Search? Click Here
Did you know you can visit to the swarm with www.bugsswarm.com?
Post on the internet Working Thread

Henry Davenport

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 6 posts - 761 through 766 (of 766 total)
1 … 38 39
  • Author
    Posts
  • 10/14/2011 at 11:34 pm in reply to: Debate advice and style first 909 posts #10944

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    Has Bob said anything about the term “pro-White”? I think I picked it up listening to Derek and Don’s show. I just put a post on Amren that used “pro-White” and “anti-White,” but it occurs to me that in MSM if “pro-White” is used with “anti-White,” the former might carry into the penumbra of the latter some of the unpleasant baggage that’s been attached to the word “White.”

    I don’t want to do anything that messes in any way with the term “anti-White,” since it seems to me one of our two critical terms.

    08/29/2011 at 10:37 pm in reply to: Crazy Ideas For Spreading The Mantra #9323

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    I just posted the below on Kevin MacDonald’s Occidental Observer (if there’s some reason I shouldn’t do this sort of thing, please let me know):

    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/08/race-realism-breaking-into-the-mainstream/?show=comments#comment-47746

    “…the Internet certainly provides an opening for skirting the MSM.”

    Bob Whitaker’s site has a group of posters who are working as a loose-knit group carrying a specific message repeatedly to mainstream sites. Their posts are excellent, and the posters have a nice spirit…there’s nothing like carrying out a task together to build a good feeling!

    Here’s the thread where they currently keep each other informed of where they’re posting, and under the heading “Swarm Topics,” they have other discussion threads concerning their activity:

    http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/topic/where-did-you-post-the-mantra-today/page/25/

    And here’s the message they try to deliver:

    http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/the-white-mantra/

    On their MSM comments, their signature line is most often,

    “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.”

    IMO, every white site, including OO, should have a section devoted to this kind of activity.

    Dr. MacDonald, Matt Parrott, and others…what do you think?

    08/22/2011 at 1:39 am in reply to: Debate advice and style first 909 posts #9044

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    “Anti-whites use words like ‘racist,’ ‘Nazi,’ ‘anti-semite,’ ‘bigot,’ to bully white people into tucking our tails between our legs and not opposing our genocide. ‘Anti-racist’ is a code word for anti-white.”

    I think I like it! Lol! That is REAL hard not to like!

    I’ll be very curious to see how “genocide” flies with my audience, and what insane but delightful arguments it gets me into!

    08/22/2011 at 1:31 am in reply to: Debate advice and style first 909 posts #9043

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    @ dungeoneer…Your insertion of “Anti-whites” as the grammatical subject in my quote improves it a lot IMO…thanks.

    I think of genocide as involving killing of individuals, and I think most of my audience will also. Checking at Wiki, I don’t find that the termination of a race by racial flooding and interbreeding is regarded anywhere as genocide…I assume that’s the principle mechanism contemplated in the genocide referred to in your mantra (?)

    I’ll poke about this site and try to find some discussion on why that word is viewed as suitable. At my present stage of understanding, the term seems to me like the kind of extravagance (not that I view the disappearance of the white race as a small matter) that I’m used to from the left, and it turns me off, and I’m afraid it will turn off my audience. But I’m very impressed by a lot of the posts copied here that you all are putting on MSM sites, so my mind is open!

    Hm, well as I think about it, I’m beginning to see it a little differently already. The principle feature (or at least let’s make it the principle feature) of genocide, as opposed to mere mass murder, is the very feature you’re protesting against when you use the word. I’ll think about it more, but probably I’ll be on board.

    And thanks for the other post, I’ll give some thought to that too.

    08/21/2011 at 11:35 pm in reply to: Debate advice and style first 909 posts #9037

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    After several years at my MSM site, most posters liberal or conservative are friendly to me despite my avowed “racism.”
    I try to take the sting out of the word:

    chicken_plucker writes:

    mynabyrd…I just looked over the thread…I didn’t post at all in the first fifty posts…there must be a lot of other racists here besides me.

    Now you talk about a discriminated-against group, that’s us racists on the KNS forum. Once every six months an article is written like this one on which we are allowed to have our say. More or less. KNS has successfully trained me to say less. It’s pathetic. There’s so much more to my racism.

    http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2011/aug/20/ina-hughs-does-the-help-do-injustice-to-civil/?comments_id=1891549
    —
    And actually I say quite a lot on that site. It’s taken a couple of years to learn how to do it.

    08/21/2011 at 11:15 pm in reply to: Debate advice and style first 909 posts #9034

    Henry Davenport
    Participant

    On Amren recently someone posted something like,

    “Words like ‘racist,’ ‘Nazi,’ ‘anti-semite,’ ‘bigot,’ are just commands to white people to tuck their tails between their legs”

    I liked that a lot, and I’ve enjoyed posting it on my MSM site, knoxnews.com, where there is a good amount of basic resentment at the whole “anti-racist” enterprise, along with a good amount of the usual liberalism.

    Does that response fit with what you all are trying to do, or do you think it’s lacking in some way?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 761 through 766 (of 766 total)
1 … 38 39