B. U. G. S.

So, because the focus on the NBPP is to hate whites, and then hate Zionist Jews in Israel, they’re the same?

You have received the Award of Higher Learning! /sarcasm

So white people and jewish people are different?

According to your Ilk they are.
And Asgardian….I’m sorry, my scenario would be too far off.
You would be regarded as the typical New York Crackpot…from which you seem to know from experience. 🙂

Typical Racist and his self victimization 😀

Anyways back to time square….not only would I probably be severly injured I would also be arrested for HATE SPEECH.

Was lord king prince shamir shabbbbaezzzz arrested for hate speech or the incitement of murder? No. I would love nothing more than to prove you wrong but unfortunately I have worked very hard in my life to achieve what I have now. Thats codeword for “white privilege” lol.

Anyways back to time square….not only would I probably be severly injured I would also be arrested for HATE SPEECH

I guess that’s why more of these supposed “Innocent” blacks are disproportionately arrested for hate crimes than whites 😉

Shabazz hasn’t been arrested for the SAME reason your God Whitaker, and the leader of militia groups haven’t…

I wouldn’t call yourself “Successful” by wasting time on the internet advocating for a group supporting deportation 😀

Typical use-mention error. The quote from the SPLC article said the NBPP hates whites and is anti-Semitic.

When Shabazz says: “Kill all Zionists in Israel”, they’re anti-Semitic.
When Shabazz says: “Kill some crackers”, they hate whites.

There’s specification in the former. If there weren’t, then we could easily say they’re against humanity.

But they’re not against all humans, are they? Only ones part of assigned groups.

Your attempt to find a contradiction where there isn’t one is shallow and transparent. 😉

I wouldn’t be talking if I were you, since not only did you make violent threat, but have historically done so. 🙂

Oh, don’t worry. He did a GREAT job spouting off the Mantra and your talking points. That was all it took for him to lose the debate.

They’re not exceptions, they’re realities. All it takes is a minimal amount of research to find the information. The fact that it takes so little to find that people DO call non-whites racist just betrays your selective hearing/sight when it comes to any contradictions with your worldview. In other words, you live in a fantasy world, and anything that contradicts it is “an exception”.

You can’t keep calling out “Token!” whenever there’s something that disproves your claims. Eventually people will catch on.

Yes, it would be more likely for Africans and Asians in Europe, Canada, Australia and ESPECIALLY America to be wiped out. But, I see you don’t care, because there would still be more of them somewhere else.

“in whole or in part” — means everything, Scythian. I almost want to burst out laughing at this comment, because it’s SUCH a double standard.

Actually, when I say only 9% of whites intermarry, I’m saying it’s impossible for a genocide to take place via miscegenation with such a low number. If 100% of whites intermarried, then yes, genocide would very much be the result, because the target would be “any white person that exists must pass on their genes to an inevitably half-white, half-whatever child”.

As it stands, only 9% of white marriages were with non-whites, and that says nothing about their children and who their children will marry. If the half-white half-black child has a child a few decades from now with a white person, then the white genes will return. And there is nothing wrong with that.

So, anti-racists in Japan, Malaysia, etc. are pro-genocide? So the only way to be against genocide is to be racist, or to simply not care? What a riot.

—

This was one hell of a Gish Gallop, Scythian. If anything, it only proved just how unfocused you are concerning your own standpoints.

And this is why debating you would be hilarious, and it’s why you probably didn’t accept. 😉