<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title></title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 14:47:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cults and Trash</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/17/cults-and-trash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/17/cults-and-trash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 10:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coaching Session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=23747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One commenter said I am just like Jim Jones, and thank God we are not in Jonestown, I guess it would be Bobstown. How many people would take an insult like that? No one has even mentioned my discussion of the fact that after I wrote about Jewoholism and then wrote another argument, over seventy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One commenter said I am just like Jim Jones, and thank God we are not in Jonestown, I guess it would be Bobstown.</p>
<p>How many people would take an insult like that?</p>
<p>No one has even mentioned my discussion of the fact that after I wrote about Jewoholism and then wrote another argument, over seventy comments came in about Jews and Jewoholism and only one comment on the new article had anything to do with the new article.</p>
<p>I pointed out briefly that that was enormously insulting, but no one has mentioned it since.</p>
<p>It seems to me that insulting me is free of charge here.</p>
<p>Someone once called me white trash, and I pointed he had just proven I wasn’t.   I pointed out that at that time in South Carolina, if he had called white trash white trash they would pull out their broad-bladed knife which they opened with one hand and slashed his face, if he was lucky, his throat if he was not</p>
<p>Anything even vaguely approaching a Cult would make it fatal for a person to call me Jim Jones.</p>
<p>It doesn’t bother me.   I expect a lot of silliness.</p>
<p>But if you’re going to learn to Mantra Think, you first have to be able to see reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/17/cults-and-trash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whatever Else You Do at High Tide, Keep the Money Punishment</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/16/whatever-else-you-do-at-high-tide-keep-the-money-punishment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/16/whatever-else-you-do-at-high-tide-keep-the-money-punishment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coaching Session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=23718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Out of the eight or nine Crusades, only one was at all successful. More interesting is the fact that, in two or three of them, the Crusaders were on the verge of victory, their numbers were there and all enemy fortresses and forces had been dispersed. In every one of those cases, the different leaders [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of the eight or nine Crusades, only one was at all successful. More interesting is the fact that, in two or three of them, the Crusaders were on the verge of victory, their numbers were there and all enemy fortresses and forces had been dispersed.</p>
<p>In every one of those cases, the different leaders got down to disputing who was The Leader and how to proceed with the attack on that basis. In all two or three cases the Moslems had time to completely recover and totally defeat and in one case almost wipe out the Crusaders.</p>
<p>In one huge battle between a German tribe and Rome, the Germans were doing fine until one of their great leaders died. They then proceeded to go into official mourning, right there in the middle of the battle. It was a matter of Principle or Morality or whatever the hell else nitwits used to justify something besides fighting to win.</p>
<p>The Romans, surprisingly, did not go along with this quaint custom. They went out for a good old fashioned slaughter while the Germans were weeping.</p>
<p>I don’t CARE about Justice. I care about winning.</p>
<p>The traitors who are destroying us deserve no mercy, and the person saying this has been in through world wars. I am only interested in saying what is most effective to win and, once we gain the advantage, don’t follow the history of those dumbass Germans or the Crusaders.</p>
<p>As one commenter said, even the Tribunals demanded by the most chest beating glorifier will miss a LOT of the enemy. In the real world, most of the guilty will buy their way out, and, above all, the search will end.</p>
<p>Almost my sole interest is that we USE the money method our enemies have worked out so well.</p>
<p>Believe it or not, what I am most afraid is not Tribunals, but that once the tribunals are over, you’ll forget all about the pay system to keep people researching who and whose heirs must keep paying, not just after the tribunals are over, but ten years from now and a century from now.</p>
<p>Yes, yes, we are talking about Mere Money versus Human Life and all the rest. But in the real world and in the long term, all that chest-beating crap amounts to getting all the steam off.</p>
<p>Nobody remembers the Nuremberg Trials. Nobody is afraid of being called to a Tribunal in the real world. The Holocaust is remembered every day because it pays out billions of dollars each year.</p>
<p>As I just pointed out, professional conservatives are still decrying Hitler and none of them are asking that any Communist crime be punished for the simple reason that they will lost their JOBS if they get off the Holocaust-racist message.</p>
<p>Whatever else you do when the time COMES, please do not STOP with tribunals.</p>
<p>Keep the steam on.</p>
<p>With mere, dirty old MONEY.</p>
<p>This is more important to me than the whole question of your dramatic tribunals. I disavow tribunals now because they get us off the subject. I am even more worried that having anything that dramatic will blow off the steam and lead to the just as dramatic Love Fest afterwards.</p>
<p>WHATEVER YOU DO, KEEP ON THE STEAM!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/16/whatever-else-you-do-at-high-tide-keep-the-money-punishment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mantra Thinking 2:  Get Out of the Stream of Nonsense</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/15/mantra-thinking-2-get-out-of-the-stream-of-nonsense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/15/mantra-thinking-2-get-out-of-the-stream-of-nonsense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 11:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coaching Session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=23624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The respectable conservative mantra has always been “It’s not about race.” John Derbyshire was just fired by National Review because, among other things, he warned whites against going to a place which is almost all black. He did not make on single statement in that article that could be factually disagreed with by anybody who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The respectable conservative mantra has always been “It’s not about race.”</p>
<p>John Derbyshire was just fired by National Review because, among other things, he warned whites against going to a place which is almost all black. He did not make on single statement in that article that could be factually disagreed with by anybody who read it.</p>
<p>It was a set of banned truths.</p>
<p>For example, people often slip into saying that police are not allowed to &#8220;profile.” Then you watch a TV program the hero of which is a Police Profiler.</p>
<p>Racial profiling is outlawed, but not because it is not based on facts. A black person is six to twenty times as likely to have committed a crime than a white person.</p>
<p>This is the important point: The police are required to ignore that. Border patrols are required to insist that a person who is blond and has no accent is just as likely to be an illegal Mexican immigrant in El Paso as a brown person who speaks only Spanish.</p>
<p>This is for REAL, gang!</p>
<p>What is also for real is that any respectable conservative who repeats what I just said is fired.</p>
<p>Any respectable conservative who asks to for a definition of the word “racist” that he has just been called will be looking for a new job in this depression economy.</p>
<p>The same is true for any law enforcement officer.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, who mentions any of this?</p>
<p>Your Obedient Servant and no one else.</p>
<p>If commenters would stop worrying about how complicated Mantra Thinking is, they could concentrate on reading articles like this and learning that Mantra Thinking is ridding your mind of all the standard blocks. That is extremely difficult, but it is NOT complicated.</p>
<p>When someone says “racist,” point out that what he means is that IN HIS OPINION something is racist.</p>
<p>This changes the dialogue. He is now demanding laws to punish, not Racism, but ANYTHING HE CHOOSES TO CALL racism. But nobody, I mean NOBODY but me, and now the White Rabbit, can be trusted to say that.</p>
<p>I just had an article about how the media get away with short statements in the midst of articles which are dead wrong, fatally wrong, but anyone outside of Bob and Company will talk about the whole article and try to put that totally false statement “in the context” of the article.</p>
<p>We are always seeing professional conservatives say, &#8220;It’s not a matter of race.” According to present wage-earning respectable conservatives, nothing is a matter of race.</p>
<p>Especially race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/15/mantra-thinking-2-get-out-of-the-stream-of-nonsense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mantra Thinking: “Hold it Right There!”</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/13/mantra-thinking-hold-it-right-there/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/13/mantra-thinking-hold-it-right-there/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 10:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coaching Session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=23403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Week Magazine had an article about different kinds of diets. It said, in passing, “Tests have shown that people on low carb diets do not lose more weight than those on other diets taking in the same number of calories.” Low carb diets threatened to begin doing to the giant Nutritional Education Profession exactly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Week Magazine had an article about different kinds of diets. It said, in passing, “Tests have shown that people on low carb diets do not lose more weight than those on other diets taking in the same number of calories.”</p>
<p>Low carb diets threatened to begin doing to the giant Nutritional Education Profession exactly what the discovery of bacteria did to medicine. Bacteria began the total destruction of everything Doctors of Medicine at the University had been paid to learn and know for a thousand years.</p>
<p>There have been plenty of those tests, but they certainly have not shown what the professional nutritionists would give a fortune to prove: that calories are all that matter.</p>
<p>If this had been a headline in a newspaper, it would have been subjected to complete scrutiny. I have been on low carb diets, and while it may not be true that “Calories Don’t Count,” it is for sure I lost a more weight and took in more calories.</p>
<p>But here is the problem: This was NOT a newspaper headline. It was a line in an article. A person who doesn’t think in Mantra terms wouldn’t even notice it.</p>
<p>Yet right here is what we observe all the time: An outright lie, but a lie in low key, a lie told while your attention is focused on where the article is taking you.</p>
<p>Another article in This Week said that “a test had proven” that people who are strongly against gays have gay tendencies themselves. In other words, instead of stating the standard Politically Correct line, they stuck it in the middle of a paragraph in the middle of an article.</p>
<p>ONLY, I repeat, ONLY a Mantra Thinker would say, “Hold it right there!”</p>
<p>I am not saying that there are no such tests. I am saying that the statements are lies.</p>
<p>I remember very well when anyone who said that blacks TESTED lower than whites was anaziswhowantedtokillsixmillionjews.</p>
<p>A Mantra Thinker is always on guard for that stray sentence that completely strips the speaker or writer of any credibility. Unlike most people, the instant he hears a statement like this dropped in, he goes through ALL the implications.</p>
<p>One of BUGsers’ most infuriating and effective strategies is that we don’t let go.</p>
<p>While The Party Line in The Week goes unquestioned, a professional interrogator would be useless if he let ONE such remark go without wringing every drop of sweat and admission he possibly could out of it. These sentences, in the hands of a Mantra Thinker, can destroy the entire credibility of the writer.</p>
<p>But the average person would simply do what most of our main page commenters do: He would take the article on diets AS A WHOLE and discuss what his World View on that question is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/13/mantra-thinking-hold-it-right-there/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yes, Ole Bob is Fussy as Hell</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/12/yes-ole-bob-is-fussy-as-hell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/12/yes-ole-bob-is-fussy-as-hell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 10:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coaching Session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=23401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is almost impossible to explain how the Mantra works until you use it. As comments here show, once you use the Mantra you go into a phase where you simply cannot believe others DON’T use it. In my experience, nobody who has used the Mantra has ever STOPPED using it. Mantra Thinking is in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is almost impossible to explain how the Mantra works until you use it. As comments here show, once you use the Mantra you go into a phase where you simply cannot believe others DON’T use it.</p>
<p>In my experience, nobody who has used the Mantra has ever STOPPED using it.</p>
<p>Mantra Thinking is in the same category. I don’t define it, I expect you to grow into using it. Once you do, I don’t think you will ever STOP using it.</p>
<p>Much of my writing here that doesn’t seem to relate to the Mantra uses some Mantra Thinking on such a wide range of subjects that the thinking itself very hard is to see. Commenters are usually so lost in making general comments on their world view that they don’t notice the Mantra Thinking connection.</p>
<p>Most never will.</p>
<p>But it is VITAL to me that SOME do.</p>
<p>That is the reason I keep bitching so unkindly about Black Outs.</p>
<p>Always remember that I am honestly, seriously, deeply worried about making the mistake Roger Pearson did. My whole, repeat, my WHOLE concern is in NOT leaving a hole when I go that cannot be filled.</p>
<p>So when I read Dick Whitman’s comment, published in full in another article here, it was my idea of fulfillment.</p>
<p>When I write about Black Outs, it is out of FEAR, which is where most genuine anger comes from.</p>
<p>I bitched about your Black Out when you were having that long discussion on David Duke.</p>
<p>Insults and unfounded accusations about Doctor Dave didn’t worry me because I know him pretty well, and he has been subjected to so much abuse, including physical beatings, that you would have to be a past Master to hit him with one that would really bother him.</p>
<p>I have written that Dave is a great man and he has been a hero of mine all my life. He doesn’t need my protection.</p>
<p>My problem was not with what you did say, but with what you DIDN’T say.</p>
<p>You discussed a lot of things about Jews and about Dave, but what really saddened me was the hole you left.</p>
<p>After eighty or so comments I had to be the ONLY one to talk about the all-important difference between Dave’s approach and mine. He is using the old one I used to use! He is exclaiming the virtues of survival for ALL RACES!</p>
<p>Dave is NOT focusing EXCLUSIVELY on the ONLY race whose numbers are actually DECLINING, the ONE race which the media is openly bragging is being done away with.</p>
<p>He MENTIONS that plenty, but that is not his FOCUS.</p>
<p>Seventy comments, and no one mentioned that. So after waiting it out, I had to bring it up.</p>
<p>It is NOT enough that ***I*** answer it.</p>
<p>In fact it is a failure in my life’s purpose if I have to deal with it myself alone.</p>
<p>My job is only done when YOU can handle it.</p>
<p>The Coach’s job is produce not only players, but that some of those players become Coaches.</p>
<p>I am a coach, not a substitute player.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/12/yes-ole-bob-is-fussy-as-hell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Hate to be Nice to Anybody,  but I Can’t Improve on Dick Whitman’s Statement!</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/11/i-hate-to-be-nice-to-anybody-but-i-cant-improve-on-dick-whitmans-statement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/11/i-hate-to-be-nice-to-anybody-but-i-cant-improve-on-dick-whitmans-statement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 12:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coaching Session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=23372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve played both high school and college basketball. I’ve seen coaches scream at my teammates and I, in at least one case (in High School), remember a player bursting out in tears. I saw a coach slap a teammate in the face for being too soft. These coaches demanded excellence and when we made stupid [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve played both high school and college basketball. I’ve seen coaches scream at my teammates and I, in at least one case (in High School), remember a player bursting out in tears. I saw a coach slap a teammate in the face for being too soft. These coaches demanded excellence and when we made stupid mistakes, we would hear about it. The meanest coach I ever had (and most demanding) now coaches at a very high level (he won a lot and made his players better and went from coaching high school JV teams to Div 1 College in 10 years).</p>
<p>I see Bob as being no different than any of these coaches. He demands excellence and when we make stupid mistakes, we hear about it. DON’T TAKE IT PERSONALLY! Just like these coaches I had, Bob wants to win and make you better.</p>
<p>Now for the troll situation. Because our enemy cannot handle our message outright they will use dirty tricks. Trolling is one such dirty trick. And the sophistication of the trolls will increase. As you see with the current troll, he was here a long time and even took time to spread the Mantra in the past.</p>
<p>In fact, trolls will use spreading the Mantra as their pretext to be here to engage in trolling activities. They’ll spread the Mantra one minute, and then start attacking other pro-Whites the next (or engage in other trolling activities).</p>
<p>Eventually what we’ll see is a troll or a couple trolls (who used to post here or do at this time) start websites committed to smearing BUGS or FTWR. Their main purpose will be to keep others from staying on our message. In fact, there will be people who posted here for years who will one day turn on us and start stirring shit against BUGS.</p>
<p>They’ll say “Don’t start posting at BUGS, those people are all cult members…I used to post there..stay away…BUGS is there to keep you from discussing the Jews…Whitaker is a Jew…blah,blah,blah&#8230;etc., etc.”</p>
<p>You guys need to remember that this is a legitimate war. The enemy (anti-Whites) can not handle our message. All they can do is use dirty tricks against us while trying to censor us. And as the message spreads farther (and the anti-White system starts collapsing even faster), the dirty tricks will become MORE DIRTY and more sophisticated.</p>
<p>Wars require disciplined personnel to carry out a plan of action in order to neutralize an enemy system. Wars are stressful and uncertain. But we (pro-Whites) are willing to accept the stress and uncertainty because we feel/believe/understand the importance of saving our race (by destroying the anti-White system by disseminating the mantra to the tipping point).</p>
<p>We will disseminate the Mantra to the tipping point.<br />
We will disseminate the Mantra to the tipping point.<br />
We will disseminate the Mantra to the tipping point.(1)</p>
<p>(1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tipping_Point</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/11/i-hate-to-be-nice-to-anybody-but-i-cant-improve-on-dick-whitmans-statement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Go, Brian, Go!</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/10/go-brian-go/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/10/go-brian-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 10:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coaching Session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=23243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[William Pierce, the highly successful leader of the National Alliance, was a man I knew, liked, and respected. As soon as he died, the organization became moribund. Something he said near the end of his life has become the basis of what I want from BUGS. He was asked if there was anyone to take [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>William Pierce, the highly successful leader of the National Alliance, was a man I knew, liked, and respected. As soon as he died, the organization became moribund.</p>
<p>Something he said near the end of his life has become the basis of what I want from BUGS.</p>
<p>He was asked if there was anyone to take over after his demise. He is reported to have replied, “Yes, but none of them are still alive.” This struck the people who quoted it to me as a piece of ironic humor.</p>
<p>It didn’t amuse me.</p>
<p>It scared the hell out of me.</p>
<p>The man was stating frankly that he had thrown his LIFE away!</p>
<p>I didn’t consider that a bit amusing.</p>
<p>If you can keep that ironic remark in mind without a blackout, you can understand that I am on the hunt to have people on hand who can take the BUGS message right on without a break, whether I am here or not.</p>
<p>For years Brian has been the anchor for our tech work and done the WORK of being editor.</p>
<p>I have been urging him for years to take over and MAKE DECISIONS as editor. HE felt he was too young. So I am ECSTATIC that he has decided to get in here and take control.</p>
<p>One thing I had to learn over the years was delegation. It takes guts to delegate. But you have probably had experience with management that thinks it has to monitor every single step taken by those it manages. You can’t play that game in the big leagues.</p>
<p>If you delegate you become responsible for others’ mistakes. It’s scary.</p>
<p>But if you DON’T delegate, your managerial sphere is going to be VERY limited.</p>
<p>And if you don’t delegate, especially after the age of 70, you might be saying that everything you have worked for dies with you.</p>
<p>Intellectually I begat White Rabbit and he begat beefcake. But it never occurred to White Rabbit or beefcake to clear their initiatives with me.</p>
<p>To put it another way, Ole Coach will advise you when you need it, but you’re the one in the field.</p>
<p>I can’t do your blocking or your passing for you.</p>
<p>And one day the guys on the field now will have to coach their own teams.</p>
<p>If not, the season will be over forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/10/go-brian-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/09/policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/09/policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 22:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comment Responses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=23224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Upon Bob&#8217;s insistence, I would like to announce a change in comment policy regarding the daily article. Starting tomorrow we will enforce a policy of one comment per commenter per article per day. Any following comments or those that are off topic will be deleted, regardless of merit. Bob and I don&#8217;t wish to discourage [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upon Bob&#8217;s insistence, I would like to announce a change in comment policy regarding the daily article. </p>
<p>Starting tomorrow we will enforce a policy of one comment per commenter per article per day.  Any following comments or those that are off topic will be deleted, regardless of merit.</p>
<p>Bob and I don&#8217;t wish to discourage commenting, but we are doing this to encourage a well written and thought out comment to reduce mental diarrhea. </p>
<p>The swarm will not be affected by this change.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/09/policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jewaholism 2</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/09/jewoholism-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/09/jewoholism-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 11:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coaching Session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=23161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using the title again will galvanize your interest. I wrote an article on Jewaholism and the comments reached 62 before Brian had to make an editorial decision to end the comments In my next article, I congratulated you on a major step forward in our history, and only one of two comments on it had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using the title again will galvanize your interest.</p>
<p>I wrote an article on Jewaholism and the comments reached 62 before Brian had to make an editorial decision to end the comments</p>
<p>In my next article, I congratulated you on a major step forward in our history, and only one of two comments on it had anything to say about that. The rest of the comments to that article was still about Jewaholism and bitches about Brian’s editorial decision.</p>
<p>This ignoring of my congratulations and concentration on Jews is as insulting as you can possibly be to me and to my message. But I am sure no one noticed that but me.</p>
<p>No, commenters were too busy telling me how I insulted them or how I am a Cult Leader.</p>
<p>But if this sort of thing really bothered me I would have gotten out of this business long ago.</p>
<p>So the comments on Jewaholism are over seventy and climbing, while my congratulations’ comment score is one or maybe two.</p>
<p>Which shows you the ratio interest in Jews is to interest in what I have to say here.</p>
<p>I’m used to this. I expect it.</p>
<p>Clearly if I want to get even OUR readers really involved, I should talk about Jews and other fascinating issues.</p>
<p>But I am not interested in large numbers of enthusiastic dues-payers.</p>
<p>I’m looking for a few good BRAINS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/09/jewoholism-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keep Our Work Area Clean!</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/08/keep-our-work-area-clean/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/08/keep-our-work-area-clean/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 11:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coaching Session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=23125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ONLY time we should see links without explanation in Swarm is when it is a straight REPORT of putting the Mantra on the web. There seem to be LOT of blackouts here. I will see a link that has vaguely to do with something a Stormfronter would be interested in. If you put a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ONLY time we should see links without explanation in Swarm is when it is a straight REPORT of putting the Mantra on the web.</p>
<p>There seem to be LOT of blackouts here. I will see a link that has vaguely to do with something a Stormfronter would be interested in.</p>
<p>If you put a link in BUGS, a WORK area, explain WHY it is there, don’t just drop it in to waste our time.</p>
<p>If it is not a REPORT, a link has to be EXPLAINED.</p>
<p>Surely you can stop having a blackout about that simple rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/08/keep-our-work-area-clean/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congratulations on Mantra Thinking!</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/07/congratulations-on-mantra-thinking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/07/congratulations-on-mantra-thinking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 10:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coaching Session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=23041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One commenter said he gets confused when he wants to trace ideas to me. He seems to indicate a certain guilt about this. No way, Jose! You are doing EXACTLY what, years ago, I could only call Mantra Thinking. Years ago, when those who are now called the &#8220;old hands,&#8221; Lord Nelson, the Trucker, WR, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One commenter said he gets confused when he wants to trace ideas to me. He seems to indicate a certain guilt about this.</p>
<p>No way, Jose!</p>
<p>You are doing EXACTLY what, years ago, I could only call Mantra Thinking.</p>
<p>Years ago, when those who are now called the &#8220;old hands,&#8221; Lord Nelson, the Trucker, WR, had not yet begun here, I would talk about Mantra Thinking. I still do.</p>
<p>But, like the use of the Mantra itself, it is really impossible to explain MT to people who have not been here, been out THERE with our message, and had practice in these things.</p>
<p>Other people are sincerely trying to sell you doctrines. I am trying to sell a Way of Thinking. My goal is and always has been to get you to see the holes in the world that I see people falling through all the time the way I do.</p>
<p>Back in the Chained Book Age, it made no difference whatsoever whether what you said was true or not, or whether what you said WORKED or not. All that made the slightest difference was quoting an Authority, and above all quoting him in Latin or Greek. So no matter how many studies you did, men had more teeth than women because ARISTOTLE said so.</p>
<p>Taking blood from sick people never did them any good, but you could quote Galen, not just in Latin, but in the high-class language of upper class Romans, GREEK, stating flatly that what George Washington needed when he was near death from pneumonia was to have his veins opened and a quart or two of his blood put into a bowl.</p>
<p>This kind of crap would be a joke, and a rather superficial one, if it had not chained US to our chained books.</p>
<p>So in these million words, I said over and over that I was showing you DISCIPLINE in how to save our race. I did not want to get sidetracked, but I would say from time to time that what this discipline, this Other Kind of thinking, would end up in was a new kind of thinking.</p>
<p>And when one of you describes it to me, he sounds APOLOGETIC!</p>
<p>In answer, I should sound CONGRATULATORY!</p>
<p>It took me years to get anyone to use the Mantra itself, but now that we are a Swarm the Mantra Thinking has gotten under way, and I can see why no one would notice it but me.</p>
<p>Our thinking is the latest stage in the transition from the Chained Book Age to the Google Age.</p>
<p>In the Chained Book Age, information was hard to come by. Now it overwhelms us. Mantra Thinking asks, &#8220;Why was this particular information produced?&#8221;</p>
<p>Mantra Thinking is ANALYSIS of information. It is the careful study of the BASICS BEHIND information.</p>
<p>For me, Mantra Thinking is like the Mantra itself: You can&#8217;t understand it until you get used to using it. And once you get used to using it, you will see people who use the old thinking as dunces.</p>
<p>So this was glad tidings, and I offer my congratulations. Before we discuss a history of thought, let&#8217;s develop the thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/07/congratulations-on-mantra-thinking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Too Many of You are Still Jewaholics</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/06/too-many-of-you-are-still-jewaholics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/06/too-many-of-you-are-still-jewaholics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 11:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment Responses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=22988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somebody threw in “Israel for Jews” into my nice, neat, Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans. Outside of satisfying your ADDICTION for talking about Jews, what GOOD does that do? The Jews and Hitler are what every anti-white is desperate to get into. He can get off into a discussion of the Middle [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somebody threw in “Israel for Jews” into my nice, neat, Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans.</p>
<p>Outside of satisfying your ADDICTION for talking about Jews, what GOOD does that do?</p>
<p>The Jews and Hitler are what every anti-white is desperate to get into. He can get off into a discussion of the Middle East</p>
<p>Worst of all, any mention of Jews or Israel is completely familiar to everybody, and gets their minds off of our NEW points about white genocide that they have never heard of before.</p>
<p>The best thing you can for anti-whites is to talk abut Jews and Communists. We work our asses off to put them on totally unfamiliar ground where they can’t come up with anything, and then some drooling institution escapee EXPOSES JOOS or Commies.</p>
<p>Why don’t you just cut our legs off LITERALLY.</p>
<p>If you come from BUGS and talk about Jews, Israel, or whatever Stormfront addiction you are addicted to, I beg you to GO ELSEWHERE.</p>
<p>And, please, I was in alcohol and drug recovery and I sponsored a number of people, so don’t tell me you can take just one little sip, one little mention of JOOS and then leave it alone.</p>
<p>If you are a jewaholic, don’t take the first goddam drink, and don’t mention the first Jew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/06/too-many-of-you-are-still-jewaholics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Management</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/04/management/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/04/management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 11:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coaching Session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=22854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my favorite examples of how anybody who is going to exercise power has to go in blind has to do with aviation negotiations and Richard Nixon. It is impossible to imagine anyone being on top of being President of the United States going in. Most people go there from the Senate or was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my favorite examples of how anybody who is going to exercise power has to go in blind has to do with aviation negotiations and Richard Nixon.</p>
<p>It is impossible to imagine anyone being on top of being President of the United States going in. Most people go there from the Senate or was a governor or a general or a high level executive who knew next to nothing about the rubber or syrup or service his institution produced.</p>
<p>If there is any job that would seem to prepare you for being president, it would seem to be the only other elected national office, one heartbeat from the white House, the vice presidency.</p>
<p>But when he first reached the White House in 1969, having been Vice President for two terms 1953-1961, Nixon admitted he had no idea how to allocate his time. He spent one of his first days in the Oval Office agonizing over the details of a civil aviation agreement. Far be it from me to minimize the importance of civil aviation agreements, especially ones made way, way above my pay grade, But they are at absolute most the business of a Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, and just go to the President for initialing.</p>
<p>But it was on Nixon&#8217;s desk, so instead of calling on someone to prioritize for him he worried about it.</p>
<p>Even a former vice president goes in blind. But Nixon probably thought that, as a former senator and vice president, he was expected to know how to do his own prioritizing.</p>
<p>Wrong.</p>
<p>In one of the four thousand or so articles here I have talked about the Senior Executive Service (SES). Eventually, everything here relates to everything else.</p>
<p>Before the Civil Service Reform Act in 1978 or so, the government was not very up-to-date on some things.</p>
<p>Surprise, surprise!</p>
<p>Before the Reform Act the top three grades, equivalent to generals were called &#8220;super grades.&#8221; A person who was in supply in one part of the government, say office supplies, would advance grade by grade in that same area right on up to GS-18.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, a sizable typewriter company looking for a new Chief Executive Officer would not look for someone who knew all about typewriters. They hired somebody who had been a chief executive officer or his deputy somewhere else and usually in an entirely different industry.</p>
<p>It took less than a century, but the SES caught up with this. Before 1978 if you wanted to fill a slot at the top of anything you had to find someone who had come up in that area. If you wanted someone to take over office supplies, he had to be picked from the few people who had risen to a supergrade, GS-15 or above, in office supplies.</p>
<p>The Reform Act totally scrapped that. The old supergrades were changed to SES, the old GS-16 becoming SES Level I. Since 1978 an SES is expected to be able to manage personnel, supplies, or other things from one end of government to the other, from Defense to the Interior.</p>
<p>In other words, even the Federal Government finally realized that if you go in at the top, you go in blind.</p>
<p>And nothing is a better example of going in at the top than Mantra Thinking.</p>
<p>The specialists, the writers of times on both sides, hate it.</p>
<p>But if even the Feds can get with reality, so can we.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/04/management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Writing</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/03/writing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/03/writing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 12:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coaching Session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=22801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The best short comment I ever got on my writing was “Bob writes interesting stuff when he isn’t writing about himself.” I got a kick out of it because it was so blunt, the exact thing a diplomat doesn’t EVER say to a self-obsessed old man. It has been remarked that writers have to be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best short comment I ever got on my writing was “Bob writes interesting stuff when he isn’t writing about himself.” I got a kick out of it because it was so blunt, the exact thing a diplomat doesn’t EVER say to a self-obsessed old man.</p>
<p>It has been remarked that writers have to be crazy, because they spend their entire working lives sitting there talking to themselves. The fact that one is sitting there talking to himself is obscured by the fact that one is doing it on a machine by hand instead of babbling to oneself on a street corner.</p>
<p>But some have done it on a voice recorder. They really are talking to themselves, just like that guy you heard about who ended up in the dingaling ward.</p>
<p>When you DO get something published, you often have a bit of a feeling that you are making something private public. Even Stephen King, who couldn’t be MORE public, has an intensely personal feeling about a book he has been up close and personal with for MONTHS, just him and that fetus literally growing into a book for the millions.</p>
<p>All writers get frustrated when they ask people to read over what they are doing. He gives you his project which he has been slowly developing and rewriting, and you point out some spelling errors and grammar. He is waiting for the first verdict of you, his first jury, and what he gets is some school work.</p>
<p>The immediately result is that said writer gets a desperate wish to have kidneys for breakfast.</p>
<p>Yours.</p>
<p>But I have slowly come to realize that it is the writer, not the first reader, who is being naïve.</p>
<p>You are trying to find out whether your draft writing is fulfilling your own ambitions for it. Is it entertaining &#8212; for your AUDIENCE? Is it understandable? For your AUDIENCE? You are a writer precisely because you know this audience and you have worked your butt off to be able to be THEIR writer.</p>
<p>Then you hand a draft of your special idea to your special people, to someone and expect THEM to look it over and tell you how it plays to a particular group of people of whom he has no knowledge and, likely, damned little interest. And you have an urge to rip out his guts when he is more impressed by your using &#8216;their instead&#8217; of &#8216;their,&#8217; than he is about subjects and people you have spent most of your waking life thinking about.</p>
<p>When I went to a party, it seemed that most people I met wanted to WRITE. Over half the time what they wanted to write was an autobiography.</p>
<p>They are most interested in themselves.</p>
<p>Aren’t we all? That is why I put the word AUDIENCE in caps up there.</p>
<p>So there is a personal element to my getting upset when comments drift away completely from the point I am trying to make. I bitch and I moan, but the simple fact is that Hitler IS more interesting than Bob Whitaker.</p>
<p>That is where DISCIPLINE comes in, both for you and for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/03/writing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Going In at the Top Means Going in Blind</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/02/going-in-at-the-top-means-going-in-blind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/02/going-in-at-the-top-means-going-in-blind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 11:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coaching Session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=22744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some months or years ago, Brian announced to me that I had written four thousand articles for Whitakeronline . So by now we’re coming up on five thousand. I hate to shock you, but I suspect that some of you have not read every single one of them. Or maybe you forgot some. When I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some months or years ago, Brian announced to me that I had written four thousand articles for Whitakeronline .</p>
<p>So by now we’re coming up on five thousand.</p>
<p>I hate to shock you, but I suspect that some of you have not read every single one of them. Or maybe you forgot some.</p>
<p>When I was describing the permanent punishment I recommended for anti-whites, one of you actually looked up my first description of it: “Don&#8217;t Lose the Victory!”</p>
<p>I deeply appreciate that. I could never have found it.</p>
<p>I hit the link, but I still can’t figure out the date on that article.</p>
<p>As White Rabbit very accurately pointed out, I tend to panic when something technical happens to our site.</p>
<p>But then again, the reason you tolerate me knowing so little about the web and other topics is because there is advice someone else can’t give you.</p>
<p>My experience is that if you seek power you simply have to give up being too embarrassed to make a fool of yourself.</p>
<p>I went from international aviation negotiator to special assistant to the director of the entire Federal Civil Service. In between I was called in as a merc as cover, in which job I had to pass muster with the real mercs, though I never had basic military training and have never cleaned my own gun. .</p>
<p>When I was senior staff and my congressman went off to China, I had to fill his place and speak for him.</p>
<p>The essential point is that, if you are going to exercise power, you have to go in not only blind, but at the top. Like a new lieutenant taking over command of career sergeants, you have to get used to going in with everybody looking to you for guidance when you start out with less information than the receptionists.</p>
<p>I do this here, and I beg your patience with me. If I have the facts wrong, I will simply spill out to you the story as I have heard it. I don’t mind looking like a fool in front of my own people.</p>
<p>Please look at that last sentence. If you think about it you will realize that everyone who takes a high level job has to be that way. It is not unusual for somebody to go straight from Deputy Assistant Secretary of something huge in the government to a private sector job administering show production or chewing gum.</p>
<p>He goes in blind.</p>
<p>He depends on the people around him. He has to be able to find, not so much the information as the PEOPLE who can GIVE him the straight dope.</p>
<p>So my apparent sloppiness with information and my ignorance of internet savvy are not anything new. If I screw up the history, BBG is there, if I need advice on real-world internet wisdom, White Rabbit is at my beck and call. Brian is much, much younger, but he has become one hell of an editor.</p>
<p>I like to say that my basic rule of management is “Get good people and then stay out of their way.”</p>
<p>Actually, I never stayed out of their way. I was always reachable. Incompetent people who are given too much authority tend to not delegate at all or else to delegate and then hide.</p>
<p>If some of you get as far as I expect you to in life, you will find out exactly what I am talking about here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/02/going-in-at-the-top-means-going-in-blind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Knee Jerk BUGS Blackout</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/01/another-knee-jerk-bugs-blackout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/01/another-knee-jerk-bugs-blackout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 11:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coaching Session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=22677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, Stormfront Refugees, the comments are familiar again. I mentioned “der Tag” in the title of an article about what we need to do here and now, and about all I got was comments about Hitler and National Socialism. On Stormfront the politics of the 1930s was dominant, second only to the latest news headlines [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Stormfront Refugees, the comments are familiar again.</p>
<p>I mentioned “der Tag” in the title of an article about what we need to do here and now, and about all I got was comments about Hitler and National Socialism.</p>
<p>On Stormfront the politics of the 1930s was dominant, second only to the latest news headlines as ordered by the national media. So it was Hitler, Hitler, Hitler.</p>
<p>I’ll tell you one thing that Hitler DIDN’T do: That was to spend all his time talking about some political figure from seventy years before his time, and he didn’t spend all his time breathlessly talking about the latest news.</p>
<p>Which is, if you remember, why we came here FROM Stormfront.</p>
<p>I just did an article about how one of our commenters had used the ridiculous libservative term “race mixer,” which takes us back to pre-Mantra days.</p>
<p>This is the same sort of thing. I try to make a point about OUR timing but I used the term “der Tag.” Naturally, all I got was babble about Hitler.</p>
<p>Just like Good Old Stormfront.</p>
<p>Another BUGS Blackout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/05/01/another-knee-jerk-bugs-blackout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now or Never is NOT Der Tag!</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/04/30/now-or-never-is-not-der-tag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/04/30/now-or-never-is-not-der-tag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coaching Session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=22615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a comment on “Now or Never,&#8221; Jason Here said we had best take baby steps because our day was not anywhere near here yet. I don’t know exactly what he means, but it reminds of one of our basic lessons here. God bless Stormfront, but us Stormfront Refugees remember when all we heard about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a comment on “Now or Never,&#8221; Jason Here said we had best take baby steps because our day was not anywhere near here yet.</p>
<p>I don’t know exactly what he means, but it reminds of one of our basic lessons here. God bless Stormfront, but us Stormfront Refugees remember when all we heard about was how the writer was ready to go out and Seize Power in a Torchlight Parade. Shouts about “Der Tag” is coming were our daily fare.</p>
<p>When I say Now or Never I do NOT mean “preparing for der Tag” or the imminent Day of Judgment.</p>
<p>PLEASE LISTEN: Now or Never means this is the time for you to do the IMPORTANT work.</p>
<p>Der Tag goes with the same kind of thinking that made the Weakest Generation proud of fighting a war that put one third of the human race under the Communists. They STILL call it a War for Freedom!</p>
<p>Hero or potato peeler, everybody, all Americans, in that war committed a horrible crime against humanity. But even a “der Tager” who wishes Hitler had won can’t understand that statement. To him, that generation fulfills his one ideal: They fought, they won, and they pounded their chests for seventy years at last count.</p>
<p>When I say Now or Never I mean now or never is when to do the IMPORTANT stuff. It is the exact OPPOSITE. Not one single genuine war hero has ever had the slightest effect on history.</p>
<p>Let me REPEAT that: NO WAR HERO HAS EVER HAD THE SLIGHTEST EFFECT ON HISTORY.</p>
<p>That’s the axiom. The corollary to that axiom is that anyone who joined up for the torchlight parade had nothing to do with CAUSING it.</p>
<p>So please don’t black out on me. The time to do something that changes the world’s fate is NOT just before the March on Rome or the March on Rome or whatever the juveniles are screaming about.</p>
<p>BY the way, after Horatio made his Stand at the Bridge, Rome was conquered and burned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/04/30/now-or-never-is-not-der-tag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chained Books to Google</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/04/29/chained-books-to-google/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/04/29/chained-books-to-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 11:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coaching Session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=22561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One can say there are two parts to understanding history, facts and logic. In the Middle Ages, when a college at Cambridge would be particularly rich if it owned twenty books, each chained to the wall and with a full time Librarian to regulate access to them, Knowledge was everything. Every person who had access [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One can say there are two parts to understanding history, facts and logic.</p>
<p>In the Middle Ages, when a college at Cambridge would be particularly rich if it owned twenty books, each chained to the wall and with a full time Librarian to regulate access to them, Knowledge was everything.</p>
<p>Every person who had access to the chained books was aware that Aristotle had stated that men had more teeth than women. There was no correcting that. No matter what survey you took, you would be looking at men who had lost teeth or something.</p>
<p>I am NOT kidding about this.</p>
<p>I think it was Walter Pater who invented this “Renaissance” crap. The idea was that civilized Europe was a rebirth of civilized Rome, with those Dark Ages in between. Finally, his “modern” Europe had discovered Classical books and started using the opposable thumb and other things they hadn’t known about for a thousand years.</p>
<p>Actually, my vision is the exact opposite. Europe began a modern era when it ditched the horseshit of Galen and his bleeding and the ridiculous, outdated, dead end physics of “Form” and &#8220;Essence.”</p>
<p>This is very relevant today, because we have rocketed into an information revolution as profound as the whole difference between the chained book and twentieth-century public libraries. From chained books to public libraries in a period of eight hundred years, we have moved from public libraries to everything at your finger tip.</p>
<p>Facts are no longer rare. LOGIC is rare now.</p>
<p>We live in the Chained Book Age of LOGIC.</p>
<p>Mantra Thinking is the LOGIC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/04/29/chained-books-to-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today’s Flower Children  are Nasty Little Bastards, Too</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/04/28/todays-flower-children-are-nasty-little-bastards-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/04/28/todays-flower-children-are-nasty-little-bastards-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 11:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coaching Session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=22499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blacks paid to go on discussion shows love to point out that THEY didn’t read the book being discussed. The only adverse review of my last book was by one person who said he hadn’t read it. This is the attitude of a spoiled child. But the whole PC religion is based on the superiority [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blacks paid to go on discussion shows love to point out that THEY didn’t read the book being discussed.</p>
<p>The only adverse review of my last book was by one person who said he hadn’t read it.</p>
<p>This is the attitude of a spoiled child. But the whole PC religion is based on the superiority of anti-whites.</p>
<p>I am old enough to remember that the prime characteristic of 1960s youth, the Flower Children, the Love Generation, was bad manners. Funny nobody mentions that.</p>
<p>The girl who wrote the best book I ever read about how to treat women wrote it then. She begged that the words “Thank you” and a smile be used on someone who is dating you. This definitely wasn’t aimed at Southerners. But it is description of the almost unimaginable nastiness that was part of the Love Generation.</p>
<p>I was just back from Africa, so I really tried to hold it in. But I was approaching the door to my apartment building and another guy was coming in so I let him go in first.</p>
<p>He not only didn&#8217;t thank me, he ignored me with a nasty look on his face, which was standard for the Love Generation. So I kicked him in the butt.</p>
<p>My doctor brother and I were in Cambridge to see Carleton Coon. In front of a Harvard building the students were all crossing without looking. They were the Morally Superior, and those driving cars had to break for them, and it was raining.</p>
<p>That was the other piece of satisfying revenge. Someone raised in the country in South Carolina can handle a car, so my brother, going about 35, knocked one of the snotty bastards with the edge of the car and he stumbled all the way to the other side.</p>
<p>Two ass kicks, but very satisfying.</p>
<p>Eric Hoffer mentions this rudeness. Hoffer did heavy work all his life, and he despised the presumption of “representing the Working class” by these rude little bastards. He pointed out that the attitude of those New Left types was exactly he same as that of the French aristocrats toward working people before the Revolution.</p>
<p>They were just plain nasty, and I doubt you will see this mentioned anywhere else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/04/28/todays-flower-children-are-nasty-little-bastards-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BBG DARES to Hit Me With FACTS!</title>
		<link>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/04/27/bbg-dares-to-hit-me-with-facts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/04/27/bbg-dares-to-hit-me-with-facts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 11:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coaching Session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/?p=22427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Backbaygrouch gave me a lot of information on the Mayflower Compact. He sort of apologized because being wrong embarrasses real people. Not me. What I said was actually what the majority of people, if they have ever heard of the Compact at all an remember it, have impressed on them. You would be astonished to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Backbaygrouch gave me a lot of information on the Mayflower Compact. He sort of apologized because being wrong embarrasses real people.</p>
<p>Not me. What I said was actually what the majority of people, if they have ever heard of the Compact at all an remember it, have impressed on them. You would be astonished to learn how much solid fact I have gotten out of making a complete fool of myself.</p>
<p>The fact is that public opinion is based on such vague remembered impressions. I had actually heard that the Compact was written on board.</p>
<p>Remember that when I was coming up the Pilgrims were the FIRST. A documentary on American history endorsed by the National Education Association began with “…how a nation founded by Pilgrims in Massachusetts in 1620 became a world power.”</p>
<p>That makes the NEA look a lot more like an idiot than if I said the Mayflower was French.</p>
<p>I have rethought my article in the light of the facts as presented by BBG. In public opinion OF MY DAY, the Compact was looked upon as the first statement of principles in American history. Beyond that, there was no story.</p>
<p>They just presented the Compact.</p>
<p>You knew the Pilgrims first landed in English America.</p>
<p>The reasons for it, as put down by BBG, require a pretty advanced understanding of history. You would play hell trying to explain these details in your average college history course.</p>
<p>First and foremost, how would you explicate, as BBG did, that the Compact was written largely because the Pilgrims did not decide to go on to some OTHER settlement. As I said, my Harvard graduated Associate Director was absolutely astonished to discover that Jamestown was settled BEFORE Plymouth.</p>
<p>A couple of facts in exchange. The first Indian the Pilgrims encountered spoke English. Europeans had been fishing off those shores since the late Middle Ages, and he had dealt with them regularly.</p>
<p>Secondly, the shipment that John Smith described as “twenty niggurs” who arrived a year before the Founding Fathers of Plymouth were, as BBG guessed, indentured. It is almost impossible to get a straight story about how slavery evolved in Jamestown,.</p>
<p>Blacks were always slaves in Latin America and, oddly enough, in Plymouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2012/04/27/bbg-dares-to-hit-me-with-facts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

