A journalist moves toward a bloated, hunchbacked figure.

The bloated hunchback is asked about being a Bilderberg member. The bloated hunchback replies, “You are sick”.

Turning to others, the bloated hunchback repeats that the journalist is sick.

So I’ve seen this pattern EVERY time Henry Kissinger is questioned by hostile journalists. He calls them sick.

And if he can, he turns to other people and repeats it.

He says it so reflexively, so CONSISTENTLY, that it’s almost certainly a meme he has stored away:

“You are sick” / “You are a sick person” / “These people are sick” / etc.

Before analyzing this further, another example: Probably the most well-known quote by another virulent anti-white, Zbigniew Brzezinski:

“Russia can be an empire or a democracy, but it cannot be both”.

But rather than the historical context and the quote’s validity, if you look at the quote’s STRUCTURE:

“Russia can be an empire or a democracy, but it cannot be both”.

Now at BUGS, SOME reverse engineering of anti-white meme warfare takes place, but there is a deeper level:

Effective memes contain patterns that make them effective. That is why you’ll find similar patterns between memes, no matter what the source:

You can’t have ‘diversity’ and Free Speech.

White self-hatred is sick!!!

LL sent me a YouTube link some time ago showing some British MP demanding laws against “extremists”. She was demanding measures to suppress these “extremists.”

This was all there was to it: This woman kept demanding that “extremists” be suppressed. Apparently the chairman she was talking to, being a clahssy Engishman, didn’t know how to ask a straight question.

So, I kid you not, it went back and forth like this:

Woman: “We must take measures against extremism.”

The Clahssy Englishman aasks, “What do yyou mean?”

She replied, “Measures must be taken against extremists.”

Back and forth it went, just like that:

“Take measures against extremists.”

Then the repeat, “What do you mean?”

Back and forth back and forth like a ping pong game being played between total retards, ON and ON:

What she apparently meant by “extremists” was people who say things we don’t want them to say.”

And as this went on, right down the IQ Scale, I thought how wonderful it would be if this Uppah Clahss person were replaced, just for a minute, by a real person.

Instead of aahsking the propah question, your average guy would finally say, “Extremists compared to what?”

So I am not kidding here. No one could use plain English because, since he and she were both Uppah Claahss, he had to understand a term used by another Uppah Clahss person.

Not in a million years could he ask her “What do you mean by extremist?”

All I can figure is that everyone is supposed too know what is outside of OUR Opinion, ESTABLISHED Opinion. Anyone who asks for a definition is admitting that he does already KNOW Established.

I can’t offer any other explanation.

I bring this up because LL said he had heard that this woman is up to be Britain’s next Primer Minister.

When the Queen kept yelling “Off with his head!” nobody had to explain why everyone was too terrified to ask her “WHY?”

If you don’t KNOW why, off with your head..

The Black shooter who sniped those White Police officers two days ago declared that he was out to get WHITES. His grudges against Whites are probably all somewhere in back issues of SPLC literature.

So can we assume the SPLC is responsible for the Dallas sniper?

When a young White man in Charleston went on a rampage in a church killing Black people, the SPLC, ADL, CNN and pretty well all the media assumed I was responsible for all of that violence.

The CNN interviewer came to this building, the “interview” began with the CNN man asking me whether I approved of murder, I chopped him up, and the whole interview was tossed away except for few seconds they used weeks later. But Laura recorded the whole thing on her telephone, got it typed up, and made copies.

In fact, when the SPLC writer first called me he started with my “relationship” to the Charleston shooter, whom I had never met. From what I got, the fact that I was born in West Columbia, SC and the shooter was also born in West Columbia clinched the conviction.

If so, the fact that I moved out of West Columbia in 1941 and the guy I had “influenced” was in his early twenties was not brought up.

Besides the murders, this item is relevant to another recent news event.

The FBI head, as I understand it, is or has been a Republican. Hearings are being conducted on Hillary Clinton’s misuse of classified information in her email.

So apparently to show Trump was an online terrorist, too, one Democrat pointed out to the FBI Director that Donald Trump had retweeted “White Genocide,” (my meme: “The best ideas you have will not be your own”).

These two words are so radical that all of the major fund-raising pro-White groups have rejected it.

I think Trump uses it BECAUSE it is outrageous. And incidentally, perfectly accurate.

This is newsworthy, but it may be historic today as well.

Anti-Whites blame Hitler on the fact that Germany was not oppressive enough. Hitler took power in the face of Hate Laws like the ones it has today.

But an American would have another explanation, one which is banned from the media.

In 1932 Germany, like America today, leftists had a license to commit violence like that given to anti-White thugs in America today.

An American would say that THAT was the reason for Hitler’s rise to power. Only his outright fascistic NSDAP could violently react to the leftist thugs in 1932 Germany.

They can accuse Bob Whitaker of murder casually, but they can’t do that to Trump. He’ll sue their asses off.

Anti-Whites are outraged when Trump hires bodyguards to kick the asses of anti-White thugs.

Goldwater was crushed, but Reagan came along anyway.

The rules are now clear and familiar:

No one has a right to free speech today unless he has the force to exercise it.

I did not set up these rules.

Trump did not set up these rules.

No American would tolerate this situation.

It is the Marxist Rule: Truth is a bourgeois concept.

Either free speech must actually be restored or it is just a question of WHICH political barrel we are staring down.

Independence and ruling the world are two very different things.

In fact, independence means exactly the opposite.

Independence means that you rule yourself and leave the rest of the world to make its own rules.

A declaration that all men are ANYTHING is a direct repudiation of independence.

The Preamble to the Constitution is the only purpose of America that was accepted by Americans. The Constitution says that the ONLY purpose of America is to govern AMERICANS.

The big problem is that we let the establishment get away with a bunch of trash. By the time we finally get around to questioning whether America exists entirely for immigrants, the damage is done.

The same thing is true of everything we let the establishment get away with.

No adult should be allowed to get away with ignoring what people WANT.

Christopher Hitchens had the exact same attitude he attributed to “racists.” If someone pointed out that Blacks immigrated INTO South Africa under apartheid, his reply is “Who cares what a bunch of niggers want?”

The reason respectable conservatives drool when the Declaration of Independence is discussed is because they will not face the “intellectuals” and tell them one simple fact:

Freedom means people get what THEY want.

Not what the “intellectuals” want.

Not what the “bettah clahss” wants.

Freedom produces countries people WANT to live in.

Freedom produces countries people WANT to immigrate to. “Intellectuals” like Hitchens produce nothing but countries people desperately want to escape from.

And a free people only accepts immigrants they WANT.

Otherwise you end with a country people want OUT of.

That is what we will have if we accept all the refugees from countries that have failed.

The British Public is Asking Why Pollsters Didn’t Warn Them of Brexit Vote.

52% of the British public voted to pull the UK out of the EU.

Then there was this lead article saying that the “British public was upset at pollsters not telling them what THEY were about to do”.

WHICH British public did which?

Nobody else will notice this.

The answer is that the pollsters didn’t see anything coming because they have no idea who The British Public IS!

WHICH British public? The one that voted Brexit or the one that was astonished at what THEY did?

Every single article attacked Brexit.

Then the Brits voted for it.

It’s not at all surprising the pollsters got caught with their pants down.

And there doesn’t seem much hope pollsters will get anywhere by reporting on two different “British publics.”

Maybe they need to stop reinforcing each others ideas and start asking the PUBLIC about the public.