Adelheim in Norway contacted me and I looked at few minutes of their Swedish youtube video. I don’t usually look, though I LOVE to know you are putting them out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSFiMcmpMnA&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL

There are lots of pictures, but what jumped out at me was the MAP they have. It is what I have in mind when I am trying to explain the Mantra.

The map shows the world in black, with the pitifully few white countries in white, and a set of huge moving arrows to show the immigration going across our one small part of the world. Nothing better illustrates that sometimes a picture is better than ten thousand words than this.

I don’t know any of this new fangled stuff since my straight telegraph key, but I think those who can do youtubes can also share images. I am sure our Scandinavian crowd would be glad to let you use this illustration. I think it is an irreplaceable pictorial illustration of the Mantra.

I don’t think anybody but BUGSERS will understand the unique, important point for me of the Tennessee Conference.

I only realized it today.

There were the Big Guy Speeches until hour 4:00.

After all those speeches by orators and Leaders and orators they all knew, here was tired old Bob who hadn’t even packed the right clothes. My speech was very short and totally below the oratory of my predecessors.

I had the Ultimate Hole Card.

I talked about how Derek had USED our approach successfully, then I dropped the whole thing into White Rabbit’s and Truck Roy’s laps. I sat to the side and came in when they wanted me a few times, but finally they had the dialogue going strong and they are used to working together.

As I say, after what amounted to hours of Leadership, the audience was a bit confused by the three of us up there in alternation, openly talking to each other about what to do next, away from the microphone.

Derek Black, the young organizer who has already pushed his way onto the State Republican Committee, has, as I have said here before, “tried all the brands” and discovered that of all the brands, the Mantra Attack does the job.

You only really learn that, I think, when you get in there and mix it up. Derek did.

Derek told me that White Rabbit really wowed ‘em. They were exhausted and a lot of them visibly nodding when we got on, but Derek said they really sat up as White Rabbit took over.

Please don’t give me any modesty crap about this, White Rabbit. This is important, and we are not playing dueling egos here.

It was, in fact, the only team act at the Conference.

Please note the above sentence.

No one who is new to our whole approach and was there listening to Leadership Speeches really GOT this monumental point.

I didn’t get it until I blew my top right back from the conference and rested up.

The speeches will be on the Internet, though I understand that no video recording was permitted

But if you listen to my short piece, it was pointing to my reason for being there, called there by Derek who saw my stuff worked, and two young men who were making it work.

White Rabbit sold one hell of a lot of tee shirts to the tiny audience, and if I were there for my ego I would have shot the man. People talked to him, and when they talked to me more than half of it was about him.

It is critical to remember that the Mantra is not a debating tactic.

The Mantra is repeating back to anti-whites what they say all the time. If everyone took it for granted that every black country — NOT JUST AFRICA — were singled out for immigration, it would not take five minutes for everybody to realize this was an anti-BLACK measure.

Over and over I have given the example that singling out Iceland for immigration is like singling out Haiti along with all black countries. The other half of the island of San Domingo, the Dominican Republic, is already mixed blood, so it would be exempted from the pressure.

When I use the term Jewish Wet Dream I am REPEATING what an endless number of Jews have said to me and in public. They start with “I am Jewish, so…” and then they say that anyone wanting to preserve the white race is an enemy. “Race-mixing,” by which they mean WHITE-mixing, is therefore a Jew’s duty.

So when I point out that, from what THEY say, the ultimate in race-mixing, a blond girl and a black man, is a Jewish Wet Dream. They have said a million times that it represents one of their main goals in life.

Telling people what they just said is a very different form of argument than accusing a group of secret manipulators. It takes a think to “expose” such a Conspiracy. And it is as productive as accusing businessmen of wanting to make a profit.

The Mantra is the total application of the basic rule of Western science, the rule that made it the ONLY real; science on earth, Occam‘s Razor. Occam’s Razor says that you cut away the crap. Occam’s Razor says that you look carefully at the obvious cause of something instead of building a whole new World Philosophy on a whole new theology or philosophy.

Occam’s Razor is the reason we are using the Internet rather than banging on drums.

Commenters run into an endless stream of critics who want to get away from the basic point and talk about a World View. The one great barrier for us is the insistence that the Mantra will “cause trouble,” that the white problem is already being solved by being called the RACE problem.

So why bring it up?

Because you cannot deal with a problem until you have STATED the problem. What we want right now is for the planned extinction of our race to be RECOGNIZED as a PROBLEM.

I get so SICK of discussions about THE races!

Whenever anyone discusses race relations, they are not talking about what should be done in “the world.” ALL talk about immigration and integration applies only to WHITE countries. So “assimilation” only means integration INSIDE white countries.

And no one, NO ONE, ever SAYS that. When we put this point in Pat Buchanan’s discussions, it gets wiped, much less anybody else’s.

We are, in fact, dealing entirely with the destruction of the white race, which is what nobody in respectable life dares say out loud.

So it is our moral duty to say it out loud. But don’t use familiar language, use the Mantra.

The reason the Mantra is so effective today is because we can SEE its reality. In the 1950s when integration was aimed by its promoters at the ultimate end of white existence, it seems to be alarmism. But now it is OBVIOUS. Which is why it cannot be mentioned. Its discussion was allowed when it could be pooh-poohed. But today it is so obvious it must be suppressed, ONCE IT IS MENTIONED.

I don’t believe in conspiracies per se. That is partly because when people think exactly alike it is natural to think they are in cahoots. But every college graduate has been indoctrinated so that he understands exactly how he is to react in every case. A graduate of the Sorbonne and a graduate of Harvard will appear to be in a conspiracy, but they are much more like zombies. And leftist zombies create rightist zombies. Liberal reaction to any EFFECTIVE dissent is to declare the person making that dissent “unrespectable.”

So, if one is to make a LIVING at being a RESPECTABLE conservative, one does not need to be part of a conspiracy. He knows what will not be tolerated, or he would not be a professional.

If you don’t use the Mantra, you are respectable, Which is worse than a crime. You are worse than a Communist. You are what makes absurdity and evil POSSIBLE.

I was in the University of South Carolina Student Senate, the student council, in 1962 when Saint John the Kennedy sent the Army in to enforce integration at the University of Mississippi. I wanted to introduce a resolution giving our backing to Mississippi, but for once I couldn’t decide, aka, I didn’t have the guts.

So we are not all as brave as the commenters on Brian’s article on professorial genocide seem to think we are. Some of us wouldn’t find it easy to be ALONE in class against the professor and her thugs.

It takes infinitely more moral courage to fight it out with a professor for our cause than it does for a hundred thousand men to hit the beach at Normandy WITH EACH OTHER.

Contrary to every Wordist dogma, we are a hardwired social animal. You can’t just make us over by writing a book.

As a former prof, let me assure you that there is nothing easier than being a bully from the front of the class. No student EVER wins a debate with a prof. A few of you have put the Mantra in newsgroups and you see how easy it is to cut it or change the subject or just declare the subject is closed.

It takes guts to face a roomful of people. It takes super guts to face a ROOMFUL of hostile people.

In “Servitude and Slavery” below, I referred to my own specialty in graduate economics, Public Choice:

“If libertarianism and its theoretical expression, Public Choice, can’t even explain why people vote it certainly cannot explain the rest of life.

Under pure Public Choice Theory, as all the experts in that field agree, no votes would occur, no public choices would be made. They admit they can’t doesn’t explain why people vote, but they don’t worry about that.”

If you do a straight Public Choice libertarian calculation on whether you should vote, you wouldn’t. The cost is going to the polling place and standing in line. And, if we are just talking about the benefit to you PERSONALLY of casting your ballot, what do you get for it? What is the real probability that your particular vote will affect YOU personally?

Zilch.

No pure libertarian would bother to vote. The reason we DO vote goes to the very fundamental error of libertarianism. Voters want to influence how their SOCIETY goes, not just to benefit themselves.

Like Marx and Rand everyone else Public Choice is still in the age when animals did not fight wars. All we have learned about the nature of all social animals has been completely missed.

In other words, Public Choice and libertarianism declare that LOYALTY has nothing to do with humans. The whole Wordist superstructure of libertarianism founders on that one point, just as “anti-racism” founders on the Mantra.

I sent this logic to someone in Public Choice. Remember that I said that the job of respectable conservatism is to miss the point while appearing to address it. The same is true of Public Choice. Our whole training was that of a professional knife thrower, to always MISS just right.

This person is NOT an anti-white. But his TRAINING is to miss the point. He saw what I said. one would vote at all. His reply to me will sound familiar to anyone who has ever actually WORKED with the Mantra.

He said that Public Choicers do still mention the point that if self-interest were the only basis of voting no one would vote at all. But that was ALL he addressed. What I wrote about loyalty might as well have been blank space. I wrote him again to remind him of it and he said I should pay attention to what HE said.

You have to USE the Mantra to understand this reaction. We have here a form of HYPNOTISM. A proposition that will undermine a whole world-view runs into this.

It is vital that you recognize this form of hypnotism. You cannot just “mention the logic of the Mantra.” No one will SEE the Mantra even when you first ram it down their throats. All of us who have fought it out know well that you simply CANNOT get onto other topics and that you cannot just “mention the logic.”

You must HIT THE TARGET again and again and again. In a week, even someone you have forced to face it will have HYPNOTICALLY forgotten it.

Let us go back to Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis. A friend of his died of a cut on his finger while he was doing a dissection for anatomy on an old corpse. Semmelweis looked at his friend’s symptoms and discovered that they were the same as those of “childbed fever” of which so many of the mothers and babies in his hospital died. Doctors in his hospital were doing dissections and then going straight to deliver babies without washing their hands.

It was obvious where the childbed fever was coming from.

Semmelweis explained it and explained it and explained it. The doctors replied that they were discussing childbed fever, just as my friend said they were DISCUSSING why people wouldn’t vote at all using Public Choice logic. They got him into discussions of Galen and Hippocrates. They talked about the Simplism of just washing your hands in carbolic acid. The moment he mentioned childbed fever they went off on their own tack.

Semmelweis’s deliveries were without the huge mortality rate theirs was. He was denounced as a monomaniac. In other words, they talked about everything but what he told them. They didn’t try his simplistic solution.. Hell, they didn’t even SEE it.

In the end Semmelweis won, but only after he died in a madhouse.

THAT is what we are facing. It is life and death, and “mentioning the Mantra” while you are going along with someone’s discussion won’t do the trick.

Don’t let them get away with murder. That is what you do when you allow anyone to talk about “mixing THE races.”

It allows them get away with genocide. They tell you that all the races are taking an equal part in this, that it is just “fair play.” It INFURIATES me when people let this go by while they recited the latest line.

One of our spokesmen was doing an interview and the interviewer mentioned that nobody was demanding that Japan take in immigrants. Our spokesman, however, was busy talking about what an Aristocrat he was and let it slide.

Our Mantra:

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am ANAZIWHOWANTSTOKILLSIXMILLIONJEWS.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“ANTI-RACIST IS A CODE WORD FOR ANTI-WHITE.”