German:

46
00:03:15,000 –> 00:03:16,500
Afrika für die Afrikaner.

47
00:03:17,000 –> 00:03:18,000
Asien für die Asiaten.

48
00:03:19,000 –> 00:03:20,000
Weisse Länder für ALLE.

49
00:03:21,000 –> 00:03:23,000
Alle sagen, dass es dieses Rassenproblem gäbe.

50
00:03:23,500 –> 00:03:26,000
Alle sagen, dieses Rassenproblem könne nur gelöst werden

51
00:03:26,500 –> 00:03:29,000
wenn die Dritte Welt in die weissen Länder strömt

52
00:03:29,500 –> 00:03:31,000
und zwar ausschließlich in die WEISSEN LÄNDER.

53
00:03:31,800 –> 00:03:35,000
Die Niederlande und Belgien sind ebenso dicht besiedelt wie Japan und Taiwan

54
00:03:35,500 –> 00:03:39,000
aber niemand sagt, dass Japan und Taiwan dieses Rassenproblem lösen werden…

55
00:03:39,500 –> 00:03:44,500
indem sie Millionen Leute aus der Dritten Welt aufnehmen und diese “assimilieren”.

56
00:03:45,000 –> 00:03:49,000
Jeder sagt, dass die endgültige Lösung für dieses Rassenproblem

57
00:03:49,500 –> 00:03:53,000
darin liegt, dass sich jedes weisse Land, und zwar NUR WEISSE LÄNDER,

58
00:03:54,000 –> 00:03:58,000
“assimiliert” d. h. “Mischehen” mit den ganzen Nicht-Weissen eingeht.

59
00:04:00,000 –> 00:04:02,000
Was wäre, wenn ich behaupten würde, es gäbe dieses Rassenproblem?

60
00:04:03,000 –> 00:04:05,000
Und dass dieses Rassenproblem nur gelöst werden kann

61
00:04:05,500 –> 00:04:07,000
wenn Millionen von Nicht-Schwarzen…

62
00:04:07,500 –> 00:04:08,500
in jedes schwarze Land…

63
00:04:09,000 –> 00:04:10,500
und nur in schwarze Länder gebracht werden würden?

64
00:04:11,000 –> 00:04:12,500
Wie lange würde es dauern, bis jemand bemerkt,…

65
00:04:13,000 –> 00:04:14,500
dass ich nicht über ein Rassenproblem spreche…

66
00:04:15,000 –> 00:04:17,000
sondern, dass ich über eine endgültige Lösung für das “Schwarze Problem” spreche?

67
00:04:18,000 –> 00:04:21,000
Und wie lange würde es dauern, bis das einem geistig gesunden, schwarzen Menschen auffallen würde?

68
00:04:22,000 –> 00:04:25,000
Und wie verrückt wäre ein schwarzer Mensch, wenn er da nichts dagegen hätte?

69
00:04:26,000 –> 00:04:31,000
Aber wenn ich die offensichtliche Wahrheit über das gegenwärtig ablaufende Programm des Völkermords gegen meine Rasse, die Weisse Rasse, sage…

70
00:04:32,000 –> 00:04:36,500
…die offensichtliche Wahrheit über das aktuell laufende Programm des Völkermords gegen meine Rasse…

71
00:04:37,500 –> 00:04:41,000
…das gegenwärtig ablaufende Programm des Völkermords gegen meine Rasse, die Weisse Rasse…

72
00:04:42,000 –> 00:04:48,000
Aber wenn ich die offensichtliche Wahrheit über das gegenwärtig ablaufende Programm des Völkermords gegen meine Rasse, die Weisse Rasse, sage…

73
00:04:49,000 –> 00:04:51,500
stimmen Liberale und respektable Konservative überein, dass ich ein…

74
00:04:52,000 –> 00:04:54,800
Nazibinder6MillionenJudenumbringenwill.

75
00:04:55,000 –> 00:04:58,000
Sie behaupten, dass sie Antirassisten sind,

76
00:04:58,500 –> 00:05:00,000
aber was sie wirklich sind, ist ANTI-WEISS.

77
00:05:02,000 –> 00:05:21,000
Antirassist ist ein Codewort für ANTI-WEISS.

The phrase “Stop White Genocide” repeated twice in different ways. I’m sure you could figure out how to break it apart, or pick which one to use, or use both: Stoppen Völkermord, stoppen Weiß Genozid!

A mini I saw LL use on Twitter, and have used since:

Nur weiße Gesellschaften müssen immer “vielfältig” sein. Nur weiße Kinder leiden darunter. Es ist ein Völkermord.

French (“France”, not “Canada”):

46
00:03:15,000 –> 00:03:16,500
L’Afrique aux Africains.

47
00:03:17,000 –> 00:03:18,000
L’Asie aux Asiatiques.

48
00:03:19,000 –> 00:03:20,000
Les pays blancs pour TOUT LE MONDE.

49
00:03:21,000 –> 00:03:23,000
Tout le monde dit qu’il y a ce problème de race.

50
00:03:23,500 –> 00:03:26,000
Tout le monde dit que ce problème de race sera résolu,

51
00:03:26,500 –> 00:03:29,000
lorsque le tiers monde se déversera dans les pays blancs,

52
00:03:29,500 –> 00:03:31,000
et SEULEMENT les pays blancs.

53
00:03:31,800 –> 00:03:35,000
Les Pays-Bas et la Belgique sont tout aussi peuplée que le Japon et Taiwan;

54
00:03:35,500 –> 00:03:39,000
mais personne ne dit que le Japon et Taiwan permettront de résoudre ce problème de race

55
00:03:39,500 –> 00:03:44,500
en faisant appel à des millions de tiers-mondistes et je cite “assimilez-vous” avec eux.

56
00:03:45,000 –> 00:03:49,000
Tout le monde dit que la solution définitive à ce problème de race

57
00:03:49,500 –> 00:03:53,000
est pour TOUS les pays blancs et SEULS les pays blancs,

58
00:03:54,000 –> 00:03:58,000
à “s’assimiler” (c-à-d se marier) avec tous ces non-blancs.

59
00:04:00,000 –> 00:04:02,000
Quoi si je vous disais qu’il y avait ce problème de race ?

60
00:04:03,000 –> 00:04:05,000
Et que ce problème de race sera seulement résolu

61
00:04:05,500 –> 00:04:07,000
si des millions de non-noirs

62
00:04:07,500 –> 00:04:08,500
étaient conduit dans chaque pays noir,

63
00:04:09,000 –> 00:04:10,500
Et seulement de cultures noir.

64
00:04:11,000 –> 00:04:12,500
Combien de temps cela prendrait-il à quiconque de réaliser

65
00:04:13,000 –> 00:04:14,500
que je ne parle pas d’un problème de race

66
00:04:15,000 –> 00:04:17,000
Je parle de la solution finale au problème noir ?

67
00:04:18,000 –> 00:04:21,000
Et combien de temps cela prendrait-il à tout homme noir sain d’esprit de remarquer ça ?

68
00:04:22,000 –> 00:04:25,000
Et quel genre d’homme noir psychopathe n’aurait pas d’objection à cela ?

69
00:04:26,000 –> 00:04:31,000
Mais si je dis la vérité évidente sur le PROGRAMME EN COURS DE GÉNOCIDE contre ma race, la race blanche …

70
00:04:32,000 –> 00:04:36,500
la vérité évidente sur le PROGRAMME EN COURS DE GÉNOCIDE contre MA race

71
00:04:37,500 –> 00:04:41,000
la vérité évidente sur LE PROGRAMME EN COURS DE GÉNOCIDE contre ma race, la race blanche …

72
00:04:42,000 –> 00:04:48,000
Mais si je vous dit la vérité évidente sur LE PROGRAMME EN COURS DE GÉNOCIDE contre ma race, la race blanche

73
00:04:49,000 –> 00:04:51,500
Les libéraux et les “conservateurs respectables” conviennent que je suis:

74
00:04:52,000 –> 00:04:54,800
“UNE NAZI QUI VEUT TUER 6 MILLIONS DE JUIFS”.

75
00:04:55,000 –> 00:04:58,000
Ils disent qu’ils sont “anti-raciste”,

76
00:04:58,500 –> 00:05:00,000
mais ce qu’ils sont c’est “anti-blanc”.

77
00:05:02,000 –> 00:05:21,000
“Anti-raciste” est un mot-clé pour “anti-blanc”.

The phrase, “Stop White Genocide“: NON au génocide des blancs!

A Twitter-mini I got from a French pro-White, that I’ve used a lot:

Diversité, métissage, et immigration massive ne sont imposés qu’aux pays Blancs Européens. C’est le génocide des Blancs!

@ Benjamin Newells: I don’t know. They were all provided by pro-Whites, either via YouTube, BUGS, or Stormfront. I ran all of them through Google Translate and made sure that there were no tricks played or obvious mistranslations—I checked them fairly meticulously, as I recall.

Mike M said that he felt one of my French minis could be better (or something like that). And I say the following not to be provincial (at all), but how would I know? That’s just one French pro-White’s word against another French pro-White’s word, neither of whom I know. Unless you can get a group of people who speak a certain language to vote, I don’t see how there’s a way of knowing, barring obvious mistranslations (like “World Poverty” in the German one above [not mine] if true).

Dutch:

46
00:03:15,000 –> 00:03:16,500
Afrika voor de Afrikanen.

47
00:03:17,000 –> 00:03:18,000
Azië voor Aziaten.

48
00:03:19,000 –> 00:03:20,000
Blanke landen voor IEDEREEN

49
00:03:21,000 –> 00:03:23,000
Iedereen zegt dat er een rassenprobleem is.

50
00:03:23,500 –> 00:03:26,000
Iedereen zegt dat dit rassenprobleem alleen word opgelost,

51
00:03:26,500 –> 00:03:29,000
wanneer de derde wereldlanden blanke landen binnenstromen,

52
00:03:29,500 –> 00:03:31,000
en ALLEEN in blanke landen.

53
00:03:31,800 –> 00:03:35,000
Nederland en België zijn net zo dichtbevolkt als Japan en Taiwan;

54
00:03:35,500 –> 00:03:39,000
maar niemand zegt dat Japan en Taiwan dit rassenprobleem zullen oplossen…

55
00:03:39,500 –> 00:03:44,500
door miljoenen van de derde-wereld bevolking onderdak te bieden en met HEN te integreren.

56
00:03:45,000 –> 00:03:49,000
Iedereen zegt dat de eindoplossing voor dit rassenprobleem…

57
00:03:49,500 –> 00:03:53,000
is door blanke landen en blanke landen alleen…

58
00:03:54,000 –> 00:03:58,000
te integreren (huwen met) met alle niet-blanken.

59
00:04:00,000 –> 00:04:02,000
Wat als ik zei dat dit rassenprobleem er was?

60
00:04:03,000 –> 00:04:05,000
en dat dit rassenproblem alleen opgelost werd…

61
00:04:05,500 –> 00:04:07,000
als miljoenen niet-zwarten…

62
00:04:07,500 –> 00:04:08,500
elk ZWART land warden binnengebracht…

63
00:04:09,000 –> 00:04:10,500
en zwarte landen alleen?

64
00:04:11,000 –> 00:04:12,500
Hoe lang zou het voor iedereen duren om te realizeren…

65
00:04:13,000 –> 00:04:14,500
Dat ik niet praat over een rassenprobleem…

66
00:04:15,000 –> 00:04:17,000
maar dat ik praat over een eindoplossing voor het zwarte probleem?

67
00:04:18,000 –> 00:04:21,000
En hoe lang zou een gewone zwarte man nodig hebben om dit door te krijgen?

68
00:04:22,000 –> 00:04:25,000
En wat voor psychopathische zwarte man zou geen bezwaar leveren?

69
00:04:26,000 –> 00:04:31,000
Maar als ik de waarheid vertel over het proces van genocide tegen mijn ras, het blanke ras…

70
00:04:32,000 –> 00:04:36,500
… de waarheid over het proces van genocide tegen mijn ras…

71
00:04:37,500 –> 00:04:41,000
… de waarheid over het proces van genocide tegen mijn ras, het blanke ras…

72
00:04:42,000 –> 00:04:48,000
Maar als ik de waarheid vertel over het proces van genocide tegen mijn ras, het blanke ras,

73
00:04:49,000 –> 00:04:51,500
Zijn liberalen en gerespecteerde conservatieven het erover eens dat ik iemand ben die…

74
00:04:52,000 –> 00:04:54,800
Nazidiezesmiljoenjodenwildoden.

75
00:04:55,000 –> 00:04:58,000
Ze zeggen dat ze “anti-racistisch” zijn,

76
00:04:58,500 –> 00:05:00,000
maar wat ze zijn is anti-blank.

77
00:05:02,000 –> 00:05:21,000
“Anti-racistisch” is een codewoord voor anti-blank.

@Benjamin Newells
@Jason

This is the thread—with the various translations—to which you were referring in the current Working Thread. I tailored my entries for Twitter. Some of the translations I gave were from WRR; others were not available on WRR, and I took those from the translations of my video transcripts.

If anyone needs a translation of the full mantra, and it is not on WRR, see if the language is listed on the CCs for my video (there are 17 languages available, other than English). If you need the full mantra for one of those, let me know, and I’ll post it here.

If I don’t respond in a timely manner, reach me on Twitter, as I may not have seen the request.

I don’t have a lot of time at the moment, so this post won’t be as substantial and well-reasoned as I would like. This touches on some issues of truth, propaganda, our mission, the self-improvement and self-education of our activists, etc., that I have been pondering for awhile. To ignore all of that, and get down to brass tacks:

HD, I share your concern (while also acknowledging that we are in a “dirty war”), but I don’t quite think it is founded. Words have a life of their own. Some words, especially in this modern age, which lacks precision, are more vague and malleable than others. From my scant reading and research, it would seem that métissage has a larger range of meaning than, say, something you would see in an engineering manual.

Well, I was going to give a lot of examples of pictures, but I’m not sure how to post one, and I realize that’s going to take more time than I have.

Do some reading on it, HD, and I think you will feel more comfortable. Type “metissage” into Google images and see what I mean. You will find more blacks and Whites holding hands, White babies nursing on black mothers, black babies with blue eyes, blacks and Whites kissing, etc., than you can shake a stick at. Furthermore, French nationalists (not Anglo-sphere BUGSters like most of us trying to ad hoc some French propaganda) have made Photoshopped pictures against “metissage” showing pictures of White girls with black men, calling it the death of Europe and the genocide of Whites. You can find them either on my Twitter, or on a thread in the French section of Stormfront (no time for links).

Google some articles. I did some reading on my own regarding this term a couple of weeks ago. I made sure to not only read nationalist articles, and I found many “mainstream”, anti-White articles which talked about metissage in the context of interracial marriage, mixed-race children, etc. I googled a combination of terms this morning and read some about the Code Noir in Louisiana, and that article was also using metissage in the context of marital and sexual unions between Whites and Blacks in the 1700’s.

This post sucks, LOL. I wanted to give lots of links and pics, and hammer this out, but I don’t have time. A couple more random thoughts:

French pro-Whites use the term in that context. I lifted this off a French girl and have used it probably 50 times:

Diversité, métissage, et immigration massive ne sont imposés qu’aux pays Blancs Européens. C’est le génocide des Blancs!

I encourage others to as well. It fits on Twitter, and if you want to alter it to make room for a long @, you can figure out how, without even knowing French.

Basically: Diversity, “metissage”, and massive immigration are only imposed on White Europeans. It’s White Genocide!

Also search the Twitter stream for metissage or #metissage. I did right before I made this post, and the very first Tweet, at the top of the list, was a girl, posting a picture of a White woman and black man kissing, with a string of heart symbols after it.

Sarkozy might be anti-White, but he isn’t stupid. He’s not a fool. To use such a loaded term, which the native French have been propagandized ad nauseum to associate with interracial sex, blacks and Whites kissing, blacks and Whites holding hands, mixed-race babies, is an intentional and calculated move on his part. I don’t even think he meant to leave himself “leeway”, but it could be seen as him allowing himself plausible deniability… because of the intrinsic semantic range within metissage.

However, like I said, to use such a loaded term that taps into a gazillion Euros of social engineering is intentional. He’s a politician. He doesn’t do that by accident. He knew damn well what he was doing, and what he was saying, and the subconscious minds of everyone who heard that speech also knew damn well what he was saying.

Nothing in this post will convince you, because I didn’t post links, sources, etc. I don’t have the time to even worry about my grammar, lol. But if you spend three hours looking at articles, historical references, Twitter, Google images, etc., I think you’ll come away feeling more at ease with the truthfulness of our position, “dirty war” tactics aside.

Some Thoughts From An Inebriated Weirwood (Free Folk & Northerners should stop giving liquor to trees…):

I share the concerns of Jason & others. I think it is poor strategy (or at least not the best strategy) to associate our memes with trigger-words and trigger-symbols; that is, words and symbols that are backed with bazillions of social engineering dollars to produce a predictable, proven result in the passive victim).

My first activity on this site took place 13 or so months ago, commenting on a blog wherein, I believe, it was noted that Duke and others at the SF Conference refused to use the Mantra. I quoted A Famous Person, who said: “And no one puts new wine into old wineskins; or else the new wine bursts the wineskins, the wine is spilled, and the wineskins are ruined. But new wine must be put into new wineskins.”

I then likened BUGS to New Wine, that would & should not go into the old wineskins (Dr. Duke, SF, swastikas, etc.). I still generally agree with that approach, insofar as WE are concerned… but I suppose I don’t get as worried as some when people outside of our propaganda team put our new wine into old wineskins.

If we were going to get worried and demoralized because our message has been and/or is associated with doubleplusungood thoughts & crimethink, then we should have given up already. Didn’t Horus say that Breivik e-mailed a copy of his Manifesto to FTWR’s e-mail address? Didn’t Breivik complain multiple times about the genocide of the European/Norwegian people? Varg Vikernes has a certain reputation amongst the “mainstream” in Europe, and it isn’t good. He is seen as a murderingnaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews. Yet he was dropping genocide, in reference to Europa and her people, multiple times per week on http://www.thuleanperspective.com, for the longest time.

Point being, I don’t know if, given the presumptions of this thread, genocide could take “more damage” in Europe than it already has, given the associations to Breivik & Varg.

Yet, that doesn’t seem to register and, prior to this recent *blip* with Cobb, Jimmy, etc., this wasn’t even an issue with people (if people had even made those connections).

Likewise, we already have certain associations that are along the same lines of things that people are worrying about in this thread. David Duke has said the Mantra. FTWR is advertised on Stormfront. Don Black has said the Mantra. We have a designated section on Stormfront called “Swarmfront”. Likewise, the Eyes Forward avatar, debatably (wink, wink) has Schutzstaffel for pupils.

I would venture to say that, in the “mind” of the public, “David Duke” and “Stormfront” trigger much the same reactions as a swastika. Yet, we didn’t have an 11-page thread fretting over how to distance ourselves from Duke, SF, etc.

<tangent> To hop rails for a moment and take a different track: I would imagine that the recent furor over Jimmy’s activism, and the fervent enthusiasm (and concomitant worry) it has caused, is rooted in The Drama (TM) of a few months ago. BUGS took a hit, and many posters quit posting. Why deny this? For someone to join the site and post an image (Celtic Cross or not) that got 750,000 views on reddit (hell, my video only has 178,339 and ARH has 216,089 [at the time of this post])… for someone to get 3/4ths of a MILLION views on reddit, in the course of a day or so, was, self-evidently, a definite shot in the arm.

I could go on, but that’s the long and short of it. In light of what BUGS went through, for a new member (of BUGS, at least) to join up and put on such a fireworks display, necessarily got people excited. Is what it is.

But I don’t see how Craig Cobb, or the Celtic Cross, or even the NSM, would do more damage than associations with David Duke, Stormfront, Breivik, and Varg already has.

Now, that’s not to say that we should EMBRACE those things, insofar as our focus, honed team is concerned… but neither, I think, should we shirk & sulk & shrink from such things. It is what it is. Tally ho & sally forth!

Two Random Thoughts:

1) I am not speaking to Jimmy (who knows I appreciate his cojones & activism)… but in general: We should focus more on “Stop White Genocice”, “End White Genocide”, “Fight White Genocide”, “Stop White Genocide Worldwide”, “Stop Eurocide”, etc., than “‘Anti-racist’ is a codeword for Anti-White.” Just my opinion. It seems like ARIACWFAW is the easy way out… and doesn’t cut as straight to the quick as the genocide charge.

White Genocide is the core of what BUGS is about. Everything else just functions as a support structure. If we are going to go broke for anything, go broke on genocide.

2) To soothe your souls, let us hope that “genocide of European peoples” and “White Genocide” take the same route as “anti-White”.

That is, anti-White has been used on Stormfront, VNN, and elsewhere, for a long time.

Doubt it? Download some Goyfires from 2005-2007. LOL. Alex Linder was dropping Anti-White & “Genocide” like skittles, multiple times per podcast. Yet, the wholesale use of “anti-White” on Goyfire, as well as on various pro-White forums, didn’t stop the Lamestream Media from picking it up.

Right? When someone uses “anti-White” now, do they feel they are ontologically beholden to Dr. Duke & Alex Linder? Of course not. It penetrated the mainstream as just another phrase.

We can only hope White Genocide does the same (and clearly, it has precedent). It is manifestly more toxic; ergo, if it does eventually penetrate the mainstream, it will probably take longer.

But, it is what it is.

In Conclusion:

BUGS’ Strategy should remain the same: Avoid swastikas, NSM, etc., when possible. However, if the NSM, Craig Cobb, etc., use “genocide” or ARIACWFAW, don’t fret and piss your pants. It is what it is. You really can’t control the message (given the size of our team). Imagine what it will be like when some Talking Head hijacks it, takes it out of context, and makes it completely fucking lame… just keep pushing forward.

As other BUGSters have said: RAID!