B. U. G. S.

Thank you linux, I am gonna save the whole video.

Apparently it’s even worse than I thought. Sarkozy’s word is “métissage,” and here’s the word’s translation to English by Collins, a very reputable inter-language dictionary as I recall from my school days:

métissage  
Translations
masculine noun
[de cultures, populations] “mix”
le métissage de la société “the cultural mix of society”
http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/french-english/métissage

NOT “interbreeding”! Which I should have also guessed beforehand, since no head of state in the world today, at least in the Western world, is likely to call for interbreeding (and much less, as I said above, for interbreeding by force).

No, I don’t care that mixing leads to interbreeding. Deliberately mistranslating a word is sleaze, and I feel like I need a bath.

This is a dirty war guys, Sarkozy was instrumental in pushing through GENOCIDAL anti-White policies, so the odd bit of misrepresentation here and there is likely to happen in the grand scheme of things.

As Gar5 says, judge the man by his actions and our message holds true – most definitely a GENOCIDAL anti-White.

HD – Bob pointed out, it doesn’t matter if the translation is incorrect. If they start talking about the translation they are talking about the statement made by Sarkozy. This is a good thing.

Whitestone – Any chance you can shoot me an email at laura_fitz-gerald@hotmail.com ?
How is your French accent?

I don’t have a lot of time at the moment, so this post won’t be as substantial and well-reasoned as I would like. This touches on some issues of truth, propaganda, our mission, the self-improvement and self-education of our activists, etc., that I have been pondering for awhile. To ignore all of that, and get down to brass tacks:

HD, I share your concern (while also acknowledging that we are in a “dirty war”), but I don’t quite think it is founded. Words have a life of their own. Some words, especially in this modern age, which lacks precision, are more vague and malleable than others. From my scant reading and research, it would seem that métissage has a larger range of meaning than, say, something you would see in an engineering manual.

Well, I was going to give a lot of examples of pictures, but I’m not sure how to post one, and I realize that’s going to take more time than I have.

Do some reading on it, HD, and I think you will feel more comfortable. Type “metissage” into Google images and see what I mean. You will find more blacks and Whites holding hands, White babies nursing on black mothers, black babies with blue eyes, blacks and Whites kissing, etc., than you can shake a stick at. Furthermore, French nationalists (not Anglo-sphere BUGSters like most of us trying to ad hoc some French propaganda) have made Photoshopped pictures against “metissage” showing pictures of White girls with black men, calling it the death of Europe and the genocide of Whites. You can find them either on my Twitter, or on a thread in the French section of Stormfront (no time for links).

Google some articles. I did some reading on my own regarding this term a couple of weeks ago. I made sure to not only read nationalist articles, and I found many “mainstream”, anti-White articles which talked about metissage in the context of interracial marriage, mixed-race children, etc. I googled a combination of terms this morning and read some about the Code Noir in Louisiana, and that article was also using metissage in the context of marital and sexual unions between Whites and Blacks in the 1700’s.

This post sucks, LOL. I wanted to give lots of links and pics, and hammer this out, but I don’t have time. A couple more random thoughts:

French pro-Whites use the term in that context. I lifted this off a French girl and have used it probably 50 times:

Diversité, métissage, et immigration massive ne sont imposés qu’aux pays Blancs Européens. C’est le génocide des Blancs!

I encourage others to as well. It fits on Twitter, and if you want to alter it to make room for a long @, you can figure out how, without even knowing French.

Basically: Diversity, “metissage”, and massive immigration are only imposed on White Europeans. It’s White Genocide!

Also search the Twitter stream for metissage or #metissage. I did right before I made this post, and the very first Tweet, at the top of the list, was a girl, posting a picture of a White woman and black man kissing, with a string of heart symbols after it.

Sarkozy might be anti-White, but he isn’t stupid. He’s not a fool. To use such a loaded term, which the native French have been propagandized ad nauseum to associate with interracial sex, blacks and Whites kissing, blacks and Whites holding hands, mixed-race babies, is an intentional and calculated move on his part. I don’t even think he meant to leave himself “leeway”, but it could be seen as him allowing himself plausible deniability… because of the intrinsic semantic range within metissage.

However, like I said, to use such a loaded term that taps into a gazillion Euros of social engineering is intentional. He’s a politician. He doesn’t do that by accident. He knew damn well what he was doing, and what he was saying, and the subconscious minds of everyone who heard that speech also knew damn well what he was saying.

Nothing in this post will convince you, because I didn’t post links, sources, etc. I don’t have the time to even worry about my grammar, lol. But if you spend three hours looking at articles, historical references, Twitter, Google images, etc., I think you’ll come away feeling more at ease with the truthfulness of our position, “dirty war” tactics aside.