“Anyway, if you need any extra manpower for swarming by all means send me a PM.”

That was by an SF poster on our sub-forum thread “What is the Mantra,” even though over a quarter of the posts on that thread had in their signatures our invitational phrase, “Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!”

Even though the poster seemed like just a happy-to-just-talk-about-things type, he’s made me wonder if our invitational phrase, “Join the BUGS Team! Post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!” is not as clearly invitational as we think.

I know that sounds crazy, but remember that we know our SF sub-forum is for the purpose of recruiting, but most SF’ers who stumble across it may assume our subforum is just a discussion forum like all the others that are all they know!

And as for our invitational phrase, it won’t strike them as any different from links in other SF’ers signatures that have to do with posters’ personally favorite sites.

I think we goofed. We looked at what we’re doing on our SF subforum through our own eyes instead of through the eyes of the SF’ers who will take a look there. (I don’t agree entirely with what I’m saying, because after all we are clearly DOING something….that will certainly be obvious to everyone who comes there (?))

But maybe we need some stronger red-and-blue invitations in our signatures there in addition to the one we have:

1. “We need more BUGSTERS!”

2. A drawing of Bob looking like Uncle Sam and pointing at the reader and saying, “Uncle Bob needs YOU!”

I have a suggestion about this sub-forum, based on my experience there last night with MaxVictory on our thread, “What is the Mantra?”

And notice that I said “our” thread. But let’s remember that SF’ers who wander over to it will consider it “their” thread, since it’s on SF, right? I think those two different ways of viewing the thread played a large part in what happened there last night, which is that we ALL got caught up one way or another in long discussion (vituperative, in some instances) with MaxVictory (who I came to rather admire last night btw).

If it could be done over (and it will be, ad infinitum), here’s what I would like: let the excellent poster MaxVictory and the excellent poster and bugster Valeman have their long, interesting, and extremely civil and very friendly discussion.

The rest of us on that thread: Post about something ELSE that has to do with the Mantra, and do NOT get involved in the discussion with Max!

In other words, don’t refuse intellectual discussion with those for whom that is their way of coming to this material, but keep it as small a part of the thread as possible by letting just one person who can maintain a civil feeling deal with it.

Now I don’t feel confident about that, especially since I believe it contradicts Horus’ instructions not to debate even on pro-White threads (I MUST start listening to his podcasts!) but to just bugster there. But based on my time at OO and SF seeing how we are doing there, I think it needs to be a combination of the two.

But I’m willing to follow Horus’ instruction if his instruction is still the same. And in any case, my brain is worn out from my time on OO generating arguments for those guys, so I don’t plan to be the one arguing with them in any case.

But I do think it would take a lot of talent to address only with bugstering the question that the title of that thread asks, “What is the Mantra?”

In any case, whether we argue or not, shouldn’t we be civil and friendly? This point needs discussion, because not all people here feel that’s the best way!

1. Any pro-White who addresses us civilly in his posts should be replied to in a completely civil and friendly manner.

2. We should not consider a pro-White to be addressing us UNcivilly when he is only disagreeing with and criticizing our methods, and so we should reply to such a poster in a completely civil and friendly manner. If he is criticizing our methods without having observed them in action, we should remind ourselves that as silly as that seems to us, it doesn’t seem silly to him if he has never even thought in terms of action. And so if we suggest he precede his critique with some actual experience of us, we should do that completely from a civil and friendly feeling! And similarly for similar situations!

Agree? Disagree?

I just linked this thread in a post to a companion thread on our SF sub-forum
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t856117/#post9859179

If such transparency becomes a problem, we can start a new thread here.

• This reply was modified 144 days ago by  Harumphty Dumpty.

Anyone have any comments on what went down on Swarmfront last night, on the “New To BUGS? Want to learn how we work?” thread?

After the present row is done, I’m going to take a vow to never visit Swarmfront again. It’s like we’ve set up a second home on the grounds of an insane asylum and are required to keep our doors open for any lunatic who wanders in and wants to do his shtick.

HD
I think if you are going to apologize to someone, who has been trolling us, then you shouldn’t go there again. He has avoided every question we have asked and has called us every name in the book. I think you might be suffering a case of battered wife syndrome and no I am not being mean to you HD, I am just saying how it looks. We knocked this guy down and you are helping him up.

P.S.
I find it amazing how the Mantra attracts people that don’t want Whites talking about White GeNOcide. Even at Stormfront of all places!

OB: re your P.S.: Yes, that’s fascinating! Swarmfront has been an experience I’ll be reflecting on for a while.