Archive for category Mantra
Anti-Mantra pro-Whites are stuck in a state of “truthism”. They think that if you keep on talking about all the little, often pointless, truths in the world, it will turn into one BIG truth.
That is silly. Millions of small truths don’t make a BIG truth.
The Mantra approach is the opposite of truthism. We know that there is only ONE truth that matters right NOW.
“911 truth” will not ensure our survival.
“Jews own this” will not ensure our survival.
“Blacks commit more crime” will not ensure our survival.
“White people are better” will not ensure our survival.
The ONLY thing at this time that is exactly on point is the Mantra and its White Genocide message.
So please anti-mantra pro-Whites, stop with these little truths.
Small truth + Small truth = 2 Small truths. Not a big truth.
There are pro-White groups out there appealing to every segment, from academic discussions all the way down to a couple of guys having a beer. But these are people who already agree with each other chatting among themselves. You wouldn’t be interested in their material unless you were ALREADY pro-White. For all the hoopla that surrounds some of the more flamboyant pro-White groups, they will never reach anyone who isn’t already pro-White to start with, so they don’t represent a threat to the Anti-White System.
What makes the Mantra approach different is that it’s not just a bunch of guys sitting around bitching and moaning about how bad things are, or putting forward a grand plan for a White Utopia. The Mantra actually interacts with the real world and changes it.
That’s why the anti-Whites have focused on shutting the Mantra down while other pro-White messages receive less attention. Their instincts tell them this is where the threat comes from and they are right. Costume parties in the street don’t scare them. Long papers may be interesting, but anti-Whites are not bothered by them.
They ARE bothered by the Mantra. Why? Because we’re doing something that has never been done before: We are using a consistent message that points out the heart and soul of the Anti-White agenda, exposing the ongoing program of genocide against my people, White people. They have NO WAY to fight the message except to silence it.
The Mantra has HIT THE CRUCIAL NERVE. Those who do the work of spreading the message of the Mantra have decided to leave the comfortable pro-White reservations of the past and venture out to CHANGE the REAL WORLD.
For those lurkers and casual readers out there who don’t “buy in” to the FACT that what anti-whites are perpetrating against our children is genocide, I submit the following to you:
Recently, courtesy of Tim Jacob Wise and Co., the anti-whites have ratcheted up the White Privilege meme through their preferred outlet in Duluth, MN. Talk about privilege.
Despite their best and well-funded efforts, WE won the first battle on that front as UMD (University of Minnesota’s Diversity) has – for the moment – officially repudiated their methods and message and pulled their support of the Unfair Campaign. Thumbs up. However, there is more to what they did with this. It’s time to crunch the subtext of the message they delivered.
EVERYBODY in the Respectable World agrees that there is this thing called White Privilege.
EVERYBODY says that this Privilege can, should, and will be taken away.
EVERYBODY says that there is one way and ONLY one way to solve this problem of White Privilege.
When asked HOW whites are “privileged,” they say we were “BORN that way. We’re white.” Clearly, the solution to the problem of whites being born with White Privilege is to do away with the problem of us being here; to genocide our race. They might sugarcoat their program and say things like “We all bleed red. We’re all one race,” but what they really mean is “On Earth, whites have no place.”
You know the rest…
The Mantra machine of simple truth triumphs once more.
I first read the mantra in 2010. I was still new to the consistent message thing but when I came across one line of the mantra, I knew I had to put it in every post I wrote. That line was:
“Anti-racist” is a codeword for anti-white.
But at the time I thought it sounded funny. The thing that sounded funny to me was the “-ist” part.
I was in a wordist mentality. I wanted to attack the word “Anti-racISM” so my “White nationalISM” could prevail. I quickly adopted that phrase and changed just ONE letter;
“Anti-racism” is a codeword for anti-white.
This is the one that sounds funny to me now.
I was in a wordist mentality. I believed that an “-ism” meant it was objective and true.
I know better now.
An “-ism” means whatever an “-ist” wants it to mean.
It doesn’t matter if one “-ist” says this about this “-ism” and another “-ist” says something completely different about that same “-ism.”
An “-ism” means whatever an “-ist” wants it to mean.
That is how the “anti-racists” were able to be so anti-white for so long and get away with it. We believed the “-ism” meant they were objective and true.
I now try to avoid using any “-ism” online or in any conversation.
And in almost every post I do, the last line I write is:
“Anti-racist” is a codeword for anti-white.
I mentioned before that YOU were working out a shortening of the Mantra.
In BUGS, unlike other fora, one commenter did not head off for some Wise Abstract, but asked what the hell I was talking about. Actually he just politely asked what I was referring to, but I was reminded once again that in BUGS, some people actually THINK about what I say, not about how they can get deeply philosophical about it.
In short, I said something, and I got called on it. Which is what BUGS is all about.
But life was certainly a lot simpler when all I had to deal with was people who tried to make things more complicated rather than being unapologetically proletarian and calling me on what I said.
Once again, the problem with what I said was that it is simplisticated.
I insisted on the full Mantra because of the tailgating tendency. After tens of thousands of debates against the actual enemy, I was familiar with the phenomenon that is NOW, TO YOU, second nature. Now that we are knee deep in the Mantra and you have actually BEEN smashing anti-white teeth out the way I was used to doing, you cannot put yourself back in the world where nobody had any idea what Mantra Thinking was.
But to COACH, you still obviously stumble over your own feet while giggling about how smart you are.
I know you tend to forget that, just a short time ago, nobody EVER said “anti-white” unless it was about non-white antisemitism and they said, ABSOLUTELY WITHOUT FAIL, “anti-white AND anti-Semitic.”
In every case we all knew they were talking about non-white antisemitism.
I call myself a Coach rather than a Teacher or a Source of Wisdom because that gives me the right to be blunt and just plain nasty to you in a way no Confucius or Buddha would have been.
So now let us go back to my original point: you don’t realize what a short time it has been since when the term “anti-white” was utterly unknown. So you don’t know how amateurish you still look to me.
Oh, yes, compared to the average AMPW and, God knows, compared to the general population, you are geniuses.
I read your comments on those who say the white man deserves extinction, and what I do NOT see is the approach I always use and advocate here, again and again and again: 1) “You are JUSTIFYING GENOCIDE and 2) NOTHING ELSE.
The point, 1) is “You are justifying genocide,” and 2) is the most important thing in a debate is SILENCE.
My heart welled with pride when I saw someone quote Lord Nelson in an interview, when the interviewer was caught flat-footed by the Mantra and tried to get off on something, else, Lord Nelson just said, “I have made my point.”
But, to be as frank as only a Coach can be, damned few of you are Lord Nelson, and Lord Nelson often looks like an amateur in actual combat.
And THAT , ladies and gentlemen, is the reason I insisted on the FULL Mantra.
The FULL Mantra comes from tens of thousands of actual combats and conversions I did ALONE
To be brutally frank, you have not been at this long enough to deal with the obvious points they are going to make, as we all can predict, without stumbling over your own tongue.
If you are satisfied with where you are now, I will demand the FULL Mantra every single time.
I HOPE the time will come that, having been out in the field hundreds of times, you will no longer get all confused when the same point is brought up predictably for the thousandth time.
Another difference between a Coach and a Learned Teacher is that a Learned Teacher is never just plain WRONG. Here I am either right or wrong. I demand you to use the full Mantra because I frankly don’t believe any of you are smart enough or disciplined enough to run right over them on the points you know they are going to make.
I think you are going to act like “race doesn’t exist” or one of the ten thousand versions of “whites deserve it,” is somehow NEW. Like a freshman football guard, you are going to stumble over your own feet.
I don’t think you can give a shortened version of the Mantra and block them totally the way I have learned to do.
So if you wonder why I insist on the full Mantra, concentrate on the lesson only Lord Nelson seems to have gotten right, that one time.
Most of you frankly don’t know the difference, which one terrific commenter pointed out, between “population shift” and “genocide.”
When the Mantra becomes public property, we will have to go on from there.
From what I see in your comments, you will be as helpless in world of free speech as the anti-whites will be.
By now, knocking anti-whites on their asses and keeping them there should not be rocket science, on ANY of the predictable pieces of crap that crippled pro-whites for decades.
Right now, you look amateurish to me.
But it took me years, too.
Adelheim in Norway contacted me and I looked at few minutes of their Swedish youtube video. I don’t usually look, though I LOVE to know you are putting them out.
There are lots of pictures, but what jumped out at me was the MAP they have. It is what I have in mind when I am trying to explain the Mantra.
The map shows the world in black, with the pitifully few white countries in white, and a set of huge moving arrows to show the immigration going across our one small part of the world. Nothing better illustrates that sometimes a picture is better than ten thousand words than this.
I don’t know any of this new fangled stuff since my straight telegraph key, but I think those who can do youtubes can also share images. I am sure our Scandinavian crowd would be glad to let you use this illustration. I think it is an irreplaceable pictorial illustration of the Mantra.
I don’t think anybody but BUGSERS will understand the unique, important point for me of the Tennessee Conference.
I only realized it today.
There were the Big Guy Speeches until hour 4:00.
After all those speeches by orators and Leaders and orators they all knew, here was tired old Bob who hadn’t even packed the right clothes. My speech was very short and totally below the oratory of my predecessors.
I had the Ultimate Hole Card.
I talked about how Derek had USED our approach successfully, then I dropped the whole thing into White Rabbit’s and Truck Roy’s laps. I sat to the side and came in when they wanted me a few times, but finally they had the dialogue going strong and they are used to working together.
As I say, after what amounted to hours of Leadership, the audience was a bit confused by the three of us up there in alternation, openly talking to each other about what to do next, away from the microphone.
Derek Black, the young organizer who has already pushed his way onto the State Republican Committee, has, as I have said here before, “tried all the brands” and discovered that of all the brands, the Mantra Attack does the job.
You only really learn that, I think, when you get in there and mix it up. Derek did.
Derek told me that White Rabbit really wowed ‘em. They were exhausted and a lot of them visibly nodding when we got on, but Derek said they really sat up as White Rabbit took over.
Please don’t give me any modesty crap about this, White Rabbit. This is important, and we are not playing dueling egos here.
It was, in fact, the only team act at the Conference.
Please note the above sentence.
No one who is new to our whole approach and was there listening to Leadership Speeches really GOT this monumental point.
I didn’t get it until I blew my top right back from the conference and rested up.
The speeches will be on the Internet, though I understand that no video recording was permitted
But if you listen to my short piece, it was pointing to my reason for being there, called there by Derek who saw my stuff worked, and two young men who were making it work.
White Rabbit sold one hell of a lot of tee shirts to the tiny audience, and if I were there for my ego I would have shot the man. People talked to him, and when they talked to me more than half of it was about him.
The SF announcement says it will be “in the Knoxville area” on September 17 and the only place to register is http://www.stormfront.org/forum/f12-announcement75/
I just got off the elevator with a mother and her little three-year-old boy.
He was, of course, looking at the only brightly lit things in the elevator, the ones indicating the floor we were each going to.
He had heard us indicate the buttons to push. We were on the lift together for only about a minute. So the conversation I made was to say to him, “You’re going to fifteen and I’m going to eleven.”
The boy doesn’t need to understand what it means, I just included him in the conversation his mother and I had had.
A young child does two things: 1) he gets very used to not understanding what is going on, but 2) He still manages to get a picture of the world from the tens of thousands of things he hears and does not understand.
I do exactly the same thing here.
I just burst into laughter remembering that ten years ago readers of Whitaker online gently corrected me when I took Texas Hold ‘Em for an actual commenter.
I talked learnedly about the Book of Genesis and got “the firmament” wrong.
The little boy will come, in time, to realize that the floors on the elevator mean he is going up to the fifteenth floor, from which every day he looks out on the world from an entirely different perspective from that when he was on the first floor.
It is true that we forget the really awful childhood pains, but we also forget this particular joy. We forget the joy of a developing human brain.
The kid will someday realize the connection between that elevator and the sight he sees on his porch a hundred and forty feet up. He will forget that realization in half a minute. But while he is having it, it is The Latest News, the World Coming Together.
It happens to each child thousands of times. It is a repeated joy everybody forgets, but for that moment it is like the candy bar he has waited all day for. Dessert is delicious and instantly forgotten. It is still a wonderful thing when you have the taste buds of a child.
I will never know when I enter my second childhood because I am still in my first.
Nothing I write has big words, because after my threescore and ten, I am STILL delighting in figuring out how basics connect together.
Mantra Thinking is childish. That is why it is so joyful.
I am getting pretty tired, and the SWARM is where I look for encouragement.
We get thousands of hits on the site, but we are lucky to get fifteen or twenty comments in BUGS SWARM.
Where the hell are the REST of you?
Is it true that only one in several hundred of people who read BUGS bothers to actually get out there and do the job?
There is no Wordism called Whitakerism. In fact, what we SHOULD have is the precise opposite.
From a very hard and dedicated lifetime, I have developed some basic truths that bear my marks.
The Mantra is an essence of a Whitakerism:
1) There is not a big word in it.
Except maybe anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
2) It is no absolutely no longer than it has to be.
3) What it expresses is so obvious that nobody sees it.
There may be other characteristics, but my point here is that I am not good at listing things.
There are other Wordisms that have Whitakerisms. Wordism is concept that took our a lot of work and came out so simply that an intelligent, rebellious mind cannot believe he didn’t have it all the time.
Wordism is the fatal error everyone falls into when they talk about Universal Love or Loyalty to Humankind in General. It is more divisive and evil than any fanatical nationalism or racism, because its idea of “Humanity” is forcing all humans into one mold and destroying any mind that isn’t loyal to that particular mold, that set of Words.
Militant obedience cuts the ground out from under such intellectual terms as The Stockholm Syndrome, and ties together the toadies of the grammar school bully with the mobs on campus who stage a riot if anybody tries to make a speech disagreeing with Mommy Professor.
Whitakerisms constitute the exact opposite of a Wordist Whitakerism.
Whitakerisms cut the ground out from under the Buckleys and the Mommy Professors who believe that they have an explanation of human behavior that only exists up there in the ethereal realm of their big words and somehow Special Discussion.
Whitakerisms should encourage you, and me, to grow out of our John Birch or totally Southern backgrounds and study what truth the side we took really represents. Every Southerner should recognize the Siding With the Bully Syndrome in terms like “The Lessons of the Civil War.”
It is human nature that both sides in any conflict are partly right and partly wrong. All Mommy Professor ever does is get “lessons” out of the winning side.
For which the winning side pays him.
I would appreciate BUGSERS to toss in other Whitakerisms developed over our many years.
It is critical to remember that the Mantra is not a debating tactic.
The Mantra is repeating back to anti-whites what they say all the time. If everyone took it for granted that every black country — NOT JUST AFRICA — were singled out for immigration, it would not take five minutes for everybody to realize this was an anti-BLACK measure.
Over and over I have given the example that singling out Iceland for immigration is like singling out Haiti along with all black countries. The other half of the island of San Domingo, the Dominican Republic, is already mixed blood, so it would be exempted from the pressure.
When I use the term Jewish Wet Dream I am REPEATING what an endless number of Jews have said to me and in public. They start with “I am Jewish, so…” and then they say that anyone wanting to preserve the white race is an enemy. “Race-mixing,” by which they mean WHITE-mixing, is therefore a Jew’s duty.
So when I point out that, from what THEY say, the ultimate in race-mixing, a blond girl and a black man, is a Jewish Wet Dream. They have said a million times that it represents one of their main goals in life.
Telling people what they just said is a very different form of argument than accusing a group of secret manipulators. It takes a think to “expose” such a Conspiracy. And it is as productive as accusing businessmen of wanting to make a profit.
The Mantra is the total application of the basic rule of Western science, the rule that made it the ONLY real; science on earth, Occam‘s Razor. Occam’s Razor says that you cut away the crap. Occam’s Razor says that you look carefully at the obvious cause of something instead of building a whole new World Philosophy on a whole new theology or philosophy.
Occam’s Razor is the reason we are using the Internet rather than banging on drums.
Commenters run into an endless stream of critics who want to get away from the basic point and talk about a World View. The one great barrier for us is the insistence that the Mantra will “cause trouble,” that the white problem is already being solved by being called the RACE problem.
So why bring it up?
Because you cannot deal with a problem until you have STATED the problem. What we want right now is for the planned extinction of our race to be RECOGNIZED as a PROBLEM.
I mentioned that most people are puzzled when I point out that the wheel is not, contrary to the usual statement, “since the invention of the wheel,” a common or an early invention. But the comic strip BC is constantly using the wheel among its joke-like primitive people as The sign of the very first thing invented.
BC like all humor depends on what people assume and know about. Everyone here has had the agonizing experience of explaining a joke someone does not understand.
BC shows that the wheel has not only to be cliché but a cliché everyone gets immediately.
Most of us also have had the experience of listening to a language we understand imperfectly. You begin to miss Americans or even freaking limeys when you spend a long time in a foreign language environment.
A lot of people speak English, but no one around you speaks it well enough so you can make puns or any kind of relaxed conversation.
We have a fluency here with the Mantra and Mommy Professor and other concepts that makes it infinitely easier to talk.
This is what I trip over when I mention the “as old as the invention of the wheel” concept, not that I can’t explain it, but the whole point is that everyone takes “since the invention of the wheel” so routinely they laugh at it in BC, but they have to have it explained to them when it is brought out.
The day will come when everyone will laugh at those ridiculous gray stone “classical buildings” in Washington. But we are still at the phase where we have to explain what they already know, that all those “sculptures” and “classical buildings” are based on pure ignorance.
It is heavy work slowly explaining to the DUHH chorus that assimilation is only aimed at the white race. It is heavy work explaining to those who laugh at BC the reason why they laugh at it.
And after you have done all that work, they are not FLUENT at it. It took a long time to get the assumptions we have.
But once you begin to get these across in the age of the Internet, it is amazing what people will think of when the seed is planted. The present effort at genocide takes a lot of explaining, but once it is thought about, even subconsciously, people will realize that it is no more abstract than a concentration camp.
Every now and then I am delighted to see concentrated discussions of action on the Mantra. But they’ve died out. What I am getting now is musings on the world in general. There are worse things than stimulating thought, most of it highly literate, but it isn’t our WAR.
I can’t tell what you are doing out in the real world of if you don’t report on it. Gator said I should give an assignment each week. Gator, no one takes my “assignments.” I begged BUGSers for months to simply put good BUGS entries on Stormfront, just copy and paste, and the only person who did it was Brain, who already has too much to do.
Gator put the Mantra out and said so. He seems to be almost unique lately. I am sure our old solid group, like Lord Nelson, are out there doing it but they don’t REPORT it.
There is, of course, the problem that I am almost blind here. I had to bitched and complained to Gator that I couldn’t FIND his piece at the link he gave. All I cold see was the title and the statement that there were 14 comments on it, then it listed other topics.
I finally SCROLLED DOWN and found the whole thing and the comments. Gator assumed I would naturally do that in the first place. When someone is as dense as I am in these things, there’s not a hell of a lot Gator or anybody else can do for me.
But Bob is your main instrument here. Don’t feel sorry for yourself. I have to face the fact that Bob is all I have. I used to tell my wife, “If you think putting up with me is bad, try BEING ME for a while.”
I got her sympathy with that one!
As for giving assignments, I can only quote General Lee: “I cannot get my orders carried out.” If General Lee had that problem, you can’t expect this lesser Robert to handle it. Gator got fourteen comments, and SO FAR, he has found a forum where his Mantra has not been wiped out. This gave him a chance to make a FURTHER comment on the replies.
We have not had much chance to talk about comments because the Mantra is usually wiped out almost immediately. This illustrates my point: I am almost dead blind here. I don’t know how many discussions are going on that I don’t hear about. And this is vital to me.
Gator says 11 of the 14 comments probably came from BUGS people. But folks like to PLAY with their screen names. It seems to be considered cute. So one commenter uses several names here, and the comments there were under several names. Where does that leave ME or anybody lese trying to analyze replies?
Please consider my position when you get cute with screen names. In this case they may have been necessary to make two comments instead of one in one name.
But not one commenter SAID he got in there!
I’m BLIND here, gang!
But I was DELIGHTED to see that in those Gator comments our folks grabbed onto the “You are justifying genocide line, which is the second punch in discussing Mantra, and HELD onto it.
If 11 of the comments were from us, that has its encouraging side. They did it RIGHT. When you are forming your first team as we are, getting it RIGHT is critical to your coach.
We are lighting a fire. Modern men have a hard time with lighting a fire without matches because they are used to just flipping a lighter. Doing it from scratch is a LONG process. We have come a long way in igniting a fireplace, but when it comes to lighting the kind of fire we are doing, the old process is still there.
In history books the process of forming an idea and then making it knows looks quick, “Thirty years later, it was common knowledge.” When you are reading a history books, thirty years doesn’t impress you. But every single one of those years was REAL and SLOW to those living it.
I have hit and hit and hit and finally I have a tiny spark. It takes forever to create a tiny spark, and then you have to puff and not blow to keep it going, to keep from killing it. That is when you are trying to start a campfire.
We are changing the WORLD.
In fact it is the difficulties we have that demonstrated that we are trying to do something that big. At this stage, I am more than happy to see a few of us get it RIGHT.
At least half of the environmental disasters today are NOT the result of greed. They come from environmental Idealism. This is recorded but never MENTIONED in an endless string of documentaries.
How many times have you seen a documentary saying that some animal has gotten out of hand, and it was originally imported to take care of some other imbalance? But the documentary makers do not NOTICE this. They NEVER say, “…ONCE AGAIN this animal which has gone out of control was introduced to take care of an environmental problem is creating a far worse one.”
The usual explanation for this is that it is a Conspiracy. The Learned Elders of Zion call each other up, “We won’t say AGAIN.” The Conspiracy idea is plausible to those who feel that people in high places MUST KNOW how stupid they are being. If you get on the inside you realize that nobody gets to the top inside the system unless they think like everybody else I the system does.
ALL established religions select those who are hypnotically repetitious and those who are talented psychopaths, who are able to fake being hypnotically repetitious.
One example stands out in my mind, but you would have had to be there to be as impressed as I was.
My cover was a tourist trip across a Communist border roughly forty years ago. Among the tourists was a real hippie couple. They had on their hippie uniform, beads and such. I wondered how people who carried the Viet Cong flag in parades and lauded Communists would react to what the few tourists too poor to afford planes always saw:
The dug out area or wall, the men with automatic weapons, the skull and crossbones signs that are the international sign of land mines, and the warnings that anyone who tries to escape the Workers’ Paradise will be shot on sight.
I wondered what their reaction would be.
There wasn’t one.
Both hippies went into TRANCE. A REAL trance. They looked straight ahead. They did not SEE the ditch, the land mine warnings, the machine guns.
If you had been there you would be as intrigued as I was: They didn’t SEE it!
The reason the endless cycle of environmental disasters caused by environmentalists is not mentioned in documentaries is because the documentary makers genuinely do not SEE them.
Successful documentary makers have no odor of heresy on them. An established religion can identify someone who is not a True Thinker without even noticing it. There are millions of competing faiths battling to become The Established Religion. The ONE that wins out develops the ability to weed out potential heresy.
EVERY established religion has always required this form of hypnosis in the people who, after all, are merely parts of its mechanism.
This is why using the Mantra is such a useful introduction to reality.
When you use the Mantra, they don’t HEAR you. They go into that TRANCE.
And as an introduction to reality, you need to see that TRANCE in action.
A columnist for National Review, of all places, is worried to death about the demographic collapse of Europe. In the last issue, he noted that a mainline British scientific group had made it official: it recommended that Europeans have NO children. The column writer said it was astonishing that official sources were now stating the inevitable logic they had been moving toward for so long. Sterility is now official policy.
The Zero Population Growth of the 1970s, of which Soylent Green was a symptom, is now Zero Population. That specific report pointed out that an Ethiopian child would produce less than one half percent of the carbon emissions that a first world child would. Third worlders, said the report, should be left to produce the children.
Like the Mantra, this is a matter of something becoming so obvious writers cannot help but write about it. Like the Mantra, respectable conservatives will do anything to dance around the actual basis of these all-too-obvious facts, these elephants in the living room.
The obvious fact is that in order to remove the white man’s consciousness of race which ruled in the 1930s, social engineering had to declare total war. Total war means incidental destruction. In a seventy-year campaign to get white men to cheer when a pygmy marries a beautiful blond, the whole of his nature had to be attacked. The whole business of producing children is based on a prejudice deep in our animal soul: the desire to procreate and perpetuate our own kind.
The whole desire to procreate our own kind is now a Hitlerite obsession, not a natural drive. Conservative Catholics loved the attack on this his instinct when it just said that one should ignore reproducing one’s own kind and consider all marriages holy if a pedophile in a dress the right words in a dead language. But you can’t attack anything this basic drive without turning off the drive to produce one’s own kind without striking at the basis of life itself.
I get so SICK of discussions about THE races!
Whenever anyone discusses race relations, they are not talking about what should be done in “the world.” ALL talk about immigration and integration applies only to WHITE countries. So “assimilation” only means integration INSIDE white countries.
And no one, NO ONE, ever SAYS that. When we put this point in Pat Buchanan’s discussions, it gets wiped, much less anybody else’s.
We are, in fact, dealing entirely with the destruction of the white race, which is what nobody in respectable life dares say out loud.
So it is our moral duty to say it out loud. But don’t use familiar language, use the Mantra.
The reason the Mantra is so effective today is because we can SEE its reality. In the 1950s when integration was aimed by its promoters at the ultimate end of white existence, it seems to be alarmism. But now it is OBVIOUS. Which is why it cannot be mentioned. Its discussion was allowed when it could be pooh-poohed. But today it is so obvious it must be suppressed, ONCE IT IS MENTIONED.
I don’t believe in conspiracies per se. That is partly because when people think exactly alike it is natural to think they are in cahoots. But every college graduate has been indoctrinated so that he understands exactly how he is to react in every case. A graduate of the Sorbonne and a graduate of Harvard will appear to be in a conspiracy, but they are much more like zombies. And leftist zombies create rightist zombies. Liberal reaction to any EFFECTIVE dissent is to declare the person making that dissent “unrespectable.”
So, if one is to make a LIVING at being a RESPECTABLE conservative, one does not need to be part of a conspiracy. He knows what will not be tolerated, or he would not be a professional.
If you don’t use the Mantra, you are respectable, Which is worse than a crime. You are worse than a Communist. You are what makes absurdity and evil POSSIBLE.
When I was coming up, “modern” meant industrial. One writer said, “It is as modern as Marx, as up-to-date as the Webbs.” Fifty years later, I have to explain that the latter were the upper class founders of the old British Labor Party.
Back then, the whole world was going to live in the middle of big cities because that was where the jobs would be. People would live where they work.
In fact, millions of blacks and PRs went downtown as workers moved to the suburbs to get welfare. In the next New Age, people moved to where they could NOT WORK most profitably. When the suburban and inner city trends became “inevitable,” of course, THAT pattern broke down.
As a religion, Political Correctness has to have its own Inevitable Future, its good god called “Change” or “Progress” and its Hell and Devils residing in “reaction” or racism. Political Correctness is derived from our other religions, so this follows naturally. The problem is that other religions were able to make promises in the afterlife. You believe, you pay for the church, you obey rules set, and you avoid Hell. But Hell is always put off into the unprovable period after you are dead, where no one can PROVE it one way or another.
The Western conflict between science and religion was absolutely unique in history. No other society had produced a science separate from its established religion. Even then, had the church stuck to its doctrine of punishment or reward after death. there would have been no conflict. But the church claimed Genesis as scientific truth. One thing the church had to be taught, over and over, was not to stick its doctrines in areas where they are subject to proof or disproof or they would be chopped off with a lot of pain to the church.
Evangelical Christianity was growing by leaps and bounds when it, unlike the Modern churches, kept its serious religion for the afterlife. Now that it is pushing anti-evolution and a fertilized egg should be allowed to vote, its growth has stopped in the first world.
Marxism and its product Political Correctness put EVERYTHING into this world. It is based on the Inevitables of History, and every inevitable Marx and his followers came up with has turned out, over and over and over and over, to be sillier than the Church versus Galileo.
You can’t see this if you look for complications. Like Genesis, the failures of Marxism are with where you START not where you finish. Stalin used Lysenko to declare that, since Marxism will remake the world entirely by planning the world, the laws of genetics did not apply. The result for Soviet agriculture were what those who did not share the Communist religion would have expected. You can’t make summer wheat into winter wheat by freezing it.
As with the Mantra, Political Correctness deals with SIMPLY insanity for a while by complicating it: “You are just being simplistic by labeling Comrade Lysenko’s doctrines that way,” and then, like the Catholic Church with Galileo, just never mentioning it again.
The process is the same as any other church. First you bring forward your Authorities. A lot of people go to huge pain and face oppression to overthrow the Doctrine. Then it denies that Political Correctness said such a thing. Anyone who brings up Lysenko or Galileo is being “simplistic” and “insulting.”
Established religion is allowed to make the same mistake over and over because no one reminds them of the earlier ones. Respectable conservatives have made an industry of forgetting that Marxism is just SILLY. Making a tame opposition part of the establishment. It was a coalition of Sadducees and Philistines and so forth who crucified Jesus.
Our job is not a new one. It is the old one that those who valued truth over the establishment has always had. It now and ever shall be as long as Authority is used against reality.
I was in the University of South Carolina Student Senate, the student council, in 1962 when Saint John the Kennedy sent the Army in to enforce integration at the University of Mississippi. I wanted to introduce a resolution giving our backing to Mississippi, but for once I couldn’t decide, aka, I didn’t have the guts.
So we are not all as brave as the commenters on Brian’s article on professorial genocide seem to think we are. Some of us wouldn’t find it easy to be ALONE in class against the professor and her thugs.
It takes infinitely more moral courage to fight it out with a professor for our cause than it does for a hundred thousand men to hit the beach at Normandy WITH EACH OTHER.
Contrary to every Wordist dogma, we are a hardwired social animal. You can’t just make us over by writing a book.
As a former prof, let me assure you that there is nothing easier than being a bully from the front of the class. No student EVER wins a debate with a prof. A few of you have put the Mantra in newsgroups and you see how easy it is to cut it or change the subject or just declare the subject is closed.
It takes guts to face a roomful of people. It takes super guts to face a ROOMFUL of hostile people.
In Bob’s last book, he wanted one thing from college students and that was to start giving their professors a hard time.
I have an English composition professor straight out of the murky bowels of California, and to call this woman anything less than fanatically PC would be the understatement of the century. Lately she has been using her bully pulpit to make comments disparaging of those who don’t fall in line with her PC group think.
The past week we were reading pieces of literature with the theme of race. On our final piece we assembled into groups of five and lazily mulled over the material. About twenty or so minutes wasted we discuss what conclusions our group has come to. This time she made a comment saying that there won’t be world peace until everyone hurries up and intermixes.
I piped up and told her that was genocide. She tried to backstep out of that by saying that by saying genocide is a violent. I countered by quoting article 2 sections C and D of the ’48 conventions on genocide.
The other two white males in the class became her fiercest defenders. We went though many points and the following are the most memorable; Rome fell because it turned inwards, cultures need outside influences to survive, the founders designed the constitution so it could be modified to include everyone, the propositional state, that EVERYONE who was inside a colony was included in “for ourselves and our posterity,” race is a social construct, and finally what are white people anyway?
The professor looking frustrated tried to end the conversation but, I refused to give it up. However, when she stood before the class and admitted that she was for genocide, I stared at her slack jawed and allowed class to move on.
While I felt as if I had failed since I had gone off the genocide point, the greatest achievement was having the professor admit to supporting genocide. Go forth chaps and give academia the trouncing they deserve!
In “Servitude and Slavery” below, I referred to my own specialty in graduate economics, Public Choice:
“If libertarianism and its theoretical expression, Public Choice, can’t even explain why people vote it certainly cannot explain the rest of life.
Under pure Public Choice Theory, as all the experts in that field agree, no votes would occur, no public choices would be made. They admit they can’t doesn’t explain why people vote, but they don’t worry about that.”
If you do a straight Public Choice libertarian calculation on whether you should vote, you wouldn’t. The cost is going to the polling place and standing in line. And, if we are just talking about the benefit to you PERSONALLY of casting your ballot, what do you get for it? What is the real probability that your particular vote will affect YOU personally?
No pure libertarian would bother to vote. The reason we DO vote goes to the very fundamental error of libertarianism. Voters want to influence how their SOCIETY goes, not just to benefit themselves.
Like Marx and Rand everyone else Public Choice is still in the age when animals did not fight wars. All we have learned about the nature of all social animals has been completely missed.
In other words, Public Choice and libertarianism declare that LOYALTY has nothing to do with humans. The whole Wordist superstructure of libertarianism founders on that one point, just as “anti-racism” founders on the Mantra.
I sent this logic to someone in Public Choice. Remember that I said that the job of respectable conservatism is to miss the point while appearing to address it. The same is true of Public Choice. Our whole training was that of a professional knife thrower, to always MISS just right.
This person is NOT an anti-white. But his TRAINING is to miss the point. He saw what I said. one would vote at all. His reply to me will sound familiar to anyone who has ever actually WORKED with the Mantra.
He said that Public Choicers do still mention the point that if self-interest were the only basis of voting no one would vote at all. But that was ALL he addressed. What I wrote about loyalty might as well have been blank space. I wrote him again to remind him of it and he said I should pay attention to what HE said.
You have to USE the Mantra to understand this reaction. We have here a form of HYPNOTISM. A proposition that will undermine a whole world-view runs into this.
It is vital that you recognize this form of hypnotism. You cannot just “mention the logic of the Mantra.” No one will SEE the Mantra even when you first ram it down their throats. All of us who have fought it out know well that you simply CANNOT get onto other topics and that you cannot just “mention the logic.”
You must HIT THE TARGET again and again and again. In a week, even someone you have forced to face it will have HYPNOTICALLY forgotten it.
Let us go back to Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis. A friend of his died of a cut on his finger while he was doing a dissection for anatomy on an old corpse. Semmelweis looked at his friend’s symptoms and discovered that they were the same as those of “childbed fever” of which so many of the mothers and babies in his hospital died. Doctors in his hospital were doing dissections and then going straight to deliver babies without washing their hands.
It was obvious where the childbed fever was coming from.
Semmelweis explained it and explained it and explained it. The doctors replied that they were discussing childbed fever, just as my friend said they were DISCUSSING why people wouldn’t vote at all using Public Choice logic. They got him into discussions of Galen and Hippocrates. They talked about the Simplism of just washing your hands in carbolic acid. The moment he mentioned childbed fever they went off on their own tack.
Semmelweis’s deliveries were without the huge mortality rate theirs was. He was denounced as a monomaniac. In other words, they talked about everything but what he told them. They didn’t try his simplistic solution.. Hell, they didn’t even SEE it.
In the end Semmelweis won, but only after he died in a madhouse.
THAT is what we are facing. It is life and death, and “mentioning the Mantra” while you are going along with someone’s discussion won’t do the trick.
Don’t let them get away with murder. That is what you do when you allow anyone to talk about “mixing THE races.”
It allows them get away with genocide. They tell you that all the races are taking an equal part in this, that it is just “fair play.” It INFURIATES me when people let this go by while they recited the latest line.
One of our spokesmen was doing an interview and the interviewer mentioned that nobody was demanding that Japan take in immigrants. Our spokesman, however, was busy talking about what an Aristocrat he was and let it slide.
AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black Country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem? I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am ANAZIWHOWANTSTOKILLSIXMILLIONJEWS.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“ANTI-RACIST IS A CODE WORD FOR ANTI-WHITE.”
As Sam Dickson points out, he and I can remember time when immigrants were, believe it or not GRATEFUL. If you find this hard to believe, you will find it even harder to believe who they were grateful TO.
Immigrants were not grateful to a WHAT. They were grateful TO AMERICANS. This is almost forgotten example of the BASIC “We the People” that Dave pinpoints below.
Almost all of you have been raised in a time when immigrants are not grateful at all. The few who do see their being allowed to come, credit this to The System, to the Propositional State.
During the 1980 campaign Reagan asked us to make suggestions on the campaign. I alone, as usual, asked Rusher to tell Reagan to change to the We the People line. Up to then, like all conservatives, the ads had talked about how lucky you little people were to live under the SYSTEM, all hail the SYSTEM! In short, they were Wordist.
I, as usual alone, said we should talk about the American PEOPLE, how the PEOPLE were bringing America back to life. Those of you who may remember the campaign remember the result. The campaign managers took that idea and RAN with it. Reagan started his American Heroes campaign, showing people running up their flags and singling out regular people who did great things.
This was two decades before 9/11, and it succeeded like wildfire. Instead of stale discussion of institutions and history, it showed present-day Americans.
Until then, everybody in the campaign ignored the fact that Carter won in 1976 on a slogan of “We want to make America as good as its people are.”
Nobody ever got Inside-the-Beltway Fever as fast as Carter did when after 1976. Within a year he was bitching about how all our problems were the result of “a malaise among the American people.” Everybody remembered that switch-around three years later, because it was the first shot of Carter’s move to the standard Washington Left.
But in 1980 Republicans were running the standard “Gosh us little Americans are so LUCKY to be UNDER the INSTITUTIONS we have.” It was the Propositional State, presented to a public which had rejected Republicans for a man who talked about the goodness of the American PEOPLE and then switched gears.
I suggested we run on the winning platform of 1976.
It worked like a charm.
Today, so long as Americans allow us to be discredited by out racist past, and grovel and drool to this doctrine the way conservatives love to do, it will be All Hail to the Institutions, and the PEOPLE be damned. To turn things around they must get out there and demand what they mean by the word racist, which no conservative EVER does, and we have to point out that the destruction of our race, which they suspected was at the basis of liberal policy, turns out to be exactly where it is headed.
Our racist fathers were right. We ARE in danger.
You cannot join the chorus of self-hatred and get a revival going. The Mantra and We the People are inseparable.
Following in the footsteps of Bob, Lord Nelson and Adelheim with their radio shows; Horus, one of our silent members, and I are proud to introduce Follow the White Rabbit. He has spent a considerable amount of time on the creation of this pilot show and would dearly appreciate feedback.
Houris suggests that you listen to “White Rabbit Genocide” first.