B. U. G. S.

“I need to stay away from the guy…”

You’ve got it.

wow, chill out guys.  Harumphty is an excellent contributor who argues forcefully and keeps pro-white posts up in anti-white places.  And so is Genseric.

Personally, I think Genseric’s reply is pointless, since it didn’t suggest different phrasings.  We have a word for forced integration and propaganda for blending with the goal of racial annihilation, it is genocide.  However, if we’re trying to explain what genocide is, it’s hard to avoid the words like “blending” and “forced integration”.  Which is a problem, but the fact that leftists have attached positive connotations to those words was always a problem we would have to face eventually.

If I was Harumphty, I would have politely ignored it.

Much respect for both of you.  You guys have been here for a long time, and done more for our people than most others.

@steadiness

“integrate” is a superfluous term. Also, “blending…..”

Whites aren’t something you put on Frappe in a blender. Avoid this nonsensical BS at all costs.

Should read something like “Assimilated (i.e. intermarry) with all those non-whites until we are no more. That is GENOCIDE.”

Hardly see how you can say this was a pointless post. HD is just mad because I didn’t couch my advice in “plush and comfy” agreeable terms for him. Nevertheless, it’s your opinion that I didn’t address his request directly. In my opinion, I did exactly that. Fighting white genocide is SERIOUS business, deadly serious in my estimate

@HD Using the very limited Intellect God blessed me with, I have arrived at the following conclusion.

I don’t have a NEED to speak to people at work this bluntly in person because most of the time the opportunity to speak about white genocide does not present itself or would prove detrimental to my longevity and/or career. However, when the rare opportunity does present itself, you should rest easy knowing that I make what I wrote above look like soft-toss batting practice when I do engage an anti-white IRL. Furthermore, I go in for the kill whenever I see you or anyone – whether you know it or not – working against our efforts.

Nevertheless, as in most cases, speaking my mind has repeatedly landed me with threats of physical violence. I have learned to anticipate this from anti-whites, but not from someone on my own “team.” Regardless of its origin, I will adapt to this new development as well. I always hold my own and reserve the right to say/carry my piece.

Even though I don’t share your same disdain for a requisite rebuke, I still see value in most of your efforts despite your desire “to punch my lights out.” Who knows, perhaps you will get your wish. But be forewarned, bullies typically get what they deserve.

Oh, and by the way. I checked again for you today. The Mantra still says NOTHING about “mixing bowls or blenders.”

Immigration & forced-assimilation in EVERY white country and ONLY white countries is white genocide.

Immigration & forced-assimilation in EVERY white country and ONLY white countries is white genocide.

Immigration & forced-assimilation in EVERY white country and ONLY white countries is white genocide.

Immigration & forced-assimilation in EVERY white country and ONLY white countries is white genocide.

Immigration & forced-assimilation in EVERY white country and ONLY white countries is white genocide.

“I go in for the kill whenever I see you ..”

Then stop it. Stop it right fucking NOW!

This argument is pointless, you’re both right.

Harumphty, I thought your paraphrase was spot-on.  Unfortunately, as both you and Genseric pointed out, you have to use the world integrate and blend to say that it’s genocide.  Anti-whites say they want integration and blending, but only of whites.  Our point is that that’s genocide.  In this context, “genocide is genocide” might sound better to us, but we have to remember that other people use worship words like “integrate” to avoid thinking about the obvious consequences of their actions.

You guys are both right.  Stop arguing about it.

Genseric, no one here is going to think you said  you go in for the kill whenever you see me! Lol!  If that’s what you’re referring to.

“I go in for the kill whenever I see you or anyone – whether you know it or not – working against our efforts.”

In other words,

1. Unlike you, MY ear for everything Mantra is perfect.

2. When in MY opinion you make an error, you cease being a fellow bugser and I treat you just like another anti-white.

Genseric, please consider if that outlook is helping us, or in several ways is “working against our efforts.”

——–

steadiness, the mantra issue isn’t what we’re arguing about. We’re arguing about how we treat each other here. It’s important for several reasons, one of which is that potential bugsers have been repelled from this site by its tone. It’s a meaty subject, and maybe we should leave it now on this thread (after Genseric’s next comment, if he wishes), and I’ll try to submit an article about it next week. If it’s put up we can all argue the devil out of it then.

In the spirit of helping you retain your ability to function and honoring your request, I am done responding to you.

“Blend” your heart out for all I care. Please don’t say you speak for me while you do it.

Perhaps I am out of bounds on this, and someone can tell me why exactly.  But I use “blend white children out of existence” quite a bit,  but I always mention it’s genocide.  I never mention it without the word genocide.

I understand that the terminology is heavily semantic.  I know we aren’t suppose to use words like “HATE”, but sometimes i do.  As an example “if I don’t hate white children “anti-racists” say that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews”.

Is there any reference to the words we’re not suppose to use and why we’re not suppose to use them?

@ elcyCesreveR: I didn’t realize “hate” was out of bounds! Lol! (Oh I see…yeah, we don’t call the other side “haters.” At least not directly, but your example is indirect and seems fine to me).

No, there’s no such directory. We all rely on our own instincts and each other’s, and of course the few (that I’m aware of ) terms that Bob has pointed out not to use…”Jew” and such. The r-word (or “racist,” as Genseric quaintly calls it!) there is disagreement about, but Bob says to at least be very very careful with it. On the first couple of pages of the “Are you new to Bugs” thread, I’ve ranted on about that and other words, but I use the word “racist” sometimes too.

Sorry not to be more helpful.

An Idea i was tossing around:

Since we are on a consistent message,  when anti-whites give us the same recycled responses,  should we have one consistent response to each of their responses?

I know that there was a list compiled of the common anti-white responses and how we counter each of them.  Gar5 created “bugs buddy” based around that.  However there are numerous responses to each argument.

Would it be to our advantage to have ONE powerful consistent message for EACH anti-white response?   Things like “we all bleed red, common african ancestor,we’re all one race, etc” could all be narrowed down to one response.  Things like colonialism and history could have it’s own response as well… and so on.

Assuming we did that.  I could create an online “flash-card” so pro-whites can learn how to handle each anti-white response,  once a pro-white has them memorized they’ll be able to use it in real world face2face interaction as well.