Archive for category Political Correctness
Cold Eye Nausea
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Political Correctness, Politics on 10/13/2009
What is the difference between a cultural outlook and a prejudice?
There is none. Not only is there no difference, but only the most nauseatingly ignorant person thinks there is.
I made my living for decades operating among highly intelligent, ruthless people who wanted my blood. That is an experience that makes you instantaneously boil things down to basics. It doesn’t take long for you to stop noticing whether the person you are talking to uses big words or has an accent; all you learn to notice is whether he is buying what you say or not, whether what he is saying is drivel or not.
So almost everything that impresses other people completely disappears for you. In such a raw fight for power, you not only ignore people’s pretenses, at some level you don’t even notice them at all. Let me give you a shocking example of this.
Have you ever been standing in a line at a supermarket and seen a charming baby on in a crib? Us older folks do. But instead of grabbing at the child, a mature person looks it in the eyes and grins and maybe says some words. Very often this is delightful to the infant, and they grin and kick and blow bubbles.
Have you ever seen a respectable conservative when a liberal praises him for being “cultural” instead of “prejudiced.” It takes a very experienced, cold, professional eye to see how exactly a Buckley reacts the reaction of that baby being smiled at by an adult.
A Buckley, senior or the departed senior, does his own version of grinning and kicking and bubbling at the mouth. So does every respectable conservative. You see, the liberals who call the shots have the same frigid professional eye that I do. This reaction to liberal praise is the sine qua non of being given the absolutely essential credentials of being labeled a “respectable” conservative by media liberals.
So a Buckley will bubble and grin and kick in an entirely different way. Me will not be wearing a diaper, but an expensive suit as approved in New York and New England. He will raise his eyebrows in the way he would expect one of his gods, an Ivy League WASP or a Jewish Intellectual, would expect him to.
Where the baby goes “Goo!” the Buckley will use big words.
But to a really cold, professional eye, all this is superficial. In fact, you learn very quickly it is fatal to let these superficial differences impress you at all.
This very hard-learned ability to see right through the superficialities becomes automatic, and it is absolutely essential if you are to be hired and trusted at high levels. People with power and money don’t hire people who don’t have this Cold Eye.
But, in all honesty, this Cold Eye has certain drawbacks you don’t see until you have been through the mill and developed that Cold Eye.
Once again, I am not being cynical, but dead honest: One of the things that comes with this Cold Eye is nausea.
In my seemingly endless list of life experiences, I once worked in a retarded home. My stomach is churning right now as I try to write this down. No matter how hardened you are, that room full of grown men in diapers, the few extreme retards who make it to beard-growing age, makes your stomach turn. They are smiling, every one of them, delighted to see you. You CAN’T hate them.
But I will never forget that one of the most extreme bleeding-hearts I even knew saw them and said, Bob, I never thought it would be possible that I would ever agree with the Nazis about euthanasia in any case, but God help me, I would do it to these people.”
Now you get an idea why the Cold Eye carries with it a threat of nausea.
It is critical to understand that there is not a bit of cynicism in what I am saying. It is a REAL problem for me. With my combined experienced and the Cold Eye I could not help developing, watching a respectable conservative react to a liberal telling him he Cultural and not Prejudiced is literally nauseating. I can’t help it and I certainly don’t LIKE it.
You see, a Buckley or a Hannity or a respectable conservative Southerner looks at an establishment liberal exactly the same way that baby ion the supermarket looks at me. Hannity and Buckley and a Southern apologizer have EXACTLY the same attitude to Ivy Leaguers and Jewish Intellectuals that that baby has to me. To Buckley, who is not tainted in his own mind with a Southern family but is also Catholic and IRISH, of all things, the true Yankee or the true Jewish Intellectual is the True Adult, the True Final Judge.
This was true of Buckley, it is far more true of somebody down the line like Hannity. Buckley senior must have pointed out a thousand times that he was born in NEW YORK. He and his family never allowed anyone to call their background without answering, ANGLO-Irish.”
To someone with my Cold Eye, these inferiority complexes stand out like a black man at a Nuremburg Rally.
Too often, this reaction to respectable grin and bubbles at any liberal praise really reminds me of those smiling men in the diapers, and I anteing cynical and it IS a problem for me.
An Individual Point of View
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, History, Political Correctness on 10/09/2009
One reason I see things clearly is because I see them from what Aleksander Solzhenitsyn in the Gulag Archipelago called “an individual point of view.” Few readers and no intellectuals understood what he meant by this.
Up until his time in the Gulag, Solzhenitsyn adhered to the established religion of his country, Marxism-Leninism. He thought Stalin was a thug and said so, which is what got him into the Gulag. But he considered Lenin the greatest man in history and it was his life’s work to write the definitive biography of that Saint.
What Solzhenitsyn meant by an “individual point of view” was what he later became: a Russian, not a Marxist. He saw himself as an individual with a, repeat A, meaning ONE, personal point of view: “an individual point of view.” Only then was he able to observe THE REST of the world accurately.
If you are part of the established religion, regardless of what that institution may be, you are not a part of the world or the people you are analyzing. You look down on others in the light of your own Final Truth.
Everybody is a provincial, but you cannot understand anything about real people unless you face the fact that you are a hick, too. The people who cannot understand reality at all are those who THINK the INSTITUTION they are part of does not have a “point of view.”
Those who have an institutional view analyze everything as a step up or down toward their Final Truth. They are the most extreme form of provincial. They possess a hickdom no real hick could even imagine.
And, unlike a normal hick, the institutional hick cannot imagine that he IS a provincial.
PC Hypnosis
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Mantra, Political Correctness on 10/04/2009
At least half of the environmental disasters today are NOT the result of greed. They come from environmental Idealism. This is recorded but never MENTIONED in an endless string of documentaries.
How many times have you seen a documentary saying that some animal has gotten out of hand, and it was originally imported to take care of some other imbalance? But the documentary makers do not NOTICE this. They NEVER say, “…ONCE AGAIN this animal which has gone out of control was introduced to take care of an environmental problem is creating a far worse one.”
The usual explanation for this is that it is a Conspiracy. The Learned Elders of Zion call each other up, “We won’t say AGAIN.” The Conspiracy idea is plausible to those who feel that people in high places MUST KNOW how stupid they are being. If you get on the inside you realize that nobody gets to the top inside the system unless they think like everybody else I the system does.
ALL established religions select those who are hypnotically repetitious and those who are talented psychopaths, who are able to fake being hypnotically repetitious.
One example stands out in my mind, but you would have had to be there to be as impressed as I was.
My cover was a tourist trip across a Communist border roughly forty years ago. Among the tourists was a real hippie couple. They had on their hippie uniform, beads and such. I wondered how people who carried the Viet Cong flag in parades and lauded Communists would react to what the few tourists too poor to afford planes always saw:
The dug out area or wall, the men with automatic weapons, the skull and crossbones signs that are the international sign of land mines, and the warnings that anyone who tries to escape the Workers’ Paradise will be shot on sight.
I wondered what their reaction would be.
There wasn’t one.
Both hippies went into TRANCE. A REAL trance. They looked straight ahead. They did not SEE the ditch, the land mine warnings, the machine guns.
If you had been there you would be as intrigued as I was: They didn’t SEE it!
The reason the endless cycle of environmental disasters caused by environmentalists is not mentioned in documentaries is because the documentary makers genuinely do not SEE them.
Successful documentary makers have no odor of heresy on them. An established religion can identify someone who is not a True Thinker without even noticing it. There are millions of competing faiths battling to become The Established Religion. The ONE that wins out develops the ability to weed out potential heresy.
EVERY established religion has always required this form of hypnosis in the people who, after all, are merely parts of its mechanism.
This is why using the Mantra is such a useful introduction to reality.
When you use the Mantra, they don’t HEAR you. They go into that TRANCE.
And as an introduction to reality, you need to see that TRANCE in action.
Give ‘Em That New Time Religion
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, History, Political Correctness on 10/02/2009
People in historic times did not live in the same universe we do. In fact, most of them did not live in the UNIVERSE.
This is a concept Lawrence Brown developed in his 1963 book “The Might of the West.” I read it at least once a year and each time I feel a hunger for more. This is REAL history, this is trying to look at the world from the point of the people who lived it, rather than our present “It all leads to Marx and social progress” theme of Political Correctness.
Today historians all write as if everybody in history was just trying to reach our present state of Enlightenment. Every established religion looks at the world this way. The old shaman and the old priest and the “new” Politically Correct professor have the same attitude, “All history has been a search for the Truth, it was searching for the Truth I, at long last, preach.”
It is as old as the hills and the same thing will be fashionable, in another form, when the hills wear down to flatlands.
Race Mixing is UGLY
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Political Correctness on 09/29/2009
Michael Moore demonstrates that Mommy Professor loves ugliness for its own sake.
I do not like looking at ugly people. Why is it that someone so horribly ugly is so popular with Mommy Professor’s products? A good looking person could say the same thing.
Yes, it is very popular for people to say that looks don’t matter. In fact, if you want to hear sincere expressions of that belief go to a high-end beauty parlor and listen to Mommy Professors’ upper income liberals talk to each other. As they sit there spending thousands of dollars on touch-ups and blonding they will recite The Party Line that Looks Don’t Matter.
Vanishingly few people in a high-end beauty parlor are buying contact lenses that make their eyes look brown. Even fewer are having anything darkened. But they sit there and tell each other that children don’t care if their blond mother makes them brown and kinky.
If they have feelings, maybe the kids have feelings too. Well, if they are RACIST feelings that will keep a black guy who likes blond from getting what he wants the kids have no right to those feelings. They are there to get blonded and to talk about how to help the black guy end blondness.
So any discussion of looks is “superficial.” Meanwhile looks are the first concern of damned near everybody, especially their own.
“Do unto others as you would have others do to unto you.”
“Have the COURAGE to Support Comrade Stalin”
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, History, Political Correctness on 09/07/2009
During the Stalin Era, there was a public meeting in a small city in Russia. One speech ended on the usual note of how all the wonderful that had been accomplished were “under the Leadership of Comrade Stalin.”
The usual standing ovation occurred.
Stalin was a couple of thousand miles away, but when the ovation had gone on for even longer than usual, no one dared sit down. The realization dawned on the thousand or so attendees that the Secret Police were there, as they were everywhere, and the first person to sit down would be arrested in the morning. So the standing ovation went on and on and on and on and on and on…
And, yes, the first couple of people who sat down DID get arrested in the morning.
If you know anything about the Stalin Era, you get the same laugh I do out of one of the slogans they used, “Have the courage to support Comrade Stalin.” That is like telling a sheep “Have the COURAGE not to get eaten by a lion.”
But we have exactly the same thing today. If you hear that someone “has the COURAGE to SPEAK OUT” you know very well which side they are taking.
No one who openly fights for white survival “has the courage to speak out.” Only anti-whites are ever described as “having the courage to speak out.”
In fact, this is one sure sign of a despotic society. It used to be the height of courage in America for someone to say, “I do not agree with your opinion, but I will fight to the death for your right to express it.” You don’t hear that since the WWII Generation learned that Goodspeak is the only way to go.
The media only praised McCain for Courage when he agreed with them on policy. No one in authority today does anything but denounce anyone who disagrees with The Party Line.
In totalitarian environments the only “spontaneous demonstrations” are those that have been prepared by professionals for reasons everybody can predict. In America, there are no exceptions to day at all.
Final Appeal
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, Law and Order, Political Correctness on 08/31/2009
The World War 2 Generation came back from their how-to-be a good doggy training with the conviction that they were AMERICANS ONLY. There was no white, there was no black, there were no Southerners and no Northerners. As to self-interest, there was only Sacrifice.
That is precisely the kind of Wordist attitude that the Constitution could not operate in. The Constitution uses a system of checks and balances where personal preferences are allowed because the different branches of government will keep each other in check. The final appeal was to the people.
But when the WWII Generation took power, there was no “people.” They were all Americans. The people did not have any existence except as Good AMERICANS. So they had to appeal to a Federal Branch to tell them what Good Americans were.
Whereas the Tenth Amendment made it specific that the final appeal would be to the people or the states, Good Americans do not see any separate entities of this kind.
So the World War II Generation’s Final Appeal is to the Federal Courts.
PC Can’t Keep Its Excuses Straight
Posted by Bob in Coaching Session, How Things Work, Political Correctness on 08/27/2009
There is a rule that anyone who makes a living off of history or social commentary has to provide his tithe to our established religion of PC. BBC documentaries end with a sermon in which everything that has been said is jammed into the PC world review.
When I see that this particular book is the one in which the author pays his tithe, I close it and return it. Each author must give excuses for minority behavior. In one case a historical fiction writer was declaring that the Gypsies were regular exploited WORKERS just like everybody else, like illegal aliens in America.
Meanwhile Piers was explaining that Gypsies stole babies and other property because they did not recognize property rights. So presumably if Gypsies were appearing in your town and you gabbed one of THEIR kids, they would think nothing of it.
So Gypsies are hard workers for their due wage and don’t recognize there is such a thing as a due wage.
Blacks don’t commit more crimes — or one would be justified in suspecting them of crime more than people with white skin — and every writer must know the list of reasons WHY blacks have a RIGHT to commit more crime.
Democrats spend hundreds of millions getting out the minority vote, but if you say non-whites are likely to vote Democratic in the wrong context, you are a Nazi.




Recent Comments