April 12, 2003 : The Curse of Union

April 12, 2003 : “Tribe’ is the Liberal Word for “Nigger”

April 12, 2003 : The United Nations is the Enemy of Nations

Fun Quote:

I hear that the Apostles were all Jews. 

So why did they all have Good Ole Boy names like Matt and Luke and Pete?

                                                                The Curse of Union                                                                                         

 Iraq can never be free until it is broken down into sane parts.

 When I was in Africa, a white government still ruled in Rhodesia, now Zimbabwe.  We said that the minute the Communist guerrillas took over the government there, the big tribe would slaughter the smaller tribe.

 Liberals said no such slaughter would take place.

 As soon as black rule arrived, the majority tribe slaughtered the minority tribe.

 Zimbabwe has had about three million Shona, the slaughterers, and two million Bele, the slaughterees.

 Further north in Africa one tribe committed what even liberals admit was genocide on the other.

 In every African country tribes hate each other or kill each other.

 Liberals and respectable conservatives say that what is needed is Marxism or Social Progress or Christianity to make tribes stop killing each other.

 Let me ask an unrespectable question.   Why are those tribes that hate each other jammed together in the same country?

The reason was stated by General Wesley Clark, “There is no room in today’s Europe for ethnically pure countries.”  As a liberal, Clark demands that American troops be used to force different people to live under the same government.

 Russia is already destitute, but it is spending what little money it has forcing the Moslem country of Chechnya to stay within Russia.

 It took Tito, an absolute tyrant, to hold the gaggle of peoples called Yugoslavia together.     Once Tito died Yugoslavia fell apart.  Now independent Croatia is at peace because it is made up of Croatians.

 And where is the bleeding going on in old Yugoslavia?

 War continues in areas where ethnic Albanians are forced to live in the same country with ethnic Serbs, of course.  So we all agree that the solution to the problems there is to force these hostile groups to live together by force.

 It is no accident that Iraq is a ridiculous combination of hostile peoples with Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds.

 The moment the Communist tyranny ended, the Glorious Union, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, fell apart.

 Killing people to force them to live under the same government is called “territorial integrity”.  It is the Lincoln legacy of “preserving the Union”, which killed more Americans than all our other wars put together.

 Preserving the Union is killing people today.  It is the main engine of tyranny around the world. 

 Forcing hostile peoples under the same government to produce a tyranny is a very, very old tactic.

Romans called it “Divide and conquer”.

 
                                           "Tribe" is the Liberal Word for "Nigger"                                                                         

When millions of white people have the same language and the same culture we call it a “nation”.  When millions of Africans have the same language and the same culture we call it a “tribe”.

 An African tribe is not that different from a European nation.  The word “tribe” is major put-down, exactly like “nigger”. 

 But whereas a respectable conservatives will go ballistic if you say “nigger”, liberals and conservatives feely use the word “tribe”.  The reason for this is that the African “tribe” defies “territorial integrity”.   Liberals like that word “tribe” because it represents exactly the kind of natural combination of a people that liberals are dedicated to destroying.

 Liberals' overwhelming interest is in breaking up white countries and bringing in the third world with immigration and integration.   But they automatically reject the idea of African countries being made up of natural African nations or “tribes".

Liberals are as fanatically devoted to "territorial integrity" as Lincoln conservatives are.  Liberals want artificial states that force hostile groups to live together so that they can plan the new society from the ground up.

 Swaziland and Lesotho are stable, relatively democratic Africa countries.  They are each made up of a single tribe.

Call it a tribe or a nation, it is a natural union.   There will be no  peace as long as different nations and tribes are forced together under the same flag.

                                                 The United Nations is the Enemy of Nations                                                                

The United States will kill Kurds to force them to live under the rule of Baghdad.

Iraq is a member of the United Nations.   But the last thing Iraq is is a nation.  It is a political unit that the British Empire put together from pieces of the Kurdish nation, groups of Sunnis, groups of Shiites, and anybody else who fell into this convenient administrative unit ruled from London.

 Now we will kill to hold together this unit of the British Empire.  When the United Nations says that Iraq is a nation, we keep a perfectly straight face.  After all the United Nations represents the “Moral Authority” of Cameroon and Libya.

As a matter of fact, the biggest single step toward peace on earth would be a confederation of real nations, the very thing the United Nations is dedicated to preventing.

 Saddam ruled because Iraq could only be held together by a tyrant.   Tito ruled because Yugoslavia could only be held together by a tyrant.   The empire of the Russian Czar was called “a prison of nations”.   The Soviet Empire based its power on holding together hostile nations in the Soviet Union.

 The Soviet Union called itself a union of Peace Loving Democratic Republics.  Peace only came when these “Peace-Loving” governments ended.  Democracy only came when these “Democratic” regimes ended.  

 These Communist satrapies under the rule of Communist Czars only became republics when these so-called “Republics” lost power.

 Each of these tyrants had the full moral authority of the United Nations behind them.  Each of these tyrannies constituted one of the “nations” that made up the United Nations.

Today the only way peace or freedom can come is by having a world of nations.  Once again, that can only happen when the group that calls itself the United Nations is abolished.