Nick Griffin started off less full of fire and danced around the topic at one time. The evolution that may be taking place is in the hearts and minds.
He still doesn’t hit the mark every time but “Genocide”, “Deliberate”, “The Final Solution” and “this crime demands a new set of Nuremberg trials”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdGBIvT7KbU
Over time I’m quite sure Renaud Camus will begin to speak more to the point as well. Political Types need support and the encouragement of a consistent message to lead them until they can catch up and get out front.

“White Racist Minions Attack Online”
“Essentially, a fairly small number of people begins bombarding a blog, YouTube video or other online comments section with the Mantra. The swarm proclaims itself as “winning” when it overwhelms other posters in sheer numbers. At press time the EW blog had more than 1,050 comments. ”
http://www.eugeneweekly.com/20140130/news-briefs/white-racist-minions-attack-online

They say “small number of people” and “overwhelms other posters in sheer numbers” without understanding this or any other contradiction.

@Mimmy Jarr
The video was interesting and I did a tiny bit of investigating so far. The head of at least one of the organizations was unaware of the video and thanked BUGS for the mention as well as saying how active BUGS is becoming. (He was put on the spot as somebody on a radio show credited it to him; being familiar with his style, he was in “what the heck is going on” mode when they said that.) He seems to think BUGS made the video and was helping him by advertising his group; as some Rabbits have helped him on events in the past. (Rabbits are found in unlikely places.)
Now, who put the video together, I don’t know but I know the people to ask and perhaps find out.

As for real world connections; I live in La Plata, Maryland (Southern MD. / Charles County) and it’s not like it’s a secret.
Anti-Whites already know where I live and avoid me for some reason.
E-Mail = Bowie.Cloned@gmail.com

Having just seen this I’ll respond as best I can. They will be just general ideas to consider.
1) Make notes on index cards or something small as reference. Including clarification of each statement on the back of the card when they pretend not to understand. One or two index cards should be reserved for questions that are the equivalent of “Are you still beating your wife”; defer the question until you’re able to seek representation/professional advice and/or dismiss the question as being biased.
2) Consider using the simple tactic of putting off events as you research the possibility of obtaining representation and/or professional advice.
3) Get professional advice and representation if possible. (If you have a lawyer or something close; UNDERSTAND THEY ARE AN OFFICER OF THE COURT be careful what you say to them, their first loyalty is to the system as a matter of practicality.)
4) Another document you may wish to include under an act of conscience is the “Pledge Against Genocide” found at the Genocide Watch website. (It would be better if you had pre-signed it but it can still come in useful.)

I’d say stalling while you get yourself together is a fairly good idea if at all possible under most conditions. Perhaps even the tactic of attending the board of admissions and brushing aside the questions until you can attempt to obtain professional advice. It may also be noteworthy to bring up how emotionally distraught your condition is and that you’d not be able to provide an adequate nor coherent defense of yourself at this time. (Hearing a few of the questions may give you an advance scout advantage for later however.) It is quite likely they will start off sympathetic sounding but they likely have their mind made up as to the outcome already and all that remains is how to make an example of you so that nobody else gets any ideas. They also have experience and you don’t as well as them not having any pressure on themselves if they screw up, they don’t face punishment.

Your worst enemy is now you; the moment you forget what you’re up against. I’ve been in a situation not unlike yours, you may think you know what’s coming but you don’t.
Let’s reverse the rolls so you understand better. An Anti-White is about to face Ol’ Bob acting as Prosecutor and Judge. Ol’ Bob will be polite, sympathetic, deceitful or, whatever else it takes to reach the fair and just verdict of Guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt and stick it to their Anti-White’s backside in every possible way while leaving open the possibility of doing it to them again next month all over again.

I’ll post more if I get any other ideas.

Not every site bans discussion of the White Genocide fully.
I’ve observed that some sites allow the topic of White Genocide but, they keep the volume to a Whisper. I’ve yet to determine the criteria used but it does not appear to be based upon repetition of those I’m talking about. The editing often seems to take place after the comment has been posted and, upon returning to the site later you find some comments you had noticed have been removed while others remain.

The imposed silence is easy to observe but reduced volume becomes much more difficult to detect. Such a tactic also gives the illusion that less people are dissidents.