Today Swedens biggest morning news paper “Dagens Nyheter” (Liberal) had an article signed by the publisher headed “Guilt is a white man”. It starts of by referring to a very anti-white article in another mainstream news paper:
“the article in Dagens Arena February 19 contains several really extremely controversial claims. Here are three of them: […]

2nd To undoubtedly, if you yourself are white, claiming that something is not expressions of racism is to indirectly say that “some people by virtue of their gender, skin color, their class, have more rights and freedoms than other people.”

3rd The white man has for 400 years been afraid of losing “the right to name and thus decide over the world.”

The strange thing is that I first did not respond to theses. They, and variants of them, are so commonplace in the debate that they almost feel like truths: Western civilization is based on deep, racist structures and oppression of non-whites.”

He then goes on accusing the anti-white of doing what he accuses racists to do, judging someone by the color of their skin rather than the weight of their arguments (referring to the anti-whites smearing of an other marginally less anti-white).

Fast forward to the really interesting part: “[The anti-white] is a known post colonialist voice. In this context, and in times when “critical whiteness studies” is an academic concept, it seems obvious to reintroduce race as a relevant parameter in the discussion. The term “colonialism” seems entirely reserved for a specific type of territorial and cultural expansion: the European / western from the 1400s onwards.

Perhaps there are prominent post colonialist research that focuses on Arabic, Japanese or Soviet colonialism. But, I never in the debate, and I still looked pretty closely. There, the colonial gentleman is always white and equipped with pith helmet and riding crop. He is an Englishman, not, for example, a Turk, even though the Ottoman Empire for hundreds of years was one of the most expansive.

The Muslim empires time extended over more than a thousand years, and left a massive “colonial” legacy, not least in terms of art, religion and language. Does this mean that today’s Arabs, say, a housewife in Jeddah, also bears collective guilt? Or that maybe, for some abstract reason, is completely reserved for whites.

He then of cours sums up with the usual liberal BS-conclusions, base line: It’s important to remember the horrors, but maybe it’s not just our fault, whites should have a right to say whats racist or not, some have privilege some not.

These are direct qoutes of on of Swedens BIGGEST LIBERAL NEWS PAPER, that every day criticizes every expulsion of illegals and verbally abuses all anti-immigrant politicians!

Where might he (sub-continuously?) have gotten this idea from?
Whats the odds for independent double creation?
Undercover lover? 😉
Is this common in your countries, it’s certainly not in my!

If you think I’m twisting his argument, see for your self

http://www.dn.se/ledare/signerat/skulden-ar-en-vit-man
http://translate.google.com/