Archive for category Law and Order

Our Border Is No Longer A Game

Written by Bob Whitaker – Originally posted on NationalSalvation.net – http://www.nationalsalvation.net/ourborderisnolongera.html

Lester Maddox was a staunch segregationist who was elected governor of Georgia in the 1960s. Black riots were occurring all over the country. When a black riot took place in Augusta, Georgia, Lester Maddox stated that if any policeman did not SHOOT looters on sight, he personally would take away that officer’s badge.

The riot ended suddenly. Only one looter was shot. He was in a liquor store he had broken into, laying on the floor. That picture appeared in outraged publications all over America, especially Time Magazine. But though Time tried to make the case that the poor man was only getting liquor to take home to his starving family, it wasn’t very successful.

While I was on Capitol Hill there was a hurricane in Florida followed by massive looting. My boss, John Ashbrook, shared his senior staffer’s gift for subtlety, so he made a speech on the House Floor called, “Shoot Looters!” The main newspaper in his district attacked him violently, saying this was an irrational statement to make. After a flood of letters backing Ashbook came in, they decided it must be some kind of organized protest by Ashbrook supporters, so they did a scientific poll of the district.

They pointed out, with some embarrassment, that Eighty-One Percent (81%) of district residents backed Ashbrook: “Shoot Looters!” More than one letter to the paper said that this was the first time the writer had EVER agreed with Ashbrook on ANYTHING.

I first broached the idea of a Platform Party to Jamie Kelso as we were riding back from the DC convention. He LOVED the concept, but we had one strong disagreement. As you will see in an article below, I believe in SHOOTING anyone who comes across our border illegally. Jamie said Americans would not STAND for such a thing.

I would give a months warning in every publication in Mexico, Canada, and elsewhere. I would put up huge signs in English, Spanish, French and various Indian languages to make it clear that the US border is a DEADLINE, complete with skull and crossbones for the illiterate.

My point is this: Any other form of enforcement would be subject to debate. 

We must make it absolutely clear that the US border is not a game of hide-and-seek.

We can say that America is the world’s last superpower, but it is the only superpower in history that wants nothing but to protect its OWN borders and its own people’s interests. 

But the Preamble Party says that, on THAT point, there is no room for compromise.

Kelso says that is too violent. I say that any other approach makes the border a game of hide-and-seek.

Shoot looters. Shoot border violators. Our border is no longer a game.

There is a major side benefit to this. The United States will no longer speak in George Bush whine. We will speak little and MEAN it:

“Speak softly and carry a big stick.”

A country that shoots anyone who violates its borders can tell OPEC to cut the crap and OPEC will cut the crap.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

The Two Hundred Dollar Billionaire

The present election law on donation limits was passed to “end the control of elections by big money.”

That crapola always makes  me laugh.

You pass the law and rich folk will send their lawyer to take care of it for them.

That’s it!

Trump is an insoluble problem because he is a billionaire. When it comes to his own personal campaign, the court has ruled that the law can put no limit on spending because of First Amendment Freedom of Speech.
 photo plutocracy-300x162.jpg

Also the thugs who usually control us cannot move against a man who can afford protection.

So the law cannot affect Donald Trump but it can cripple Bob Whitaker.

While the sponsors of the present law talked about Big Money, they started at contributions of two hundred bucks!

So we had a working man who wanted to finance a robocall but could not because anyone who gives $200 to my campaign has to be identified by his name and who he works for!

No working man can afford to have his name and his employer’s made public.

Big Money is $200!

The thugs can’t get at Trump but they can go after a working man.

I am glad that Trump can beat them, but is there a single idiot who thinks exposing $200 contributions is going to “Stop Big Money?”

That makes this campaign finance crap not only nonsense, but OBVIOUS nonsense!

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 Comments

White Rage

The black rage is their defense.

Now when the young guy in Charleston did his shootings, they instantly convicted me which gave us lots of publicity.

The guy who just did the Jewish Center killings has just been convicted. At the beginning of his closing argument he put up on the whiteboard that “Diversity is a code word for White Genocide”.

But oddly enough, nobody came after me.  photo whiterage_1.jpg

One explanation for this is, the same reason they put it off with CNN, they can’t deal with me.

But all this has made me consider White Rage.

If a black man runs around killing white people, it’s because of oppression.

Now if we have white guys out killing, In The Name Of White Genocide, it may be a warning.

Isolated Black killings of whites are the result of a legitimate “Black Rage”.

So isolated killings In The Name Of Genocide, may mean that instead stopping all discussion of White Genocide, the White Rage may indicate that’s exactly what we need to discuss. Or are we going to just have people keep picking up guns?

At the moment we’ve had very isolated incidents, two of them, but should we not consider White Rage?

There is no excuse for anybody just shooting other people, on a basis like this, but it may signify that we are going to have to discuss the real issue. And that does not mean with in the current bounds.

So maybe we should start looking at these isolated two killings as White Rage.

And a warning.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Comments

“Arrest-Proof Yourself”

I enjoyed reading Carson’s “Arrest-Proof Yourself” for a reason peculiar to myself, just as I enjoyed Holland’s “Trust Me, I’m Lying” for another underlying theme.

The underlying theme I saw in “Trust Me” was from my having lived through the years Holland clearly thought of as The Good Old Days. His information from how blog info is not even meant to be truthful was interesting. His grief about the news monopoly blogs are replacing is HILARIOUS.

One of Holland’s gods, Walter Cronkite, would make regular speeches about what morons like Holland thought were objective. He made it very clear that his duty was to BE biased, to select the news he reported. Like an old-timer, Holland moans about the true and objective and checked-out news of his youth.

Holland’s “icon” is Jon “Stewart” on Comedy Central, whose show is a “Revival Meeting for Political Correctness.” Jerry Falwell should sue “Stewart” for stealing his whole approach and his whole vocabulary.

Carson didn’t make a fool of himself, because one of his main themes was laid down almost forty years ago by a truly great writer.

Me.

Carson explained the hunger for arrests today on the basis of law as an industry.
 photo arrest.jpg
The crime rate peaked back in the 60s, when Batman kept repeating the “rehabilitation” crap because by then it was already funny. Like Mommy Professor, he would repeat that he caught Penguin and Cat Woman, not for punishment, but for rehabilitation.

Today, fifty years later, what every college student believes in has long since been a JOKE out in the real world.

A mere forty years ago I made a shockingly novel point: I said that the Military Industrial Complex indeed did have a political agenda based on government money.

But I then detailed how ALL government expenditure, including the Education-Welfare Complex, also produced its own political agenda which Mommy Professor sells daily.

Simply put, when teachers want a pay raise, it is not entirely because that would be good for the kids. This doesn’t sound surprising today, but before my 1976 book came out, standard commentary NEVER mentioned that anything “social” or “education” could have ANY money-based constituency.

So a lot of Carson’s book was uniquely familiar territory for me. He was a cop and FBI and is now a big money defense attorney.

Carson points out that the ONLY criterion a street cop has for promotion and pay, and even retention, is the number of ARRESTS he makes.

As I did for the education-welfare establishment, Carson details the huge amount of money generated by the system for every person who goes to jail.

Any other outlook is as zombied out as Batman talking about rehabilitating.

And he makes it clear that jail is not prison, and that the ONLY criterion for a good cop is how many people he sends to jail and how many to prison.

Carson also underlines a point I made to you when BUGSERS discussed what to do if the FBI or other officers showed up. A lot of people came up with smartass lines to use on the investigators, and I begged you NOT to smartass them.

Now you have it from an ex-cop and an ex-interrogator: if you face the real thing, try to save your ass, not make bragging points.

To say that Carson agrees is pure understatement.

Carson drops the crap that “part of the reason” the War on Drugs continues, the disaster of Prohibition cubed, is that those hundreds of billions of dollars spent on it has a constituency.

Carson does not use the term bullshit, but early he makes it clear that this insane program, far more disastrous in a year than the whole War in Vietnam, is ENTIRELY because people from judges to cops depend on it for their livelihood.

It is a scary book, but worthwhile. But you can also see that persecuting a bunch of amateur political fanatics, no matter how effective they are, is not likely to be a real-life major police priority.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

10 Comments

Final Appeal

The World War 2 Generation came back from their how-to-be a good doggy training with the conviction that they were AMERICANS ONLY. There was no white, there was no black, there were no Southerners and no Northerners. As to self-interest, there was only Sacrifice.

That is precisely the kind of Wordist attitude that the Constitution could not operate in. The Constitution uses a system of checks and balances where personal preferences are allowed because the different branches of government will keep each other in check. The final appeal was to the people.

But when the WWII Generation took power, there was no “people.” They were all Americans. The people did not have any existence except as Good AMERICANS. So they had to appeal to a Federal Branch to tell them what Good Americans were.

Whereas the Tenth Amendment made it specific that the final appeal would be to the people or the states, Good Americans do not see any separate entities of this kind.

So the World War II Generation’s Final Appeal is to the Federal Courts.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 Comments