B. U. G. S.

@ Adelheim: I think the best page to link would be the page where the podcasts are collected:

http://whitegenocideproject.com/category/beefcakes-bootcamp/

Since the episodes are numbered, it will be obvious to anyone who links to that page that if he wants to start at the beginning he needs to go to the final page in that collection.

The problem I see with linking to any particular episode is that it’s not yet quite as obvious as it should be on the site how to get to the rest of the collection, unless almost all visitors will understand immediately that they should click on the same avatar in the right margin.

You might want to hear from Peter WhiteRabbit or from Beefcake first…I’ll contact them both now.

For recruiting purposes, maybe http://whitegenocideproject.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/0001-Intro-to-the-Swarm.mp3 should be edited down to about half the length. Edit out everything but the first couple of minutes and the last one/third (when he begins to talk about the mantra as the way to wake white people up) into a single podcast.

I agree with your cutting out the dysgenics dialogue, runner. That was a good call IMO. I’ve only listened to the first 15 minutes of episode 1. So far, cutting that part was going to be my first suggestion if the purpose is boiling things down to the basics and getting people ready for the swarm. If that’s the purpose, there is no need to go off into tangents about how we came to be pro-White.

My second suggestion for Beefcake would be to ease-up on the self-deprecation. A little bit makes people more open to suggestion, too much makes you look bad.

There’s nothing wrong with taking a little break here and there with some light, non-need-to-know info. That’s actually a good idea. But like before, too much is counter-productive.

Beefcake’s got a good radio voice, no doubt, but I think he would do well to focus his podcasts more.

And just to be clear: I think Beefcake’s Bootcamp was a great idea and I think he’s perfect for the job.

GrepP, I may clarify that in a later podcast.

The point was not to make people think I am dumb.

Rather it was one of those “if I can do this, so can YOU” statements.

Some people are intimidated when faced with having to learn a new skill set, and they assume that there is something magical about the person teaching it, and they assume they themselves cannot pick it up.

My main point was that I did not want anyone to think there was anything special allowing me to do this, to point out they can learn it too.

@ Beefcake: the problem with what you say just above is that it’s probably overwhelmingly obvious to any listener that you ARE special.

Maybe you could mention now and then the fact that despite our having a very developed methodology, it’s extremely easy to just jump right in and begin. I’ve posted here too many times that that’s what I did…I thought this place was just a bunch of people posting together with rather remarkable skill, and I jumped in and a few posts later was told that people here didn’t use the R-word, and after quite a few more posts I was told that you all were working from something called “the mantra.”

Beginning here is the easiest thing in the world if a person can take direction, and if that direction is offered pleasantly. That last is important…I would have been out of here if someone had yelled at me before I even knew there was a “Mantra.”

I’m thinking of dropping the term “pro-White” and always using instead the term “White-and-normal.”

My thoughts on it are in the second post below (the posts are from a thread on White GeNOcide Project), and I would appreciate any of your thoughts on the idea. At this moment, I’m very fired up at the thought of spreading the term “White-and-normal” as the single antonym of the single term “anti-White”!

Nothing evokes the hatred that fills anti-White hearts so much as seeing a pro-White in possession of the moral high ground.

Feedback is appreciated.

Hm, maybe better would be, “White who is normal,” and “Whites who are normal”? At least until those phrases become well known? Yes, it’s a bit of writing, but…

Nothing evokes the hatred that fills anti-White hearts so much as seeing a White who is normal in possession of the moral high ground.

No, I think “White-and-normal” works better.

Oh and I actually have a question about #7, “Not pissing in the punch bowl” / not “cock blocking the mantra.”

I am a bit unclear on what exactly constitutes “pissing in the punch bowl.” Before I listened to podcast 7, I kind of had the opposite idea. I thought part of the reason they called it “the swarm” was because multiple people swarmed/overwhelmed the same targets…so I would often click on links where others posted the mantra/mini-mantras and join in.

I don”t think it’s ALWAYS cock blocking the mantra to do that…we need people at least voting up other BUGSer\’s comments for example, but I’m a bit confused on it now. I mean, I realize I wouldn’t post the full mantra in the same place someone else did because that would make it look like spam, but things get more fuzzy for me with the mini-mantras.

So, say someone’s posted a mini-mantra or a few on a particular youtube video. Should NO ONE else post any mini-mantras on that video because the other person is working there? Besides something like a Ray William Johnson video (where are are so many comments, almost no one would see two different BUGSers comments), when, if ever, is it okay for more than one person to post mantra-related stuff on the same thing?

n short:

When you see a forum where you see the whole Mantra is being discussed, and lots of discussion taking place for several pages, with some supporting the point, and Anti-Whites attacking it, then just let it do its thing.

If you see a long thread with many replies already, the enemy flooded into the valley already, then you can go ahead and mini mantra them.

We don’t want to block off the valley that we want the enemy to march into.

Once there is a vocal Anti-White or multiple of them dominating the discussion, THEN you swarm in to finish them off.

Also, there should be a podcast coming out soon that is already been recorded on how to handle victory when we just made the point we wanted to about the Anti-White in front of the Audience, and knowing when you can leave that thread and move on.

There is a point where the Anti-Whites are now digging themselves into a further hole in front of the Audience. Once they are making fools of themselves, we want to leave them alone to continue digging themselves into that hole deeper, and not correct them when they are making a mistake.

Anyway, this will be included in a future podcast. Or two.

http://www.jackandjillpolitics.com/2012/05/in-the-wake-of-trayvon-martin-conservative-media-launch-race-war/

Working on some new projects troops.

Including, going into detail on a Subject talked about here:

http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2011/10/03/some-advice-david-duke-needs-to-give-his-readers-to-david-duke-bob%E2%80%99s-testimony-and-reminder/

Yes, beefcake used to be a bit of a “player”, and knows a little bit about the crimson arts, and can explain WHY Dr.Duke always gets hot blondes, andwhere you guys can ALSO learn how to have more options in women as well.