You know as much as I agree with what you say, and as much as I realize that science reveals what it does, I think that something is still not realized, here. That’s all I can say.

– Shari

ME:

Shari, SysOp and I have had many a long discussion, as sane people will in an insane world, about men and women. Some of it was mutual reassurance, the kind two sane people residing in an asylum would have to assure each other that these other people really are the nuts.

Some of our talk was about men and women. We agreed that men and women are DIFFERENT. They are different, not in the Women’s Lb way, as competitors for the male role, but dffere3nt in a SYMBIOTIC way.

SysOps said it was God, I tend toward evolution, but whatever it was had a REASON for making us different, and it wasn’t so that Bella Abzug and Betty Friedan could make a living.

As usual, while some theorize abut this, I USE it. Both of my first two books in my own name are dedicated to my ex-wife, who is still my trusted friend. She made the Populist Forum operate and was essential to all the rest.

When I took over the Oversight Unit on Capitol Hill I chose a brilliant experienced woman as my Associate Director. I was amused that one of my staffers who was a conservative anti-racist was shocked and upset that he had to work under a WOMAN.

Now I have SysOp kicking me ar …, I mean, making deferential suggestions to me.

What you express is a feminine opinion. Women are more GENERICALLY conservative than men. I have tried to explain this many times to professional politicos who wonder why women now vote more liberal than men. They give me the usual dazed cow look and then go back to their complicated discussions.

An old bull like me charges into the new age. You look at it quizically. For me to say yours is a normal feminine approach would have the Women’s’ Libber lynch mob out in force. You and SysOp have no trouble being called women.

We are the only sane ones in this funny farm.

BUGS — No sooner said than done!

I submit a problem to the Seminar.

I would prefer the whole top line to read:

Bob’sUndergroundSeminar(BUGS)

That would reduce it to the 29 spaces the present top line is limited to. If they’re HERE, they’ll know it’s whitakeronline.org

BUT let’s leave the Bob’s Blog everywhere else FOR NOW. One advantage I have over The Talent is that I know how confusing the smallest change can be for us civilians in the computer wars.

Damn it, gang! Give me some comments!

This sort of “simple” thing is CRITICAL.

Finally, over half a century later, I realize what we meant when we complained about kids who “pulled on their mothers handbags and screamed for attention.” Someone wrote a book called “Everything I Needed to Know I Learned in Kindergarten.” This piece is like that.

Why did we say everything about that kid “pulling on their mother’s pocketbook?”

There were generally two types of people I was raised with, people with the courtesy we practiced and the lower level whites and blacks. But when they were around us, they tried to learn from us. If one of their kids got out of hand, they would slap them. By the time a kid got old enough to reach and grab hold of their mother’s pocketbook, they didn’t do it.

In our case, by the time I got old enough to stand up and reach my mother’s pocketbook, it never OCURRED to me to do it. Yelling was trash, yelling was nigger stuff.

But it worked TWO ways. If a child who could barely stand said something, everybody LISTENED. If you are a child that age and you have a conscience, that makes you say something worthwhile and then shut up. You learn almost from your first words not to act like a nigger, not to be trash.

But in a way, I was spoiled rotten. Almost from the time I stopped wearing diapers, I was used to being LISTENED TO. But LISTENING was NOT what passes for listening today. Today “listening” means you stand there and let the other person FINALLY finish while you stand there panting like a dog to say what you want to say. You have no idea what the other person was talking about, but you let him finish, and that is LISTENING.

The result of one person waiting to say what he wants to say as soon as anther’s lips stop moving is what passes for “the art of conversation” which the Internet is supposed to have destroyed.

I just spent a week listening to this “art of conversation” and every minute of it I WAS dying to get back to this blog and to Stormfront. Only HERE do we have what I call conversations.

The computer has SAVED the real art of conversation.

I was in a ultra-liberal area just recently in a pub. Some liberals that knew my buddy were yapping about immigration and how horrible the name ‘illegal’ is…etc. I gave them one of my standard modified BW one liners about how it was NOT a Mexican problem. No one is flooding Mexico with non Mexicans and giving them Health care, Affirmative action etc. As usual, BW type lines are like Nuclear Weapons. Nothing is ever the same after you use them. They got all red hot liberal pissy mad. I just stuck to my guns as usual.

I then said something new. I told them I never immigrated to this country and was INSULTED that they called these Mexicans Immigrants. They are just illegal. I went on to say that Europeans never immigrated to America—–WE TOOK IT and there is a BIG difference. The liberals nearly spit out their boutique beer. The Asians sitting in the next booth butted in (they were laughing hysterically) and said they respected me and bought me a beer. The liberals were MORE offended by them than by my statement of fact. The liberals then spent an hour arguing with the Japanese gentlemen about how evil I was for bragging about killing off some of their Indian/Asian kin. He kept buying me (and only me) beers.

Liberals do not understand non-whites. They can’t believe that Arabs would love Putin after he genocides Muslims in Chechnya. I can. He kicked their asses and that is the only thing they do respect.

Comment by Tim

One young guy on Stormfront is getting back into the dating game, and he is hurting.

He asks, “HOW Can You CONQUER a Woman?”

Like every other hetero male, I’ve been there. So to show my sympathy, I gave him some advice which is probably as inaccurate as that of any male who tries to figure women out. As always, I snuck a few of OUR points in it:

ME:

#42
Bob Whitaker of whitakeronline
“Friend of Stormfront”
Sustaining Member

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: columbia, sc
Posts: 3,535
Re: Is it possible to “conquer” a woman?

——————————————————————————–

This “conquering” business is a twentieth century holdover from out-of-date thinking.

Believe it or not, Mommy Professor in the 1950s taught that only man was a territorial animal. Male birds tweeted and male howler monkeys howled to “conquer” females. We now know that male animals howl and fight for TERRITORY, just as we do, and their wars are often nastier than ours and do NOT stem from artificial things as Rousseau and Marx and Mommy Professor thought.

Yes, I KNOW it sounds incredible that Mommy Professor never noticed this. But it didn’t fit into his plans for the world.

Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, it is the FEMALE who does the choosing of which males father the next generation. That is the critical decision they have been making for millions of years.

Obviously they DO tend to choose the males who take the best territory or they would have died out. Women know exactly what they’re doing and we males DON’T. They screw up like we do, but we are right to blame them more for it. Women are NOT cowering, helpless creatures. When a white woman chooses a black man it is a violation of the choice she has had millions of years of evolution to learn to make.

In your case, remember she is balancing things you, and for that matter she, is not fully aware of. That’s her function, and its importance cannot be overstated.

At least ninety percent of the males of EVERY social species end up NOT being picked by the female they want. In EVERY species the female waxes hot and cold, and has long before you were born and before anything that even looked like you was born.

You do not conquer, you PERSIST.

You have to persist, but persist without getting your eyes pecked or ripped out. Women make you WORK. That goes for monkeys, peacocks, and man. You need to persist and not let her get you down. Stay at it and show maturity, which every female needs in a male to take care of her offspring.

Adelheim:

Bob,
Ok! The e-mail has been sent.
Getting a good and effective translation of the mantra is hard. So I understand it very well when you said that you worked on that thing for a very long time.

ME:

You hit on it perfectly. In fact, the only shortcoming is the extent of the understatement you cannot help.

I was raised as a child among the Masturbation Generation. I was taught endlessly that “Power comes from the battle of a GUN!” and that the only people who determine history are the Tough Guys Who Give the Ultimate Sacrifice at the Front. Then, as I STUDIED history, one truth almost knocked me over:

No war hero has ever made the slightest difference in world history!

By the time the chest-thumpers of today dropped their rifles on Omaha Beach, the outcome of World War II had been determined in a propaganda and diplomatic war waged a decade before.

That’s the way I worked in the Cold War.

By Normandy, the future had been determined by people in coats and ties, most of whom never heard a shot fired and most of whom had never done a day of any other kind of work in their entire lives.

While Americans were following the Invasion on their maps in the US, the coats and ties were deep into formulating the post-War world. When I got invitations to Reagan’s inauguration, which I had been instrumental in causing, I gave the tickets away. I left watching History In The Making to others, while I went back to my typewriter and telephone and made it.

That job, the Reagan win. was DONE. I left the torchlight paraders fighting each other for credit.

Did the suits who made the history ten years before Normandy CLAIM credit? Of course not. The Masturbation Generation says IT saved the world, and the pros want them to believe that. That Generation became the cadre that fought for whites to doom themselves because they had destroyed Hitler’s Racism.

At least the media persuaded them that that was what it was all about.

Most of those who determined the War before half the American soldiers dropped their weapons at Omaha Beach were doing complicated, NOT SECRET things that BECAME secret a decade later. Most of the goofballs who call themselves The Greatest Generation would have switched sides in politics today if they realized how they were manipulated.

It was right there in the record, but they were going to read it. They didn’t want anybdy to show them they were idiots. They wanted the John Birch Society and the Jewish Conspiratorialists to tell them Dark and Ingenious Forces had betrayed them. Thery did NOT want to realize they were the mindless dolts they were.

Even if the REAL “secrets” were exposed, most of the goofballs wouldn’t understand them. To man my age who has exercised POWER, the old clown screaming that Mao, Hitler, Lenin or Al Jolsen said that “Power comes from the barrel of a gun!!!” is as embarrassing as a man the same age who keep shouting about the Easter Bunny being real.

I can explain the fact that the Mantra is the product of FIFTY YEARS of constantly trying and rewriting with the following quote from music teachers:

“When a musician just sits down and plays wonderfully without the slightest sign that it is difficult, there is blood on the keys.”:

He has worked for YEARS to make it look easy.

Writers have the same saying. Montaigne said in his Essays, “If I had had more time, I would have written LESS.” Even in his day, hundreds of years back, writers knew that routinely.

Anybody can write an hour-long speech. But Ashbrook discovered to his delight that I could write one minute speech, which can be dropped right into the Congressional Record, at the beginning of proceedings, without costing the Member any of his precious Floor Time. A lot of the one-minute speeches took longer than the long ones.

And the one-minute speeches were read FIRST.

Which is what fools people about the Mantra. It cost me as much time and WORK as writing and re-writing one of my books. THAT is the sort of knowledge that gave me REAL POWER. That is the sort of WORK that pays in terms of actual power.

Holocaust education has been dropped from British schools. This was at the behest of the Moslem Community. That Islamic Community is the direct result of British Jews pouring time and money into getting their revenge on white gentiles. The revenge consisted of bringing in the third world to commit genocide against white gentiles.*

Hate is suicidal. If you dedicate your life to hating others instead of preserving your own, “What goes around comes around” becomes a murderous reality. The Islamic Community which will be the majority of Western Europe around 2050 hates Jews with an intensity Hitler would have been jealous of.

But I have known people who should be fighting genocide against our race to turn it into a hatred of Jews that makes them say OUR race is not as important as EXPOSING the Evil Jews.

This incident in Britain is just the very first shoe dropping as the campaign stretching back beyond Shylock of pure hatred for white gentiles took over Jewish thinking completely. With the Hitler excuse, it has taken over without any Jewish alternative. Since 1945, when they had sympathy all over the world, Jews have turned every population against themselves.

I oppose pure hate because I don’t want our promising movement to go down the same rat hole sympathy for the Jews has gone.

*The White Mantra

“Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote, assimilating, unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

http://whitakeronline.org

http://www.nationalsalvation.net/