@time
As I remember they did that as a training exercise and the anti-White side didn’t sound at all convincing.

Just an idea. You can gather plenty of material in your daily debates. Take screenshots of what the anti-Whites say and read them out for the YT audience. Easy.

sounds like a good idea…

we already have all the debate topics in bugs buddy 2.0, so we could just make it appear to be a controlled debate.

I think it’s interesting that you guys would suggest this, especially after you bitched and moaned after Linux butchered the Mantra by surrounding it in Swastikas.

But, I remember what Whitaker’s post was in response to that:
When someone tries to butcher your message like that, it means the message is working.

The fact that you guys feel the need to hold a mock debate to make people who are against racism look bad says a lot. You can’t just have a real debate with one of us and prove yourself — you have to make it all up.

I’ll be sure to forward this thread to a few people. If I start noticing some fishy debates appearing on YouTube or other websites. 😉

@timeforfreedom

Whatever you want to call us is irrelevant. I consider all of you to just be racists. Does that mean I have to go on YouTube and either:

A) Make comments pretending to be you guys to butcher your message; or,
B) Make false debates to butcher your message?

The answer is no, it doesn’t. That’s deceptive, and not ONLY will it drive people away from you guys for intentionally lying about the validity of the debate, but it’ll also prove just how scared you are.

I challenged any of you to a debate. You wouldn’t take that valid opportunity, but will take the time to fake a debate to make you guys seem any better (or us any worse) than we actually are? It speaks enough for itself.

And you’re living up to exactly what Bob said. If you’re trying to dilute the message by either taking control of the message for yourself and destroying it or by taking the construct of the message and using it for your own purposes (or just jumping on the bandwagon), then you’re proving how powerful the message really is.

So, I’ll reiterate: The fact that you guys have to do this instead of agreeing to a legitimate debate speaks wonders about our message and your honesty when it comes to opposing that message.

[EDIT] I recall a few videos on YouTube where crappy 3D figures were holding a fake debate, but it was using a computer voice generator and it was very clearly just rhetoric. I was fine with that — in fact I kind of laughed at how stupid some of the comments your fake anti-racist made were, but I also laughed that you guys didn’t have any legitimate debates to use as your propaganda.

Now the suggestion in this thread is to post something like those fake computer generated debates, only make it live, and publish it as though it were legitimate. That is possibly even more laugh-worthy than the above.

Blanchevictoire says
“The fact that you guys feel the need to hold a mock debate to make people who are anti-White look bad says a lot”

There I fixed it for you, anti-White. Yes, guilty as charged. We have no respect for you, or your anti-White, Pro White Genocide friends.

Happy?

“Has ANYONE heard of anti racists protest or attack any non white groups based soley off of race? ”

Nope. “Anti-racists” only ever attack White people.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

Blanch comes in here, pushing GLOBAL White GENOCIDE.

Then he uses GENOCIDE Denial, as a tactic against our RACE, the White RACE.

Then he says we should respect him and his INSANE opinions. lol

There is nothing DUMBER than an anti-White.
There is nothing DUMBER than an anti-White.
There is nothing DUMBER than an anti-White.
There is nothing DUMBER than an anti-White.

@oldblighty I don’t agree with your message, but does that mean I have to be so underhanded as what this thread is calling for? You may think so, but no, I don’t.

As long as you acknowledge that it only proves our message is working — you won’t accept a legitimate debate, but you’ll go out of your way to make a fake one. Deliberately being deceptive when an honest alternative is readily available. 🙂

@asgardian117 Again, you’re using that as a representation of what all anti-racists agree with. Based on what I’ve read (I haven’t even heard of them before), I don’t agree with them. No violence should be advocated.

But if you want a few anti-racist groups that don’t focus on white privilege or white racism, then I’m more than happy to.

http://www.imadr.org/
http://www.bll.gr.jp/
http://shitback.tumblr.com/
http://www.hrpcambodia.info/
http://www.humanrightspartymalaysia.com/

[EDIT] I can’t advocate something that doesn’t exist.
Racist is as much a hate word as “murderer”. If that’s the case, then I don’t care. You guys are racist. 🙂

Blanch is a Anti Racist…blanch says to stop judging it by what other “anti racists” do or it will judge us by what other ppl like us do.

Funny thing blanch this isnt a clan rally, this isnt stormfront, this is BUGS just some normal white people who wanna see their race survive in the future.

while you claim total denial of accepting responsibility for people that you self identify with you tell us not to blame you for their actions or you will blame others on us….hmmmmm the difference is you identify with ppl that carried these acts out we dont identify ourselves as the ppl you reference us as.

Let go of your Anti Whitism.