Search? Click Here
Did you know you can visit to the swarm with www.bugsswarm.com?
Post on the internet Working Thread

Denying the consequences of speaking out, and demanding a list of names

Home Forums BUGS SWARM Denying the consequences of speaking out, and demanding a list of names

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 25 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #93547
    Carloman
    Participant

    Anti-Whites have taken to denying everything we say point by point and demanding specific, detailed information. Yesterday someone denied that there is any consequence to people speaking out publicly about “so-called” White genocide. I can think of several people who have lost their jobs for using racial slurs or posting on Stormfront, but I don’t have any examples of anyone loosing his job over speaking out about White genocide specifically. The only good example I could come up with was the politician in the Netherlands who was murdered.

    Another anti-White said that, since our goal is a public discussion of White genocide, and youtube is a public forum, let’s have that public discussion now, right here on youtube. He then insisted that I name the people who are imposing the conditions on us that are leading to our destruction. My reply was our traitorous leaders, members of Congress, certain politicians. The only specific example I gave was the late Senator Edward Kennedy. I suppose I could have added certain people in media, but he seemed to be asking for a list of specific names. I think his next question would have been, “And what are you planning on doing to those people? Putting them on trial? Killing them?”

    Any ideas on how best to answer these sorts of questions?

    #93553
    Electric
    Participant

    You don’t need to answer their question, they answer our questions. We are the interrogators. You could simply state that we are demanding that they end White genocide. They are criminals so it’ll be up to our leaders to decide what happens to them, you could then proceed to ask him why he supports genocide against our children.

    #93555
    Secret Squirrel
    Participant

    The person who asks the questions controls the conversation

    #93556
    Sunlit I.
    Participant

    When genocide is going on the first and foremost goal of any sane individual is to STOP it.

    Similarly when a crime is being committed one is not expected to start with figuring out how exactly many years its perpetrator risks ending up with, but with calling police or helping the victim oneself.

    Asking such questions makes it sound like this Anti-White has a hand in it himself. “So how many years will my partner get for doing it you say? (Maybe I will immediately decide to drop my gun then)” LOL

    #93557
    Sunlit I.
    Participant

    When genocide is going on the first and foremost goal of any sane individual is to STOP it.

    Similarly when a crime is being committed one is not expected to start with figuring out how exactly many years its perpetrator risks ending up with, but with calling police or helping the victim oneself.

    Asking such questions makes it sound like this Anti-White has a hand in it himself. “So how many years will my partner get for doing it you say? (Maybe I will immediately decide to drop my gun then)” LOL

    #93558
    Secret Squirrel
    Participant

    “He then insisted that I name the people who are imposing the conditions on us that are leading to our destruction.”

    This anti-White is one of those imposing the conditions of White Genocide. He would protest any move to set aside land for Whites and he has the gall to ask who is opposing us? That was a stupid question from a stupid anti-White. Point it out to the audience.

    When the anti-White asks ridiculous detailed questions to things that are obvious to anyone, he is trying to change the subject from White Genocide, because he can’t deal with it.

    You point that out and go back to pointing out the Global White Genocide.

    Remember you are not trying to convince the anti-White of anything. You are showing the audience that he is anti-White.

    We use Anti-Whites to make Pro Whites.

    #93573
    Cleric_Preston
    Participant

    In the past I responded to the ‘list of names’ by stating
    “It is nearly 70 years since WW2 ended and investigations into the holocaust are still continuing. There will be plenty of time to fully investigate and claim reparations from all Anti-Whites involved AFTER White Genocide has been stopped”

    That’s true, but it’s too defensive. A more aggressive response would be

    “Good, now we are getting somewhere. You admit White Genocide is occurring. The attempt to destroy EVERY White country through 3rd World immigration and ‘assimilation’ is GENOCIDE
    ‘anti-racist’ is a codeword for Anti-White.

    As Secret Squirrel said we are not trying to convert any Anti-Whites, our audience is the people who are reading or watching the exchange.

    @ Carloman, ” I think his next question would have been, “And what are you planning on doing to those people? Putting them on trial? Killing them?”

    Our response to ‘what are you going to gas the Anti-Whites ?’ sort of questions regarding longer term plans is.

    (1) The Anti-Whites involved will be liable to pay reparations.
    http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/2013/08/13/reparations-not-tribunals/

    I think the following has been discussed as well but I can’t find a link.
    (2) Just as affirmative action programs were established to help Blacks in USA overcome the effects of slavery, so too will affirmative action programs be implemented to help White people overcome the effects of White Genocide.
    As Genocide is infinitely worse than slavery the affirmative action program to help White people will naturally be infinitely more extensive than current affirmative action programs to help Black people.

    #93575
    seapea
    Participant

    I personally like the circular response, aka THE LOOP response…

    Q: Who’s responsible for White GENOcide?
    A: The anti-whites.

    Q: Who are the anti-whites?
    A: The people responsible for White GENOcide.

    Q: Who are the people responsible for White GENOcide?
    A: The anti-whites.

    Rinse and repeat and repeat and repeat.

    If I’m feeling charitable, I might break the loop and give…
    If your home is broken into while your away one day and several items stolen. Do you have to know who the thieves are to know a crime was committed?

    WHITE GENOCIDE is a CRIME.


    Don’t be afraid to keep things simple.

    Also, anti-whites RARELY concede points. The sooner one gets use to that FACT, the easier Mantra work becomes. Keep spreading the words.

    #93579
    Mimmy Jarr
    Participant

    Q: Who’s responsible for White GENOcide?
    A: The anti-whites.

    Q: Who are the anti-whites?
    A: The people responsible for White GENOcide.

    Q: Who are the people responsible for White GENOcide?
    A: The Diversity Nazis

    #93581
    seapea
    Participant

    The Diversity Nazis, I love their swastika.

    #93582
    Jason
    Participant

    EWR and SS above nailed it, we don’t waste time answering their dishonest questions. And Horus made a great point recently – it is impossible to have “discussions” or arguments when we are in the middle of psychological warfare.

    Getting into “who are the anti-Whites” is tailgating, of which I have been guilty. They love that discussion. It’s a trap. If you see your house being burned down, the police don’t make you answer who did it before they will open a case. That is for the investigation to determine. We are pointing out a crime. That’s the only thing we need to do right now.

    #93583

    Denying reality about the consequences of whites speaking about white genocide and racial reality,demanding a membership list of the religion of anti-whitism.

    #93585
    Carloman
    Participant

    Thanks for the replies. You’ve all given me some ideas.

    Jason wrote, “Horus made a great point recently – it is impossible to have “discussions” or arguments when we are in the middle of psychological warfare.” I agree, but how do we make that point to the audience. The anti-White says, “Let’s have that discussion right here on youtube.” If I reply, “Not now; we’re in the middle of psychological warfare,” the audience won’t understand what I’m talking about. Would a good answer be, “The time will be ready when there is a general willingness to discuss White genocide”?

    Speaking of Horus, he does speak about genocide tribunals and putting a velvet rope around people’s necks. I’ve listened to the first eleven of his podcasts. He seems to meander around a lot. Is it worth listening to the rest of them?

    Also, you’ve all answered my second question, but what about the anti-White who says there are no consequences to speaking out about White genocide. Are there any examples I could point out?

    #93587
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    Emma West.

    #93588

    Carolman, why not mention the recent Kyle Hunt White Man March as an example of what happens to whites who speak out against white genocide?

    Then ask the anti-white if there are supposedly no consequences for discussing white genocide, why have so many whites over the years been imprisoned, fired from their jobs, and suffered violent assaults for speaking out against the anti-white tyranny?

    It`s called Soft Totalitarianism, the anti-whites boast about it when they claim “99% of people agree with us”

    #93590
    Secret Squirrel
    Participant

    “Speaking of Horus, he does speak about genocide tribunals and putting a velvet rope around people’s necks. I’ve listened to the first eleven of his podcasts. He seems to meander around a lot. Is it worth listening to the rest of them?”

    That was an early podcast before Horus understood where Bob was going with White Genocide. Unfortunately podcasts can’t be edited like text.

    Bob is about creating a self sustaining industry, that deals out money punishments to rich anti-Whites, because that industry will keep working forever. Tribunals work only once. It will not stop all the anti-Whites that will be born later.

    If you aren’t entertained by Horus, stop listening. If you already understand the Mantra, then spread it.

    “Also, you’ve all answered my second question, but what about the anti-White who says there are no consequences to speaking out about White genocide. Are there any examples I could point out?”

    SPLC wrote a hit piece on Horus just to publish his name and address. They are hoping one of their maniacs will attack him.

    Bob has spoken of finding it difficult to get work because of his beliefs. Starting with one of his professors writing a review on him saying “Bob feels very strongly about race”. That harmed his chances of getting work. If it wasn’t for a certain individual in Washington, Bob would not have had a career there at all, because no one else would have him.

    I understand Beefcake also had his name and address published. I think they may also have rung his work to get him fired. This is their standard MO. Getting people fired. It is a form of money punishment.

    Minerva was prevented from entering Canada.

    Ramzpaul was threatened by a thug on his doorstep. Though I don’t count him as a BUGSer. He dabbles every now and then.

    They really only go after you if you become a name. Becoming a name make you newsworthy. But that might change when they move out of the mocking stage, into the opposition stage.

    #93591
    Jason
    Participant

    You might turn the question around on them. Ask them if they will join you in calling for the SPLC to stop calling up employers or otherwise hurting the ability of a person to earn a living.

    Ask them if they are calling for an end to “Hate speech” laws in Europe, Canada and Australia.

    Ask them if they call for an end to Speech Codes on American campuses.

    Ask them what they are doing to create a climate of free speech for those who dissent.

    In other words, use their asinine denial of free speech suppression to make points about how wide spread it really is. You will never get a person like this to admit he is wrong. He’s being dishonest, everyone knows being pro-White is very dangerous.

    #93592
    Jason
    Participant

    FYI, the way Bob crafted these lines, they actually ARE less likely to get a person in trouble. The Mantra was written to avoid legal trouble in places that have Hate Speech laws.

    #93594
    Carloman
    Participant

    Thanks for the replies. One more question: What people were specifically threatened for participating in the White Man’s March? I think mentioning people who were threatened or harmed for participating in the White Man’s March would be better than mentioning someone who was arrested for some rant on a train.

    #93595
    Secret Squirrel
    Participant

    Most people on WMM were anon. There were no threats I heard of.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 25 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.