The mainstream media constantly provides proof that the mantra is true. The most recent example can be found here:

http://www.amren.com/news/2013/06/nation-should-welcome-darkening-demographic/

Here are the money quotes:

“If you find that declaration sad, or possibly slanderous, you probably have fond memories of “the way we were” during a supposedly kinder and gentler time before the civil rights movement, women’s lib and cellphones. If you don’t shed tears over that America, you may have grown up as I did–oppressed by the strictures of a social and political system that didn’t show much respect to those who were not white male Christians.

Either way, the overwhelmingly white nation that Rockwell depicted in his sentimental paintings is gone… Just last week, new data from the U.S.Census Bureau confirmed a trend long in evidence: The nation continues, inexorably, to grow darker.

For the year ending July 1, 2012, deaths among non-Hispanic whites exceeded births, the Census Bureau reported. The majority of births in this country are now to blacks, Asians and Latinas.

That trend helps to explain the discomfort among older conservative voters with immigration, which has been the driver of the nation’s increasing diversity. They see the country in which they grew up, in which they held the political, social and economic power, slipping away, becoming a place with which they are unfamiliar. Their anxiety boils down to a misplaced fear that they will be strangers in their own land.

{snip}

Younger Americans have grown up in a more diverse nation, so they are far less likely to see those with darker skin and different accents as a threat. But there are good reasons for older white Americans to welcome immigrants, too–whether or not they entered the country with legal documents.

Without them, the United States would be doomed to the kind of demographic “bust” that countries from Japan to Russia are experiencing, with birthrates so low that the population is not reproducing itself. That has all sorts of dire economic consequences.”

In other words, because the US has been flooded with non-white immigrants and white children were forced to integrate with them, they are not “racist” anymore. There are still some old white racists, but they’ll be dead soon anyway.

If every other white country follows the same policy and reduces their native white population to a minority and force assimilates it with non-whites, they too can destroy the scourge of white privilege and racism in their own countries. Of course, that will mean the end of white people, but that is a small price to pay according to genocidal anti-whites.

In other words:

“Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”

I don’t know about you, but I am unaware of this author engaging in any activism to demand that black countries be flooded with non-blacks in order to end black privilege and “racism.”

That’s because she’s not anti-racist. She’s just anti-white. Anti-racist is just a code word for anti-white.

Apologies for above posts.  They were meant for the working thread.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/black-mayor-rips-being-white-in-philly-magazine-story/

Adelheim,

I wanted to add a couple of thoughts too.

First, I think you did a GREAT job.  You forced your opponent to admit that he supports policies that will lead to a future with no white children.  That is all we have to do to wake the sleeping Titan.

One of my favorite things that you did was that you said something like “How do you think that makes White people feel?”

Whites must call out these anti-white hypocrites who pretend to care so much for peoples “feelings” and “dignity” on their callous disregard for the feelings of our white children.  It can be painful to show vulnerability but you did it masterfully!  Thank you so much.

One minor thing that I would have done differently is this.  At one point, he asked you what would be so wrong if Whites become a minority.  If I remember correctly, you responded with the most important point, which is that if you force assimilate a minority, you are exterminating them and that’s genocide.

But you might have added that he himself has already said that it is highly disadvantageous to be a minority.  He has dedicated his life to fighting “racism”, which he claims is a scourge that afflicts minorities and only minorities.  Moreover, he wishes to impose the burdens of being a minority on White children in ALL white countries.  Therefore, he clearly does not care for their well-being.

Anyway, this is really a minor point because the most important thing is that you brought it back to White genocide.

I also take a different point of view on your tone.  Most posters seem to think you should have been more aggressive and maybe that’s true, but I’m not so sure.  Privot was being conciliatory and you might have come across as the bad guy if you had taken a more hostile tone.

Thanks again so much for doing this!

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

CP and Dungeoneer,

Thanks again for responding.

CP you are exactly right.  I have tried it and gotten responses very similar to the one you modeled.  The thing is that I think the people who say that are anti-whites.  They are not the white and normals we are trying to reach.

Your mock anti-white response completely negates the idea of sections a and b altogether.  If “your own men rape and murder you sometimes too” is a defense to genocide under sections a and b then there is no reason to have them in the Convention because that will always be true in human populations.  I think people instinctively know this and that is why that tu quoque defense is less effective when arguing crime statistics in the context of the Genocide Convention.

I can tell you that a couple of times now I have panicked moderators and gotten myself banned using all sections of the Convention together.

I’m going to have to disagree with y’all.  I don’t  think we can ignore sections (a), (b), (d) and (e) of the genocide convention.  The fact is all aspects of white genocide, that is physical (anti-white crime, forced integration), identitarian (anti-white propaganda and humiliation), political repression, cultural (feminism sowing divisions among us), economic (affirmative action), work together and wind up being a deadly witch’s brew.

Still, by far the most important are immigration and forced integration and I wouldn’t mess with the mantra, but there are none-the-less those people who will not see a genocide without physical violence.  I like the approach Jared Taylor took in his video about Brittney Watts, blaming the anti-white educational system more than individual criminals, which just makes it sound like you’re demonizing white people.

Anyway, just some thoughts.

BTW I really don’t understand why more people don’t realize that KMac and JT are pointing to BUGS.  Folks would rather just sit around there and preach to the choir rather than post the mantra.  I can’t figure it out for the life of me.

Anti-white, you don’t care about my “freedom to choose” with whom I live, work, study, worship, and socialize.  You don’t care about “freedom to  choose”.  You’re just bringing that up to justify genocide because you think the world will be a better place whenever there’s no more racism because “everybody’s brown.”

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

OMG that is awesome news.

I am trying to swarm.  I too share the concern that the mantra is not being posted where appropriate, but I am not sure what to do about it.