Fighting involves only the most elementary kind of intelligence. It is all about basics. But is winning fights easy?

Here’s a revision of the Mantra based on this week’s comments:

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

The Netherlands is more crowded than Japan, Belgium is more crowded than Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve the RACE problem by bringing in millions of third-worlders and assimilating and intermarrying with them.

The words immigration, tolerance, and especially assimilation are being used to promote a program of genocide against the white race.

Everybody says the final solution to the RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to bring in the third world and assimilate and intermarry with non-whites.

All this immigration and intermarriage is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries.

This is genocide against the white race.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

Dave looked at why I had both the Netherlands and Belgium to balance Japan and Taiwan and did me one better, driving the point home in two short sentences which are punchier than my version.

I LIKE it!

The problem with doing Mantra Thinking kind of thinking is that the corrections seem so OBVIOUS. I now feel like an idiot for not noticing that people lapsed out when I came to the black man bit.

But the simple fact is that when you think this way, everything seems obvious IN RETROSPECT.

I keep repeating that the Mantra was years of work, and that it is long because I have to anticipate arguments because you only get one shot. I did that for a reason. It wasn’t just bragging and bitching. I have gotten a bit gun shy about bragging and bitching since Pain and Simmons started calling me on it.

But I was hoping someone would look carefully and see what arguments the new Mantra version cuts out. The black business was aimed at making the point again which was already made in the rest of the Mantra, applying it to blacks. Only with GROUP experience was I informed that the cost of it far outweighed its benefits.

An author can never really edit his own work ALONE.

We also took out “anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews,” which was the one place where I got a laugh. But Dave’s version is so clean and so short (129 words) and so perfectly on track that any addition looks like it would weigh it down.

And of course in the few cases where you do get a second shot “anazxiwhowantstokillsixmillionjews” is a nice continuation of the theme.

As I have said, the Mantra is so long because I don’t expect to get a second shot. So I have to cover the arguments that people have been hypnotized into nodding at vigorously over the years, or the effect can be destroyed by 1) a canned answer and 2) cutting off discussion. It is AMAZING that I have boiled down the argument so far that nobody has been able to handle the Mantra even when I was kicked out and they had the discussion all to themselves! Never take this for granted.

I am personally a bit sick of every great piece of propaganda I come up with being dismissed as “Well, everybody KNEW that, didn’t they?” but this is not just a personal matter when it comes to BUGS.

I am, after all, presuming to TEACH you some TECHNIQUES in BUGS. While others can moronically dismiss what I took a lot of effort to boil things down to as “obvious,” it is critical for YOU to understand that there was no Mantra before. YOU must understand this technique and the skill it reflects.

No, I am not worrying about being immodest here. First, I got PAID for doing this. Second, it is not immodest for a person who has spent his life perfecting a technique to say it’s good, especially if he is presuming to TEACH it.

As for the morons who say “That’s obvious” and then go back to detailed descriptions of Jews and News, there is an exact equivalent in the Sherlock Holmes story, “The Red-Headed League.” Intelligent people were impressed by Holmes’ deceptively simply detection methods which amounted to genius. But in “The Red-Headed League” he had a moron for a client. Said moron was impressed by Holmes’ deduction, but when Holmes explained it, he said, “Oh. At first I thought you had done something very clever, but now I see it’s simple after all.”

Holmes was as impressed by this guy’s smarts as I am by people who say, “Oh. I thought you had done something clever, but now I see my latest on News and Jews is much smarter and much more important.”

And Holmes proved his worth in the marketplace just as I did.

You cannot really learn these techniques until you understand exactly what they consist of and WHY THEY ARE EFFECTIVE.

Should I put this in Stormfront? Obviously no one else is going to.

I think that repetition is always good.

I also think that the reference to the Netherlands and Belgium being as crowded as Taiwan and Japan is very important.

I well remember that in my first introduction to the Mantra I was most influenced by the comparison of the Netherlands and Belgium to Taiwan and Japan.

Its logic is very powerful to anyone who has not considered the asymmetry of the standards of Political Correctness between white and nonwhite nations.

Black nationalism is a reality, Chinese nationalism is a reality, Japanese nationalism is a reality. These things need to be stressed.

********************

 

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third-worlders and assimilating and intermarrying with them.

The words immigration, tolerance, and especially assimilation are being used to promote a program of genocide against the white race.

Everybody says the final solution to the RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to bring in the third world and assimilate and intermarry with all those non-whites.

All this immigration and intermarriage is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries.

This is about genocide against the white race.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

 

******************

Notice that I dropped some style conventions in the text such as “quote unquote” and “i.e.” because these are unnecessary to delivering a clear message.

Condensing the Mantra really isn’t the issue.

The enemies of the white race and particularly the anti-white white traitors need to know that there are people who are intent upon bringing them to justice.

Right!

I also think the discussion of the black got off the subject.  I believe that if the Mantra stayed on the same subject, as Dave does here, I would not have lost Shank.

Shall we make this our new Mantra?

The question mark means it’s a question.  A question  is a request for an ANSWER.  BUGS is no longer just Bob’s.

I like it and will give it a go.

One small suggestion:

Repeat: This is happening to ALL white countries and ONLY white countries.

– woundednietzsche

good suggestion!

I added it.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

The words immigration, tolerance, and especially assimilation are being used to promote a program of genocide against the white race.

Everybody says the final solution to the RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to bring in the third world and “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

This is not about culture, this is about RACE.

Repeat: “ALL white countries and ONLY white countries.

Anti-racist has become a code word for anti-white.

Repeat, all this immigration and intermarriage is for “EVERY white country and ONLY white countries”

The most important thing to remember about the Mantra is that it refers to what is in reality very serious crimes.

The most serious crimes are not against the law. It flummoxes me how few people realize what a huge issue this is in life.

We need to separate out what we are doing with the Mantra.

It can’t be about winning an argument, because the subject matter is far too serious for that. The Mantra isn’t meat for a debating society. It is about the most serious crimes being committed against the white race.

And if it is about fighting, keep in mind that winning fights involve the most elementary form of intelligence. The real issue is when to fight.

If you know how to win fights, then your posture must be forbearance, forbearance, forbearance. Never run after a combat, for the result you seek will most assuredly run away. But if you wait (and wait and wait and wait) the right opportunity for attack may present itself in way where there is no question that the right time has arrived to attack.

I think of this as natural cadence.

The American military could never comprehend what I just said. When you structure yourself for a combat, it is imperative that you abandon that structure for actual combat. That’s because winning a fight involves the most elementary form of intelligence. You miss this intelligence if you do not understand that you must not do what you are structured to do because what you are structured to do is an Achilles heel.

The American military screws up again, again, and again on this count. It is so dependent on its Lincoln Log House structure for combat that it can only carry the combat it is structured to carry out. That’s a formula for defeat if there ever was one, no matter how small or large the scale of operation. This is as true for police operations and military operations as it is for gang fighting and ordinary street fighting too.

It is a universal principle that winning fights involve the most elementary form of intelligence. People who don’t know how to fight never understand this. That is why the martial arts are so big. The worst thing is the world you can do is pretending that fighting is a martial art. If you think that, you don’t understand anything.

Winning fights involves only the most elementary form of intelligence.

The Mantra is about serious crimes. Keep that in mind.

— Dave

When I wrote the long Mantra, it was in a vacuum on white genocide. Now that Pat Buchanan has written Death of the West and editorials on the end of the white race, it may be that a lot of people are sufficiently familiar with the concept that the following short Mantra might be useful:

******************

AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!

The words immigration, tolerance, and especially assimilation are being used to promote a program of genocide against the white race.

Everybody says the final solution to the RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to bring in the third world and “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”

This is not about culture, this is about RACE.

Repeat: “ALL white countries and ONLY white countries.

Anti-racist has become a code word for anti-white.

Reperat, all this immigration and intermarriage is for “EVERY white country and ONLY white countries ”

******************

The reason there is a question mark up there in the title is that I am ASKING you about this.

You are well on your way to becoming pros, so I don’t have to warn you about fiddling with something that WORKS.

On other hand, I am desperate to improve what we have. This is serious business, and and I need your input.

In the days of the muzzle loaders, they used to say you had to shoot straight because you might not get a second chance. The long Mantra is the perfect ONE-SHOT weapon. My mistake was reciting the WHOLE Mantra to Shank in a place where I HAD ALL THE SHOTS I WANTED..

The Mantra is the product of years of practice. I know exactly how they are going to dodge their way out of it. The long Mantra is undodgeable. But that is because it fills all the holes at one time:

1) It stops discussion of any other subject for a moment. It demands and takes full attention and interrupts to flow of conversation.

2) I SPECIFICALLY explains why this is GENOCIDE. That requires REPETITION.

3) It is altogether RACIAL. The biggest lie today is the respectable conservatives changing the subject to something called “white CULTURE” which any black supposedly is able to LEARN. The specific subject of racial intermarriage MUST be addressed UP FRONT, especially if you only get one shot..

If you give them the slightest opportunity, they will come back with “assimilation” and “culture.”

The long Mantra was carefully developed for the one shot we normally get.

In the Shank interview, I had a near-perfect Mantra for a single shot because normally we are lucky to get ONE shot in. But I have not developed the Mantra strategy for an EXCHANGE.

Prometheus and Lord Nelson show more expertise at an “Exchange Mantra,” which I now realize Sharo was aiming at, than I do.  I LEARN from your criticism.

This is a seminar. You are here to do what Lord Nelson and Prometheus and backbaygrouch are doing, to hone your OWN skills. If the professor can’t learn from students, it is NOT a SEMINAR.

We are not here just to learn Bob’s Expertise and upchuck it at exam time. I am training PROS.