for #7

7)”Well if anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White, then YOU are saying that racist = White? That is patently FALSE because ALL races are capable of committing Racism. I am an anti-Racist!”

I usually repeat some form of, “But nobody is flooding Japan with non-Japanese, giving them special rights, healthcare and free education paid for by the Japanese … (add at least one more ethnicity), No, this solution to the “Race Problem” you anti-Whites think you’re solving is done in ONLY White countries, and ALL White countries. It’s Genocide.”

And then they’re led into the next “trap” … they invariably try to interrogate me about “There’s no such thing as a White Country”. Ya’ll know the script for handling THAT one!

@genseric

Thanks for the positive feedback and advice.

It’s fun seeing BUGSers responses to all these points.

Should help with smashin’ those anti-whites.

Some lovely responses Beefcake-oh and great job on the SF Radio show. Can’t wait to here anti-White “Dave” call in again. Mantrafy that oddball freak.

9)“Every Country is for Everyone! & We’re ALL The Same. The Laws of Economics dictate that massive immigration is a One Way Street.”

No it is not.Only white countries are “for everybody” .Non-white countries are strictly “for non-whites” .They get to maintain their people`s existence,but white children expected to become a memory.Economics never justifies genocide.

The laws of economics also dictate that Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and Singapore should accept massive amounts of immigrants from Thailand, Bangladesh, Burma, India and Indonesia, in Japan’s case especially because they’re not having enough Japanese babies to replace themselves. Since there is no clamor for them to accept immigrants according to the laws of economics, it seems that once again anti-white sentiment is hidden behind supposed natural law.

Of course, this was explicitly in the Mantra. Learn the Mantra until you don’t need it anymore.

As I am fairly new here, I would appreciate any input from what I just put together from experienced BUGSters. For example, on answer b. to #4 I added “Why do you think that is? Could it be because Anti-Racist is a code word for Anti-White?” to the end. Does this work or is phrasing that repeater a no-no for some reason?

In context:

4)”So, what do YOU propose to DO about White genocide?”
a. A full public discussion about white genocide is our most important demand, should we not be allowed to discuss the Genocide of our own race?
b. There will still be Asians in Asia, because Asia is for the Asians. There will still be Africans in Africa, because Africa is for the Africans.
But if I dare imply that White countries should be granted THE SAME RIGHTS that ALL the other countries have, then I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. Why do you think that is? Could it be because Anti-Racist is a code word for Anti-White?

P.S.

In the list I posted above I tried to list answers in descending order f what I thought was the best. So responses with Questions at the end should be listed first, those that don’t or I think would be less effective last.