Search? Click Here
Did you know you can visit to the swarm with www.bugsswarm.com?
Post on the internet Working Thread

-Blanchevictoire-

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 9 posts - 61 through 69 (of 69 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • See five/six other comments dippy. How long does it take to get it?

    TIMEFORFREEDOM:

    Why are you crazy racists so hateful of other races?
    Why do you crazy racists desire so badly to see all non-white people thrust out of white society?
    Why do you crazy racists want so badly to deny all non-white people the right to move where they please to seek a better life?
    Why are you crazy racists so RACIST????

    Keep asking all these ridiculous questions. I’ll pose ones that aren’t so ridiculous. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Take the debate, freakish racist.

    There’s no such thing as an AntiRacist Hitler. Hitler was racist ๐Ÿ˜€

    @timeforfreedom My intro to my debate challenge was:

    Don’t make it last minute. Schedule it. Live debate.

    I’ve also said many times before that forum debates are horrible. We’ll debate live, where neither of us can back down from questions, where neither of us can just Google the answers, and where neither of us can edit what we said if we found out we messed up.

    If you don’t have the balls to do that, then it doesn’t matter how “good” of a debater you are here, you’re still a failure.

    @oldblighty I’ll stop demanding a debate once one of you accepts or once EWR says it’s okay to publish the first one.

    Or once a bunch of YOU say “publish it publicly”. If that happens, then Sam will publish it.

    @timeforfreedom A Gish Gallop if I’ve ever seen it. I don’t have enough time to respond to all this bull. Accept the debate challenge and we can do it live.

    You guys support Golden Dawn, Stormfront, the attacks in Rosarno, and racial discrimination. You openly condemn miscegenation. I’ve got every reason to not respect you, but I do anyway.

    So remember: Call me whatever you want, dehumanize me however you want, and try to defend denying a legitimate debate challenge in exchange for an intentionally deceptive, falsified debate publication; it says everything about you, and nothing about me. ๐Ÿ™‚

    @oldblighty I don’t agree with your message, but does that mean I have to be so underhanded as what this thread is calling for? You may think so, but no, I don’t.

    As long as you acknowledge that it only proves our message is working — you won’t accept a legitimate debate, but you’ll go out of your way to make a fake one. Deliberately being deceptive when an honest alternative is readily available. ๐Ÿ™‚

    @asgardian117 Again, you’re using that as a representation of what all anti-racists agree with. Based on what I’ve read (I haven’t even heard of them before), I don’t agree with them. No violence should be advocated.

    But if you want a few anti-racist groups that don’t focus on white privilege or white racism, then I’m more than happy to.

    http://www.imadr.org/
    http://www.bll.gr.jp/
    http://shitback.tumblr.com/
    http://www.hrpcambodia.info/
    http://www.humanrightspartymalaysia.com/

    [EDIT] I can’t advocate something that doesn’t exist.
    Racist is as much a hate word as “murderer”. If that’s the case, then I don’t care. You guys are racist. ๐Ÿ™‚

    @timeforfreedom

    Whatever you want to call us is irrelevant. I consider all of you to just be racists. Does that mean I have to go on YouTube and either:

    A) Make comments pretending to be you guys to butcher your message; or,
    B) Make false debates to butcher your message?

    The answer is no, it doesn’t. That’s deceptive, and not ONLY will it drive people away from you guys for intentionally lying about the validity of the debate, but it’ll also prove just how scared you are.

    I challenged any of you to a debate. You wouldn’t take that valid opportunity, but will take the time to fake a debate to make you guys seem any better (or us any worse) than we actually are? It speaks enough for itself.

    And you’re living up to exactly what Bob said. If you’re trying to dilute the message by either taking control of the message for yourself and destroying it or by taking the construct of the message and using it for your own purposes (or just jumping on the bandwagon), then you’re proving how powerful the message really is.

    So, I’ll reiterate: The fact that you guys have to do this instead of agreeing to a legitimate debate speaks wonders about our message and your honesty when it comes to opposing that message.

    [EDIT] I recall a few videos on YouTube where crappy 3D figures were holding a fake debate, but it was using a computer voice generator and it was very clearly just rhetoric. I was fine with that — in fact I kind of laughed at how stupid some of the comments your fake anti-racist made were, but I also laughed that you guys didn’t have any legitimate debates to use as your propaganda.

    Now the suggestion in this thread is to post something like those fake computer generated debates, only make it live, and publish it as though it were legitimate. That is possibly even more laugh-worthy than the above.

    I think it’s interesting that you guys would suggest this, especially after you bitched and moaned after Linux butchered the Mantra by surrounding it in Swastikas.

    But, I remember what Whitaker’s post was in response to that:
    When someone tries to butcher your message like that, it means the message is working.

    The fact that you guys feel the need to hold a mock debate to make people who are against racism look bad says a lot. You can’t just have a real debate with one of us and prove yourself — you have to make it all up.

    I’ll be sure to forward this thread to a few people. If I start noticing some fishy debates appearing on YouTube or other websites. ๐Ÿ˜‰

Viewing 9 posts - 61 through 69 (of 69 total)