The first intellectual rule of research is obvious to and understood by every literate person above the age of twelve.

Except professors.

Rule A One:

Put on permanent hold any so-called “study” that comes out exactly the way those providing the money want it to come out.

Some time ago two of the “top researchers on the environment” were caught with their pants down.

Emails between them made it clear that they were conspiring to make the case their funders wanted.

The grantors want to turn the entire industrial economy over to “intellectuals” like these two to prevent global warming.

This made unexpectedly big news.

So the University sponsored a study of whether or not the original researh was biased.

Naturally they assigned this latter bit of objective justice to the same two professors.

After long and paid effort, they concluded they had been totally objective.

A lot of media announced that professional academics are ever more dominated by self-professed “Marxists.”

They make it sound like Marxist doesn’t mean much.

Marx stated that “the truth is a bourgeois concept.”

In short, a Marxist is prohibited from doing any research that is legal under American tax law.

Marxists declare that “Everything is political.”

To Marxists, objectivity is immoral.

Just to make it clear, we’re talking prison sentences here, gang!

To a stamp collector, the discovery of a prized stamp is beautiful.

There is a close up on the stamp and real collectors can’t get enough of it.

To us stamp illiterates, that close up and the discussion holds as much charm as going to New York Harbor and waiting for the Titanic to show up.

My life has been built around political debate, so for me a short devastating winning point being made is what a slow motion film of Babe Ruth hitting a homer is to a baseball history fanatic.

In turn, part of political debate is political explanation, and this can also become an art form.  There was a debate between a person who felt that it was important to keep a strict limit on how much money is printed. His opponent believed in the Gold Standard.

The Gold Standard man took a twenty out of his wallet and made a dramatic point:

“This is piece of paper that says twenty dollars on it. In the real world it is worthless.”

His opponent then demonstrated that sometimes the best  point can be made without words. He simply reached out and tried to take that bill away from his opponent. What that guy did was what any of us would do when somebody tries to take money out of our hands.

It caused a huge laugh.

And the Gold Standard’s guy found his dramatic “worthless!” statement lying in ruins.

To me, it was a thing of beauty.

The Trump Message can be put into simple English.

The Trump Message is four words long: “We don’t LIKE you.”

And those four words are poison to the establishment.

It is all supposed to be voluntary.

The whole system is based on the idea that whatever is happening, it’s our choice.

This time people aren’t trying to lay out a particular Plot or Conspiracy. Instead of trying to explain everything in some complicated way, voters are saying the one thing that voters are SUPPOSED to say:

Whoever or whatever is running things, it STINKS.

So what is the alternative.

Well, we pay millions of people trillions of dollars to BE celebrities, politicians, and all the rest.

So the Trump vote means, “Come up with something better.”

“Something WE like.”

This hits a nerve.

Americans are supposed to have forgotten that those with all the big bucks are supposed to come up with a system WE like.

It’s a very AMERICAN approach: “We don’t like this.”

“Come up with something better.”

The audience finally just won’t take this ridiculous crap any longer.

We’re stamping and we’re hooting.

If you are a bad enough audience, the act has to change.

The following may sound a bit childish but it should be taken seriously.

“Who had it first?”

“Who started it?”

As a child, you might have heard such questions a few times a day.

They are questions asked by adults, so that they can adjudicate the unseen conflicts that occur between children.

If the fight is over something positive: “Who had it first?”

If the fight is over something negative: “Who started it?”

So, on average, if children hear such questions a few times every day, that means that in a year the children have heard them a thousand times. So by the time they’ve reached adulthood, they’ve heard them over TEN THOUSAND TIMES!

And just so you understand, as adults they’re not going to forget these ethics either.

So when we go Swarming and we hear responses to the Mantra such as “you stole this land”, etc.,… then no matter how ridiculous it is, it’s worth tapping into this energy flow of passed-down ethics, to steer it where we want to go.

That’s why the talking points about the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution are so important: “For ourselves and our posterity”…

We could also go back to the prehistoric White tribes of the Americas and the Pacific, the Solutreans, to get back to the first KNOWN “Who had it first?”… but there’s a balance with tailgating.

In my experience, the talking points we have on the U.S. Constitution are effective and important.

But going further back, especially into prehistory, the evidence is scarce and not widely known, so the potential for tailgating increases dramatically.

But what Kennewick Man and every OTHER anti-white archaeological scandal tells us is this:

1. Anti-whites are liars.

2. They are justifying an ONGOING genocide.

They are the people who say, “I immigrated so everybody should be able to immigrate”.

They read the only official statement of America’s purpose, “We the People of the United States of America ….. and OUR Posterity…” and say that means a Nation of …For God’s Sake! … IMMIGRANTS!!!!!!

We did all sorts of awful things. That doesn’t make this your hyphenated country.

We had horrible things done to us. Why the HELL do you think we are here in the FIRST place?

If you want to join us, then join US!  Cut the nation of immigrants and hyphenated crap!

If you are “Hispanic”, you have over ten million square miles you have turned into poverty row.

STAY THERE!

And then there’s this “You stole it from the Indians” crap!

That is the biggest lie ever F%*KING told!

You “native Americans” immigrated from Asia.

Then another group of Indians came in from Asia.

The second group drove the first southward and then THEY were driven southward.

Your Sacred Navajos are late comers.

Early Indians have been driven all the way down to that “land beyond argument” Tierre del Fuego, which is right by ANTARTICA!

We took America. WE took it from the British, too.

And we By God CLAIMED it!!!!

In 1787!

If we allow you in, it is NOT so you can give it away!

Fund Raising is a Science. I was fascinated by how direct mail fundraisers operated. Richard Viguerie wrote the manual on direct mail techniques.

The professionals have statistically verified how long sentences should be, how long paragraphs should be and what words make a difference in how many and how much funds are raised.

This is excellent work, but it has one fatal problem. It selects what is best for fund raising, but not what WORKS in the field. As one AFP Board member said repeatedly, “White Genocide is a hard sell.”

People who give money, have money. People who give money like the same old tunes.  Almost every fundraising letter is a set of old platitudes that have worked.

For campaigns, we will have to find a fundraising appeal that EXPLAINS this problem, finds donors who want to stimulate the electorate, even if it breaks out of the old platitudes.

Otherwise we will have National Review and hissy fits forever.