Fighting involves only the most elementary kind of intelligence. It is all about basics. But is winning fights easy?

Here’s a revision of the Mantra based on this week’s comments:

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

The Netherlands is more crowded than Japan, Belgium is more crowded than Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve the RACE problem by bringing in millions of third-worlders and assimilating and intermarrying with them.

The words immigration, tolerance, and especially assimilation are being used to promote a program of genocide against the white race.

Everybody says the final solution to the RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to bring in the third world and assimilate and intermarry with non-whites.

All this immigration and intermarriage is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries.

This is genocide against the white race.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

Dave looked at why I had both the Netherlands and Belgium to balance Japan and Taiwan and did me one better, driving the point home in two short sentences which are punchier than my version.

I LIKE it!

The problem with doing Mantra Thinking kind of thinking is that the corrections seem so OBVIOUS. I now feel like an idiot for not noticing that people lapsed out when I came to the black man bit.

But the simple fact is that when you think this way, everything seems obvious IN RETROSPECT.

I keep repeating that the Mantra was years of work, and that it is long because I have to anticipate arguments because you only get one shot. I did that for a reason. It wasn’t just bragging and bitching. I have gotten a bit gun shy about bragging and bitching since Pain and Simmons started calling me on it.

But I was hoping someone would look carefully and see what arguments the new Mantra version cuts out. The black business was aimed at making the point again which was already made in the rest of the Mantra, applying it to blacks. Only with GROUP experience was I informed that the cost of it far outweighed its benefits.

An author can never really edit his own work ALONE.

We also took out “anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews,” which was the one place where I got a laugh. But Dave’s version is so clean and so short (129 words) and so perfectly on track that any addition looks like it would weigh it down.

And of course in the few cases where you do get a second shot “anazxiwhowantstokillsixmillionjews” is a nice continuation of the theme.

I think that repetition is always good.

I also think that the reference to the Netherlands and Belgium being as crowded as Taiwan and Japan is very important.

I well remember that in my first introduction to the Mantra I was most influenced by the comparison of the Netherlands and Belgium to Taiwan and Japan.

Its logic is very powerful to anyone who has not considered the asymmetry of the standards of Political Correctness between white and nonwhite nations.

Black nationalism is a reality, Chinese nationalism is a reality, Japanese nationalism is a reality. These things need to be stressed.

********************

 

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third-worlders and assimilating and intermarrying with them.

The words immigration, tolerance, and especially assimilation are being used to promote a program of genocide against the white race.

Everybody says the final solution to the RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to bring in the third world and assimilate and intermarry with all those non-whites.

All this immigration and intermarriage is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries.

This is about genocide against the white race.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

 

******************

Notice that I dropped some style conventions in the text such as “quote unquote” and “i.e.” because these are unnecessary to delivering a clear message.

Condensing the Mantra really isn’t the issue.

The enemies of the white race and particularly the anti-white white traitors need to know that there are people who are intent upon bringing them to justice.

Right!

I also think the discussion of the black got off the subject.  I believe that if the Mantra stayed on the same subject, as Dave does here, I would not have lost Shank.

Shall we make this our new Mantra?

The question mark means it’s a question.  A question  is a request for an ANSWER.  BUGS is no longer just Bob’s.

I like it and will give it a go.

One small suggestion:

Repeat: This is happening to ALL white countries and ONLY white countries.

– woundednietzsche

good suggestion!

I added it.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

The words immigration, tolerance, and especially assimilation are being used to promote a program of genocide against the white race.

Everybody says the final solution to the RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to bring in the third world and “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

This is not about culture, this is about RACE.

Repeat: “ALL white countries and ONLY white countries.

Anti-racist has become a code word for anti-white.

Repeat, all this immigration and intermarriage is for “EVERY white country and ONLY white countries”

The most important thing to remember about the Mantra is that it refers to what is in reality very serious crimes.

The most serious crimes are not against the law. It flummoxes me how few people realize what a huge issue this is in life.

We need to separate out what we are doing with the Mantra.

It can’t be about winning an argument, because the subject matter is far too serious for that. The Mantra isn’t meat for a debating society. It is about the most serious crimes being committed against the white race.

And if it is about fighting, keep in mind that winning fights involve the most elementary form of intelligence. The real issue is when to fight.

If you know how to win fights, then your posture must be forbearance, forbearance, forbearance. Never run after a combat, for the result you seek will most assuredly run away. But if you wait (and wait and wait and wait) the right opportunity for attack may present itself in way where there is no question that the right time has arrived to attack.

I think of this as natural cadence.

The American military could never comprehend what I just said. When you structure yourself for a combat, it is imperative that you abandon that structure for actual combat. That’s because winning a fight involves the most elementary form of intelligence. You miss this intelligence if you do not understand that you must not do what you are structured to do because what you are structured to do is an Achilles heel.

The American military screws up again, again, and again on this count. It is so dependent on its Lincoln Log House structure for combat that it can only carry the combat it is structured to carry out. That’s a formula for defeat if there ever was one, no matter how small or large the scale of operation. This is as true for police operations and military operations as it is for gang fighting and ordinary street fighting too.

It is a universal principle that winning fights involve the most elementary form of intelligence. People who don’t know how to fight never understand this. That is why the martial arts are so big. The worst thing is the world you can do is pretending that fighting is a martial art. If you think that, you don’t understand anything.

Winning fights involves only the most elementary form of intelligence.

The Mantra is about serious crimes. Keep that in mind.

– Dave

When I wrote the long Mantra, it was in a vacuum on white genocide. Now that Pat Buchanan has written Death of the West and editorials on the end of the white race, it may be that a lot of people are sufficiently familiar with the concept that the following short Mantra might be useful:

******************

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

The words immigration, tolerance, and especially assimilation are being used to promote a program of genocide against the white race.

Everybody says the final solution to the RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to bring in the third world and “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

This is not about culture, this is about RACE.

Repeat: “ALL white countries and ONLY white countries.

Anti-racist has become a code word for anti-white.

Reperat, all this immigration and intermarriage is for “EVERY white country and ONLY white countries ”

******************

The reason there is a question mark up there in the title is that I am ASKING you about this.

You are well on your way to becoming pros, so I don’t have to warn you about fiddling with something that WORKS.

On other hand, I am desperate to improve what we have. This is serious business, and and I need your input.

In the days of the muzzle loaders, they used to say you had to shoot straight because you might not get a second chance. The long Mantra is the perfect ONE-SHOT weapon. My mistake was reciting the WHOLE Mantra to Shank in a place where I HAD ALL THE SHOTS I WANTED..

The Mantra is the product of years of practice. I know exactly how they are going to dodge their way out of it. The long Mantra is undodgeable. But that is because it fills all the holes at one time:

1) It stops discussion of any other subject for a moment. It demands and takes full attention and interrupts to flow of conversation.

2) I SPECIFICALLY explains why this is GENOCIDE. That requires REPETITION.

3) It is altogether RACIAL. The biggest lie today is the respectable conservatives changing the subject to something called “white CULTURE” which any black supposedly is able to LEARN. The specific subject of racial intermarriage MUST be addressed UP FRONT, especially if you only get one shot..

If you give them the slightest opportunity, they will come back with “assimilation” and “culture.”

The long Mantra was carefully developed for the one shot we normally get.

In the Shank interview, I had a near-perfect Mantra for a single shot because normally we are lucky to get ONE shot in. But I have not developed the Mantra strategy for an EXCHANGE.

Prometheus and Lord Nelson show more expertise at an “Exchange Mantra,” which I now realize Sharo was aiming at, than I do.  I LEARN from your criticism.

This is a seminar. You are here to do what Lord Nelson and Prometheus and backbaygrouch are doing, to hone your OWN skills. If the professor can’t learn from students, it is NOT a SEMINAR.

We are not here just to learn Bob’s Expertise and upchuck it at exam time. I am training PROS.

I was very happy with the comments on “The Annotated Mantra.”

All of them sounded like people who approach this as a JOB OF WORK. I can only say that I felt like I was in the middle of a bunch of PROS.

This is the product of YEARS of interaction which I have never tried before. Which NOBODY has ever tried before.

The reason is simple enough. Those who learned the trade in what AFKAN calls “Movement Past” still live in a world I remember intimately. All means of communication were blocked. All you had were low-budget publications and face-to-face discussions.

Face-to-face discussion was excellent practice, and I used it literally thousands of times. I honed my skills at it.

I learned decades of lessons in power strategy and how to communicated, and I got PAID for it. But the one thing I could not tell others about was how to USE this experience for OUR cause.

On the subject of race, I could not COMMUNICATE to others what I LEARNED in face-to-face discussions and in the propaganda work at which I was a recognized professional. I also had no chance to try out my approaches outside the little world of people I talked with.

Before the Internet there was no chance to form a TEAM like BUGS.

It is no wonder we are NEW. The opportunity, the world of commununications, is new.

It is not easy for someone who spent decades in movement past to keep plugging away at the same old stand. Exactly the same thing happened in ninteenth century medicine. A lot of doctors kept killing patients with the old theories. That is undertandable, but it is not forgivable.

If what we are doing were not a matter of life or death, we could be patient and understanding.

Inside the movement a lot of people are talking about Jews, a lot of people talk about race, others tout other strategies. But they don’t field test them and report. But we are the ONLY group which is dedicated to finding out what WORKS out in the field, in face-to-face and Internet communications and on what discussion shows we can book.

We constantly hear defeatists talking about our failure to communicate, but nobody but BUGS STUDIES COMMUNICATION ITSELF. Nobody but BUGS has EVER dropped worrying about whether I have been insulted or whether there can be quibble with what I am saying, but instead concentrated entirely on how to CONVINCE people of the truth in a brainwashed world.

BUGS is Doing its absolutely unique job.

As usual, once we’ve done it everybody will say they knew it all along.

I boiled the Mantra down to fit into comment sections that limit posts to 500 characters some time back. That is a very restrictive standard. Yet I managed to increase the scope, maybe unwisely. Perhaps someone can get it back on tract and yet add no more characters than are removed. Here it is, cut to bone.Anti-racists say Asians & Africans must have their lands but white lands must have open borders. Crowded Asia can exclude. more crowded Eurpoe is racist to exclude..Anti-racists say white blood must be mixed while Black, Yellow & Jewish blood must be pure. This is genocide against Christain Whites. Anti-racist is code for anti-White

– backbaygrouch

My problem with Stormfront is that I am dealing with people who have not succeeded in convincing people. That can only be learned by DOING.

Every time I try to get a point about CONVINCING people across, I get tangled up with someone who says, “Well, what I say is TRUE.”

Of course what we are saying is TRUE. We are in the weird position of trying to find ways to convince people of simple reality. But our PROBLEM is not to learn simple realities, those we have by the bushel. Our problem is with the CONVINCING part.

As above. backbaygrouch was faced with the problem of a five hundred unit limit on what he posted. You can’t put the International Jewish Conspiracy into five hundred spaces. I gave backbaygrouch the Mantra, and he used it to fit into the spaces.

But ALL of us face the same limitation backbaygrouch faced here. If practice makes perfect, I SHOULD be almost perfect after fifty years of doing this, including professionally. But as one commentator pointed out, I flunked the test in the Peter Shank interview. I lost his attention reciting the full Mantra.

No, I am not being hard on myself. The average Stormfronter, not having had to DO what backbaygrouch and I have DONE, would be insulted if I said he had flunked a test.

That is because he is not aware of how HARD these tests are, how ADVANCED these tests are. This is right out there in the heat of battle, and if you think you are perfect you are badly misled. I need commentators to tell me when I don’t come up to snuff.

My point is that this is the most serious business there is AND that it is HARD WORK.

Stormfronters are satisfied when what they say is true and they have SAID it. The last thing on their minds is whether they GOT THE POINT ACROSS. But what the hell good is a weapon that fires beautifully but never HITS anything?

I think that is a major key to failure on our side: People are anxious; to tell the truth but they don’t have [practice in DRIVING THE TRUTH HOME.

How can you tell people this outside of BUGS? I would have to say, “I’ve been there. I’ve DONE that.” I sound like a supercilious bully.

But now that YOU’VE been there and members of BUGS have done that, maybe we can work out a way to make this point clear without people getting insulted by it.

I just spent ten minutes for the comment that inspired this. Someone pointed out that Shank lost interest as I repeated ALL of the Mantra.

Others have mentioned this. But I didn’t want to touch the Mantra until you became USED to USING it. You aren ow aware that “making a pioint” and GETTING IT ACROSS are two entirely different things.

The length of the thing, IN PRACTICE, is to stop somebody cold and make them see what you are saying. One sentence can’t do that. There has to be a delay or the conversation will go on from the point before yours.

Now let’s go into the Mantra to see if we can’t 1) Hit home and 2) Shorten it CREATIVELY.

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

( This IS the Mantra in short form. Maybe now that we have this, the long form can be cut back.)

“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”

“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

(How would it be if we cut it off here?)

“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”

“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”

“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”

“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

http://whitakeronline.org

http://www.nationalsalvation.net/

We are opening the new book on race. Kennedy is speaking to a group of useful idiots whose only bright spot in the future is that the feminists and the atheists preceeded them into oblivion from the Democratic party. Even the jews are abandoning the “party of color” in dribs and drabs because the average jew is seen as the uberwhite.

What is interesting is from news sources it seems three drug addicts with prison nazi tattoos were arrested in Denver. As of now there is no feeding frenzy of a witch hunt for whites in general, but that is certainly possible. I would hazard a wild guess that the DNC is conducting polling to see how extreme the witch hunt for “racists” can go, our first loyalty test so to speak. The opportunities for Mantra would grow exponentially in a loyalty test enviroment.

— Simmons

Pat Buchanan is the only one willing to say certain things and in a position to get away with it. The problem is he always lets you down in the end. With Pat, there is, literally, “No THERE there.”

Pat is the only national writer who dares talk about the end of the white race, but he ASKS if there is anything wrong with that. He does not say, I, Pat Buchanan, am a white man, so I, Pat Buchanan, say this is BAD.”

Any non-white could object to the diminishing size of his own group, but Pat can’t. Pat does not see himself as having any status as an individual white man. He sees himself as a part of something OBJECTIVE, which he vaguely calls The West. A thing is bad if the POPE says it’s bad. A thing is bad if you can quote the Bible or the Constitution or some Tradition as opposing it.

Pat cannot say anything is UGLY. It has to be OBJECTIVELY ugly, ugly in a sense he can get out of Aristotle or Lincoln.

That is why white people can’t have the same outlook as a human being: I object to the end of my race because it is MY race. Conservatives keep complaining that whites do not make the objections that any other race would make routinely, but they never ask why. One black conservative said in frustration, “Why can’t white people stand up for themselves?”

The reason they cannot stand up for themselves is because they are stuck back in the age when white people WERE the world. When the Founding Fathers talked about “all men are created equal” they would have laughed out loud if someone had said, “You mean the Australian aborigines, the blacks, the Chinese?”

They would have laughed because talk about Asia or Australia had nothing to do with the PRACTICAL world of Philadelphia in the middle of a war in 1776. In that tense situation, with everyman there facing death, a person who brought up, “Does that include Chinese?” or “Why not animals, too?” would have been committed.

Conservatives consider themselves as part of “The West,” in which they and certain non-whites who bathe regularly and went to the right schools belong. Pat is, above all else, a good Catholic. He is free to object to any diminution of the Catholic population, but not of the white population.

In the real world today, no leftist cliché is as deadly to our racial survival as the Mantra of conservatism:

“It is not about race, it about CULTURE.”

I feel as alone as those last two members of the meerkat tribe felt when someone is ASTONISHED to realize that someone who runs something called Chronicles of Culture has finally realize that he is a deadly enemy of the white RACE. I had that discussion with Tom Fleming a quarter of a century ago, and I predicted this was where he was going.

He insisted that people who try to defend the West would get around to giving a place to the white race, too. He insisted that the BOOKS which supposedly made The West were indispensable. I said that if the race is there, the books are merely their byproduct. Do you see where he ended up and where I ended up?

I told him that over A QUARTER OF A CENTURY ago!

Pat talks about “The Death of the West” and then he talks about the end of the white RACE. Then he can’t say he is a white man with a white man’s feelings. All that matters is what the Pope WRITES ex cathedra. All that matters are some “traditional values” that spring from BOOKS.

The death of Pat Buchanan’s and Tom Fleming’s “West” is long overdue.

Lord Nelson and I just finished a program with Truck Roy. We talked about the mantra and the fact that all anti-racist arguments always leads towards white genocide.

I think it will be aired next weekend. Lord Nelson or I will let you know.

I hope some of you are able to listen to it and give some feedback.

But now that we’re talking about it, I would like to add something about Bob’s open activism. It’s interesting that liberals never use Bob’s life long dedication to ending white genocide as a smear against Reagan? The media could “expose” the fact that Bob worked in the Reagan administration and also discuss his writings on race. They could “prove” that Reagan was a “racist.” I also noticed that the ADL doesn’t have much to say about Bob.

The reason for this is simple. It’s more dangerous for them smearing Bob, because then his ideas might get out. It’s better for our enemies that they show lots of pictures of Nazis but not talk about people like Bob.

I think this is important. In fact, if ever I did become more public with the issue of race, I’d want it to be like Bob. It says something when people consider your ideas so dangerous that they don’t even smear you because your name might get out.

– Z

You are SO right about why they don’t attack me. I think your point is immediately accepted by all those who have seen how astonishingly effective the Mantra is but you brought it out SPECIFICALLY.

People stop talking. They stop talking about me. But they NEVER take me on. I have made this point a number of times, but no one before has seen it as clearly as you express it here. And it may be the most important thing about me for BUGS.

As you see so clearly, they can’t discuss me without quoting things I want them to quote. They want me hushed up, because once anyone starts looking into what I am saying, even because it is scandal, my deadly points begin to spread out.

It is what another brilliant comment here referred to as “poise.” After all these years in battle, I have learned to take whatever is said and make the point I WANT to make. This is a HARD discipline to learn.

And the ONLY reason YOU would spend the effort of HARD work like this is if it is EFFECTIVE. You have seen how the Mantra is almost magical this way. Z’s insight shows again how effective this whole discipline, this poise, is. The other side can’t deal with me because everything I say has been boiled down to the point where it, like the Mantra, is dynamite.

As Z points out, it doesn’t matter whether they make me famous or notorious. Either way, they are LOST. This is the demonstration of the fact that the discipline I am trying to inculcate here is EFFECTIVE.

You aren’t here to worship at Bob’s altar or to learn “Correct” thought as in grammar and grad school or to find out how to “win” an argument or to find out how to look good. You are here to learn something EFFECTIVE to use in power politics.

This is not bragging. It is explaining why I DO this.

Good call, Z!

I’m trying the idea chain at freerepublic. Been there for years bounced once for “racism” many years ago. Not an open forum by any means and I hold no illusions that one day its front page will print the Mantra. I had one phrase make it up to national cable news when it counted and I started it there so the place is not totally wordist useless.

One thing it has become is a rightwing bloggers training ground. There is the target group, mostly wordist but highly competitive for those few scraps that exist for them, therefor more fertile territory for us than writing letters up the chain to say the Jewish National Review.

Now what exactly are they useful for, the diabolical plan to cleave up the left and separate the white libs from the FCCs. Who opposes this, mainstream conservative opinion of two camps the neo-cons who rely on the power straddle they share with their jew brethren and the Limbaughs who rely on the huddled masses for their master to protect them from the librul monolith of doom (send money today).

With the libs cleaved up and reduced to a simpler less effective machine I expect the right to have to rearrange its batteries of field guns. Now more than likely they will turn them in our direction but that is where the Mantra comes in frontally.

Anyway my effort is to introduce the next set of questions into the debate the ones that take apart the left’s cults.

– Simmons

Pain and Simmons are doing what I REALLY like to see. They came back from a fight giving each other hell, but that is because we haven’t had enough of the reports from the front they are providing.

They are coming back from the fight we have been talking about with Tom Fleming and his crew. As ALWAYS happens at least once when comrades go into a fight, one comes back feeling the other has let him down.

This is part of the process of fighting together. But take it from an old warrior, what is really important here is that, for the first time, we have two of our number coming back and saying how THEY WERE OR WERE NOT BACKED UP rightly.

Please understand what I am saying here. We now have a genuine REPORT FROM THE FRONT in joint action. I cannot TEACH this. Read Pain’s attack on Simmons and Simmons’ reply.

Simmons makes sense, and he is talking strategy. Pain may or not accept Simmons’ version, but there is none of the “Oh, GOD! My comrade didn’t back me up so I’m going to take my marbles and go homer!” crap out of Pain. It sounds insulting to me for me to even MENTION that attitude in connection with Pain, but Pain should forgive me for mentioning it because it shows you the kind of people I have had to deal with.

For fifty years, instead of being a COACH FOR FIGHTERS like Pain and Lord Nelson and Simmons and Prometheus I have had to put on a Mommy skirt and pacify the kids. If I didn’t one of them would cry that I was not backing him up and go off and sulking

When warriors some back sweating from a real fight, they don’t always tell each other what fine jobs they did. I don’t know about regular trained military coordination in today’s regular army. I am used to some guys coming back saying to each other, “I WAS STUCK OVER THERE GETTING SHOT AT FROM THREE SIDES. WHERE THE F*** WERE YOU?”

But out in the middle of nowhere you didn’t have a soldier whining, “Well, if people won’t back up, I’ll just take my weapons and go home.”

I have overcome my indoctrination by the self-styled Greatest Generation. The battle to get the Mantra into the mainstream is a thousand times more important than some firefight out on the ass-end of nowhere. I only did that as a cover for intelligence work.

It’s WEIRD. The last thing a man engaged in a firefight would do is some back and whine and threaten to quit because somebody didn’t back him up. But here, where it counts, I spent my time trying to calm down the kids and dealing with “ALL IS LOST!” crap.

It is SUCH a relief to see Pain and Simmons come back sweating and bitching and arguing about how to handle things.

If Knute Rockne could always tell his players which one was right and which one was wrong, I’m no Knute Rockne. If a player depends entirely on his coach in high school he is not going to make it in college ball, because the coach won’t be there.

YOU have to DO it. You have to WORK IT OUT with each other. That is the major part of what I mean by reports from the front. This is a SEMINAR, not grammar school. You have to get out there, DO it, and then work discuss how each of YOU performed without the ultimatums.

After all my years of wiping the prima donnas’ noses — and other parts – I am finally getting a chance to work with people who can get on the front and report from the front.

Pain gets credit for putting Fleming to flight.

But I really enjoyed that exchange between Pain and Simmons. Without that sort of exchange on who does what in a TEAM effort, we will severely handicapped in future.

We are reinventing the Moot. “Reinventing” means I am not sure WHAT we are doing. So when I make a judgment call, PLEASE don’t take offense or apologize to me.

That is why I need you to USE General Comments. I said that I like discussion between you, but on the other hand I get uncomfortable when the discussion goes off on one of the very sidetracks I am trying to get you to avoid.

If your comment is not addressed to my point, please take it to General Comments.

In fact, when someone mentions a book or an author, and somebody addresses that book and author, it is time for you to say, “Out of COURTESY to Bob, let’s take this to General Comments.”

The Moot has the basic problem of human, individual thinking. What I say is SUPPOSED to make you think in all kinds of directions. On the other hand what I address can be INTERRELATED. And, like the Mantra, it is a matter of DISCIPLINE. Discussing Fitzschuler’s latest book may be on your mind, but calling it a specific “Comment” is not the place for it.

It is a matter of simple courtesy for you to continue your talks in General Comments the moment they are no longer comments on the specific point made.

This is not an easy call. Which is why it is good exercise.

I have been to where many a Great Civilization has fallen. In every single one of them, as in the Mantra, the skin at its height had been white. The people are now BROWN.

The Genome Project keeps trying to prove that all men are equal. I spent my youth fighting exactly the same “final proof” that all races had equal innate IQs. It was just as authoritative and just as universal. No way I’ll fall for that twist on the facts again.

They report what fits. What doesn’t fit doesn’t get published.

History is a series of Northern Invasions. In the World History course there is another Northern Invasion, like the Doric Greeks, and another civilization rises and then turns brown and falls.

Any animal that can hold its territory has minimum coloration. It is lion CUBS who have the protective coloration. Animals depend on strength or blending into the background.

DON’T MIX THIS POINT UP WITH PROTECTIVE COLORATION. The above sentence is an intro: white skin shows that one has developed in an area which requires no protective coloration. Europe is what I call The Genetic High Ground. It is NOT miserably cold, we are not Ice People.

White people are those who conquer the genetic high ground and then spread out, invade, to take over brown slave cultures. This is what history shows.

There is a facet of poise (that Robert Whitaker excels at) that is of critical importance, and that is noticing what others do not.There are other facets of poise (excellent performance under pressure) that can be taught, but only with hard training supplemented by real world experience. This is the focus of America’s elite combat teams such as the Navy Seals.

Also, any fire fighter who has not learned poise is going to end up getting burnt. And any police officer that has not learned poise is going to end up involved in unnecessary violence.

But the core of poise, the real essence of it, is noticing what others do not.

It is a special kind of capability that focuses on mental and visual acuity and it goes beyond racial politics and its effective response. Instead, it is almost a “marital art”.

For what is Asia’s absurd obsession with badges of status other than a form of ignorance masking a society in a low state of development and a people who lack poise?

And what is Political Correctness, if it is not that very same ignorance and low state of development?

No one ever tells our school children that being intelligent is a requirement, not an elective, and it is a requirement not of the academic credit granting authority, but of the larger nature surrounding us, a nature that punishes ignorance and stupidity without fail and without mercy.

Learning this special kind of poise is what BUGS is all about, and focusing on it will furnish white nationalism its competitive advantage.

Accordingly, it is what white nationalism should strive to develop and organize itself around.

– Dave

This is a very acute observation.

Consider Dave’s general term poise and look at disciplining oneself to use the Mantra. If you do not have poise, you will go chasing off into any subject the other side brings up that interests or might make you look good with all your knowledge of it.

If you can be lured off that way, you are like any person who can be conned. There’s one born every minute.

Someone who is not a sucker has two questions about any product: “How much does it cost, and what can it do that I want done?”

And the most important word a person seeking poise can add:

PERIOD.

When you think of a person who has poise, you think of someone who has no “pressure of speech.” A poised person is not uncomfortable insisting on a reply. If you keep insisting on keeping talking off the subject, he is perfectly comfortable answering your nothing with silence. The ONLY reply a poised person will give is to remind the bullshitter of what the question was.

Poise is an EXCELLENT term for our approach.

Thanks, Dave!

http://www.theage.com.au/world/drastic-rise-in-japans-migrant-intake-urged-20080616-2rkl.html?page=1A group of 80 politicians from the ruling Liberal Democratic Party has called for a drastic increase in the ratio of immigrants in Japan to 10% of the population

Prometheus says:
Of course, no anti-racists has ever proposed this as a solution for Japan. No anti-racist has ever demanded Japan take in the third world, but every anti-racist states that they would have no problem with a non-white race or nation becoming multiracial.

They ignore the racial aspect of demographic change in Fiji and Tibet, but liberalism can’t keep pretending it is race neutral forever. They can get away with ignoring the demise of whites, but can they get away with supporting the demise of a non-white race? Can they get away with not saying anything in their defense?

If in the future non-whites get up and demand EXACTLY what we demand for our race, what will our faithful anti-whites do?

– Prometheus

Prometheus and I were doing our act in Opposing Views when an anti-white tried to answer the Mantra by pointing out that a lot of oil-rich Arab countries were importing non-Arab labor. Instead of going into the obvious economics and so forth here, i just shoved their noses in the Mantra again.

As Prometheus expands on it here, the key word in the Mantra is DEMANDS. A Japanese political party may PROPOSE immigration, but EVERY RACE demands that EVERY white country and ONLY white countries ALL import AND ASSIMILATE, something no Moslem country is asked to do.

Before you answer THEM go back to OUR basics. Before you answer them get a handle on what they are REALLY saying.

Hit them at the ROOTS and

STAY ON MESSAGE.