Search? Click Here
Did you know you can visit to the swarm with www.bugsswarm.com?
Post on the internet Working Thread

Carloman

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 48 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: There is a new White House Petition for You to Sign #111711

    Carloman
    Participant

    Signed and forwarded.


    Carloman
    Participant

    Invite Prime Minister of Hungary Viktor Orban to the U.S. to explain how to fight White Genocide

    Just 150 initials on that will display it on the White House’s website until the end of May.

    You can put just initials in the name boxes.

    Click on the “confirm” link that the White House emails you!

    It usually takes awhile for the site to re-total the number of initials.

    Anyone anywhere in the world can participate.

    The White House Meme Team thanks you, and we welcome you!

    in reply to: Cuckservatives #111077

    Carloman
    Participant

    “Cuckservative” is a great meme, but I don’t think it meshes well with the Mantra. I think you’ll get more traction simply using “respectable conservatives.” If you use either the term “Rino” or “Cuckservative,” you may get sidetracked into explaining what they mean, which distracts from our message. We want to keep on point and not give the reader too much to decipher.

    in reply to: Postage Paid envelopes #110974

    Carloman
    Participant

    That sounds like a good idea, although I’m sure other people do that, too, with whatever their pet cause is. They will probably get a lot more Jesus than Mantra that way, but it’s still worth a try.

    in reply to: Our Change.org petitions #110950

    Carloman
    Participant

    I signed it, but after I signed a message came up saying that, if I donated one dollar, the petition would spread faster, or something like that. What would that dollar go for? Also, after signing, an endless stream of other petitions came up. After clicking Skip on the first several, I eventually just closed the window,

    in reply to: The White Genocide Clock #110830

    Carloman
    Participant

    Seems like a very good idea.

    Would you like me to work on a Java applet that can be placed on a website that does the same thing? A Java applet would be much easier to incorporate into a website than the Java Script code above, since the code above would have to be tailored to a particular website, whereas a Java applet could imply be added to the web page by dropping it in. However, it would take me soe time to do write a Java applet. Do you think anyone would use it? I’d like to do it, but I would want to think that someone would use it before doing it.

    in reply to: Please sign this month's White House petition #108082

    Carloman
    Participant

    The White House has removed the petition:

    Unlike Obama, Trump White House prohibits petition that opposes White Genocide

    So much for the idea that Trump is a pro-White president.

    in reply to: How to Reply to "Europe for the Europeans" #106721

    Carloman
    Participant

    So you admit there’s ongoing White Genocide in Europe, but you support White Genocide outside of Europe?

    So you support White Genocide in America?

    That’s a good response. I’ll use that next time. Thanks, Benjamin.

    in reply to: January Petition Is Ready for Your Signature #105102

    Carloman
    Participant

    Carloman
    Participant

    I’ve signed it, and everyone here should sign it as soon as possible, so that it will become visible while it is still in the news.

    in reply to: Dismantling The White Privilege Meme #99112

    Carloman
    Participant

    @Benjamin: I’ve been going over in my mind whether we should say that White countries ought to have White Privilege, or reject the whole concept, just as we reject the concept “racism.” On the one hand, the word “privilege” is a perfectly valid concept, unlike “racism,” which was specifically invented to demonize White people. Under the law, citizens have certain privileges and immunities. In Japan, only the Japanese have those privileges and immunities. In a White country, only White people should have them. So I see nothing wrong with the concept as such. But if you think that is too much to explain to people, that it is too much of a distraction, then perhaps we shouldn’t use the term, even though, from a legal perspective, it is correct.

    So do you think I should stop saying, “No one complains about Japanese privilege in Japan,” etc.? That has always been one of my favorite comebacks. You are better at getting a feel for what works than I am.

    What do you think about, “It’s not a privilege; it’s our birthright”? I’ve used it a few times, but I can’t see what effect it has had.

    I like “Fighting White Privilege is a code word for White Genocide,” and also “Even if there is White privilege . . .”

    in reply to: Dismantling The White Privilege Meme #99058

    Carloman
    Participant

    @Wretched White Rabbit: I wouldn’t say “you aren’t really antiracist” because that makes it sound as if we are the true anti-racists.

    @Anotherone: As recently as the 1950’s, Blacks (Negroes) had to ride in the back of the bus in some places, could not sit down at White lunch counters, etc. Of course, Whites could not safely enter Negro areas either, so so they had Black Privilege in there areas, and we had White privilege in ours. You seem to be trying to rewrite the past to make it seem as if White countries have always been egalitarian, something like a Rainbow Confederate. I know that that’s not your intention, but that’s how it comes off.

    in reply to: Dismantling The White Privilege Meme #99040

    Carloman
    Participant

    @AnotherOne: “White people are genocidal” is, I suppose, a meme that anti-Whites use. But genocide is both real and something we want to stop, so we utilize White people’s tendency to universalize everything to turn it around and say, “But now White genocide is happening, and it is wrong, too.”

    White Privilege, back when it existed, was real, and was, I suppose, a conspiracy, but it was a good thing, and we want to bring it back in White countries. Anti-Whites are crackpots to the extent that they claim that it still exists, but the idea of White Privilege itself is not a crackpot idea; it was a desirable and natural thing in a White country. We want to pave the way for its return; not dismiss it as a crackpot idea.

    The meme “Affirmative Action is racist” is also circulating, it is very popular, and probably more people have heard it and agree with it than the meme “Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.” But it is a meme that leads to egalitarianism, so it is not useful to us in the long run. It only brings short-term satisfaction.

    @Benjamin: Thank you for your feedback. I hadn’t tested my theory in practice, but you have confirmed my thinking on this matter.

    in reply to: Dismantling The White Privilege Meme #99030

    Carloman
    Participant

    I’ve been thinking of this all night, and, after several hours of thought, I’ve come to the conclusion that we should not use the phrase “Anti-White Conspiracy Theory,” EVEN IF IT WORKS. Here is why:

    “Conspiracy Theory” is another meme, like “racist,” that our enemy uses to delegitimize us. They endlessly push the notion that only crackpots believe in conspiracy theories because genocide IS a conspiracy, and they want us to believe that only crackpots believe in White genocide.

    Many AMPW’s will argue against, for example, Affirmative Action by saying that Affirmative Action is racist. They may even use the term anti-White racism. And it does work to a certain extent. They may even get more traction using “anti-White racism” than using simply “anti-White.” We could even go around saying that White genocide is racist. But the reason we don’t do that is because it strengthens the term “racist,” whereas we want to delegitimize the term.

    So I’ll grant that you’re probably correct that saying “White privilege is an anti-White conspiracy theory” works, in the sense that it catches people’s attention and gets them talking about White privilege. But it also strengthens the meme “Only crackpots believe in conspiracy theories.” The consequence of this may be that people do start to see that White Privilege doesn’t exist, but it will lead them on the path to a colorblind society, just as calling Affirmative Action “racist” may get people to oppose Affirmative Action, but it will likewise lead them on the path to a colorblind society.

    In order to end White genocide, we have to reëstablish and relegitimize White Privilege, and we have to CONSPIRE with each other to make that happen. If we knock down the idea of a conspiracy, we are delegitimizing the very thing we need to do to put an end to White genocide. Otherwise, we’re simply atomic individuals typing at a keyboard.

    That is why I will not be using the meme “White Privilege is an anti-White conspiracy theory,” no matter how well you tell me it works. To the objection that most people don’t intellectualize the way we do, even so, anti-White have invested a lot into the “Conspiracy Theories are for crackpots” meme, and they wouldn’t have done it it it weren’t an effective meme to prevent understanding and effective action by us.

    in reply to: Dismantling The White Privilege Meme #99022

    Carloman
    Participant

    The more I think about it, the more I think it’s a bad idea to deny that White Privilege exists. Any of our memes can be turned around and used against us. For example, if we call them “White Genocide deniers,” they can call us “White Privilege deniers.” It reminds me of a couple of month ago when Benjamin told me not to argue that South Africa was a White country. He said that it was irrelevant to the issue of White Genocide, and he was right. If I say that South Africa is a White country, someone else will say that South Africa is not a White country, and then we are arguing about it instead of discussing White genocide. So if you say that White Privilege doesn’t exist, someone will say that White Privilege does exist, and will point out some country club or whatever that is all White, and now you are arguing about whether White Privilege exists rather than discussing White Genocide.

    So I would recommend either using the Japanese example above, or saying something like “Even if White Privilege did exist, would that justify White Genocide?” as Bob said in the last coaching session. But, as above, if you do find that denying White Privilege works, then please report it, and maybe I’ll try it, too.

    in reply to: Dismantling The White Privilege Meme #99020

    Carloman
    Participant

    Conspiracy theories can be true or false. If we say “White Privilege is an anti-White conspiracy theory,” they can come back with “White Genocide is a conspiracy theory.” Which, in a sense, it is. That’s why I wouldn’t use that one. I prefer the “Nobody complains about Japanese Privilege in Japan” one. But if anyone has success with the conspiracy theory meme, where anti-Whites don’t come back with “White Genocide is a conspiracy theory,” then please report it here.

    in reply to: Ideas needed to finished my e-book. #98735

    Carloman
    Participant

    Just looking them over quickly I had the following thoughts:

    In the first one you write: “Every group today has taken land from others. The only difference is that White people were better at it.” Well, that second sentence could be taken as White supremacist. Besides, Genghis Khan was pretty good at taking land, too, wasn’t he? And so were the Arab Muslims and the Ottoman Turks. I’d take out the second sentence and perhaps replace it with examples of non-White conquests.

    You also write “Oriental Asia is not being globally ‘diversified’.” Although the word “Oriental” was a perfectly respectable word when I was a kid, I think today it’s considered a hate word (unless it’s being applied to a restaurant run by an Oriental, er, I mean an Asian, in which case it’s cultural enrichment). I would replace it with “East Asia.”

    Will the first e-Book have any references to BUGS or how to join us?

    In the second one, you seem to be suggesting that White rabbits/people are better than the other species/races. It’s not that I disagree, but I’m not sure that that’s the best way to present the message. On the other hand, I don’t have any suggestions as to how to make it better.

    in reply to: WHY WE NEED A PRIVATE WORKING THREAD/FORUM #96555

    Carloman
    Participant

    @Sysop, how do I send you a private message to inquire about the private area of this website?

    in reply to: Anti-White Tim Wise Writes Rebuttal to the Mantra #95564

    Carloman
    Participant

    I don’t know enough about genetics to say whether, from a purely genetic analysis, Jews are White or non-White, although I strongly suspect that they are genetically different from Whites, as there are often physical differences. But I do know that most Jews do not consider themselves White and have no loyalty to White people, so on that basis I consider them non-White. But since Benjamin agrees that they should not live in White countries, that’s good enough for me.

    in reply to: Anti-White Tim Wise Writes Rebuttal to the Mantra #95506

    Carloman
    Participant

    Benjamin, thank you for answering my question and clearing up the matter. You say that Jews are genetically White but do not belong in White countries. In that case, I don’t think that there’s any substantive difference between our views on the matter, and we can consider the issue settled and resume the productive relationship that we had before.

    I’m still curious as to why you chose the name “Levi.” If it was for the reason that I originally speculated, then that is certainly a legitimate reason. But if asking this question will reopen the confrontation, then I will let the matter drop.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 48 total)