture, of the war being waged and guided at the level of national strategy.
All wars have been won or lost on the basis of a very, very, VERY simple strategy: Everybody shoots at the enemy.
You wouldn’t be under fire and say, “Well, why should I shoot unless I understand how my particular weapon fits into the General Strategy?”
I personally saved the Hubble Telescope in 1977 when the Carter priority was defunding the space program. In the political wars, how did it happen that I was shooting in that direction?
I knew that our race could be saved by space colonization, BUT ONLY IF PRESERVING THE WHITE RACE WAS MADE AN ACCEPTABLE SUBJECT OF DISCUSSION AFTERWARDS. So I made contacts in the space colonization/science fiction constituency.
I personally stopped a ruling by the IRS to dictate racial quotas for each PRIVATE school. One writer in the New Right Papers pointed to this action as the active beginning of the New Right which elected Reagan.
For the moment, space colonization is considered passe. But getting the “Reagan Democrats” into the 1980 election was a direct result of the New Right, and it brought down the USSR.
I was a major obstacle to the attempt by “Pro-Life” groups to outlaw in vitro fertilization, which has since led to births of tens of thousands of White children WANTED by Whites who wanted to have children. I risked my job by telling my boss on Capitol Hill that I could not work for that, which is something you only tell your boss once on the Hill.
I think he refused to support it, despite his heavy dependence on Pro-Life for support, because of my political instincts. And, an odd thing to mention in the context of Capitol Hill, on my morality in risking my job to take that stand.
Now here is the second half of this article:
Can you imagine trying to explain these interconnections on Stormfront?
What in the HELL did saving the space telescope have to do with JEWS?
I would have had to devote more time to EXPLAINING my actions than I spent SAVING the damned thing!
People who raise money were also flummoxed by what I spent my time and nerves on.
So far I have been on the losing side with space colonization. To use this to save my race would require a COMBINATION of space colonization and legitimization of the discussion of White survival.
Bringing down the USSR not only required a combination of the Reagan Democrats with Republican conservative voters, but it also required the Reagan Administration to expose the true primitive state of the Soviet Union, which would require the thinking up of a whole program which would do that.
That last part would require a separate article to explain it.
Jerry Pournelle came up with Star Wars and put it directly in Reagan’s lap.
In a last desperate move, the USSR demanded a Nuclear Freeze and the entire political left came out demanding it. Among other things, Teddy Kennedy was reported by the CIA as meeting with Soviet agents in South America to STOP SDI, which HE labelled Star Wars.
I was essential to these things in ways that are impossible to explain, just as you will never see Pournelle connected with the Star Wars strategy.
Which bullet will win the war?
What will the war lead to?
Ask THAT question in the middle of a firefight and you will be lucky if your sergeant does not shoot YOU, but just fill out papers for this nutcase to be hospitalized under the old Section Eight.
The things I did were not the result of Anti-Communist Strategic discussions. Those happened at conservative lunches while we did the jobs ON THE FRONT.
Cut the crap and JUST SHOOT!
I enjoyed reading Carson’s “Arrest-Proof Yourself” for a reason peculiar to myself, just as I enjoyed Holland’s “Trust Me, I’m Lying” for another underlying theme.
The underlying theme I saw in “Trust Me” was from my having lived through the years Holland clearly thought of as The Good Old Days. His information from how blog info is not even meant to be truthful was interesting. His grief about the news monopoly blogs are replacing is HILARIOUS.
One of Holland’s gods, Walter Cronkite, would make regular speeches about what morons like Holland thought were objective. He made it very clear that his duty was to BE biased, to select the news he reported. Like an old-timer, Holland moans about the true and objective and checked-out news of his youth.
Holland’s “icon” is Jon “Stewart” on Comedy Central, whose show is a “Revival Meeting for Political Correctness.” Jerry Falwell should sue “Stewart” for stealing his whole approach and his whole vocabulary.
Carson didn’t make a fool of himself, because one of his main themes was laid down almost forty years ago by a truly great writer.
Carson explained the hunger for arrests today on the basis of law as an industry.
The crime rate peaked back in the 60s, when Batman kept repeating the “rehabilitation” crap because by then it was already funny. Like Mommy Professor, he would repeat that he caught Penguin and Cat Woman, not for punishment, but for rehabilitation.
Today, fifty years later, what every college student believes in has long since been a JOKE out in the real world.
A mere forty years ago I made a shockingly novel point: I said that the Military Industrial Complex indeed did have a political agenda based on government money.
But I then detailed how ALL government expenditure, including the Education-Welfare Complex, also produced its own political agenda which Mommy Professor sells daily.
Simply put, when teachers want a pay raise, it is not entirely because that would be good for the kids. This doesn’t sound surprising today, but before my 1976 book came out, standard commentary NEVER mentioned that anything “social” or “education” could have ANY money-based constituency.
So a lot of Carson’s book was uniquely familiar territory for me. He was a cop and FBI and is now a big money defense attorney.
Carson points out that the ONLY criterion a street cop has for promotion and pay, and even retention, is the number of ARRESTS he makes.
As I did for the education-welfare establishment, Carson details the huge amount of money generated by the system for every person who goes to jail.
Any other outlook is as zombied out as Batman talking about rehabilitating.
And he makes it clear that jail is not prison, and that the ONLY criterion for a good cop is how many people he sends to jail and how many to prison.
Carson also underlines a point I made to you when BUGSERS discussed what to do if the FBI or other officers showed up. A lot of people came up with smartass lines to use on the investigators, and I begged you NOT to smartass them.
Now you have it from an ex-cop and an ex-interrogator: if you face the real thing, try to save your ass, not make bragging points.
To say that Carson agrees is pure understatement.
Carson drops the crap that “part of the reason” the War on Drugs continues, the disaster of Prohibition cubed, is that those hundreds of billions of dollars spent on it has a constituency.
Carson does not use the term bullshit, but early he makes it clear that this insane program, far more disastrous in a year than the whole War in Vietnam, is ENTIRELY because people from judges to cops depend on it for their livelihood.
It is a scary book, but worthwhile. But you can also see that persecuting a bunch of amateur political fanatics, no matter how effective they are, is not likely to be a real-life major police priority.
If you ever saw the movie of Arthur C. Clark’s 2001 AD you see it begins with two groups of monkeys battling at their border. An extraterrestrial thing comes down and inspires one troop of monkeys to grab the first weapon, the horns of a dead deer, and win the battle with it.
This is puzzling now, but at the time it was understood by the whole audience. It was based on a book called African Genesis by Robert Audrey.
It is important to realize that the point Audrey made with that book he soon declared to be absurd. The idea that some African apes who first used deer horns as weapons were the direct ancestors of man was incorrect.
No one but Audrey himself even noticed that error.
Before African Genesis became a runaway best seller among the literate – especially the science fiction nerds – Mommy Professor’s enforced doctrine on animal behavior was so clumsy and stupid that it I have now forgotten.
One Soviet newspaper in the 1950s had a picture of a workers’ riot in Chicago. All that Soviets noticed in the picture were the fine clothes mere workers in America were wearing.
Audrey’s book had a similar totally unexpected effect: It showed those trapped in the Intellectuals’ Paradise what serious thinking about animal behavior LOOKED LIKE.
Before African Genesis became popular, animal behavior was just a subtitle of Political Correctness. Political Correctness has the Innocent Animal to compare to the Evil Man, and the Evil White Man contrasted to the Innocent non-Whites who live WITH nature, not AGAINST nature.
No one dare mention it, but there is really no difference whatsoever between Mommy Professor’s image of a Native American and his image of any other wild animal.
Audrey, who got rich as a Hollywood writer, populated his anthropology with fascinating animals, each of which had a personality and motivations no academic could have imagined. He was a trained anthropologist, but he had spent his time in the field.
Like the failed Soviet propaganda picture, what Audrey brought out had absolutely nothing to do with what it was intended for. The Soviets wanted to show American worker discontent. But in doing that they also showed the living standard of American workers.
In exactly the same way, the point Audrey was aiming at was absolutely forgotten as he took us through the world view of a real, honest-to-God anthropologist.
“Modern anthropology,” as only National Review still calls it, was the social anthropology of Franz Boas and company.
Social anthropology is not very interesting, but we all know it. Social anthropology says that animals and Indians are, though it is not stated that way, mindless innocents.
In Modern Anthropology, White supremacy is debunked by a declaration that all men are exactly alike. No race is unique.
At the same time a main theme of Modern Anthropology is that White people are UNIQUELY evil.
Everybody has been coached in these conclusions so often that they can repeat them in their sleep.
The result is that, since we all now the punch lines, Modern Anthropology is very boring. The history of life Audrey discussed was totally fascinating to those who had been bored sick by tome after tome of Official Anthropology.
That picture of an American labor riot was supposed to show Russians how angry American workers were. But what the Russians saw was that under Communism they were in rags that no American worker would be seen dead in.
Audrey wanted to put forward a new theory on the origin of man, but what his readers saw was the lost world of real anthropology, how fascinating the world of real evolution can be before the Marxists make it straight doctrine and, just incidentally, boring as hell.
In my article and talk about the lack of a GENETICAL morality in Christianity, I repeated at least half a dozen times that nobody, not even the snake handling preachers in the mountains will still insist that everything in Genesis is true.
This is not making fun of the Bible itself. In the Bible Belt, it simply meant that we must take into account errors in literal, worldly truths.
It just ain’t so. But an engineering family in the Bible Belt didn’t burn its holy books because of it. So if we finally just admit that the world did not come to an end when the New Testament repeatedly said it would, and every Christian had to believe it, it is simply something stated that was wrong, like the geocentric universe.
The reason I bring this up is because this is certainly not a problem limited to the Bible. I have written dozens of times about the horrible errors in medicine that killed Lord knows how many people.
But if one contradicted Galen at Oxford before 1700, the University Thought Police would fine him. It is amazing how often people were accused of heresy because they contradicted a pagan like Aristotle, because the Pope had used a quote from one of the ancient Greeks in his decisions.
In Renaissance Universities, it was very difficult to tell whether you were supposed to be contradicting Scripture or a philosopher.
We have inherited this problem.
It was a psychological shock for Europe when Newton came along because every single hallowed conjecture about the composition of the universe, Greek or Hebrew, was superseded. All the glass universes with stars in them set up to surround earth by ALL the ancients just disappeared.
It is said that the Catholic Church was so exhausted from denouncing Newton and Copernicus that it left fighting Evolution to the Protestants.
The establishment today is not any different from the old one.
Political Correctness fights as hard for its Old Religion as any Inquisitor ever did.
The fact is that, in the real world, skin color IS everything. Like the Medieval Church Political Correctness fights a simple reality.
I do not know WHY this reality exists any more than Greek philosophers actually knew how you could get all those stars up there without a stage set up in the sky.
Mommy Professor says that the key to a great future is education and sterility.
This has been tried in India and Tibet.
As I said before, India was taken over by the Brahman Caste as it transitioned from White to colored. The Sanskrit word for “caste” is “color.”
And, like the American college campus, Tibet’s emphasis on Education is wiping out the supply of potential students. The teachers are monks who become monks simply by donning the robe – like our judges and academics, these guys seem to be wild about wearing dresses.
Yuppies have only one or two children – PC says none – because each child requires a giant sum of money to feed Mommy Professors, or “get a college education.”
Tibet’s monks are self-sterilized, like Medieval monks. They call themselves Buddhists. Like any other any sect they consider themselves The Only True Buddhists.
Gautama Buddha himself made a major point of the fact he had one child, a girl.
I repeat, the Buddha himself made a POINT of having a daughter.
Knowing politics as I do, I think Buddha emphasized that child for a reason.
In the struggle between Brahman (Mommy Professors) and Tschatria (the old warrior ruling class) the blue-eyed Brahman was probably denounced for being sterile. So Buddha made a major point of NOT being without issue.
I can think of no other reason he would emphasized his daughter so much.
In Tibet, of course, sterility is the Only True Faith. The place has been depopulated by the army of monk-teachers, and the Chinese are moving in.
“History is made by those who show up for it.”
Jo3w commented that anti-white Christians are anti-white because they assume whites are more supreme than we are.
jow3, My problem with what you say is based on my constant repetition that Western morality is based on the Christian lack of morality.
The sore point Old Testament believers have with science is Six Day Creationism.
The sore point with Christianity is never mentioned.
Much more than the Old Testament has a problem with Creationism, the New Testament has the problem that WE EXIST!
One reason Bible Belters quote the Old rather than the New Testament is because there is no FAMILY morality in the New Testament.
To Jesus and St Paul, the very IDEA of family was heresy.
So Christianity went back to the old pagan morality of Human Sacrifice which said that only the best should be sacrificed to the Gods.
Early Christian myths described couples out of the Hitler Youth Guidebook, tall, intelligent, beautiful. In the ideal ending, they would be chaste and childless, for God.
Look at all the popular Nun Movies, where a beautiful talented woman remains chaste.
It is on the assumption that whites are supreme that the entire basis of our self-destruction is based.
It never OCCURS to anti-white whites that there IS any other race for sacrifice — diversity — than the white one.
Christians, including C.S. Lewis, have long been able to accept their faith without the Six Day Creation clearly stated at the Bible’s beginning.
But they absolutely refuse to accept a genetic morality, without which the Golden Rule has no meaning at all.
In India, Mommy Professor wears a towel on his head and a diaper on his ass.
For two thousand years Indian Mommy Professors have been considered to be the Height of Wisdom. The Brahman sits in his diaper while around him children collapse in hunger, and every University rings with his praises.
When the Aryan warrior class invaded India and set up a culture, the warriors, the Tschatriya, were at the top of the Caste system. “Caste” means color in English, just as is the Indian Sanskrit term for caste was the same word as “color.”
Just before India began its slide into sub-third world status, the Brahman became the top caste.
The Brahman are the Priests, the Intellectuals.
The Mommy Professors.
Buddhism originated in India, and Buddhists point out that the Buddha, “had eyes the color of blue lotus.” The man who brought Kung Fu to China also had bright blue eyes.
In a coincidence that is not historically unique, India’s Aryan conquerors devoted themselves to Wisdom, became brown and collapsed into a starving mess with only little brown Wise Men to show for it.
In the end period for White India, you might not have recognized the group that would be Wise Men of Colored India. They probably looked a great deal like Mommy Professor today rather than the little guy in the diaper with the begging bowl.
Mommy Professor in the White World has on a coat and tie and gets his money from taxation backed by force. When the Warrior Class gave the Brahman the top notch in the color system, the Brahman was probably as well financed as Mommy Professor is today.
In the future colored world, Mommy Professor will be trying to peddle his Wisdom on the streets, as anyone who reads Genseric’s “The Bubble” below will understand.
Agatha Christie wrote a story in which Detective Poirot took the side of a nasty American in England against two very nice old English ladies.
In the story Poirot explained his position this way: The American was an outsider in England and HE was an outsider in England: “I take the side of the other Outsider.” Agatha Christie obviously approved of this.
How many times have I heard someone interviewed on the street who says, “I am an immigrant, so I am for immigration.”
Joe Sobran, one of the strongest opponents of mass immigration later on, Joe Sobran, told me personally that most of his life, “I thought that, since my family were recent immigrants, I should be for immigration.”
A sane person patriot would NEVER allow anyone to immigrate if that person took it as giving the whole world an invitation to “come and get it.”
As only I have pointed out, the endlessly quoted inscription on the Statue of Liberty was written by a lifelong, dedicated Zionist, Emma Lazarus. If someone wrote an inscription on a statue in the harbor of her Israel inviting EVERYBODY, Jew or Gentile, to move in, our “Founding Mother” who wrote The Inscription would have shot them dead on the spot!
Every nation is a Nation of Immigrants. But the fact that France derives its name from a Germanic tribe does not indicate to any sane person that France was thereby obligated to bring in every German who wanted to come in and take over from then on.
In a country where excluding anybody is labelled “Nazi” it is very interesting that the adjective “exclusive” means “classy!”
The fate of every nation depends on two things:
1) The people who are INSIDE that nation; and
2) The people who are OUTSIDE of that nation.
In fact, the term “nation” means a certain type of people living inside certain borders.
Imagine an Exclusive Club making someone a member who promises to run out the door and invite everybody in!