I asked this question at the AR Conference, and people were bit taken aback by it.

I asked if there were a pamphlet, at the Conference! — that gave a brief description. No one cold tell me one.

So I ask my readers: What IS AR?

The most amazing thing about Aryan society requires a roll of drums. We are the first and only society in history where the following can happen.

Someone produces statistical proof that magic works and ghosts are all about us. It is unlikely, but let’s say it happens.

Does our society, based on science, then collapse?

No. We say, “Damn! I would never have imagined such a thing could happen.”

Then we factor in the fact that magic works and ghosts exist and go on with our lives.

In this century, three concepts of hte universe have held sway, the old Newtonian physics, Einstien’s physics based on light speed, and Heissenberg and quantum physics.

For the first time in history the truths contained in three different concepts of the universe existing side by side didn’t even ause a ripple.

I was just a kid at the time but I remember the trouble Gallileo caused. His intellectual world was based on the Old Testament, and the Old Testament said in the clearest terms that God created the firmament, the firm earth, and spread the heavens above it. When Galileo looked through the telescope invented in Northern Europe he found the earth was not the only firmament.

Copernicus had said much the same thing. But Copernicus was a Pollack, so what did HE know?

Galileo was put under hosue arrest. He was challenging the entire universe his society was based on. One person put it perfectly:

“Do you think that a man with a tube with a piece of glass in each end can overturn the whole History and Authority of the Church?”

Actually a guy with a tube with a piece of glass in each end DID overturn the whole Authority of the Church.

In fact, there has not been a Catholic school since 1700 which did NOT go with the tube instead of the Authority of the Church.

This has gone so far that before his death Pope John Paul mentioned the possibility of removing the Catholic Church’s condemnation of Galileo as a heretic. It didn’t happen, but it could.

One of the most important documents on which the Papacy based its temporal power was the Donation of Constantine. This was a forged document which was supposedly written by the Emperor Constantine which explained the reason he moved the capitol of the Roman Empire from the city of Rome to Constantinople.

In the Donation, Constantine said that, due to a miracle, he was giving all of the Western Roman Empire to the Pope. So he, the lesser of the two, had to move to the East, since the Pope owned the West. If you read Dante’s Inferno written inthe fourteenth century, Dante believed the Donation was genuine.

Actually the Donation was silly. It was forged inteh eighth century using the scholarhip of the time. It ws FULL of absurdities. For one thing, it was written in the wrong language. The Latin in it was eight-century Latin, not fourth-century Latin. And the Roman upper class wrote in Greek back tehn anyway.

The Donation got EVERYTHING wrong. It cited the wrong divisions of the church at the time of Constantine and so forth.

One of the heroes of all ages was the man who exposed the Donation. All the scholars in the fifteenth century knew it was bogus, but he wrote the book that exposed it. He stated flatly that he expected to be burned at the stake for it.

Everybody else had kept quiet. But this was the sort of person who comes from Aryans. He just couldn’t STAND for something that was obviously true to be ignored.

That was the ONLY reason he did it. Any of our Heroic Practical Men would tell you he was a fool.

But the Aryan world is not based on Practial Men. Our real hero escaped from the stake. He was surrounded by Aryans back then.

Our society discovered statistics. We found the Bell Curve. It is a very heretical Curve. It says that whether you succeed in battle does not depend on what the priests and Authorities determine from Traditional values, but one simple probabilities.

In all history there has never been a society that could absord three forms of physics without a ripple. In all of history there has never been a society that had one sentence as it guiding light:

“PROVE it.”

Every other society was based largely on the statement, ‘Things are not as they appear.”

I can say to you, because we are part of Aryan, which is called “Western” thought:

“If the world is not as it appears, why did God or evolution, or both, give us EYES?”

If your little tube with a piece of glass in each end is RIGHT. PROVABLY right, we will absord it into our society and go on.

The basis of our society is an old scientific saying, “One experiment is worth a hundred Expert Opinions.”

What would DESTROY any earlier civilized order only elicits, “Damn! I would have SWORN that wasn’t true.”

Soviet society was based on the concept that mankind was a product of economics. So as soon as the Medicogenetical Institute killed that idea, Stalin had to kill them.

Oriental societies were based on philosophers who were silly. So Marxism took them over. You would not believe what African societies are based on.

Jews like Marx are the Great Authorities. And Einstein NEEDED a universe based on a certainty.

Aryans ASK the universe, “What is true.” Odin lost an eye hanging on the world tree to learn some FACTS.

The society Odin’s people produced is called “Western.” All the Old Testament and other Middle East fanatics, including modern historians, are STILL trying to find some way to shoehorn the developement of Western Civilization into the Old Testament.

The world tree Odin hung on was called Yggsdradil, and its roots were miles deep. The roots of what is called “Western” Civilization are miles deep.

What is true is simply true.

And we are the only civilization in history that could handle that.

Now that I know there are some other physics geeks, I mean students of science, in my audience, I want to go out on a limb.

PLEASE don’t write me this was terribly boring. I have spent many hours listening to people speak to each other in languages I did not understand. It was pure cruelty to me.

But this is WRITTEN.

That means you do NOT have to sit there through the whole endless crap I did.

Scan it. If you don’t like it, forget it.

PLEASE don’t write me about how boring it is. I will figure you are an idiot for not being able to scan it.

But I’ll try to be more diplomatic than that.

OK.

Quantum physics says — yes, I know the quibbles — that electrons come into and out of EXISTENCE on a random basis.

Before it collapses into a Black Hole matter weighs a million tons a teaspoonful.

What is a Black Hole? A Black Hole is gravity field which light cannot escape.

Why is it Black?

Because we can only see light.

OK. Let’s remember simple statistics. Once you get into the thousands, much less the millions, things even out. We live in a consistent universe.

Did you notice the word “WE?”

We experiment by what we observe. Do you understand the word “observe.?” It means from the observer’s point of view.

It is not just the observation, but the observer’s point of view that determines the equation.

An Equation has two sides.

We exist INSIDE the equation, not outside. Electrons do not come into EXISTENCE on a random basis. They come into the equation of which we are a product in a bell curve.

But when you get into the quadrillions, much less the googles squared, the bell curve is nothing.

The equation of which we are part has two sides, and we, the observer, are one of those.

Have I made myself sufficiently obscure?*

* From IMAS

Now that I know there are some other physics geeks, I mean students of science, in my audience, I want to go out on a limb.

PLEASE don’t write me this was terribly boring. I have spent many hours listening to people speak to each other in languages I did not understand. It was pure cruelty to me.

But this is WRITTEN.

That means you do NOT have to sit there through the whole endless crap I did.

Scan it. If you don’t like it, forget it.

PLEASE don’t write me about how bring it is. I will figure you are an idiot for not being able to scan it.

But I’ll try to be more diplomatic than that.

OK.

Quantum physics says — yes, I know the quibbles — that electrons come into and out of EXISTENCE on a random basis.

Before it collapses into a Black Hole matter weighs a million tons a teaspoonful.

What is a Black Hole? A Black Hole is gravity field which light cannot escape.

Why is it Black?

Because we can only see light.

OK. Let’s remember simple statistics. Once you get into the thousands, much less the millions, things even out. We live in a consistent universe.

Did you notice the word “WE?”

We experiment by what we observe. Do you understand the word “observe.?” It means from the observer’s point of view.

It is not just the observation, but the observer’s point of view that determines the equation.

An Equation has two sides.

We exist INSIDE the equation, not outside. Electrons do not come into EXISTENCE on a random basis. They come into the equation of which we are a product on a mathematical basis.

Have I made myself sufficiently obscure?

One episode of Seinfeld showed him wearing a fur coat and carrying a purse. But, as the characters kept saying, it wasn’t a PURSE, it was a European wallet.

At the end of the show, someone snatched Jerry’s purse. Someone told the cop, “That guy snathced this guy’s purse.”

Seinfeld shouted shouted, “It’s not a purse, it’s EUROPEAN!”

Then the show ended when Seinfeld shouted, “OK, it’s a PURSE!” At that point the show ended with a freeze-fram of Sinefeld with his hands in the air, with his fur coat on.

Before AIDS hit the scene, we bigotted rednecks kept saying that the reason womens’ fashions were so ridiculous was that all the clothes designers for women were queer. This vicious accusation was simply quoted by the mainstream media to show how ridiculous the idea was that womens’ clothes designers were queer.

All they had to do was to put us bigots’ words in quotes: “Fromer KKK leader X says womens’ cloths designers are quote queer unquote.”

Which proved that they weren’t.

Then AIDS hit. Barbara Walters did a special bemoaning how AIDS had wiped out the designers of womens’ clothes, who were Great Artists?

“Why is it,” Barbara Walters continued, “That homosexuality gives a man such a perfect appreciation of colors and designs …” And so forth.

Knowing networking as I do, I would guess offhand that if you were NOT a homosexual you weren’t admitted into the mutual admiration club that is womens’ fashions.

Back to Seinfeld and his “European wallet.”

In the early 1970s there was an all-out effort to get men to carry purses, wear “bell-bottomed trousers” that were straight out of womens’ clothing store, and “Italian heels,” which were high-heeled boots that were also straight out of a womens’ store.

It wasn’t queer, it was European.

When I was on Capitol Hill, one of the male stars on M*A*S*H* showed up to testify. The girls rushed out to attend the hearing.

Liberal or conservative, they were sickened. “He had on high heels and he was carrying a PURSE!”

I don’t know if anyone else remembers the guys walking around in bell-bottoms with purses and high heels and blow-dryed hair.

It was the Latest Thing.

It was the sign of Progress.

And no one remembers it but me.

If I could leave one intellectual concept behind, it would be this:

Look at the things that are so obvious that we never even notice them.

One of these is the fact that all the people who criticize white people do it on computers or the printing press — the real ones white people made revolutions out of, not the one the Chinese used to make playing cards with. Whites are attacked for not giving others enough of the goods and services and health and standards of living no non-white society ever even dreamed of.

No one can talk about this.

I come up with a lot of these, but I keep realizing I have not exhausted the list.

I myself saw one of these too-obvious assumptions just this year, and I am very happy about it.

For a man in his sixty-fifth year whose chief joy in life is thinking out the implications of the over-obvious, this is just plain fun. It is breath of fresh air.

By now trying to get people interested in the implications of the over-obvious has become a bit tiresome.

They just don’t get it.

So a new idea to chew on is very welcome.

One of the more disgusting things I have run into has been the attempt to make Jesus a homosexual.

Only this year did I realize that every church takes it for granted that Jesus had another, less disgusting but just as unnatural, attitude toward sex: he was asexual.

This is the subtext in every denomination I know about.

One thing CS Lewis taught me was that an obsession is an obsession. Our usual picture of the Deadly Sin of Gluttony is someone who eats too much. Lewis pointed out that gluttony has nothing to do with how much you eat. Gluttony is an obseesion with one’s stomach.

A person whose religion consists largely of dietary laws is a glutton. A person who goes to a family supper and says there’s too much food there is a glutton. The example Lewish gave was an old lady who sent an overworked waitress back to the kitchen with everything she had brought and insised on just a piece of toast, not overcooked and no unvercooke, but JUST RIGHT.

The piece of dry toast, which was all she wanted in her modesty, was sent back again and again without any regard for the trouble she was causing for others.

That is gluttony.

It seems to me that Satan couldn’t care less whether your obsession with sex is in always thinking about it or having it or whether your obsession was with chastity. It was St. Paul, who had been a Manichaean and therefore against ALL sex, who inserted the obsession with chastity into the dogma of every church.

When Jesus said one should not THINK about adultery, he was not saying he had never thought about sex at all.

But we assume that Jesus never gave any thought to it at all.

Even the Old Testament Jehovist Christians assume this. But there is not a hint of any obsession with chastity in the OT:

“It is better to put your seed into the belly of a whore than to spill it on the ground.”

When peiople talk about Jesus’s temptation in the desert, where he spent forty days, no one ever insists that he was never thirsty. In fact, the whole point of the story is that he WAS thirsty. He WAS hungry, he WAS tempted.

Not so with sex. You have to insist that Jesus had no sexual feelings at all.

I took that so much for granted that it took me over sixty-four years to realize how ODD this idea is.