Anti-whites like to jumble many different points and assumptions into their long and wordy challenge of the mantra.
The way I would answer that is first to quote: Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everybody” and say, “do you dispute this?” “Its a good statement of reality.”
Treat him as crazy for challenging this statement of reality. Say the places he is talking about don’t apply to the Mantra statement.
Then let him come back with proof that they do pertain. Have him prove they pertain. I’ve never found one that does. I just say he is being anti-white by pointing to something that clearly does not compare to the point being made by “Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everybody”
I keep bringing up the point that he is dishonest in bringing up cases that don’t pertain and that he is just basically dishonest, that is, being anti-white.

Agreed? Is an option.  I’ve found that if you want to prolong the debate “agreed” stirs up the hornets nest that exposes more anti-white attitudes and behavior. It angers them.

When you don’t get enough responses from anti-whites, incitement might be useful.

There’s a certain value in being able to incite anti-whites.  Another one that works is “answer me reasonably and rationally.”

Maybe ideas for a tool box.

Of course the core of the activism is the White Genocide message and the label anti-white.

LOVE and FREE TO CHOOSE are such simple sound bites. Whereas we are trying to overcome so many falsehoods weaved into such simple terms.

When I try to teach and unravel, the words over flow and I’ve tailgated.

We take them too serious and give them too much respect when they use the word love.  This is what I would like to say but would probably delete or re-word to try to be expressive and clear:

Normal
0

So love justifies White genocide? So because there are mulatto by-products of LOVE, whites should just abdicate their right to exist?

“Oh, Love? Is it love or just f*cking?  Does f*cking, the right to f*ck, justify White genocide? HOW ABOUT THE RIGHT TO LIVE AS A WHITE PERSON?

Have you clinically examined these couples to see if it was love or f*cking you want to defend at the expense of the genocide of the White race? I DOUBT IT.

Or, are you using a White value and concept, LOVE, to justify anti-white value, F*CKING?

I think you are just trying to justify White genocide.”

Had a long interchange with someone opposing the mantra and got down to this:

Or I’m just not Anti-white? I don’t need to prove it to you, I know who I am and what I believe. I’ll let this debate stay at rest, I don’t want to interfere with you spreading your message. To be honest, that’s starting to seem like the most productive way we can stop it. I don’t agree with everything you say, but your logic makes a lot of sense. Props to you good sir.

GriffinWelch in reply to SAVETHECHILDREN6592 1 week ago

Thanks for the respect. That’s not anti-white. To agree that whites are at risk goes a long way to reversing the trends if enough people see that.

SAVETHECHILDREN6592 in reply to GriffinWelch 1 week ago

To be anti-racist, I must admit whites could potentially go extinct, otherwise, I would indeed be anti-white. In the next few years whites become a minority, and nothing is being to to prevent extinction, I will take action and spread the word. Thank you, you have redefined my definition of “anti-racist” and from now on I will practice what I preach.

GriffinWelch in reply to SAVETHECHILDREN6592 1 week ago

If I understand correctly, she sees the risk of white extinction and her view of anti-racist has been modified to see that white extinction/genocide is the result of anti-racism.

So some progress was made with this person and bystanders perhaps.

They always understanding things in an anti-white way.

Six guns, as you know the Mantra doesn’t say white countries are for whites only but that the anti-whites allow black countries to be black, asian countries to be asian, but white countries are forbidden to be or remain white.  anti-whites turn that as an accusation against the Mantra message, but they are misrepresenting what is actually said there.

#8483
Gator61,
I wonder if the sock puppet was an accusation that all the pro-whites were really the same person. Sort of lobbying for the right to cut off free speech. I was deactivated by it would seem one of the posters, which seems strange.
Interesting on the capitalization of White.
They did seem very professional and organized.