No. No. No. Anti-White is finally starting to take hold with pro-whites and anti-whites and people in between. Now we need to repeat it until it takes hold some more. Then we need to repeat it some more. And repeat it. And repeat. And then repeat some more. Please don’t make up words when no need exists. Call them genocidal anti-Whites.

Best thread ever! Thanks!!!

International Rabbit has great videos, but are of poor video quality: http://www.youtube.com/user/InternationalRabbit

We should be able to hunt down better quality clips on youtube or elsewhere. Adelheim, this is quite a bit to digest. Feel free to contact me if you want me to take a more active role (Horus has my email)

Former President Bill Clinton’s comments, “”In short, can we become one America in the 21st century? A half century from now when your own grandchildren are in college there will be no majority race in America. Now, we know what we will look like, but what will we be like? Can we be one America, respecting, even celebrating our differences, but embracing even more what we have in common?”
Bill Clinton 1997
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/race_relations/jan-june97/race_6-16a.html

Link includes audio

Nobody talks about “Chinese privilege” in China. Nobody talks about “Haitian privilege” in Haiti. Nobody talks about “Japanese privilege” in Japan. Nobody talks about “Somalian privilege” in Somalia. Antiracists talk about “white privilege” in white nations, ONLY white nations. They say they are antiracist. What they are is antiwhite. Antiracist is a code word for antiwhite.

The last thing professional anti-whites want to do is give us exposure. Why don’t serious anti-white groups like the SPLC, ADL, etc scream about a pro-white former Ronald Reagan staffer, college professor, senior staff member of a popular Senator, etc? Because they don’t want to deal with Bob’s message. The have no trump cards against the mantra.

The implication is they are complicit and they will hang. I dont care about stepping on the anti-whites wittle footsies, I am only concerned about using what works. The day of the rope fantasy is silly and doesn’t work. I think this is similar to the day of the rope.

A Bugster wrote the following to a small time youtube: “you don’t talk because you are clearly anti White and unable to combat the arguments put before you. You support White GENOCIDE, complicity in such a crime is punishable under International Law.”

I am interested in other Bugster’s opinions on this line of attack. To me, it borders on the “day of the rope” fantasy. I think telling them they support genocide is enough. Threatening small time anti-whites with an international crime is a bit silly. I understand Horus talks about international law on his podcast but that is reserved for “movers and shakers”. I am interested in hearing others’ thoughts.

Re: “He is just playing semantics. This post popped up over on SF a few days ago. Its well worth reading/skimming over to get more of a handle on the antis anal/semantic/i need one million sources tactic”

Here is an easy to remember lesson on language…NEVER CALL THEM ANTIS. They are ANTI-WHITE!

“Race does not exist” – name nations where people of other races are being flooded, America, Germany, England, Australia, France, etc and ask why those nations and ONLY those nations must be flooded and “assimilated” with non-whites. Then ask what if Jamaica, Somalia, Chad, Congo, Haiti (but not the Dominican Republic), etc were forced to do the same…would anyone be stupid enough not to notice that this would be the final solution to the black problem. Its genocide.

Gar5 hit is right on the head, proving race exists is not our job. We are here to make points.