Archive for category Mantra

Chewing the Mantra Cud

I mentioned that most people are puzzled when I point out that the wheel is not, contrary to the usual statement, “since the invention of the wheel,” a common or an early invention. But the comic strip BC is constantly using the wheel among its joke-like primitive people as The sign of the very first thing invented.

BC like all humor depends on what people assume and know about. Everyone here has had the agonizing experience of explaining a joke someone does not understand.

BC shows that the wheel has not only to be cliché but a cliché everyone gets immediately.

Most of us also have had the experience of listening to a language we understand imperfectly. You begin to miss Americans or even freaking limeys when you spend a long time in a foreign language environment.

A lot of people speak English, but no one around you speaks it well enough so you can make puns or any kind of relaxed conversation.

We have a fluency here with the Mantra and Mommy Professor and other concepts that makes it infinitely easier to talk.

This is what I trip over when I mention the “as old as the invention of the wheel” concept, not that I can’t explain it, but the whole point is that everyone takes “since the invention of the wheel” so routinely they laugh at it in BC, but they have to have it explained to them when it is brought out.

The day will come when everyone will laugh at those ridiculous gray stone “classical buildings” in Washington. But we are still at the phase where we have to explain what they already know, that all those “sculptures” and “classical buildings” are based on pure ignorance.

It is heavy work slowly explaining to the DUHH chorus that assimilation is only aimed at the white race. It is heavy work explaining to those who laugh at BC the reason why they laugh at it.

And after you have done all that work, they are not FLUENT at it. It took a long time to get the assumptions we have.

But once you begin to get these across in the age of the Internet, it is amazing what people will think of when the seed is planted. The present effort at genocide takes a lot of explaining, but once it is thought about, even subconsciously, people will realize that it is no more abstract than a concentration camp.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Comments

We are at the Spark Stage

Every now and then I am delighted to see concentrated discussions of action on the Mantra. But they’ve died out. What I am getting now is musings on the world in general. There are worse things than stimulating thought, most of it highly literate, but it isn’t our WAR.

I can’t tell what you are doing out in the real world of if you don’t report on it. Gator said I should give an assignment each week. Gator, no one takes my “assignments.” I begged BUGSers for months to simply put good BUGS entries on Stormfront, just copy and paste, and the only person who did it was Brain, who already has too much to do.

Gator put the Mantra out and said so. He seems to be almost unique lately. I am sure our old solid group, like Lord Nelson, are out there doing it but they don’t REPORT it.

There is, of course, the problem that I am almost blind here. I had to bitched and complained to Gator that I couldn’t FIND his piece at the link he gave. All I cold see was the title and the statement that there were 14 comments on it, then it listed other topics.

I finally SCROLLED DOWN and found the whole thing and the comments. Gator assumed I would naturally do that in the first place. When someone is as dense as I am in these things, there’s not a hell of a lot Gator or anybody else can do for me.

But Bob is your main instrument here. Don’t feel sorry for yourself. I have to face the fact that Bob is all I have. I used to tell my wife, “If you think putting up with me is bad, try BEING ME for a while.”

I got her sympathy with that one!

As for giving assignments, I can only quote General Lee: “I cannot get my orders carried out.” If General Lee had that problem, you can’t expect this lesser Robert to handle it. Gator got fourteen comments, and SO FAR, he has found a forum where his Mantra has not been wiped out. This gave him a chance to make a FURTHER comment on the replies.

We have not had much chance to talk about comments because the Mantra is usually wiped out almost immediately. This illustrates my point: I am almost dead blind here. I don’t know how many discussions are going on that I don’t hear about. And this is vital to me.

Gator says 11 of the 14 comments probably came from BUGS people. But folks like to PLAY with their screen names. It seems to be considered cute. So one commenter uses several names here, and the comments there were under several names. Where does that leave ME or anybody lese trying to analyze replies?

Please consider my position when you get cute with screen names. In this case they may have been necessary to make two comments instead of one in one name.

But not one commenter SAID he got in there!

I’m BLIND here, gang!

But I was DELIGHTED to see that in those Gator comments our folks grabbed onto the “You are justifying genocide line, which is the second punch in discussing Mantra, and HELD onto it.

If 11 of the comments were from us, that has its encouraging side. They did it RIGHT. When you are forming your first team as we are, getting it RIGHT is critical to your coach.

We are lighting a fire. Modern men have a hard time with lighting a fire without matches because they are used to just flipping a lighter. Doing it from scratch is a LONG process. We have come a long way in igniting a fireplace, but when it comes to lighting the kind of fire we are doing, the old process is still there.

In history books the process of forming an idea and then making it knows looks quick, “Thirty years later, it was common knowledge.” When you are reading a history books, thirty years doesn’t impress you. But every single one of those years was REAL and SLOW to those living it.

I have hit and hit and hit and finally I have a tiny spark. It takes forever to create a tiny spark, and then you have to puff and not blow to keep it going, to keep from killing it. That is when you are trying to start a campfire.

We are changing the WORLD.

In fact it is the difficulties we have that demonstrated that we are trying to do something that big. At this stage, I am more than happy to see a few of us get it RIGHT.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

20 Comments

PC Hypnosis

At least half of the environmental disasters today are NOT the result of greed. They come from environmental Idealism. This is recorded but never MENTIONED in an endless string of documentaries.

How many times have you seen a documentary saying that some animal has gotten out of hand, and it was originally imported to take care of some other imbalance? But the documentary makers do not NOTICE this. They NEVER say, “…ONCE AGAIN this animal which has gone out of control was introduced to take care of an environmental problem is creating a far worse one.”

The usual explanation for this is that it is a Conspiracy. The Learned Elders of Zion call each other up, “We won’t say AGAIN.” The Conspiracy idea is plausible to those who feel that people in high places MUST KNOW how stupid they are being. If you get on the inside you realize that nobody gets to the top inside the system unless they think like everybody else I the system does.

ALL established religions select those who are hypnotically repetitious and those who are talented psychopaths, who are able to fake being hypnotically repetitious.

One example stands out in my mind, but you would have had to be there to be as impressed as I was.

My cover was a tourist trip across a Communist border roughly forty years ago. Among the tourists was a real hippie couple. They had on their hippie uniform, beads and such. I wondered how people who carried the Viet Cong flag in parades and lauded Communists would react to what the few tourists too poor to afford planes always saw:
The dug out area or wall, the men with automatic weapons, the skull and crossbones signs that are the international sign of land mines, and the warnings that anyone who tries to escape the Workers’ Paradise will be shot on sight.

I wondered what their reaction would be.

There wasn’t one.

Both hippies went into TRANCE. A REAL trance. They looked straight ahead. They did not SEE the ditch, the land mine warnings, the machine guns.

If you had been there you would be as intrigued as I was: They didn’t SEE it!

The reason the endless cycle of environmental disasters caused by environmentalists is not mentioned in documentaries is because the documentary makers genuinely do not SEE them.

Successful documentary makers have no odor of heresy on them. An established religion can identify someone who is not a True Thinker without even noticing it. There are millions of competing faiths battling to become The Established Religion. The ONE that wins out develops the ability to weed out potential heresy.

EVERY established religion has always required this form of hypnosis in the people who, after all, are merely parts of its mechanism.

This is why using the Mantra is such a useful introduction to reality.

When you use the Mantra, they don’t HEAR you. They go into that TRANCE.

And as an introduction to reality, you need to see that TRANCE in action.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Comments

Anti-White is Anti-Life

A columnist for National Review, of all places, is worried to death about the demographic collapse of Europe. In the last issue, he noted that a mainline British scientific group had made it official: it recommended that Europeans have NO children. The column writer said it was astonishing that official sources were now stating the inevitable logic they had been moving toward for so long. Sterility is now official policy.

The Zero Population Growth of the 1970s, of which Soylent Green was a symptom, is now Zero Population. That specific report pointed out that an Ethiopian child would produce less than one half percent of the carbon emissions that a first world child would. Third worlders, said the report, should be left to produce the children.

Like the Mantra, this is a matter of something becoming so obvious writers cannot help but write about it. Like the Mantra, respectable conservatives will do anything to dance around the actual basis of these all-too-obvious facts, these elephants in the living room.

The obvious fact is that in order to remove the white man’s consciousness of race which ruled in the 1930s, social engineering had to declare total war. Total war means incidental destruction. In a seventy-year campaign to get white men to cheer when a pygmy marries a beautiful blond, the whole of his nature had to be attacked. The whole business of producing children is based on a prejudice deep in our animal soul: the desire to procreate and perpetuate our own kind.

The whole desire to procreate our own kind is now a Hitlerite obsession, not a natural drive. Conservative Catholics loved the attack on this his instinct when it just said that one should ignore reproducing one’s own kind and consider all marriages holy if a pedophile in a dress the right words in a dead language. But you can’t attack anything this basic drive without turning off the drive to produce one’s own kind without striking at the basis of life itself.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

5 Comments

Why is the Mantra Suppressed?

I get so SICK of discussions about THE races!

Whenever anyone discusses race relations, they are not talking about what should be done in “the world.” ALL talk about immigration and integration applies only to WHITE countries. So “assimilation” only means integration INSIDE white countries.

And no one, NO ONE, ever SAYS that. When we put this point in Pat Buchanan’s discussions, it gets wiped, much less anybody else’s.

We are, in fact, dealing entirely with the destruction of the white race, which is what nobody in respectable life dares say out loud.

So it is our moral duty to say it out loud. But don’t use familiar language, use the Mantra.

The reason the Mantra is so effective today is because we can SEE its reality. In the 1950s when integration was aimed by its promoters at the ultimate end of white existence, it seems to be alarmism. But now it is OBVIOUS. Which is why it cannot be mentioned. Its discussion was allowed when it could be pooh-poohed. But today it is so obvious it must be suppressed, ONCE IT IS MENTIONED.

I don’t believe in conspiracies per se. That is partly because when people think exactly alike it is natural to think they are in cahoots. But every college graduate has been indoctrinated so that he understands exactly how he is to react in every case. A graduate of the Sorbonne and a graduate of Harvard will appear to be in a conspiracy, but they are much more like zombies. And leftist zombies create rightist zombies. Liberal reaction to any EFFECTIVE dissent is to declare the person making that dissent “unrespectable.”

So, if one is to make a LIVING at being a RESPECTABLE conservative, one does not need to be part of a conspiracy. He knows what will not be tolerated, or he would not be a professional.

If you don’t use the Mantra, you are respectable, Which is worse than a crime. You are worse than a Communist. You are what makes absurdity and evil POSSIBLE.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

4 Comments

Political Correctness Versus Reality

When I was coming up, “modern” meant industrial. One writer said, “It is as modern as Marx, as up-to-date as the Webbs.” Fifty years later, I have to explain that the latter were the upper class founders of the old British Labor Party.

Back then, the whole world was going to live in the middle of big cities because that was where the jobs would be. People would live where they work.

In fact, millions of blacks and PRs went downtown as workers moved to the suburbs to get welfare. In the next New Age, people moved to where they could NOT WORK most profitably. When the suburban and inner city trends became “inevitable,” of course, THAT pattern broke down.

As a religion, Political Correctness has to have its own Inevitable Future, its good god called “Change” or “Progress” and its Hell and Devils residing in “reaction” or racism. Political Correctness is derived from our other religions, so this follows naturally. The problem is that other religions were able to make promises in the afterlife. You believe, you pay for the church, you obey rules set, and you avoid Hell. But Hell is always put off into the unprovable period after you are dead, where no one can PROVE it one way or another.

The Western conflict between science and religion was absolutely unique in history. No other society had produced a science separate from its established religion. Even then, had the church stuck to its doctrine of punishment or reward after death. there would have been no conflict. But the church claimed Genesis as scientific truth. One thing the church had to be taught, over and over, was not to stick its doctrines in areas where they are subject to proof or disproof or they would be chopped off with a lot of pain to the church.

Evangelical Christianity was growing by leaps and bounds when it, unlike the Modern churches, kept its serious religion for the afterlife. Now that it is pushing anti-evolution and a fertilized egg should be allowed to vote, its growth has stopped in the first world.

Marxism and its product Political Correctness put EVERYTHING into this world. It is based on the Inevitables of History, and every inevitable Marx and his followers came up with has turned out, over and over and over and over, to be sillier than the Church versus Galileo.

You can’t see this if you look for complications. Like Genesis, the failures of Marxism are with where you START not where you finish. Stalin used Lysenko to declare that, since Marxism will remake the world entirely by planning the world, the laws of genetics did not apply. The result for Soviet agriculture were what those who did not share the Communist religion would have expected. You can’t make summer wheat into winter wheat by freezing it.

As with the Mantra, Political Correctness deals with SIMPLY insanity for a while by complicating it: “You are just being simplistic by labeling Comrade Lysenko’s doctrines that way,” and then, like the Catholic Church with Galileo, just never mentioning it again.

The process is the same as any other church. First you bring forward your Authorities. A lot of people go to huge pain and face oppression to overthrow the Doctrine. Then it denies that Political Correctness said such a thing. Anyone who brings up Lysenko or Galileo is being “simplistic” and “insulting.”

Established religion is allowed to make the same mistake over and over because no one reminds them of the earlier ones. Respectable conservatives have made an industry of forgetting that Marxism is just SILLY. Making a tame opposition part of the establishment. It was a coalition of Sadducees and Philistines and so forth who crucified Jesus.

Our job is not a new one. It is the old one that those who valued truth over the establishment has always had. It now and ever shall be as long as Authority is used against reality.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

6 Comments

Professorial Bullies

I was in the University of South Carolina Student Senate, the student council, in 1962 when Saint John the Kennedy sent the Army in to enforce integration at the University of Mississippi. I wanted to introduce a resolution giving our backing to Mississippi, but for once I couldn’t decide, aka, I didn’t have the guts.

So we are not all as brave as the commenters seem to think we are. Some of us wouldn’t find it easy to be ALONE in class against the professor and her thugs.

It takes infinitely more moral courage to fight it out with a professor for our cause than it does for a hundred thousand men to hit the beach at Normandy WITH EACH OTHER.

Contrary to every Wordist dogma, we are a hardwired social animal. You can’t just make us over by writing a book.

As a former prof, let me assure you that there is nothing easier than being a bully from the front of the class. No student EVER wins a debate with a prof. A few of you have put the Mantra in newsgroups and you see how easy it is to cut it or change the subject or just declare the subject is closed.

It takes guts to face a roomful of people. It takes super guts to face a ROOMFUL of hostile people.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

6 Comments

An Example of Missing the Point

In “Servitude and Slavery” below, I referred to my own specialty in graduate economics, Public Choice:

“If libertarianism and its theoretical expression, Public Choice, can’t even explain why people vote it certainly cannot explain the rest of life.

Under pure Public Choice Theory, as all the experts in that field agree, no votes would occur, no public choices would be made. They admit they can’t doesn’t explain why people vote, but they don’t worry about that.”

If you do a straight Public Choice libertarian calculation on whether you should vote, you wouldn’t. The cost is going to the polling place and standing in line. And, if we are just talking about the benefit to you PERSONALLY of casting your ballot, what do you get for it? What is the real probability that your particular vote will affect YOU personally?

Zilch.

No pure libertarian would bother to vote. The reason we DO vote goes to the very fundamental error of libertarianism. Voters want to influence how their SOCIETY goes, not just to benefit themselves.

Like Marx and Rand everyone else Public Choice is still in the age when animals did not fight wars. All we have learned about the nature of all social animals has been completely missed.

In other words, Public Choice and libertarianism declare that LOYALTY has nothing to do with humans. The whole Wordist superstructure of libertarianism founders on that one point, just as “anti-racism” founders on the Mantra.

I sent this logic to someone in Public Choice. Remember that I said that the job of respectable conservatism is to miss the point while appearing to address it. The same is true of Public Choice. Our whole training was that of a professional knife thrower, to always MISS just right.

This person is NOT an anti-white. But his TRAINING is to miss the point. He saw what I said. one would vote at all. His reply to me will sound familiar to anyone who has ever actually WORKED with the Mantra.

He said that Public Choicers do still mention the point that if self-interest were the only basis of voting no one would vote at all. But that was ALL he addressed. What I wrote about loyalty might as well have been blank space. I wrote him again to remind him of it and he said I should pay attention to what HE said.

You have to USE the Mantra to understand this reaction. We have here a form of HYPNOTISM. A proposition that will undermine a whole world-view runs into this.

It is vital that you recognize this form of hypnotism. You cannot just “mention the logic of the Mantra.” No one will SEE the Mantra even when you first ram it down their throats. All of us who have fought it out know well that you simply CANNOT get onto other topics and that you cannot just “mention the logic.”

You must HIT THE TARGET again and again and again. In a week, even someone you have forced to face it will have HYPNOTICALLY forgotten it.

Let us go back to Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis. A friend of his died of a cut on his finger while he was doing a dissection for anatomy on an old corpse. Semmelweis looked at his friend’s symptoms and discovered that they were the same as those of “childbed fever” of which so many of the mothers and babies in his hospital died. Doctors in his hospital were doing dissections and then going straight to deliver babies without washing their hands.

It was obvious where the childbed fever was coming from.

Semmelweis explained it and explained it and explained it. The doctors replied that they were discussing childbed fever, just as my friend said they were DISCUSSING why people wouldn’t vote at all using Public Choice logic. They got him into discussions of Galen and Hippocrates. They talked about the Simplism of just washing your hands in carbolic acid. The moment he mentioned childbed fever they went off on their own tack.

Semmelweis’s deliveries were without the huge mortality rate theirs was. He was denounced as a monomaniac. In other words, they talked about everything but what he told them. They didn’t try his simplistic solution.. Hell, they didn’t even SEE it.

In the end Semmelweis won, but only after he died in a madhouse.

THAT is what we are facing. It is life and death, and “mentioning the Mantra” while you are going along with someone’s discussion won’t do the trick.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

8 Comments