The ADL’s success in “persuading” institutions to block what the ADL calls “hate speech” from even occurring may make the ADL’s goal of having “hate speech” laws in the U.S. (as they’ve achieved in other white countries) unnecessary.

Excerpt from a 2008 article in the Jerusalem Post:

ADL, YouTube launch partnership to fight video abuse

The Anti-Defamation League announced Sunday its recent expansion into the world of YouTube, the on-line video-sharing site. The US-based advocacy group has officially partnered with the digital media powerhouse in an effort to combat hate speech and other forms of abuse…the organization has already made a place for itself in YouTube’s new “Abuse and Safety Center,” where users are given advice directly from the ADL on how to confront hate speech…YouTube’s community guidelines define hate speech as “content that promotes hatred against members of a protected group”
http://www.jpost.com/JewishWorld/JewishNews/Article.aspx?id=124492

I have no reason to think it is NativeSupport. As I remember, he shut down his Youtube account, after we swarmed him. Anyway, NativeSupport’s RL name is Theo van Rossen.

http://www.facebook.com/NDNSupport

Theo van Rossum was NativeSupport’s RL name. van Boven is an international human rights lawyer. I assume lawyers are too busy to troll pro white youtube channels.

Theo van Rossum
http://www.facebook.com/NDNSupport

NativeSupport, yes that’s who I was thinking of. He did make a video “debunking” White genocide.

I’m pretty sure Boven is not his last name.

• This reply was modified 1 year ago by  Cody.
• This reply was modified 1 year ago by  Cody.

The video was not taken down for the traditional reasons. The video was banned because Youtube stated that it fell under the hate speech laws in Northern Europe. I believe… to be specific….Sweden. BUGS is a global effort. That worked against us on this one. The comments were being mostly approved and moderated etc by Northern European BUGS. Some were on TOR etc. But they basically said this is not a free speech issue because this account is not American. The comments are not being approved by anyone in America (etc etc etc). Technically this is true.

Some have asked if the video was uploaded out of Europe. I don’t remember but it would have been done via proxy in the USA. They could not prove the video was uploaded in Europe or anything. They just said this video is subject to hate laws because the most of the comments were being approved out of Sweden. Also, some of the comments did not follow “community guidelines” etc etc

We have a new account. Very straight forward. And it is definitely American with only American moderators logging in. We will also go by their damn community guidelines for comment approval. We are going to go overboard following the draconian guidelines which ONLY apply to us. The up side is that we now know they are watching us like hawks. This will make it easier to defend any censorship in the future from a legal perspective. Because we know what we have to do.

Is this is a costly mistake? Sure and you can blame me. But I would much rather find out all this before our next video comes out…….which will be much better animation and potentially much much larger and definitely more explosive than the first animation. IF they were smart they should have let it slide so they could ban something really juicy on us…using some BS loop hole. And I call it a BS loop hole because this rule would never apply to any of our enemies or anyone else. This won’t happen again. The new account is up and it is set up optimally to fight any censorship. We will be following all their damn community guidelines as well.

I replied to Vicious Biter with “Theo.” He replied to another poster but made no comment to me.