Catchy tune, like it

Here’s one I wrote recently:

Those who call themselves “anti-racists” only demand White countries to become non-White.

When was the last time they demanded that Uganda have to open up its borders and bring in millions upon millions of non-blacks into their country and “assimilate” with them?

When was the last time they demanded that Nigeria needed more “diveristy” and has to become less Black to “fight racism”?

Are Congolese people told that they need to become a minority in their own country and that anyone who oppeses it is a ‘naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews’?

They only do this to White countries and to White people, and that’s why anti-racist is just a CODEWORD for anti-white

hm first you should do in a debate is to give an overview of the situation, make your case (with the same points as the main mantra). Just like Adelheim did. That way its easier to people to understand, you give your point across early on and you can refer to it at later point.

During the debate you should expose your opponents intentions. Adelheim did this nicely as well by pointing out many times that everything he said always leads to a world without any white people. He could have added that the antiwhite was not denying white genocide, he was justifying it.

you can also be passive offensive and point out the opponents contradictions. “Well you say that everyone is equal and that diversity is good, but why is it that Whites are not included in this ‘equality’ as you want to genocide them and how can you have ‘diversity’ in a melting pot? Sorry but it doesn’t make any sense. It sounds ridiculous actually LOL”

Just make fun of them, dont take them dead serious. Also be on the offensive. They are the ones doing the explaining as well. Don’t let them lead the conversation or make you “define” things for them. Claim the moral highground.

When the anti-white asked Adelheim (cant remember what exactly) he said something about “i believe everyone have the right to exist including white people” he could have been more passive offensive by saying something like: “I just don’t agree that Whites should die out”. etc

Might be good to make a conclusion at the end if possible. Make a point about “it’s funny how everything they say always lead to a world without any white people. They say they are anti-racists but I guess what they really are is anti-white. Thanks for the debate though. Cheers.” or something.

Like i said i would most likely not have done it better than Adelheim since its much harder live. But i take this opportunity to learn from it.

To cure any illness, one must treat the cause of that illness not mask the symptoms.

Anti-white terror is a biproduct, stay on message.