Your responses are too long in my opinion. I prefer to point out their contradictions short, swift and by being passive offensive. Sparta “then we fight in the shade” style.

Here you have some points I’ve written down. You can tweak and add stuff to them as you please:

If skin color doesn’t matter, why do they complain that something is “too white”?

If you don’t care about skin color, why do you argue against people who want to keep White countries White?

If they really were colorblind, why would they have affirmative action for non-whites?

If diversity is something people really want, why do they have to force integration and assimilation?

If multiculturalism is something people really want, why do we have White flight?

Why is it that they talk about White privilege in white countries, but not Asian privilege in Asian countries?

If race is a social construct, why is racial diversity so important?

If “anti-racists” are so unconcerned with race, how come they only have a problem with White schools, White workplaces, White towns, White Cites and White countries?

They say you shouldn’t judge people based on the color of their skin, so why at the same time do they blame White people for all the evil things in the world?

It’s official in many White countries that Whites are becoming the minority in their own countries. If this trend continues it will lead to a world without any Whites.
If we had a policy that would lead to a world without Jews, it would be considered as genocide. So why is it then, that when this is happening to my race, the White race, it is not considered genocide?

If the goal is not to get rid of White people, why is it that they first want racial diversity in ALL & ONLY White countries and then want us to mix together in a “melting pot”?

They say that Africans have the right to Africa and that White people shouldn’t be there, but at the same time they say White countries are for everyone.
This seem to be the anti-white mentality. That Asia is for the Asians, Africa is for the Africans, but White countries are for EVERYBODY.

Anti-White “logic”-To advocate the survival of our own people is a “hate crime”

They are not denying White genocide, they are justifying it.

Anti-Whites don’t have to force intermarriage, because the conditions that lead to intermarriage are being forced.

All anti-whites who want to see our people as a minority in our own countries are idiots and should be treated as such.

“anti-racists are not anti-White “

If “anti-racist” is NOT a codeword for anti-white, tell us a so called “anti-racist” argument that DOESN’T lead to a world without any Whites.

“Whites did x in history!”

That’s your opinion based on anti-white versions of history. Do you believe White people deserve genocide?

“Waah White guilt! I’m ashamed of being White over the likes of you!”

Anti-whites take every opportunity to be ashamed of being White, as long as that amount to making White countries less White. I wonder why..

Alternative answer:
Anti-whites take every opportunity to be ashamed of being White. I would be ashamed too if I was anti-white.

Also, WHEN Anti-Whites come right out openly proclaiming to support white Genocide, and they are “proud” to be anti-White openly.

Do Not Correct the Enemy when he makes a Mistake.

You can say “so you’re gloating about Genocide?, is that a typo?” – then leave them be, go Swarm elsewhere, they have already made your point for you.

Some of us are getting so good at blasting Mantra logic at the Anti-Whites, we NEED to remember when to hold fire, and allow the enemy to make a mistake.

When I see Anti-Whites proclaiming to support white Genocide, openly acknowledging it, calling it Genocide, calling themselves Anti-White, and taunting/gloating about it etc… I even hit the like button on their youtube comments when they get really overt and blatant.