Archive for June 4th, 2004

The Plan that Bit the Jews in the Ass

Just when I got used to the idea that there is no justice, I am learning there is a lot of it.

There was recently a discussion program on television where several men were talking about the fact that Europe will have a Moslem majority by 2050 AD. Then one of them said something that completely astonished me. He said, “The problem is that white people just don’t have enough children.”

That is HERESY! If he had said that ten years ago he would have been ruined!

Then I got another shock. The other guys AGREED!

Ten years ago every one of them would have been labeled anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews

Then something else occurred to me. All three Jewish conferences, Orthodox, Conservative and Reformed, have led the fight for a “multiracial,” which means a brown, Europe. They demand that ONLY white countries bring the third world in and intermarry with them. They demand that ALL white countries bring in the third world and intermarry with them. Their program is entirely racial.

As in their efforts to make America a colored country in the name of “the melting pot,” Jewish leaders want an end to the very existence of Indo-Europeans. They say so. In fact, they shout it.

I will have an article describing this Jewish battle against whites in detail in the June 5 WhitakerOnline. They use Hitler as an excuse. Actually, what they are saying is pure Hitlerian Hate at its worst.

And they are getting their comeuppance. This fight for a “mulitracial”(brown) Europe that Jews took the lead on has had an interesting side effect: Soon all of Europe will be dominated by people who hate Jews more than Hitler did.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

The Death of New England

I was talking below about my surprising discovery that there IS justice in the world, and I cited the fact that Jewish leaders filled up Europe with third world immigrants as part of their — let me repeat — OPENLY declared program to rid the earth of white people. Many Jews oppose it, but that is the program of the Jewish leadership under the code words “multicultural” and “melting pot.”

But the hatred of these Jewish leaders for whites turned around and bit them on the ass, the way hate so often does. As a direct result of this Jewish policy of hatred, by mid-century Europe will have a Moslem majority that hates Jews and Israel more than Hitler did.

The same thing happened to New England. Tom Fleming wrote a lead article in National Review some years ago entitled, “The Death of the Yankee Culture.” The old Yankee leadership and culture is so dead now that nobody even knows there was one. But if you listened to Jim Bacchus’ portrayal of Thurston Howell III on Gilligan’s Island, you get a taste of what was America’s ruling class for at least two generations after the Civil War.

The Union Club in New York City was where that elite ruled from, recalling their great victory in the Civil War and their total control of America after destroying the Southern power. But their only basis of power became hatred of the South and of white people in general.

The Southern slave-based society is “Gone With the Wind,” but we all know what it was. The Yankee ruling class is just plain GONE.

All that is left of the identity of the old Union Club today is the hate song, “Battle Hymn of the Republic” and Lincoln and clichés. It had no identity except being the anti-South. No wonder it ended up calling America a melting pot.

The Southern population multiplied and populated America from coast to coast. From the center of Ohio to the Keys and the West Coast, the Southern population multiplied and settled. The huge states of Pennsylvania, New York, and New Jersey only settled the northern parts of the Midwest.

So where the hell are the descendants of the so-called Puritan Fathers of New England?

The descendants of old New Englanders don’t even make up a majority of tiny little New England today. A society built on self-hatred is not likely to produce a lot of descendants in the long run. New England was known for producing school marms and other old maids.

New England dedicated itself to self-hatred, sin, and the Old Testament. New England opposed every step of America’s westward expansion. New England only political drives were to oppose expansion, attack slavery once they stopped bringing in slaves themselves, and high tariffs to make the South give them money and pay the entire Federal budget.

And all that was BEFORE the Civil War. It got worse afterwards. Tariffs skyrocketed, and discriminatory rail rates were applied, UNTIL 1951!!! — to destroy all Southern industry.

Meanwhile, New England died out. While the Southern and Middle state population expanded over the continent, New England shriveled up.

That is why so many people think America was settled by immigrants. Tiny little New England could not even populate itself, much less spread across America. New England is now mostly Poles, Irish and so forth. Outside of New England, the overwhelming majority of the white population in America is descended from Americans who got here before 1700!

New England based its life on hatred. As with the Jewish leadership, they are dying away because hatred is a sick basis for a society.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

A Good Exchange

I think I may have found a Jew with a mind and some guts.

I have pointed out that one of the two people who really got this blog started is a black man.

For six years I have carefully replied each time a person who claimed he was a member of a minority group sent me an enraged e-mail, no matter how insulting it was. Every time the writer did not reply, and in most cases my reply bounced and I got the old “MAILER-DAEMON” bit, indicating that the brave person cursing me had not given his real e-mail address.

I respect the ones who at least give me a genuine address to reply to, even if they don’t respond to my reply. They have been taught in all the movies that an evil bigot like me will be crushed by some canned “You are a Hater” crap. When I reply with solid reasons for what I said, they simply can’t deal with it. But they gave me my say.

After five years of this, a black man actually wrote me back after my reply. We have been corresponding regularly ever since. It turns out he was born in West Columbia, South Carolina just like I was and he has the same totally out-of-date attitude I do, that somebody who is genuinely loyal to his own people and won’t back down is a good person and deserves listening to.

To both of us, race is not an abstract question. Race is what we were raised with as long as we can remember. As South Carolinians, he and I have dealt with a racial attitude and with the fact that people from the other race were, to say the least, close to us.

To a Southerner before this generation, race was as much a part of our childhood as carnal love for his mother was integral to Sigmund Freud.

When I go to my club, which is made up of people who are in recovery from narcotics and alcohol, I say, “One of the great things about being here is that there are so many things I DON’T have to explain.”

The same thing is true between me and this man.

Me and my fellow West Columbian were, so to speak, raised on the porch. We just talk. We don’t wonder why the other guy said what he said, and we don’t worry ourselves sick over what the “implications” of what the other guy said are. We just talk.

If he is offended, he doesn’t go to pieces. He explains it to me.

He got fascinated by a lot of my experiences, and said I should write an autobiography. I had to explain to him that I could not say publicly what I was saying to him. Others would be all over me about racial implications and Freudian crap. So the minute I mentioned a blog, he was all over me to go to it.

Our shared sense of humor is probably utterly alien to others. For example, he was competing in a contest and he said , “Like most Southerners, I hate to lose.”

I replied, “Yes, Southerners hate to lose. Half of us were slaves and the other half of us got stomped in the Civil War. Little problems like that do tend to give one a mild dislike of being on the losing side.”

Oh, God! Oh, God! Here I was trivializing the Oppression of Black People and the tragedy of the American War of Brother against Brother! How can any decent human being laugh at that?

He got a kick out of it, too.

Our problems in trying to help our respective races are very similar. My West Columbia buddy has tried to deal with the NAACP opportunists, the well-paid establishment pets called “spokesmen for the black community.” He has also talked plenty with black militants.

By the same token, I dealt with respectable conservatives who are the kept establishment opposition, like the NAACP, and I dealt with the Klansmen, the white militants. Respectable conservatives on our side are the exact equivalent of the NAACP spokesmen on his side of the fence and the my Klansmen are his black militants. We both respect the latter more for their sincerity, but they simply don’t have a clue about what to do and they respond to fear for their own people with hatred of others.

The instinct of both Klansmen and black militants is natural: they want to find somebody to fight. My buddy and I understand that perfectly, it is an old South Carolina attitude, but somebody has to do something smarter.

I am sorry to disappoint you, but “doing something smarter” is not what our correspondence is about. We talk because we enjoy it. There are huge lulls, like there were on the porch. He has a perspective on a vanished world I want to hear, and he wants to hear mine.

Now a Jew who raised hell with me read my reply and is also treating me like a person. A black South Carolinian and I understand the concept of “just talking,” but I wonder if I can explain it to a Jew who is apparently not from where I am from?

We have had a good exchange. Now I am going to send him this and see if he understands where I am coming from.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

And Now You Know… The Rest of the Story

Two very ironic incidents occurred in Louisiana in 1861. Both of them took place between the time Louisiana seceded and the outbreak of the Civil War at Fort Sumter.

The first incident involved a senior officer in the United States Army who was on his way to Washington from a Western outpost.

Louisiana had just seceded from the Union and all United States Army officers and West Point students who were loyal to Louisiana had resigned their positions in the Federal Army. One thing that Louisiana did NOT want to see was a high-ranking federal officer in full uniform inside the State of Louisiana.

So a full colonel in the Federal Army caused a lot of trouble. He was threatened and cursed at on his way through the state.

The full colonel was on his way to resign his commission. His name was Robert E. Lee.

Meanwhile another former Federal officer had spent some years in Louisiana teaching in a military academy. All the military teachers in that academy were also officers of the Louisiana State Militia. Each of them wore the uniform of the Louisiana State Militia in their teaching duties.

The uniform was gray.

This particular officer in the Louisiana State Militia was a Northerner but he had not yet decided to resign his post because the term had not ended and there were no hostilities between the United States and Louisiana. As a Louisiana State militiaman, he was ordered to seize certain military supplies from a federal base. He followed orders.

At about the same time Colonel Lee was being threatened for wearing his blue uniform in the State of Louisiana, this man was in a gray uniform seizing Federal supplies in that state.

His name was William Tecumseh Sherman.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments