Also, listening to myself, I realize that I kept saying “The White Race”. As Whitaker has pointed out, no Black man would say that “The Black Race” was under attack, as if it were an abstraction. A Black man would say MY people, My race. We should always say MY race or OUR race, OUR people, are under attack. Makes it personal.

My reasoning falls in line with what Bob just laid out here so I’m pleased with that. I was facing situations where people had heard The Mantra or a situation where I could not use the Mantra. So I would run the conversation sort of like Bob suggested: “yea I kind of expected him to say that since he tends to be anti-White.”

It works.

The conversation will pause for a moment while the other person gives that momentarily confused look. Sometimes if you’re expecting it, you can see the muscles around their eyes move, and their eyes bulge for a moment before they regain their train of thought.

When asked why I used the term, my response: “how can someone who supports conditions that lead to a world without White children be anything but anti-White?”

I guess that’s why backdooring our message via terminology and repetition works so well.

You’ll probably have more success getting a single Chick-fil-a to whitelist a site then trying to tackle Symantec and the blacklisting database they use. Try to get Chick-fil-a to tell you what Norton product they are using, you’ll probably have to talk to someone who does their IT since I doubt their on-site staff will know much about it.

I have used anti-White with some friends and family a while back, and usually I get blank stares. It takes time for them to process that such a category even exists.

The sad truth is, most Whites have never considered the idea that they owe some loyalty to other Whites.

Norton probably (as a few years back) still leans on the definitions supplied by pink rabbits that compose the ADL, JDL terror leagues.

Best of all, simply describing someone as anti-White usually qualify as 1% new information for one’s audience.

I basically say, if you define you dominate. It certainly worked against the sissy rightwing.

I was in Chick-fil-a today and using their WIFI. I surfed to this site on my phone and it came up and said “this site is blocked, it is a Hate site”.

I have never had that happen anywhere else. They were using Norton as their service because that is what webpage came up.

So, the Faith and Values First crowd may very well be a problem in the future. Or, maybe they are just using Norton as their anti-virus anti-porn service and they include “Hate” sites now as those to be blocked.

And we (including me) need to do a better job of self-discipline on these threads.

Perhaps, Bob could come up with some solid “gems” for us to use effectively using “anti-White terrorism” any and every time we see a news story about crimes against Whites?

Seems like that would be a natural, effective way to add another dimension to the Mantra which would reinforce how Whites are literally “under attack” each day.