IS NOT REPORTING LINKS WORKING?

by Harumphty Dumpty

Home › Forums › BUGS SWARM › IS NOT REPORTING LINKS WORKING?

This topic contains 7 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by  Scythian 10 months ago.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • 7/14/2012 at 12:20 pm #27655

    Harumphty Dumpty
    Participant

    ARE YOU NOTICING A BIG DROP IN YOUR RATE OF POST REMOVAL?

    IF YOU DO  NOTICE IMPROVEMENT, DOES IT SEEM MARKED ENOUGH TO JUSTIFY LOSING THE BENEFITS OF POSTING LINKS?

    WHAT BENEFITS HAVE WE LOST? WHAT BENEFITS HAVE WE GAINED?

    IMO we instituted this policy based on just an assumption (that anti-whites following us from this site are damaging our operations enough to justify the losses we incur by not posting our links), an assumption we could have and should have tested before instituting it as a policy. Possibly that could still be done.*

    But for the moment, let’s see what we can tell about the results, and their costs, with what we have in hand.

    ——————-

    *Here’s part of a long comment I wrote elsewhere about doing a test:

    A sensible experiment could have been devised to test the assumption [that anti-whites following us from this site are damaging our operations sufficiently to justify the losses we incur by not posting our links], and could have been carried out without being announced. Heavy swarmers on yahoo answers and youtube could have gone down their list of links each day, and by some random procedure such as flipping a coin for each one, selected half their links on each site to report, and half not to report, and noted the difference in removal of their posts, etc. between the reported group of links and the unreported group. And after a week or more of doing this, the results could have been reported to us.

    In the present situation, the only test of our original assumption is impressions comparing post removal before and after institution of the new policy. Hopefully there is occurring such a stark difference in the before and after results that we might take it at least as a strong indication that our initial assumption was correct. Is that the case for anyone?

    But anyone who has taken just an elementary course in statistics, with a chapter on setting up studies, will realize how unsatisfactory is the situation we have now put ourselves in as far as judging the results of the new policy. Basically, our comparison groups are very poorly selected.

    http://whitegenocideproject.com/beefcakes-bootcamp-episode-20-bugs-links-and-toxic-terminology/

    7/14/2012 at 9:39 pm #27666

    kiwi
    Participant

    I miss not doing the links. Whether it is a good thing or not I don’t know. Meantime, maybe we could devise an alternate way to signal where we might congregate.  Maybe we need guidelines as to where we should look for sites at which to post.  Right now I just roam around the internet, using general searches. I tend to post less because of this, it’s just less focused that way. What are others doing to find ripe sites? How might we construct a framework that will likely point us in the same general direction? Maybe something like this could be a compromise between announcing where we are, and floating aimlessly.

    Thanks for your concise analysis HD.

     

    7/14/2012 at 11:13 pm #27669

    Linux Lewis
    Participant

    When i post the mantra, on occasion I will hear an Anti-White mention Bob Whitaker.  So they know where the base is.  I would think there would be a gaggle of zombies monitoring the “Where did you post” thread but maybe i’m wrong on that.

    Does anyone post the mantra LESS because of the lack of posting on “Where did you post?”

    I know this,  i probably posted on the thread once for every hundred mini mantras i put out there

    A couple of ideas – a trusted group of bugsters,  where your privilege is escalated to be able to view the posts (which could help weed out any AWs)…  or making the posts viewable only to registered users which could help you do the same

    • This reply was modified 10 months, 1 week ago by  Linux Lewis.
    7/14/2012 at 11:25 pm #27672

    kiwi
    Participant

    Hello elcyCesreveR,

    I do post less, but only because I am less directed as to where to post. What I am suggesting is that we might find an alternate method of pointing ourselves in a general direction, without broadcasting exactly where we are.

    7/14/2012 at 11:31 pm #27673

    Linux Lewis
    Participant

    For Example – You have a “Where did you post the mantra today” thread… which is only viewable to those with access. BUT anyone can post to it.

    You get access to it after you’ve been confirmed to post the mantra a set amount of times. And if you don’t post the mantra a certain amount of times a week you get removed from the list.

    So that way…. even if they are Ant-White… they’ve still furthered our cause

    Of course,  those of you who are old school… will stay on the list no matter what.

    • This reply was modified 10 months, 1 week ago by  Linux Lewis.
    • This reply was modified 10 months, 1 week ago by  Linux Lewis.
  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Posted in | Comments Off


Next post: