It’s about repetition, John. Not numbers.

Define: Big Changes

John I think we tend to agree about most things.

Propaganda to be successful should tick a number of boxes.

It must confine itself to a small number of ideas.
The material must be true.
It must be understood and believed.
Believe b/c it is understood and true.
It must connect with the audience – it must be vital to them, there is an emotional connection.
It must be repeatedly heard by the audience.

Now if you aim at the English speaking audience, you are looking at a big audience.
A small number of BUGS – less than a several hundred is not going to hit that size of audience enough to influence them.

You say 500 – yes we are looking at this sort of number, I would be happier to see 5000.
Confident if I saw 50 000 BUGS.

You are trying to change the world, not a town.

How often do we see diversity, racism, multuculturalism spouted?
Can we match that and over take it?

What gives me confidence that the message will work is that anti-Whites are so keen to censor it.

The anti-Whites have had a 50 year head start, media control and billions of dollars worth of social engineering – it will take a number of years to reverse this but we have a weapon far more potent – the TRUTH!!

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

John, I hate to witch hunt, but Patrick is right.  You’ve also made posts promoting fake David Duke posts as if they were real – of course, we all make mistakes with the Anti-Whites putting fake stuff out there.  But you never correct yourself when it is pointed out (in that case by me and Dick Whitman).  What gives?

Read the tweets of that David Duke account- of course many of them look real, but then there are crazy tweets, like the one you mentioned. DD would never say that.  It also has tweets intended to hurt Limbaugh and Scott Walker.  It is obviously a fake done by a Leftist, who thinks associating DD with Scot Walker will hurt Walker.

And what about the John King thing?   You said episode 61 sounded quite reasonable, but that episode didn’t have John King in it!  And it was Mr King we were discussing, not a cohost.

Correct me if I’m wrong but I believe it only took 3 people in Iceland, a country of about 300 000, to force the mantra onto television. If the same ratio is applied to North America, we only need about 300 dedicated posters to really break through into mainstreem.

You want to know why I think the mantra is successful? Well out of all the arguments I’ve had on race or whatever, it’s only when I’ve adopted the mantra that I’v ebeen able to come out of arguments as the victor. That is proof enough that the mantra works.

• This reply was modified 10 months ago by  Undercover Lover.

You are correct Roderick, at least about Mantra effectiveness. When I’ve used Mantra talking points in real time, my audience is always stunned. They don’t know what to say. When they recover  they resort to name-calling, but I just brush that off.  “Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White” seems to get them more than anything else.