B. U. G. S.

Quite correct. We are primarily in a war of words (not a war of logic), a war of words in which anti-whites have been very sophisticated and we have been exceedingly naive.

Just look what anti-whites have done with the R-word. Was that done by logical argument? No! it was done by repeating the R-word over and over and over until now whites can NOT get the R-word out of their minds!

We must be similarly consistent in ALWAYS saying and writing, “ANTI-WHITE,” until that word has displaced the R-word as being THE word that has to do with race!
__________________
White GeNOcide Project

Quote:
[Originally Posted by Whitium] Those faggoty pansy-ass scrawny British Antifa morons are serious business, huh?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Haight
While I 100% agree with you that ANTIFA are…

Guys, in practically every sentence that these anti-whites utter, they call us the R-word, right?

That’s because anti-whites have been taught the value of repetition. Every time an anti-white calls us the R-word, he delivers a hammer blow that drives deeper into white minds the fundamental lie that racial feeling is a learned pathology (rather than an innate biological trait that evolved to protect group survival), as well as the related fundamental lie that whites are fundamentally evil!

Now, do we aid the anti-whites in hammering those two lies even deeper into white psyches by dutifully adopting for ourselves the R-word as our official name, and then referring to ourselves constantly as, “The Racists”?

NO??!!

WELL WHY NOT???!!! Since we are unthinkingly making a similar mistake by adopting the anti-whites’ own lying official term for themselves, “anti-fascists,” and we help them hammer that appealing little piece of lying propaganda into white minds by repeating constantly that term or it’s shortened form ourselves whenever we refer to them!!

Please! Do not accept the anti-whites’ terminology by which they rule us! We must shove aside their terminology by imposing our own terminology!

They are NOT “anti-fascists,” THAT IS A LIE! They are ANTI-WHITES, and that’s the term that all whites reading these threads should be seeing and absorbing!

They are not “antifas,” they are not “antis” (that word implants no useful message in a white reader!), they are ANTI-WHITES!

So please allow me these small changes:

Quote:
[Originally Posted by Whitium] Those faggoty pansy-ass scrawny British anti-white morons are serious business, huh?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Haight
While I 100% agree with you that these anti-whites are…

Also, if you’re on some thread where the context doesn’t make clear which particular group you’re referring to, some phrase like, “these anti-whites (of organization such and such) who lyingly call themselves (whatever)…,” is worth the extra words.

Instead of the R-word springing automatically into white minds and onto white tongues whenever race is mentioned, we want the term “anti-white” to spring automatically into white minds and onto white tongues whenever race is mentioned.

We will accomplish that by EVERYone using the FULL term “anti-white” EVERYwhere!

So please, ALWAYS call anti-whites exactly what they are, “ANTI-WHITES!”

Thanks!
__________________
White GeNOcide Project

FELLOW BUGSERS: Be relentless but friendly! I think this is a change we can accomplish within my lifetime, if I eat healthily and exercise!

(From here on, boldfacing, italics, and underlining, all of which I think are EXTREMELY important, will appear only in the original posts at the link given)
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t888241-75/
But one thing I do understand is that beefcake is very correct that we should ALWAYS refer to this misnamed-as-“ARA” group as Anti-WHITE-Action.

We must break the grip of the lying anti-white terminology that anti-whites have held us tight in!

Instead, we must grip the anti-whites in our own truthful white terminology!

And we must squeeze them hard with our truthful white terminology, as they’ve squeezed us with their bs anti-white pejoratives for a half century!!

It does us harm and is a contradiction in logic to affirm that these creeps are “anti-racist” when we all know they’re anti-white! They cannot logically be both things at the same time!

“Anti-White-Action” describes perfectly what they are and what they do! They engage in violent anti-white actions!

Let’s call anti-whites “anti-whites,” and call this group by its proper name, “Anti-White-Action”
__________________

Beefcake had posted
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t888241-73/
I want us to start refering to them here as ONLY Anti-White-Action, don’t even use the acronym AWA.

I want the distinction to be clear for those who lurk here, who read and learn, that these guys are not Anti-Racist as they claim to be.

They could easily target non-white radical groups that DO advocate violence.

They are not out attacking Black Panthers

They are not out attacking LaRaza

They only attacked white people for peaceful and lawful assembly, because these particular white had an opinion they did not agree with.

These guys think that they can resort to illegal means to attack political opponents, because these people are white, and wanted to talk about the things that are effecting them.

We have to define our enemy. They call us supremist because we feel our Race has a right to exist. We need to call them Anti-White.

We should stop refering to them at Anti-Racist-Action, they are ANTI-WHITE.

Anti-Racist is a code word for Anti-White.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t888241-80/
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haight
…these ANTIFA/ARA/Anti-White thugs…

Just “Anti-White thugs” would do the job.*

Let’s not, even in shorthand, help anti-whites hammer in deeper their appealing and appalling propaganda lies that they are “anti-racists” (they are anti-white, and can’t logically be anti-racist at the same time) and “anti-fascists” (they are fascists, in today’s popular meaning of the word).

The subject of this thread makes clear what particular group you’re referring to, and on a thread that doesn’t provide context, it’s worth the extra words to say something like, “the anti-whites who lyingly identify themselves as fighting things they aren’t in fact fighting…etc.”

it may sound stilted to us to use some extra phrasing (it’s not even necessary usually, since usually the subject of a thread provides the clarifying context), but when necessary for specificity, we do it for visitors here and to train ourselves how to speak to whites who are not yet convinced.

We want to hammer home WHITE terminology and memes, not help the anti-whites hammer home further their anti-white terminology and memes.

I hesitated (a brief moment) to write this post, because you did after all say “anti-white” (!), but I knew what I had to do!

Because it’s not a matter of adding on our white terminology to anti-white terminology(!); we want to replace anti-white terminology with WHITE terminology!

*After I wrote this post, someone suggested to me the term, “anti-white terrorists”! That seems excellent to me! It’s certainly accurate, and if challenged would provide a great opportunity to drive home the reality of what it must have been like to be in that restaurant.

I posted this
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t888540-20/#post10301892
Don’t forget to call them “anti-whites” at every opportunity, including correspondence to them or to anyone else. Who knows where else that correspondence will eventually appear and who will read it.

Other terms for them won’t move us forward in the war of words.

But if the term “anti-white” appears as frequently in everything we say about them as the R-word appears in everything they say about us, we will be doing something to eventually replace the R-word by the term “anti-white” as the universal word about race in white minds.
__________________
White GeNOcide Project