Archive for category Race Matters
Jo3w commented that anti-white Christians are anti-white because they assume whites are more supreme than we are.
jow3, My problem with what you say is based on my constant repetition that Western morality is based on the Christian lack of morality.
The sore point Old Testament believers have with science is Six Day Creationism.
The sore point with Christianity is never mentioned.
Much more than the Old Testament has a problem with Creationism, the New Testament has the problem that WE EXIST!
One reason Bible Belters quote the Old rather than the New Testament is because there is no FAMILY morality in the New Testament.
To Jesus and St Paul, the very IDEA of family was heresy.
So Christianity went back to the old pagan morality of Human Sacrifice which said that only the best should be sacrificed to the Gods.
Early Christian myths described couples out of the Hitler Youth Guidebook, tall, intelligent, beautiful. In the ideal ending, they would be chaste and childless, for God.
Look at all the popular Nun Movies, where a beautiful talented woman remains chaste.
It is on the assumption that whites are supreme that the entire basis of our self-destruction is based.
It never OCCURS to anti-white whites that there IS any other race for sacrifice — diversity — than the white one.
Christians, including C.S. Lewis, have long been able to accept their faith without the Six Day Creation clearly stated at the Bible’s beginning.
But they absolutely refuse to accept a genetic morality, without which the Golden Rule has no meaning at all.
Every time I went to a large meeting in any organization from Narcotics Anonymous to a campaign, someone pointed out that the first meeting was astonishingly tiny.
Everyone of the tiny handful at the first meeting already knew all the others.
This is the FIRST March 15 demonstration.
Some day you will tell people about it, how you stood out there alone or in tiny groups.
You are among The First.
“But I didn’t show up” makes a lousy thing to tell your grandchildren.
Outside the West you would find truth by referring to a philosopher or a Prophet.
The West took over simply because it found a truth by observation rather than doing like a California Yuppie and finding some quote that sounds Impressive and Wise.
So I observed that brown-skinned countries are poor. Yellow-skinned countries can learn up to the level whites have reached. But the only places that show basic progress are populated by white skins.
Long before anyone thought of vaccinations, it was well known that girls who milked cows for a living did not get smallpox. No matter how horrible the smallpox got, no one did anything but remark on this.
Now that the Western world is turning brown, we have become accustomed to there being no increase in the standard of living since the 1960s. There had never before been a generation of white Americans, right back to Jamestown, where the standard of living hadn’t progressed.
It is usual for those who live by the established religion to demand how someone “dares say” what everybody can see. We’re back to Semmelweis daring to state, in the teeth of all the Learned Quotes of the Great Doctors, that deaths went where these minor deities refused to wash their hands.
For some reason I do not fathom, there are a lot of people who are desperate to prove that vaccination doesn’t stop smallpox. It seems to come from some fundamentalists, but also from some of the California Cults.
Nonetheless vaccinated people did not get smallpox. Many a girl spent her entire life horribly disfigured because all the Churches condemned vaccination. Or I could say many a girl who let the Church talk her out of vaccination happened to spend her life horribly disfigured.
Not being a preacher or priest, of a God Church or a PC faith, I am responsible for what I do.
We all observe that skin color makes all the difference in a country. The response to that observation is as old as the hills:
“Where is it Written that skin color matters?”
All the priests and the prophets and the intellectuals, for the thousandth time, demand punishment for those who point out a reality they don’t like.
There was news of a Birmingham TV station that had a broadcast about one of our people putting up one sign.
Someone is writing me about some “concern” over a BUGS trend or anti-white thread or something.
Other people ask me how I am.
Here is how I am: I have been at this almost daily for over fifteen years.
The message getting out there is my ONLY interest.
If you feel slighted, go away. I have made it clear and you have seen how suicidal it is to coddle TTGHs.
One sign, combined with a call to a TV station before they take it down, has so far gotten us some publicity.
One person bothered to tell me about it.
I am not angry or bitching. I am simply very, very preoccupied.
I am, honestly, old and tired and disabled and simply have no interest in other things besides DOING something about the survival of my race.
The one sign that one BUGSER put up in that one place got a local report and network repeat.
The Birmingham report included a black reporter who said that the public she had asked about the sign agreed with it!
There was an ABC report on it. They just said it was HATE!
The ABC report got about 500 thumbs up to 100 thumbs down.
On that word Hate, if I had some workers, we would have some fun.
They would go to each site and pick someone — let’s call him X — who expressed ANY opinion, on ANY subject. They would simply say, “X, that’s HATE!”
But MY workers would then have the discipline to simply LEAVE.
They might later get a yuck out of going back and seeing what if any reply X made, but they would stay mute.
This wouldn’t be hard intellectual work, like putting in mini-Mantras.
And you wouldn’t have to dodge the bots as you did with Mantra stuff.
But then again, getting bots onto “Hate!” might make it harder for anti-whites to use Hate as an answer to anything they don’t agree with.
And who knows, we might find some guidance in how people who express an opinion on the latest cartoons deal with the word “HATE!” coming out of nowhere at them the way it does at us.
People who use the word “liar” freely are never truthful people. So I see it as a big word when I use it. But I have to now.
They fired Dr. Watson, co-Nobel Laureate, for saying that Africa’s problems are a result of low IQ’s.
The Bell Curve was a best-seller when it made that clear beyond dispute. So what have they done? They simply outlawed saying that.
In the 1950s, there was no such thing as schizophrenia. You could only call it The Schizophrenic Response. That was to make it clear that all professionals agreed it was a RESPONSE having nothing to do with human chemistry or, God knows, GENETICS.
All experts agreed on that, hence the term.
Once again, a tiny group began to look at the TESTS. The proof of the pudding was that one treated The Schizophrenic Response only by TALKING a person out of the trauma that caused that Response. But, as with racial IQ, the tests came out wrong. The American Psychiatric Association condemned such testing.
But tests on drugs by the FDA showed that they DID work. A drug company official can go to prison for selling something that comes out wrong in tests. If the psychiatrists then had sold their far more expensive Talk Cure treatments as a drug, they would have gone to prison for selling them.
Now the psychiatrists have made sure that only psychiatrists can prescribe many of those drugs. So they admitted they were wrong. But they never SAY they were wrong. The Schizophrenic Response has gone down the Memory Hole, like racial IQ analysis.
Mommy Professor has stopped trying to deal with testing that leads to heresy and has gone to outright suppression. They do not deal with Dr. Watson the way they did with Dr. Jensen.
Why does information get produced? There is no other way you can understand this new phenomenon. Suddenly the tests have begun to come out RIGHT.
Recently a whole group of tests has come out showing that the Talk Cure works and drugs do not, the way it should have come out in the first place. This is not even logical, since the problem is now universally admitted to be chemical and a diagenetic rather than a response.
The Genome Project always comes out RIGHT. Every testing that is financed is now a Just So Story.
In the past, making up one’s test results before you started risked exposure, even in the vacuum-sealed halls of academe. They’ve learned from that. The exposure of the open frauds by Global Warning advocates is just the surface, the one time they got caught. If they openly cheat on that kind of test, what kind of License to Kill do they have on RACE?
So far nobody but me has pointed out how obvious this is: “to be a forensic pathologist, you have to do two things,
1) deduce the race of a victim from the tiniest rotting remains, and
2) Join all the other Recognized Experts in denying that race exists.”
The era of the Jensens and Rushtons is OVER. The Bell Curve would not be published today. No book or treatise will be published if it contradicts orthodoxy, and certainly no study will be FINANCED if it does not guarantee results ahead of time.
The bottom line is that we will no longer be ALLOWED long explanations. We have watched the Mantra being routinely blacked out everywhere. But we sneak it in. You can’t sneak a TOME in.
We must use short, devastating stuff, like the Mantra or my description of what a forensic pathologist must do. The era of Jensen is passed. The era of BUGS has begun.
I have playing with the fact that America elected its first Catholic president in 1960, but it has no elected one since. The second point is the odd one. Even before the Hispanic invasion, Catholics were over a fourth of the American population.
And in 1960 the old stereotype completely escaped the facts. Despite all the talk about the “privileged WASPs, per capita Catholic income was higher than per capita Protestant income. Even “working class” Irish, once called shanty Irish, the people I worked with in Boston and Chicago, had union jobs in industry that paid wages that were the envy of many a WASP manager.
So here we had a quarter of the voting population, solidly middle and upper income and we have not had another Catholic president since 1963.
And I am the only one who seems to wonder about it. I haven’t hear any born and bred Catholics even bring it up.
It was THE issue among Catholics in 1960. I believe that even then-affluent Upper Darby, PA, “Ninety per cent Catholic and ninety percent Republican,” went for Kennedy. But since then the question has not come up.
But the Kennedy experience is altogether different from the Obama experience. Catholics needed get over the 1928 Al Smith experience and prove a Catholic could be president. To sum it up, Catholics wanted to make a point, but didn’t feel inferior.
Blacks will always feel inferior, even with a black president, a black pope, and world full of blacks kings. Catholics never asked for affirmative action. Blacks want it forever.
Originally Posted by Mary O’Brien:
Again, with the Asian example, are we supreme over Asians, or do we just want them to stay in their own countries?
The simple answer to your question is the latter.
By definition, a white nationalist accepts the existence of other nations.
What I now have to say sounds like a quibble, but it is not. IN MY OPINION, it is a world view your question does not reflect:
Non-whites can stay in their own countries or move to other non-white countries, this is not our concern while our survival is at stake.
One thing I saw, but that the media did not talk about, was that millions of Indians and Arabs who had lived in Africa for generations were driven out when blacks took power. The result was a loss of hard workers ands relatively intelligent people that is now causing literal starvation millions of Africans. This does not concern the media because it does not concern their real aims.
AS A PRO-White it does not concern me. It concerned me because I have seen and SMELLED real starvation, yes it has a SMELL. I knew a lot of those Arabs and Indians the “humanitarians’ forget existed.
But from a white survivalist viewpoint, this none of our business.
We ask only our own place to survive. From a white nationalist point of view, and purely THAT point of view, whether non-whites stay home or go to other non-white countries is not relevant to our ideology.
To answer your question as you mean it, we only want them to “stay home,” meaning inside the non-white world.
Our problem is that they don’t WANT to. They want the benefits and stability a white country provides. The fly in that ointment is that when they get here they destroy those benefits. That is what is so obviously wrong with the libertarian “free movement of goods, capital AND LABOR” argument.
Non-white “leaders” keep demanding that whites not object to intermarriage and that non-whites be allowed into white countries. They blame the whole world on whites. THAT is white supremacy, the idea that you can’t have an education unless non-white kids sit beside white kids.
As one official in charge of school busing said, “White children are a precious resource. They must be distributed carefully.”
How white supremacist can you GET?
White supremacy is not an ideology. It is a simple fact of world thinking today. IN THAT SENSE, it is the major force behind the drive to destroy us. “Nondiscrimination” is the battle cry behind the world wide offensive behind the drive to assimilate whites off the Planet. And in the real world, “nondiscrimination” means that there is to be no place on earth where whites are allowed to have as their own:
AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, ASIA FOR THE ASIANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”