WhitakerOnline.org Weekly Articles

March 19, 2005
Loyalty to “American Principles” Is Treason
What the American Flag Means Today
A Stark Choice

Loyalty to “American Principles” Is Treason

Leftists hate white gentiles. But every one of them will tell you he is a loyal American. He says he is loyal to “the principles America is based on.”
The Constitution tells us the only principle America is based on:

“To secure the blessings of liberty for ourselves and OUR Posterity.”

We the people are the only authority the Constitution is based on. OUR well-being is the ONLY purpose of America.

“We the People” – NOT illegal aliens. Legal aliens only have the rights they need to HELP US.

Respectable conservatives always respect this, “Loyalty to principles.” Many conservatives say they are loyal to Israel first.

This is treason.

Period.

If you are more loyal to other Catholics or other Jews or other evangelicals than you are to US, then you are a traitor. You don’t belong here.
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -

What the American Flag Means Today

African-Americans have overwhelmingly said in polls that they are about equally African and American in their loyalties. The first concern of most blacks is blacks.
Every political expert now agrees that it is stupid to expect Hispanics to be loyal to America. California Republicans lost the state by trying to take benefits away from illegal aliens. Hispanics voted overwhelmingly in favor of their brother Hispanics and against Americans.

Nobody puts it that way, because no one can be a respectable conservative and get on the national media if he says it that way. But nobody can deny that is the way Hispanic voters vote.

Only white gentiles are still droolingly loyal to the United States. So while we drool over giving freedom to Iraqis and proving to minorities we are goodies, our race faces genocide.

We are giving our loyalty away.

So white gentiles get exactly what they are asking for. They ask for nothing for themselves. They ask only to sacrifice to give to others. So they get nothing. They lose everything.

So far, so good. You get what you ask for when you declare your loyalty to a flag no matter what it does. But what upsets me is that, when white gentiles get exactly what they keep asking for, they get upset.

Your country is being overrun by the third world. Well, you keep saying you believe in a “melting pot” and a “nation of immigrants,” so they have as much right here as you do. In fact, they have MORE right to be here than you do.

You agree that America was stolen from the Indians. You agree that every attempt by earlier Americans to protect their race by segregation or to avoid rule by minorities by denying minorities the vote was wrong.

So now you celebrate those “victories.” Those are “civil rights triumphs” every conservative spokesman and conservative preacher raves about to prove he is anti-racist.

Your precious minority vote is exactly what those who tried to prevent minorities from getting suffrage said it would be. It is slavish bloc for leftism and anything that can hurt America and white gentiles. It is a slavish bloc for robbing productive people. And it is growing geometrically.

You got what you asked for.
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -

A Stark Choice

I am tired to death of dealing with “conservatives” who say their first loyalty is to Christ, by which they mean their version of Christianity. I am sick to death of soldiers who will kill Americans to enforce anything the court decides is the Constitution this week.
That is what media conservatives and preachers say the American flag stands for.

You know as well as I do that not one of the Founding Fathers would disagree with me. They had just gotten rid of blind loyalty of that same kind to their King and Country in Britain. The one thing they agreed to was that a blind loyalty to a flag was treason.

It still is.

Are you loyal to everything Jerry Falwell or Professor Nitwit or Judge Goldberg says your flag stands for or are you loyal to your own race, your own interests?

Loyalty to the United States is NOT loyalty to abstract principles like a melting pot or diversity. As I pointed out many years ago:

“By definition, a melting pot is nothing specific. Anybody who is deeply loyal to nothing specific is in desperate need of psychiatric help.”
Loyalty to “We the people of the United States of America and OUR posterity” is the exact opposite of loyalty to these manufactured “abstract principles.”

Faithfulness to “We the People” is loyalty to your OWN interests, your OWN preferences, your OWN beliefs.

And your OWN, your WHITE prejudices.

I am proud that our Founding Fathers dedicated a country to its people, and nothing else.

No Divine Right. No King in robes. No all-powerful judges in robes who can tell every state and every other branch of the Federal government what to do.

America was founded to be a nation which is made up of its people. No claims to perfection. No “rule by law, not by mere men.” No excuses.

That’s America.

Anything else is treason.

WhitakerOnline.org Weekly Articles

March 12, 2005
PC Jihad
Sissies On The Warpath
Desperate Respectables
The Friend of My Enemy Is My Enemy

PC Jihad

Most of my readers know that I constantly repeat the point that Political Correctness is not LIKE a religion, it IS a religion.

Well, what sort of religion is it? It seems to me that it is a lot like Islam with its jihad. Why do I say that?

Islam teaches that everyone is either a Muslim or an infidel. Islam requires complete devotion. The term “secular Islam” makes about as much sense as “Judeo-Christian.”

Political Correctness DEMANDS total obedience from everyone. There is no middle ground. Everyone is either Politically Correct or a “hater.”

Islam recognizes no distinction among adherents, racial, ethnic, cultural, or otherwise. You either are a Muslim or you are an infidel. If you recognize any other distinction, you are not true to Islam.

Political Correctness recognizes no distinction among adherents, racial, ethnic, cultural, or otherwise. You either are Politically Correct or you are a hater. If you recognize any other distinction, you are a hater. Unless, of course, you are a non-white.

In spite of its bloody beginnings and history, we are told by the White House and the media that Islam is a religion of “peace.”

In like manner, everyone who opposes the ABSOLUTE demands of Political Correctness is INTOLERANT. So Political Correctness is a religion of “tolerance” in the same way that Islam is a religion of “peace.”

“Spiritual” jihad in Islam is the inner battle to rid oneself of anything that hinders one from perfect obedience to Islam. Physical jihad is the war to subdue and convert or destroy infidels.

“Spiritual” Political Correctness is the inner battle against recognizing any differences among people, against “institutional racism,” “patriarchal vestiges,” etc. Physical Political Correctness is the war to subdue and eliminate the white race.

Faithful Islamic young people must memorize and recite large passages of the Koran by rote. They do this to be deemed worthy adherents and gain the approval of the Imam.

Young people living under Political Correctness are expected to memorize and recite large amounts of leftist nonsense to be blessed by its priesthood with a diploma.
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -

Sissies On The Warpath

The comparison between Political Correctness and Islam is not perfect. There are some differences. Obviously, the substance of both teachings is different. But the major difference is in their method of “jihad.”

Mohammed began Islam by good, old-fashioned murder and pillage. You either joined him or went on to the next life. It was a gruesome, but successful formula.

Political Correctness does not take a direct, masculine approach. It is feminine in its approach. All sweetness and light on the surface, but ruthless in its behind the scenes manipulations.

A Mohammedan would meet you head-on with a sword. That was his argument.

A Politically Correct “warrior” is an oxymoron. One can’t imagine such a being.

Anyone who has seen the machinations of a group of women who are at odds with one another has a glimpse of how the Politically Correct “fight.”

It takes men to meet men in battle. It takes men to keep women from each other’s throats.

It takes men to stop Political Correctness.
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -

Desperate Respectables

Respectable Conservatives are like feminine, secular Muslims. They are an oxymoron. They like to talk big and look tough, but are whimpering cowards.

Respectables are like the Tom turkey I saw recently. He is a well-fed, domesticated pet. When spring approaches, he begins to puff up to show off his plumage to the non-existent female turkeys. He can’t help himself.

He usually gets a special treat at feeding time, a few nuggets of dog food. But this time of year, when the tasty bits are thrown down, he starts to puff out his feathers before he can bend down to get the food. The chickens then swoop in to grab them.

When the time comes for someone to make a tough political stand, respectables puff up like Tom turkey to show off their “colors.” They do this to show off for some imaginary audience. They can’t help themselves.

Of course, they never achieve anything, and allow the neocon chicken hawks to swoop in and grab the initiative away from them.

That is why the neocons are running the country and the respectables are, as usual, acting like a bunch of turkeys.
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -

The Friend of My Enemy Is My Enemy

One of the tactics of war is concealment. Everyone is familiar with the camouflage worn by soldiers and painted on military vehicles. The enemy can’t strike what he can’t see.

Modern warfare has evolved more advanced forms of concealment. Instead of trying to hide troops and vehicles and weapons from the enemy with camouflage, armies create fake targets, making it much harder for the enemy to find the real ones. The plan is to get them to use up ammunition on non-existent targets, while keeping the real targets hidden.

Respectables play this role for the left and the neocons. They create all sorts of false issues to take up the time and resources of the little guy who actually wants to do something. Before these people can find the real targets, respectables have worn them out and exhausted them with incidental issues.

As long as a respectable can perform this function, he is important to the left. Of course, they have no use for him once he is no longer able to perform this function effectively. That is why the respectable must work so hard to keep up appearances.

In real war, such behavior is called “aiding and abetting the enemy.” Such people are called traitors.

One can bet that the Mohammedans knew what to do with traitors.

Maybe we can learn a bit from diversity after all.

* * * Bob Whitaker’s Weekly Articles – – February 12, 2005 * * *

1) If You Are Unarmed, Don’t Advertise It

One of my sisters got very rich and moved into a very high income neighborhood. She then got the fashion from her neighbors that having a gun in the house was a veddy veddy lower clahss attitude.

I pointed out to her that I had worked in prisons and prisoners talked about areas that had guns and places that did not have guns with exactly the same professional detachment that insurance salesmen talk about sales prospects.

A rich neighborhood that was proud it had no weapons was exactly what they were looking for. My sister told me she knew better because her neighbors had told her so.

One day two black thugs walked into her house, beat the hell out of her and her husband, and robbed the place.

Her attitude about guns has changed.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.

2) A Civil Libertarian Suppresses Freedom of Speech

Alan Dershowitz is a famous “civil libertarian” lawyer and a professor at Harvard. On one program a man pointed out that Dershowitz had dedicated his life to getting professional criminals back on the streets, which is true.

Dershowitz, the Great Civil Libertarian and Protector of Freedom of Speech, replied, “If you say that you had better put your house in your wife’s name.”

The guy backed down. Dershowitz had said that if he exercised his freedom of speech, Dershowitz would ruin him.

Dershowitz could initiate a lawsuit against him for defamation and force the man to hire lawyers he couldn’t afford. Win or lose, the man would be ruined.

No one mentioned that this Great Civil Libertarian had just threatened someone who was exercising his freedom of speech.

As always, no one noticed it but me.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.

3) Incident in Moscow

Some years back I was walking with my nephew in Moscow when we came across a dead man lying in the street who had been shot by the Russian Mafia.

I pointed out to my nephew what a professional job it was. The man was dead before he hit the ground, which took a calm shot.

Obviously the world I was familiar with was not the world of my sister or Alan Dershowitz.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.

4) My World, and Welcome to It

I went to a lot of very bad places. People like Alan Dershowitz and my sister’s wealthy Fashionable Attitude neighbors are bringing those places here.

My sister has changed her attitude about guns. She now realizes that for people to say, “We are a very rich part of town with lots to steal, and we have no guns” is not a smart thing to say. But I think she regards most of my other common sense ideas as rahther lowah clahss.

Dershowitz considers professional criminals to be his allies against the white gentiles. He keeps warning Jews that we are out to destroy them.

So he defends professional criminals and, like all three of the major Jewish Conventions, Reformed, Orthodox and Conservative, he demands that America’s borders be opened to the third world so we white gentiles can’t be united to destroy Jews.

I am not joking. Read their official statements. Go read them.

I have been in those prisons. I have been in the third world.

A lot.

Enough so I know what a professional kill looks like.

No one dares say what I just said. So now that world is coming here.

I’ll be right at home.
-. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -.

5) Dershowitz Defines the Yuppie Fashionable Opinion

Now here is the connection between my sister’s attitudes and Dershowitz’s.

All the people my sister associates with got their opinions of what an educated person should think in college. Their parents got their ideas of what an educated person should think in college.

But all the professors who told them what to think were at Podunk U. To their professors, the ones who told them what to think, a Professor at Harvard like Dershowitz was one step above God.

All the Fashionable Opinion my sister listens to comes from the sheep who were the sheep of Dershowitz’s sheep.

I remember some of these Fashionable Opinion Sheep were astounded that “some people in the 29204 area” – the Fashionable Area – by which they meant Lake High and me, were leading in the fight for the Confederate flag!

NOBODY in that nouveau riche area was for the Confederate flag! That was TACKY! Harvard professors said so, their Podunk U. professors said so, and The State newspaper said so because the New York Times said so.

And it is tacky to say those hard-working third worlders should be kept out because the masters of their Podunk U. professors said so.

Dershowitz and the Fashionable Opinion Sheep said that opposing immigration was lowah clahss. To them, for someone to say, “We do not need those hard-working third worlders here,” is retarded.

Meanwhile, you have to be a real retard to say, “This is a rich place with no guns. Come and get it.”

You have to be a real retard to say, “We need those hard-working third worlders here.”

In other words, these people are retards.

And they’re going to pay for it, big time.