Sociology is the polysyllabification of the obvious.

America’s ascent to be a superpower was mostly attributable to our vast natural resources. That’s what made the USSR the other superpower.

B…s…t!

Japan has as high a per capita income as the US and has NO resources.

After the USSR fell and reality came we out found out that the whole USSR economy was HALF that of the Netherlands.

Didn’t Mommy Professor teach you any arithmetic?

We have a geographical problem-our long border with Mexico. It’s thousands of miles and tough to control unless we have cops standing elbow to elbow.

Good God, man, learn some arithmetic. It is two thousand miles long. That’s one mile for each ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND AMERICANS, over two Americans per INCH.

The entire protection area, the straight line, around the lower fifty states is ten thousand miles long, with Thirty THOUSAND Americans for each mile.

Antis don’t do arithmetic and they can’t think. The Communists sealed border longer than that to keep their people IN, though no anti ever criticizes that. Their economies and technology were tiny compared to ours.

Arithmetic again. To repeat what Mommy Professor didn’t tell you, after the USSR fell and reality came out we found out that the whole USSR economy was HALF that of the Netherlands.

Go ballistic and then listen. When you and the Moonie Washington Times scream that our border guard is the same as the Berlin Wall, let me explain to you, as I did to them, that ALL Communist countries shoot people to keep them IN that prison. We have border guards to keep people OUT, which is the right of every nation.

And, yes, to protect your border, you have the right to shoot. We probably won’t have to shoot ANYBODY if we make it clear we WILL. Even if we do, the casualties during learning time will be less than Mexicans who die in the desert entering illegally.

Once we get serious, things like the USSR and illegal immigration stop.

UnregisteredSam: America’s ascent to be a superpower was mostly attributable to our vast natural resources. That’s what made the USSR the other superpower. Look for the former USSR to partially or wholly reunite again under a different name. Eventually, they’ll realize it’s in their interest to do so. It will take years.

Some of us are still ardent patriots. I didn’t put 6 years in the Navy because I hated the USA. I almost made it a career.

Perhaps, but Henry was also a virulent Anti-Semite, so I won’t praise him. Most of the Jews I know still refuse to buy a Ford automobile. I can’t condemn them for that.

We have a geographical problem-our long border with Mexico. It’s thousands of miles and tough to control unless we have cops standing elbow to elbow. That would be expensive. The US taxpayers might stage a revolt.(probably a peaceful one)

Statistics teaches that everything has a FINITE probability, even if that probability is google to the google power squared.

I am sure SOMEBODY will say they don’t believe this statistics stuff, and I will believe them if they agree to take a flight in an AIRPLANE that was built entirely by people who “choose not to believe” in this statistics stuff, which is basic to ALL engineering.

So much for the BS.

So statistics says there is a probability that there is NEVER a case where something is absolutely certain in all cases. All things are POSSIBLE.

Strictly speaking, this is the LAST moment in time when the words ALL or NEVER can be used.

I use them. I refuse to give up the use of all and never and no one because they CANNOT be stringently true. I am open to contradiction, but there is a finite probability that we are all figments of each others’ imagination so the contradictions don’t exist either.

If people object to my use of these words, they really need to look at the BASICS. Strictly speaking, NO ONE should EVER use those words.

But to say that, I HAD to use those words. And there is a finite probability that statistics is a figment of its own imagination and those airplanes don’t really fly.

So let’s cut the crap.

ShakaZulu, whites had damned well BETTER approve of “race relations” today if they are talking to ANY stranger, including a pollster.

Get serious, man. You and me both know what the “Yes, Massah” Syndrome is. Outside of people like you and me, the rest of the world just recognized it, and they call it The Stockholm Syndrome.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShakaZulu
For many years now the Gallup Organization has done an annual poll on the public’s perception of black-white relations in the US. This year’s poll came out last week and it finds whites more positive about race relations than blacks.
http://www/galluppoll.com/content/default.aspx?ci=28072

I remember when Jimmy Swaggart made a profound comment:

“You cannot die.”

Swaggart pointed out that you will live forever in Heaven or in Hell.

So Pro-Lifers’ battle is already won. Pro-Choice people talk about “the quality of life.” Pro-Lifers say that the quality of life is not important. Life itself is all that matters.

Hell provides eternal life. Hell can be conservatively be called a low standard of existence.with all that fire and thirst and agony and stuff, but it is LIFE. But it is LIFE.
Hell gives you Eternal Life.

Endless Life.

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” If life is all that matters, Hell is just fine.

It is not surprising that so many climatologists agree with global warming and global freezing. It is amazing that so many DISAGREE with it. After all, if you agree with Al Gore, there would be a cabinet-level job for a climatologist and a whole new Department of Climate.

By the same token, the intelligence community never did itself a bigger favor than allowing 9/11 to occur. Everyone who contributed to that disaster has been promoted, every department that failed has twice the budget ad ten times the power that it had before.

I have talked before about how other economists refer to demographics as Panic Science, since only those who take the latest population trends and expand them into a geometric progression, which ALWAYS means impending catastrophe, get famous.

The first rule in all fields is that panic pays and science is handicapped from the start. If you don’t understand this up front, you cannot evaluate any real data specialists put out,

“Professional detachment” is an oxymoron.

Alarmism rules professional opinion.

And those are only the ones I happened to HEAR about!

Here is how a group of twenty or so of us caused a panic in New Jersey and NYC:

http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0724,tucker,76913,2.html/full

The secret is that the mass of Americans are as alien to the “Elite” as they are to us. They are ALWAYS terrified that the masses are going to come get them.

Stop bitching about THEIR power and USE their fear of US!

Shari says:
You know as much as I agree with what you say, and as much as I realize that science reveals what it does, I think that something is still not realized, here. That’s all I can say.

ME:

Shari, SysOp and I have had many a long discussion, as sane people will in an insane world, about men and women. Some of it was mutual reassurance, the kind two sane people residing in an asylum would have to assure each other that these other people really are the nuts.

Some of our talk was about men and women. We agreed that men and women are DIFFERENT. They are different, not in the Women’s Lb way, as competitors for the male role, but dffere3nt in a SYMBIOTIC way.

SysOps said it was God, I tend toward evolution, but whatever it was had a REASON for making us different, and it wasn’t so that Bella Abzug and Betty Friedan could make a living.

As usual, while some theorize abut this, I USE it. Both of my first two books in my own name are dedicated to my ex-wife, who is still my trusted friend. She made the Populist Forum operate and was essential to all the rest.

When I took over the Oversight Unit on Capitol Hill I chose a brilliant experienced woman as my Associate Director. I was amused that one of my staffers who was a conservative anti-racist was shocked and upset that he had to work under a WOMAN.

Now I have SysOp kicking me ar …, I mean, making deferential suggestions to me.

What you express is a feminine opinion. Women are more GENERICALLY conservative than men. I have tried to explain this many times to professional politicos who wonder why women now vote more liberal than men. They give me the usual dazed cow look and then go back to their complicated discussions.

An old bull like me charges into the new age. You look at it quizically. For me to say yours is a normal feminine approach would have the Women’s’ Libber lynch mob out in force. You and SysOp have no trouble being called women.

We are the only sane ones in this funny farm.

You know as much as I agree with what you say, and as much as I realize that science reveals what it does, I think that something is still not realized, here. That’s all I can say.

– Shari

ME:

Shari, SysOp and I have had many a long discussion, as sane people will in an insane world, about men and women. Some of it was mutual reassurance, the kind two sane people residing in an asylum would have to assure each other that these other people really are the nuts.

Some of our talk was about men and women. We agreed that men and women are DIFFERENT. They are different, not in the Women’s Lb way, as competitors for the male role, but dffere3nt in a SYMBIOTIC way.

SysOps said it was God, I tend toward evolution, but whatever it was had a REASON for making us different, and it wasn’t so that Bella Abzug and Betty Friedan could make a living.

As usual, while some theorize abut this, I USE it. Both of my first two books in my own name are dedicated to my ex-wife, who is still my trusted friend. She made the Populist Forum operate and was essential to all the rest.

When I took over the Oversight Unit on Capitol Hill I chose a brilliant experienced woman as my Associate Director. I was amused that one of my staffers who was a conservative anti-racist was shocked and upset that he had to work under a WOMAN.

Now I have SysOp kicking me ar …, I mean, making deferential suggestions to me.

What you express is a feminine opinion. Women are more GENERICALLY conservative than men. I have tried to explain this many times to professional politicos who wonder why women now vote more liberal than men. They give me the usual dazed cow look and then go back to their complicated discussions.

An old bull like me charges into the new age. You look at it quizically. For me to say yours is a normal feminine approach would have the Women’s’ Libber lynch mob out in force. You and SysOp have no trouble being called women.

We are the only sane ones in this funny farm.

BUGS — No sooner said than done!

I submit a problem to the Seminar.

I would prefer the whole top line to read:

Bob’sUndergroundSeminar(BUGS)

That would reduce it to the 29 spaces the present top line is limited to. If they’re HERE, they’ll know it’s whitakeronline.org

BUT let’s leave the Bob’s Blog everywhere else FOR NOW. One advantage I have over The Talent is that I know how confusing the smallest change can be for us civilians in the computer wars.

Damn it, gang! Give me some comments!

This sort of “simple” thing is CRITICAL.

Finally, over half a century later, I realize what we meant when we complained about kids who “pulled on their mothers handbags and screamed for attention.” Someone wrote a book called “Everything I Needed to Know I Learned in Kindergarten.” This piece is like that.

Why did we say everything about that kid “pulling on their mother’s pocketbook?”

There were generally two types of people I was raised with, people with the courtesy we practiced and the lower level whites and blacks. But when they were around us, they tried to learn from us. If one of their kids got out of hand, they would slap them. By the time a kid got old enough to reach and grab hold of their mother’s pocketbook, they didn’t do it.

In our case, by the time I got old enough to stand up and reach my mother’s pocketbook, it never OCURRED to me to do it. Yelling was trash, yelling was nigger stuff.

But it worked TWO ways. If a child who could barely stand said something, everybody LISTENED. If you are a child that age and you have a conscience, that makes you say something worthwhile and then shut up. You learn almost from your first words not to act like a nigger, not to be trash.

But in a way, I was spoiled rotten. Almost from the time I stopped wearing diapers, I was used to being LISTENED TO. But LISTENING was NOT what passes for listening today. Today “listening” means you stand there and let the other person FINALLY finish while you stand there panting like a dog to say what you want to say. You have no idea what the other person was talking about, but you let him finish, and that is LISTENING.

The result of one person waiting to say what he wants to say as soon as anther’s lips stop moving is what passes for “the art of conversation” which the Internet is supposed to have destroyed.

I just spent a week listening to this “art of conversation” and every minute of it I WAS dying to get back to this blog and to Stormfront. Only HERE do we have what I call conversations.

The computer has SAVED the real art of conversation.