I also use ‘less White people’ as in ”Diversity’ just means less White people, it’s GENOCIDE!’

Maybe I am missing something, but I don’t have any strong preference as long as the core message of White GENOCIDE is there.

“Gar 5”

The “blended out of existence” one seems better, but I wouldn’t use the term existence since that sounds somewhat too distant, as in a theoretical concept or conversation. I use “force blended away” as a more direct way of addressing the deliberate eradication of the white genotype…

Best regards,

J.P.O.

I don;t like ‘blended out of existence’ as it is a euphemism for White Genocide.

ITs hides the genocide, the destruction of the features of a people in a word.

Use White minority, or hated White minority, or destroyed minority.

I blend cream in my coffee. It sounds innocuous. The issue is what is destroyed.

I think emphasizing White children will be a minority is good. That doesn’t make it any less genocidal.

Genocide does not equal extinction.

But it needs to be stressed that Whites are being made a minority through policies, not due to some natural process.

I increasingly think White parents need to be guilted for their silence. They are leaving a horrible world to their remaining White children.

You must focus on the intention, not the likely result.

Do you let someone trying to kill you off the hook for attempted murder, because their plot maybe won’t have worked to completion?

They tried, thats the point.

The point is, there is deliberate policy to undermine a race or identifiable group of people by making them a minority and assimilating them out.

Assimilation is the endgame. They will not accept a white minority who doesn’t assimilate.

Will anti-white stop persecuting “racists” and whites (which to them is the same) when we are a minority? Well they then say “You know, we’ve gone too far, we can stop non-white immigration now?” Will they say to someone who is against interracial marriage “You know, given that you are a minority, thats OK to suggest that whites should marry other whites”.

Will they ever say “You know, it’s gone far enough”

No, they won’t. We know they won’t, a few will see its gone too far, and defect, but the hardcore anti-whites won’t. So why give them the benefit of the doubt?

If whites are going to defect, then we must demand it now. No neutrality on this issue can be tolerated.

Assimilation of white people out of existence is the logical conclusion of what they advocate. It is the logical conclusion of having mass immigration which cannot be opposed of even criticised or recommended against, and racial assimilation, which cannot be opposed, or criticised, or even recommended against.

Play it to the end, its genocide, the eradication of an identifiable group of people. They know this is the endgame. They’ve talked about the coffee coloured new race. They’ve openly said whites must go.

If they wan’t to push it, then call it for what it is.

I know it can sound crazy to talk about “Genocide”, it sound fringe. But thats because of the insanity of what THEY are pushing.

We don’t say Genocide because we are far our fringe dwellers. We say it because it is the brutal reality. It is they who are that crazy.

Yes, they really are advocating blended out of existence, not just ‘minority’.