As a Bible Belter, the first words that hit me watching Jon “Stewart’s” show was “This is a plain, old-fashioned REVIVAL!”

Jon Stewarts’s show was just a group of Believers shouting that all Unbelievers are Evil and Damned.

In fact, what really fooled Jon’s audience was that they are so completely brainwashed about what a real  revival actually looks like. Stewart’s sophomoric audience is totally out of touch with any reality.  To them a revival is something out the 1920s, where the preacher screams about how everybody else is Evil and how all Unbelievers are going straight to Hell.

If one looks at a real revivalist, which these clowns never have, one sees exactly what one sees on Saint Jon.

A big timer evangelist is cool and calm except those few times when he, exactly like Saint Jon, comes to his crescendo.

Exactly like Stewart, Falwell repeats what the other side says, BUT HE REPEATS IT THE WAY IT ACTUALLY SOUNDS, as whining from a spoiled brat.

Stewart repeats what the evangelists say, but they say it IN CONTEXT.

This is what public speaking is all about.

When Jon Stewart is on, the Millennial sees Wisdom and see Wisdom IN CONTEXT.

To a pro, the life and death difference is WHEN you declare yourself as representing God, in the case of Falwell or Social Progress in the case of Saint Jon.

Pro-whites have no sense of this, none what so ever.

So they are destroying us.

Oh yes, they ARE innocent. They have no idea why they always lose in the final score.

But their sin is very, very real: They have to have the slightest interest in WHY they are destroying us.

Jared Taylor’s ONLY priority is to be Jared Taylor, Aristocrat and Intellectual. Saving his race is important to him.

But only if Point One is satisfied.

Buckley spent his entire intellectual life trying to prove that he was not just one more Catholic.

Not only a Catholic in WASP Territory, but a Catholic from THE SOUTH!

That is why a WASP leftist who says something good about someone from National Review, despite their religion and their birth certificate that at “South,” can’t walk into the NR office in New York without feeling that he is in danger of having one of the male staff throw him down and go straight for his zipper.

God only knows how many times I saw that photo of Professor Galbraith, not merely from Yale but from Harvard Itself, condescending to go fishing with Buckley.

Through the decades, we have seen the definition of “Us” and “Them” change.

In 1976 our Rulers were those quoted in television networks. There was a leftist establishment based on social programs, what I called “the education-welfare establishment.”

Back then it was critical who ruled the national TV networks.

You can see it just as clearly today, this division between those who rule and those who are ruled.

I read a short book on Kindle that was called Zoo. It divided us as to “ins” and “outs.”

Today’s hard currency is the title “celebrity”.

The names have been changed. But they don’t protect anybody, least of all the innocents.

The book’s main characters are defined as the “ins” and the “outs.”

As the crisis grows, it is decided that the city must be wiped out, and definition really gets razor-sharp.

And the Mayor is infuriated that how he is not one of the “us,” and “we” who are exempted.

I get the impression that it is the sudden redefinition of the Mayor from “”Us” to “them” that is the unkindest cut of all. Being one of the “we” means far more to him than merely staying alive.

And the disciples of Saint Jon have the same attitude.

Once again, it is an exact of a Revival. Death means nothing if you die as One of Us.

The Chosen. Those who See the Truth.

If we could just SHOW these sophomores, these “Wise Fools,” as the mindless morons they are, there could be some hope that they could be open to seeing the real world as it really is.

But as long as our only focus is on retaining snobbery, we are going down.

If you will read Part 1 again, in A Plague on Both You Houses, 1976, I stated that the Trump Lesson today is exactly the same one the Cucks made for the generation before Reagan.

Give her credit, what Hillary Clinton said about America’s working people, that they should be ignored by their “Betters'” like Hillary, was verbatim what William Buckley would have said if he had Hillary’s guts.

Let me give you THE example of this:

I was having lunch (Yes, luncheoneering!) with William Rusher and he was discussing the building of the National Review building in the the mid-1950s.

One of the most essential volunteers in doing the work was a young man name George Lincoln Rockwell, later the founder of The American Nazi Party. Buckley and Rusher were very greatful for the help of Rockwell and his guys, white guys who could actually handle this alien thing they called a hammer.

So, in what I suspect was a period of alcohol-induced good feeling, Buckley asked whether Rockwell would like a favor in return.

Rockwell asked a business favor for what had clearly been many hours of intelligent and hard work: He asked for Buckley to arrange for Buckley an few top staffers, including Rusher, to meet with him for supper one day and discuss how much of this “Liberal” business was — Guess what? — really “The Jews.”

Buckley, who, like so many of us in our youth, had a problem holding his liquor, rememembered how many times conservatives had recounted tales of how they, Ivy League Intellectuals, had won all those easy victories over Evil Bigots with a few brilliant words. Or rather, Buckley remembered what his Genius Buddies had TOLD him how they had won all those victories over the Bigoted Peasants.

Rusher also remembered when a younger and drunker Buckley had to be dragged away from the table screaming that people like William Rusher, who was NOT a CATHOLIC, were fake conservatives.

So Buckley and Rusher and others worried over this debate they had promised to have with Rockwell, who was, outside of the Buckley-Clinton myth that they were lowah clahss retards. Realized when sobriety hit Buckley that Rockwell was highly intelligent and highly informed.

In other words, a guy who got publicity with a swastika on his arm would wipe the floor with an effeminate lower-grade but moneyed fake from Yale.

Then Rusher grinned and told him the Brilliant Strategy they used to get out of Buckley giving into his words, which is a minor matter for any Ivy League spoiled brat.

When Rockwell showed up, waiting for a little discussion in return for a lot of work, nobody Buckley had promised was there.

Instead there was a Catholic bishop theologian, all pretty in his little dress.

I felt sick. Rusher thought it was great.

But I was a Southerner and an Old Fashioned American. My Word was VERY serious business.

To a Wordist, his own Word of Honor meant nothing, because he has no word of honor.

His only Words are those of the guy in the cute dress.

So I swallowed down my rising gorge and tried to smile at the Rusher-Buckley Act of Genius, and he got me a job with John Ashbrook.

I didn’t lose my munch, but I did lose my lunchioneering.

I want you to see this, so there will be a Part 3 to explain about the Jon Stewart comment.

The most valuable aspect of the Paltalk sessions with Bob (available on youtube), was not the value of the activism itself. It was the educational value FOR BUGSERS.

For it allowed us to more fully model Bob’s way of thinking and techniques.

A memorable case in point:

In the Paltalk room, an anti-white appeared who had repeatedly flagged Bugser comments while we were SWARMING.

But instead of reacting indignantly to this anti-white, Bob took the high ground:

Bob said condescendingly to the anti-white, that the anti-white was at least trying his hardest.

So placing himself ABOVE the enemy:

A few other examples of taking the high ground:

Anti-white writes:

“You are such a sad, fearful person”

BUGSER replies:

“In place of childish name-calling, answer this: Are you for or against White genocide?”

…

Other examples:

“I am anti-retard”:

Who told you it was ‘intelligent’ to support White GENOCIDE?

Diversity is a codeword for White GENOCIDE

…

“lol”/“No one cares”:

People of conscience care about genocide. Get a moral compass

…

“Why should I care about my race?”:

That is the SOCIOPATH’S QUESTION. Only a sociopath doesn’t care about the future of his people.

…

All these responses take the high ground – especially the MORAL HIGH GROUND. Very important!

For decades, there was a perfectly predictable time table on every Republican campaign, one you could trust like sunrise.

In the spring, for example, at a Republican cocktail party, one by one, several people would call  you over and tell you, as if it were Secret Knowledge, the magic formula, “Republicans are going to get the NEGRO VOTE this year!”

Like I say, every spring this was as predictable as sunrise.

As they whispered the Secret Formula for the Black Vote that was being pushed this election year, they would always, decade after decade, recite exactly the same statistics.

They would, even in the 90s, repeat the results of the 1952 and 1956 elections. In those elections, Eisenhower got well over forty percent of the black vote. They would cite, as if it were the first time anyone had ever been let in on The Secret, that Nelson Rockefeller got over forty percent of the black vote consistently.

In fact, I knew of other cases, like a truly right wing congressman, Livingston in Louisiana, who also broke that golden barrier of 40% of the Black vote every two years.

Then I tried to explain, TO A DUMBASS REPUBLICAN who didn’t know politics from cow manure, why this was true but the Blacks weren’t really VOTING.

If you have the choice of explaining real politics to a Republicans or calculus to a hog, pick the hog every time.

The critical fact is that this Black “vote” means nothing because Blacks would consistently go along when there was a landslide. Eisenhower and Rockefeller won their elections by so many votes that the Blacks who went along meant absolutely nothing. Livingston was the same.

Livingston was the same. He won very election big time.

The List would only be pulled out when the Black vote could MATTER.

Eisenhower and Rockefeller would have won their elections regardless. In the cases where the margin was close, only when it COUNTED, the real elections in real politics, which is an alien world to cocktail party Republicans, did the Black List come out.

This was the list handed out at Blacks churches and so forth which listed exactly who to vote for. Makes the Nazi SS look sloppy.

Please note that I am using the present tense here. Blacks have NEVER varied from rigid adherence to their Black List and they never will.

As I have pointed out, the Black List got screwed up and gave the United States senatorial nomination, not exactly a small and obscure position, to a complete political unknown and he won in a landslide.

It didn’t matter that Black voters had never heard of this guy. He was on the Black List so he got the Black so-called “Vote.”

Election night some reporters showed their surprise that this total unknown had won the Democratic nomination out of nowhere.

And it was not mentioned another time during the whole campaign.  Everybody who knows anything about politics which category excludes Republicans, knew exactly what had happened.

As I keep trying to explain, NOTHING would have gotten this mentioned in the media.   I keep being told by one or two otherwise intelligent BUGSERS saying that if I produced that list at a press conference…..

Even some of our own simply cannot grasp reality.

Yea, right, gang, the media are going to make a major story out of something that has been known by everybody here since World War II.

REPORT the Black List?

The Black List is there for any reporter to get hold of it just by giving some Black guy what in the case of a White man would be called a bribe and is proudly referred to here as “walkin’ ‘rounds Money”.

His story would be shredded and he would get another job anywhere near the media for the rest of his life.

Like White Genocide, the Black List is one more demonstration of something everybody knows: The results of the “Civil Rights Movement”  were exactly what us   “old Southern Bigots” SAID they would be.

The big Blacs magazine in the 1950s was called Jet Magazine.   Almost every single Jet cover looked like MSM looks today: It showed Black man married to White woman.

Black men want White women.

Period.

“Giving Blacks the vote” was ridiculous because they don’t really VOTE.

And if you say this in public and show a Blacks List to the media, you will be a big trouble.

I would be deeply ashamed if our present rulers did not call me a “racist.’”

If the truth is racist, it’s the truth that has got to go.

To be anything but a “racist” in today’s America is treason against the truth.

Anti-Whites are in control of the media. Therefore the Commission that by law operates the joint press conferences or joint interviews, aka debates, only appoints anti-Whites as moderators, aka, third debaters. This means that the microphones are controlled by partisans of chasing down Whites. Even who can be in attendance is decided with a bias.

Another way of putting it is that the dice are loaded against White interests. The dice cast a lot of sevens for Clinton last night. The snake eyes were only for Trump.

The moderators in the past and this year have displayed bias so blatant that even the media has acknowledged it. Yet no one asks the simple question: If it is broke, why not fix it?

Television news readers are not the only pool that can be drawn from to provide intelligent questions of national interest. There are multiple other resources out there. It is foolish to limit the search to the only professionals less trusted by the public than Congress Critters.

Try as one may there is no way to take partisanship out of organizing the “debates”. The towel of mythical fairness ought to be thrown in. Each candidate should be allowed to appoint a co-moderator. A coin flip could decide who gets which half to question and the other can control the timing during that half. Another alternative could be real debates in which only the candidates talk with a silent timekeeper enforcing a set schedule.

The second debate this year followed the usual path of not addressing White interests. Anderson Cooper appeared to make some effort at even handedness while Martha Raddatz desperately interrupted and hectored Donald Trump. She was frantic to have her Candy Crowley moment when she could slay a GOP nominee. The hate in Martha Raddatz’s heart seeped through what seem to be a half dozen face lifts the way an overflowing cesspool oozes out across a lawn. The effect was much the same.

There is no need to catalog further the record of bias on display in past TV extravaganzas posing as “debates”.

Bob has spoken about the freedom that being a candidate has given him. A freedom that in is the Bill of Rights.

The “debates” are regulated by law. The Commission is established by law. Laws can be changed. It behooves Congress to take away the power of censorship that the present system has inflicted upon Whites.

The anti-White media must be stripped of its monopoly of public discourse. A candidate such as Donald Trump ought to have his issues addressed. Those are our issues.

Every American is entitled to free speech in theory. A glitch in the law gave Bob a platform. White issues deserve the same. But so long as the anti-White media has a lock on what Americans can hear discussed in public progress is going to be grimly hard.

I think I should announce my candidacy for president in 2020 now or let it be known I will, and I will announce the reason:

First, I would defy our rulers and be the best president in American history. I am perfectly sincere in seeking the office. But there is a second reason I ran for president this time and I will want to become a candidate as soon as possible.

During my official candidacy in 2016, I enjoyed many of the rights an American citizen took for granted before September 11, 2001.

For this brief period I have enjoyed the protection of the first amendment which no longer applies to Americans. I could state what everybody knows, that so-called “diversity”  has become a program of locating concentrations of White people and — I mean this literally, chasing them down.

We all know that chasing down White people involves international immigration, by bringing in more non-Whites from non-White countries and placing them in any area in America containing with what our establishment chooses to call “too many White people.”

Areas with what they call too many White people are to be subjected to the program to bring the population mix into line with government-imposed standards.

Everybody knows that that is what diversity is, but we found that there is a ban from coast to coast against anyone, except a presidential candidate, to call this program of “diversity” what it is: chasing down White people.

Like all bans on free speech, this ban on calling chasing down White people by its real name is not called censorship any more.

Violations of free speech are never called violations of free speech. Suppression of free speech always has a different label. Words are banned because they violate “decency” under new definition of decency.

Free speech banned heresy as insulting people because of their religion. So calling “chasing down White people” as what it is, which is chasing down White people, which it clearly is, is banned by declaring that saying “chasing down White people” is a violation of “community standards.”

No one is allowed to question this. No one even imagines finding any precedent for our previous use of these new “community standards.”

Anti-Whites simply say ban it and it is banned.

No mere citizen has the right or the financial resources to question this banning of anything they disapprove of as a “violation of community standards”.

Decades ago when the big news was that some Black Panthers committing violent acts were shot by policemen, the press accepted the Black Panther statement that this police action was “Black genocide.”

No one seriously challenged it. But now any person saying that a national policy of finding and chasing down White people is WHITE genocide is banned. Anyone who uses that term has been fired, their careers ruined.

I do not enjoy living in a society where freedom of speech and freedom of the press is denied to anyone who is not politically correct. As so many tyrannies have discovered, freedom can be addictive. This is why every single Communist country, every country that declares itself a “Workers’ Paradise,” must be surrounded by a wall and by men ordered to shoot to kill any who attempts to escape.

Freedom has certainly become addictive to me. I  want to return to being a person with rights under the first amendment as soon as possible.

I want to be a candidate again in any way I can and as soon as I can the moment my rights from the election of 2016 expire.

I hope that some Americans find freedom as addictive as I do.