Making the Mini-Mantras More Effective (e.g. Questions @ the End)

Home Forums BUGS SWARM Making the Mini-Mantras More Effective (e.g. Questions @ the End)

This topic contains 1 reply, has 1 voice, and was last updated by  GregP 12 months ago.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #23822

    GregP
    Participant

    More than one person has pointed out, including Beefcake in his excellent “Beefcake’s Bootcamp” podcasts, that the mini-mantras are most effective when they ask questions of anti-Whites at the end. This is because it prompts a response from anti-Whites whom we are leading to admit they are simply justifying White Genocide.

    Well, the vast majority of the mini-mantras don’t end in questions or even ask questions in them at all.

    There is also a lot of other room for improvement and things that could use updating. One example is a word count next to each mantra for quick reference. Another is to avoid passive voice whenever possible (it doesn’t sound as good and is usually less concise (i.e. = more words). Let’s keep things simple though, since most people don’t understand what passive and active voice even are.

    I propose that we update the mini-mantras by inserting questions at the end of each, without bumping the length up over 500 characters, and if possible, bringing it down to less than 500 if it’s over.

    So here are my proposed instructions for the mini-mantras:
    -Question to anti-White(s) at the end
    -Try to keep under total 500 characters
    -Insert a character count (including spaces) before the mantra
    -OPTIONAL:
    –Reduce to less than 500 characters
    –change from passive to active voice whenever possible (using action verbs instead of “to be” verbs)

    Proposed instructions for how we do this together:
    -Everyone that wishes to volunteer to help with this picks a Section (A, B, C, D) from Mini-Mantras II and then claims a certain number.

    For example, “I claim Section B 11-20.” After you finish those, post them to this thread and then claim some more if you want.

    Try to pick small numbers to work with. It will go much faster that way. Just pick 5 or 10 and post them within a reasonable amount of time (a couple of days or whatever). Work as much as you want. This will benefit the entire SWARM and as well as make us more effective.

    Feel free to add any other suggestions, improve upon others work, and correct any mistakes I have made in this post.

    #23823

    GregP
    Participant

    So I’ll start. I already did Section B 1-10 because that’s what I use most often.

    I claim Section B 11-20 of Mini-Mantras II (we’re not working with mini-mantras I).

    Here is what I have for Section B 1-10:

    1) (307) Let me get this right. Genetic science accepts and can define race while social sciences negate race? Genetic science=based on hard facts and DNA while Social Science=based on egalitarian, leftist biases? I think I see the problem here!
    So, are you a self-hating, anti-White or a non-White who hates Whites?

    2) (500) Ah, the ole “out of Africa” hypothesis.
    In America & Europe we’re told “we’re all from Africa” so we have to set aside our ethnic interests to not offend our Black “cousins.”
    In South Africa, even though “we’re all from Africa,” we’re told Whites have no right to the country they built. People shouting “we’re all from Africa” to “fight raaacisssm” aren’t anti-racist at all. They’re anti-White. Why else do you think that hypothesis is only used to benefit Blacks in White countries outside Africa?

    3) (456) Nobody is flooding Black nations and ONLY Black nations with non-Blacks and saying, “Its OK, there is no such thing as race. That’s why we’re replacing Black people with blended people!” This is happening in White nations and ONLY in White nations. They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-White. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White. And what they want IS genocide. How else can you explain the double standards justifying White Genocide?

    4) (407) If there is no such thing as race, there is no such thing as GENOcide. A murderer will swear he is innocent if they aren’t able to find the body. How are the two different? Both are equally delusional. Would you give up on prosecuting a murderer because he is delusional? All of their arguments result in a future with no White people. How can you justify committing genocide against a whole race of people?

    5) (492) Race is a social construct? A forensics expert can tell from a hair off of a dead, rotting body through DNA the GENOtype (race) of that individual. However, to keep from getting fired, in the next breath he may say race doesn’t exist. Does something seem wrong with this picture? Why will stating obvious truths and facts get people fired? Why does race exist when White people are blamed for some real or imagined crime but doesn’t exist when they stand up and say NO to their own genocide?

    6) “Race is a social construct.” (493)
    Should ALL and ONLY Black countries be flooded with hundreds of millions of non-Blacks who are then force assimilated into the Black population because “Race is a social construct”???
    You anti-Whites ONLY ever argue for this to be done to EVERY White country and ONLY White countries. You are demanding and justifying the GENOCIDE of my people. If “race is just a social construct,” then how it’s only used to justify White genocide? Why isn’t race “a social construct” in non-White countries?

    7) (337) The only time so called “anti-racists” ever acknowledge the existence of White people is when they are calling us names:
    “White Trash,” “White Supremacist,” “Racist, White __” etc.
    Anti-racist is really just a code word for anti-White. Why else do you think everything they do, say, and promote justifies and perpetuates White genocide?

    8) “We’re all the human race” (488)
    So you’re saying that my people don’t exist and therefore their countries should be flooded with immigrants, and then have these immigrants “assimilated” until my people cease to exist because according to you “We’re all the human race”??
    Nobody is doing that to the Africans in Africa.
    Nobody is doing that to the Asians in Asia.
    You anti-Whites ONLY ever argue this be done to EVERY White country and ONLY White countries. Why are you demanding and justifying the GENOCIDE of my people?

    9) (494) The UN Genocide Law SPECIFICALLY recognizes the existence of RACE as an ‘Identifiable Group.’ No one is going to Africa or Asia and telling the people there, Blacks or Asians do not exist. Anti-Whites are only doing this in White countries & only in White countries. Dehumanization is one of the 8 steps of genocide. Maybe that’s why people are saying anti-racist is a code word for anti-White? Why are you trying to dehumanize my race by saying we’re “a social construct” and we do not exist?

    10) (488) Meanwhile, no one is flooding Africa with non-Africans and telling them, “Race is a social construct,” so “we’re are going to create a blended humanity in ONLY Africa!”
    No one is flooding Japan with non-Japanese and telling them, “Race is a social construct,” so “we’re going to create a blended humanity in ONLY Japan!”
    Only White countries are doing this, only Anti-Whites like you are promoting it. It’s GeNOcide. So tell me, what do you THINK we Whites did to lose our right to exist?

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.