Search? Click Here
Did you know you can visit to the swarm with www.bugsswarm.com?
Post on the internet Working Thread

Attacks to blast the term "White supremacism"

Home › Forums › BUGS SWARM › Attacks to blast the term "White supremacism"

This topic contains 25 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by  Asgardian 3 years, 2 months ago.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 26 total)
1 2
  • Author
    Posts
  • 11/02/2013 at 2:31 pm #54317

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    Let’s organize some of our new tasks into three separate threads, for easy access to the separate discussions and suggestions* that they’ll contain:

    Attacks to blast the word “hate(r)”

    Attacks to blast the terms “multiculturalism/diversity”

    Attacks to blast the words racist/racism

    Responses to being called a White Nationalist

    Attacks to blast the term “White supremacism” [current topic]

    *A lot of the discussions and suggestions are likely to be the same for at least two of the three threads, so it may turn out we only need one thread, or only two. But let’s try three for a good while…I think that’s likely to be better in the long run despite the overlap that will sometimes mean a little extra work.

    And separate threads will focus our minds more intensely on each of the different terms.

    Asgardian’s:

    mp3

    m4a

    11/02/2013 at 2:38 pm #54321

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    Here’s a suggested attack:

    “White supremacism” is a hate term that anti-whites hide behind to carry out White Genocide.

    I don’t know if “hate term” is better in that one, or “hate word,” which was my first choice.

    “White supremacism” is a hate word that anti-whites hide behind to carry out White Genocide.

    I think the last flows into the listener’s mind with less distraction, since “hate word” is the usual phrase.

    11/02/2013 at 2:40 pm #54323

    Electric
    Participant

    That’s YOUR OPINION.
    You’re just calling me a “White supremacist” because I am White

    11/02/2013 at 2:43 pm #54325

    Electric
    Participant

    I guess that makes all of the Blacks, Indians, Asians, Jews, Arabs and Latinos “White supremacists” because they all have their own countries to carry their future existence.

    11/02/2013 at 4:08 pm #54334

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    @ EWR: Good point! I’ve inserted a phrase for clarity:

    I guess that makes Blacks, Indians, Asians, Jews, Arabs and Latinos “White supremacists,” since they come to White countries even though they all have their own countries.

    I also chopped off the end. The races that are being used to blend us out of existence will indeed be preserved afterward in their own homelands, but that’s a separate fact from the fact that their coming to White homelands acknowledges White supremacy. I think it’s confusing to readers to jam two such separate understandings into one short sentence.

    I hope you don’t mind the critique, and if I ever said “welcome-to-BUGS” to you (which is way overdue by now!), I’ve forgotten! Welcome, EWR! 😀

    11/02/2013 at 4:12 pm #54335

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    @ EWR: Oh, I see. The response as you phrased it would be made when non-white flooding of White countries had just been mentioned, so my inserted phrase wouldn’t be necessary in that case.

    11/02/2013 at 4:32 pm #54336

    Electric
    Participant

    @HD: I think you’ve misunderstood me. That phrase is good to bring up when an ant-White calls you a “White supremacist” for wanting your country to be White and at the same time make fun of him/her for calling you a “White supremacist”.

    And I don’t know if you see the joke I’ve made in that phrase 😀 A Black guy wanting his country to be Black is a “White supremacist” It’s making fun of the anti-Whites logic. I can clearly see the term ‘White supremacist” is made JUST for targeting Whites but at the same time, anti-Whites claim race doesn’t exist.

    11/02/2013 at 4:57 pm #54343

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    @EWR: I thought that the way you’ve explained it is the way I took it, except that I don’t understand this: “A Black guy wanting his country to be Black is a ‘White supremacist’” Wouldn’t he be a “Black supremacist”?

    My head is still a muddle from the last few days…let me just look at it again tomorrow before you possibly waste your time trying to straighten me out.

    11/02/2013 at 5:08 pm #54344

    Electric
    Participant

    @HD: but you see a Black guy is NEVER called a “Black supremacist” for wanting his country to be Black.

    A White guy is ALWAYS called a “White supremacist” for wanting his country to be White.

    When an anti-White calls you a “White supremacist” for stating that you would like your people to exist in the future just say this:

    “I guess that makes all of the Blacks, Indians, Asians, Jews, Arabs and Latinos “White supremacists” because they all have their own countries to carry their future existence”

    Calling ALL non-Whites “White supremacists” is making of all of the anti-Whites logic, sort of how anti-racist Hitler called the Jew a “brown shirt from the 30’s”

    Sorry I am really bad when it comes to explaining things.

    11/02/2013 at 5:10 pm #54345

    Asgardian
    Participant

    Thats why HATE is a CodeWord for white neighborhoods.

    11/02/2013 at 5:41 pm #54346

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    I think I DID misunderstand you. (I AM very muddled today)

    Isn’t this what you’re intending to say?

    <i>I guess that makes all of the Blacks, Indians, Asians, Jews, Arabs and Latinos “Black supremacists,” “Indian supremacists,” “Asian supremacists, etc. since they all have their own countries to carry their future existence.</i>

    I don’t think it’s going to make sense to the reader to call them “White supremacists.”

    If you reply, I’ll wait until tomorrow to reply back so that I’ll be more likely to understand you.

    11/02/2013 at 6:29 pm #54349

    Asgardian
    Participant

    @EWR….ive read your post and I found something in it that may be unintended BUT its a GOOD unintended….by calling non whites “white supremacists” because they are never called non white supremacist they will then attempt to correct you and acknowledge that the white race exsists.

    11/02/2013 at 7:52 pm #54353

    Electric
    Participant

    @Asgardian EXACTLY, it could lead there.

    What I was explaining is nothing complicated really, it’s just making fun the anti-White terminology and their logic, an example would be…

    Pro-White- “Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans but White countries for EVERYBODY that’s White genocide.”

    Anti-White-“WHITE SUPREMACIST!!!”

    Pro-White- “The Indian Americans have reservation systems to preserve their future existence, are they also “WHITE SUPREMACIST’S!!!” Or do they get a pass because they’re non-White?”

    It could lead anywhere from here… if they bring up the fact the Indian’s being non-White you could make fun of them for denying the existence of race before hand. Also notice how I put “WHITE SUPREMACIST” in quotation marks? The reader would laugh because he/she knows I am making fun of their logic and terminology, he/she knows its not meant to be taken seriously.

    @HD Don’t worry, it’s not you. It’s my lack of skills to put what’s on my head into physical words. It makes me really bad at explaining things.

    11/02/2013 at 8:00 pm #54354

    Daniel Genseric
    Participant

    Is it “HATE!” or is it the TRUTH?

    ALL whites and EVERY white who dare speak out against the program of genocide against whites is a whitesupremacisthaterwhowantstosendblacksbacktoafrica.

    Those who champion Diversity in every white country and only white countries say they are anti-Hate. What they really are is anti-white.

    Anti-hate is a code word for anti-white.

    11/02/2013 at 10:36 pm #54376

    wretched Whiterabbit
    Participant

    It’s not about “supremacy”, it’s about “White survival”.
    Nobody calls nonWhite groups, “supremacists”, for opposing their own genocide.
    anti-supremacist is just another code word for antiWhite

    11/04/2013 at 12:39 pm #54458

    Hexadecimator777
    Participant

    I do it simply as, ” ‘White Supremacist’ is just an Anti-White HATE word used to justify White Genocide.”

    11/04/2013 at 7:40 pm #54464

    Dick Whitman
    Participant

    “Anytime a White person opposes the on-going program of White genocide they are called a “White Supremacist.””

    Or

    Are Jews called “supremacists” for wanting Jews to survive?

    Are blacks called “supremacists” for wanting blacks to survive?

    NO!

    Only Whites are called “supremacists” for wanting our people to survive.

    This IS White genocide.

    Or

    When black people advocate for their people it’s called “civil rights.”

    When Jews advocate for their people it’s called “lobbying.”

    When White people advocate for their people it’s called “White Supremacy.”

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

    11/04/2013 at 11:41 pm #54474

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    Bob’s most recent blog has lots of suggestions also:

    http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2013/11/03/racism-out-white-supremacy-in-i-wonder-why/#comment-65177

    11/05/2013 at 3:37 am #54494

    Algiz
    Participant

    I would avoid mentioning Jews.

    11/05/2013 at 9:29 pm #54525

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    Critique always invited.

    (Dec #3 of 3) Stop calling Whites who oppose WHITE GENOCIDE “White Supremacists”

    Suppose Japan were being flooded with millions of non-Japanese, and Japanese were forced by law to integrate with them so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.

    Would you call any Japanese man who protested that genocide of his race a “Japanese Supremacist”?

    ALL White countries and ONLY White countries are being flooded with millions of non-whites, and Whites are forced by law to integrate with them so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.

    But if I call for an open discussion of this genocide of my race, the White race, you call me a “White supremacist.”

    You say you’re anti-racist. What you are is anti-WHITE.

    Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

    I haven’t been able to think of a short title that’s more of an attack than this one is.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 26 total)
1 2

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.