B. U. G. S.

Online ads? Advertising on Stormfront alone would bring in a lot of hits…and since all the pro-Whites move in the same circles, maybe we could get a discount on it, or even have it up there for free?

I’m sure that Brian or one of the Bugsters (including myself) could knock together a professional advertisement?

My apologies Cleric, I agree with what you’re saying – I meant Feu denfer & dungeoneer. I’m sticking with “Whites”; unless I see “White ethnic groups” work better.

I really think we are bickering too much as of late, the whole reason why we are getting the Mantra into the media is because we’re not fighting with each other – we’re fighting the perpetrators of this genocide.

If any of us have any theories, I suggest we test them out first and bring back some arguments they’ve been used in before debating their use, and then we can go from there.

@ Cleric Preston & dungeoneer

Hmm, I’m indifferent to the idea. We all know who White people are, but using “White ethnic groups” could create a bit of flak and give them some ammo for the “Who’s White?” argument.

Besides that, “White ethnic groups” is going to eat up a lot of characters, and in the case of YouTube, every word counts.

When I’m spreading the message, I try to put “genocide” in towards the end of the sentence / paragraph – people’s minds remember the beginning and the end, but have a hard time remembering the middle.

E.g. If “anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White” was inserted into the middle of a person’s post it wouldn’t have the same impact as it does at the end.

The vast majority of the people we’re dealing with are basically robots or zombies that are not capable of visualising a world without White people. They do what feels good – opposing genocide makes them feel good; whereas thinking about the future makes them feel scared.

The reason why our enemy likes to talk about “the inevitable future” is because it connects the dots for the people. They don’t want people connecting the dots for themselves and saying “hey, so the whole world will look like Haiti?”.

Remember if we use our enemy’s terminology, we are playing by their rules.
I see everybody using this, I’ve even seen old Bob using it: “The Human race”; yes it is damned catchy, but it states quite plainly that there is only one race. I think we really should stop using this phrase, just like we should always capitalise White when refering to our people.

Oh just an idea I thought of, if an “anti-racist” (anti-White) says ‘race doesn’t exist’, then how is it possible for someone to be racist or to that effect “anti-racist”? That’s like an atheist hating God. Those kind of logical paradoxes catch them with their pants down.

@ The Old Man of the Mountain

I agree with all of what you said, however, an economic collapse would mean neo-cons would lose all/most of their power. If our countries are bankrupt, then the parasites that live off them are bankrupt.

And let us remember the old phrase “Idle hands are the devil’s play things.” High unemployment means lots of people have lots of free time; and that can only end one way if there’s an oppressive government in power (and especially if the unemployed are White people!).

I find it hard to believe they’d manufacture a economic collapse because it puts them in too much jeopardy. I think if they could, they’d make a slow and steady transition from a White country to a non-White country with them in control, but instead we are just being bombarded in a short space of time with non-Whites and social engineering – they are definatly in a heap of economic trouble.

@ WhiteWeasel

“White Extinction” shifts the blame from the people comitting the genocide of our people, and points it at White people. Flooding ALL and ONLY White people’s countries with millions of invaders; then encouraging and forcing them to mix is genocide – not extinction.

There is a big difference between the two: Genocide means that someone has intentionally tryed to destroy a group, whereas extinction means it’s due to a bunch of factors, e.g. birth-rates, environment, etc.

Calling genocide anything other than it is, is a step back to square one.

@ Gator61

Well, I believe the sexuality issue is for another day, but for now “anti-straight” doesn’t roll well on the tongue. I’d go in the enemies direction and say “heterophobic”. Then you can call them “anti-White heterophobes”.

@Wolfram

You might want to post the link in the Bugs Swarm / Mantra thread

Bugsters patrol the links for any anti-Whites that pop up.

@meawhiterabbit There is an edit option to the top right of your post, I’m not sure how long you have before you can’t edit it though, probably 15 minutes like in the comments section.

Btw, It’s “Bosnian”, not “Boasian” 😛