Search? Click Here
Did you know you can visit to the swarm with www.bugsswarm.com?
Post on the internet Working Thread

Henry Davenport

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 766 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: National Youth Front: Operation Bully Board #102537

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    Scott,

    I forgot, Angelo has my email address. When you have a chance, there’s one point I’d like to discuss with you, if we’re going to do this.

    in reply to: National Youth Front: Operation Bully Board #102536

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    Scott,

    Yes, I would be interested in doing some writing for you all. Some suggestions I’ve made in my correspondence with Angelo to date will probably give him a pretty good notion of what my approach to writing would basically be (but I’m always open to further guidance of course), if you all want to give me a try for a spell.

    I don’t know how to contact you, but you can PM Harumphty Dumpty at SF, or if you know anyone here who has my email address, they can give it to you.

    I have to be out for most of the rest of the day now, but tonight or tomorrow hopefully we can get that started if Angelo concurs.

    in reply to: New White Genocide E-BOOK #102511

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    Re the Diversity phrase:

    I like “codeword” better than the quotation marks, because Whites coming out of high school in the years ahead will still know what “codeword” means, but may not know the function of quotation marks as we’re using them.

    Otoh:

    While dropping the quotation marks makes the statement untrue, it will be true in the limited sense that most Whites will take it, as just a statement about what they can see happening in their own countries and other White countries.

    Re the anti-racist/anti-white phrase:

    With this one, it seems to me that we’re still in territory that’s deeply under anti-white control, more so than with the Diversity one: Lots of Whites who are souring on Diversity still don’t want to think of themselves as racists. (Am I right about that? I’m not certain of that statement, since I don’t talk to a lot of people or read a lot of comment sections, etc. I know the word “racist” is weakening too.)

    So any fooling at all with this phrase tips it off it’s narrow balance point where it says exactly what we want it to say rather than saying what anti-whites already claim it says.

    in reply to: New White Genocide E-BOOK #102510

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    @ Laura: I think we’ve agreed in the past that there’s a big difference between these two:

    “Diversity” = White Genocide

    Diversity = White Genocide

    I don’t object strongly to the first one, and I think you should wait to distribute the booklet until Gar5 has added the quotation marks.

    As for Anti-racist/anti-white, I don’t think any form of that should be distributed that has an equal sign in it.

    Laura and Gar5, if either of you disagree with these two points, could we have some discussion about it here before proceeding?

    My mind is always open.

    in reply to: National Youth Front: Operation Bully Board #102506

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    Scott, I posted the part in italics below on the working thread, but it looks like you are the one I should have asked.

    I’ll send along some memes to the school, evertssn@appstate.edu, when I wake up later. That email I sent Gage that I posted on the working thread a few hours ago…I imagine it was some one of the Trad Youth folk who did the flier that the article mentioned. I guess we have to be patient with such things and mainly just keep pushing Mantra until such pro-Whites’ own psyches are swamped with it like everyone else’s.

    @ Den G:

    How does one find out what NYF is up to on any day? If there’s any way to find out from their website, I can’t figure out what it is.

    Gage has offered to help get our White House messages up, so I’d like to be helpful to him…I just posted a comment on that pre-moderated site you linked, but I wouldn’t have known about it from just checking the NYF website. I guess we beat them to the article.

    in reply to: New White Genocide E-BOOK #102112

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    Gar5, my first reaction to what you’re saying is, whew, thank goodness…but hopefully you aren’t saying that you’re going to keep the titles as they are. Better to take two lines for the titles. Maybe I’m misunderstanding what you’re saying. I must be, since you’re agreeing with me!

    in reply to: New White Genocide E-BOOK #102108

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    BUGSers aren’t posting “anti-racist = anti-white” and “Diversity = White Genocide,” are they? If some of you all are, I think the first one especially is a big mistake, and you all should have a discussion about it.

    in reply to: New White Genocide E-BOOK #102107

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    I just emailed Gar5 my strong praise for this e-book…I think it’s very good and a lot of it is great…but I also have very strong criticism for one thing and hope he will change it…I’m going to reprint the criticism here because I think it’s important far beyond this one occasion…I’ve written many times about the various forces that I think will work to change and weaken the Mantra and our Mantra phrasings, and now it turns out that just the need to shorten one of our memes (“Diversity is a code word for White Genocide”) for a banner has apparently acted as one of those forces!

    My criticism addresses the inclusion of the headings “Anti-racist = anti-white?” and “Diversity = White Genocide?”

    I cast a strong vote for “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white” and “Diversity is a code word for White Genocide.” That gives you parallelism just as the way you have it does, and I think that in the long run both of those forms are going to serve us a lot better than using the equal sign. The more I write about this, the stronger I feel about it. I hope you’ll reconsider! Or at least discuss it with me.

    We need to keep these core phrases as they ideally should be here at the center of this effort, or what we do is going to slowly become confused. I’m going to check my WGP article now and toss out any phrases I allowed in with the equal sign…____ has been influenced by the folk who shortened it for the banners, and I”ve let myself be influenced too.

    But if WE get slack at the core of this effort, what will be on the NEXT banners? God knows.

    Gar 5, please forgive me, I hate to write this on the day all your effort should be getting nothing but reward! Which it does from me aside from this one item.

    But this kind of maintenance has to be regularly done on anything as finely tuned as our Mantra phrases, and I think a strong point should be made of it every time it’s done. So I beg your forgiveness.

    in reply to: The Paltalk Thread #101846

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    I’m listening to today’s paltalk avidly, but my computer isn’t letting me type or talk.

    “I wouldn’t be running if I had any chance of getting elected,” Bob is considering as a slogan, or something like it.

    “If we had an electorate sane enough to elect us, we wouldn’t need to run”, is the idea.

    Some other word than “sane,” maybe.

    This campaign will present unforeseen opportunities…we have to keep our eyes open so that we see them and don’t pass them by.


    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    My first reaction is that I like the idea if it can be practically done.

    When WGP is in the news and newspeople take a look at it, if they saw immediately that the Mantra was our focus, that would give them our main thing as something they can write about, and they might, since “Mantra” is not a word usually associated with folks like us.

    More importantly, daily visitors would see it and maybe over time get used to it. It takes some getting used to.

    Yeah, we haven’t used the full Mantra as much as we’d like because it’s too long for most of the places we’d like to use it, but on our own sites where we can do as we please, it seems the right thing to do. (Easy for me to say, since it’s someone else who’d have to figure out how to do it).

    Good idea IMO Benjamin.


    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    We’re propagandists, not essay writers.

    in reply to: Debate advice and style #99964

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    When an anti-white is pooh poohing White Genocide and is basing his objection on some particular, would this be a good reply to use sometimes?

    “So you’re a White supremacist who thinks Whites are so superior that nothing can threaten them?”

    It repeats the anti-whites’ terminology, but I think it also undermines it a bit.

    It was suggested by something Truck Roy said on the radio, the last item in this list of 5…check them out just because they’re so good, although I didn’t spot any others that had possible Mantra use, but maybe you will:

    https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1079115-2/?postcount=20#post12594377

    (I’ve been writing some summaries of Don’s radio shows and putting some Mantra in most of the summaries, but I don’t know if I’ll continue.)

    in reply to: Are you new to BUGS Swarm? #99885

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    STOP WHITE GENOCIDE Terminology and Memes

    At the bottom of that page are other links to quite a few articles about our terminology that may be of interest to brand new BUGSters or just to readers here.

    in reply to: Urge White House to Urge "Pants Up, Don't Loot!" #99788

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    Jason wrote:

    “HD, wow. The guy [Mr. Sieg Heil] responds:

    When you have 20-30 thousands signatures per month… Let me know, I will gladly help… Seeing as not one of them reached 300, that’s embarrassing..”

    Yeah, I told him that if he’d been listening to his beloved Mr. H speak in a beer hall in Germany in the early days, he would have told Mr. H, “When you have 20-30 thousand followers…Let me know, I will gladly help… Seeing as how you don’t even have 300 now, that’s embarrassing..”

    But absolutely nothing penetrates.

    I dreamt last night that I was back teaching math, and in frustration finally asked a student, “How long is a 30 inch cord?” and the student couldn’t answer.

    The dream had exactly the feeling I had during several hours (well let’s be honest…it was a whole freaking day!) I spent on a private thread on SF a couple of days ago getting some opinions about our monthly White house Meme-Bombs.

    “I think that it’s better to retire to our own lairs and dictate the terminology from there.”

    (WHAT terminology? “Joos joos joos joos…”??)

    And that was from a guy I like, a very steady Stalwart who like most of the Stalwarts who still sign I’m pretty sure, signs only out of an admirable collegial feeling.

    SF’ers apparently see their site as a blinding (well, it is apparently that) beacon of light that beams its rays to all potential pro-whites out in Whitelandia and calls them home to SF. Where they can spend the rest of their days passing love notes back and forth to their new compadres.

    There are some activists there of course, but their minds are just as impenetrable.

    One new guy did volunteer to receive the reminders on the FIRST of each month and sign, but he said he thought it was “tilting at windmills.”

    Another said of the petitions, “It was a good idea but it fizzled.”

    My high hopes to do a lot more with the project indeed have fizzled, because pro-whites won’t provide the number of signers necessary to do more (and at present we’re again having difficulty even getting the initial 150 sigs to make a few petitions visible), but for two years we’ve been displaying our STOP WHITE GENOCIDE memes on the website of the president of the United States.

    The part in bold is such an improbable conjunction that I would think it unnecessary to say anything more than just that to anyone!!!

    But I was informed by a higher-up at SF that the phrase “website of the president of the United States” was “not true.” I showed him that the phrase was lifted exactly from the Wash Post article on our petitions long ago.

    Is SF being used by the CIA to test some new mind-altering drug? It’s extremely unsettling to me to find myself now living in a country where there is a sizable group of White people, namely the “pro-whites” who are supposedly on my side, that I don’t understand AT ALL. I understand the White anti-whites on the left, and pretty much the anti-white Whites on the right, I understand apolitical Whites, I feel I even understood Mexicans and Guatemalans reasonably well when I spent a few weeks in those countries.

    Horus’ explanation about pro-whites was always “they are dissidents.” I never understood what that was supposed to explain, but maybe it was just a way of saying that the mental processes of most pro-whites reduce to one single response to all external stimuli: “No!”

    in reply to: Urge White House to Urge "Pants Up, Don't Loot!" #99738

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    Jason, here’s the guy’s comment, if you’re interested.

    https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1077502-115/?postcount=1150#post12556244

    SF actually has threads with intense discussions about how to get more “rep.”

    in reply to: Urge White House to Urge "Pants Up, Don't Loot!" #99736

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    The latest reason given at SF for not signing the petitions is that they are an embarrassment because so few people are signing them.

    in reply to: Our principal memes and phrases. #99652

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    I don’t see comments at SF trashing the idea of White Genocide now, as we used to. Apparently we’ve won that battle there.

    So at SF I describe the terminology aspect of what we do, letting White Genocide appear to new readers there as a settled issue, which seems to be pretty much the case there so far as I see.

    I also make the point that while posters there think in terms of building a movement, we are doing something very different at BUGS:

    We work on shifting the mainstream Zeitgeist in the pro-White direction by hammering terms like “anti-white” and “White Genocide” into the mainstream.

    Most pro-Whites are trying to pick off some members of the big White herd and knock ’em dead with the facts, all the facts (or at least what they consider to be all the facts), while we work at turning the whole herd and heading it in our direction.

    in reply to: Urge White House to Urge "Pants Up, Don't Loot!" #99605

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    J.P.O., I don’t really understand your comment. If you’d feel like explaining it more, I’m all ears.

    “anonymous as can be reasonably expected.”

    Do you mean reasonably expected in order to be tactically effective, or to be safe? I assume you mean the latter, with the “bell the cat” reference. I’ve never seen signing WH messages as being unsafe at all (posting WH messages under your own name as I did maybe isn’t too bright), but lots of pro-Whites do.

    I don’t think the White House gives a hoot about us. I don’t consider it to be “belling the cat” at all. To me it’s just a very prominent cyber billboard.

    If I could understand your comment a little better, it might help me understand better why it is so incredibly hard to get pro-whites to sign these.

    in reply to: Urge White House to Urge "Pants Up, Don't Loot!" #99597

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    @ J.P.O:

    Fidel Castro’s first attempt to take over Cuba failed. He and a small band attacked a barracks and a radio station, planning to broadcast their message of revolution from the captured station, but they were repelled and captured and jailed, and some were tortured and one man at least was castrated.

    How much more pleasant it would have been for Castro and for his band if dictator Batista had said, “No problem Fidel, no need to engage in hostilities. If you’d like to use our radio station to broadcast your revolutionary messages, why go right ahead. We’ll be happy to give you a daily show for as long as you like. It will help our ratings.”

    That’s the deal that President Obama is offering us.


    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    I appreciate so much those of you who’ve had enthusiasm for this project, and I want to highlight what I wrote elsewhere:

    Any of you who think you might be interested in continuing this project, I suggest forming a group in the private area and inviting me to join (if you wish!) and let’s see what we can arrange that makes use of what’s been built so far.

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 766 total)