Archive for June 18th, 2004

**MASH**

Posted by Bob in History on 06/18/2004

The TV series **MASH** is repeated endlessly. But you never see the original movie version of **MASH**.

That is because the movie is so horribly dated. It is pure 1960s stuff. Let me give you an example.

Eliot Gould was one of the big stars of the original movie version of **MASH**. Remember Eliot Gould?

Neither does anybody else.

Gould was Barbra Streisand’s first husband. He was big stuff in the 1960s.

In the movie, Gould comes in as the new doctor in the **MASH** unit. The other doctors ask him his name. He won’t answer them.

So the other doctors are very upset. They keep worrying about his name, the way a Jewish Mother would worry if a boy wouldn’t talk to her. Gould sits there smiling mysteriously while the other doctors are very worried about his name.

This was big stuff for the spoiled children of the 1960s. He really had those army officers who were doctors going.

I told you this was dated. Can you imagine anybody but a 60s spoiled child really believing that a group of doctors dealing in combat medicine would waste two minutes worrying about a clown who wouldn’t tell them his name?

The 60s believed it. They thought Gould was great. they thought he was Realistic. They imagined it was how they would put those silly doctors in their place.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

Just Folks?

Posted by Bob in General on 06/18/2004

I say Michael Moore is straight out of the 60s because of his baseball-cap image. He tries to look like “one of the folks” while his only friends are the media and Hollywood elite.

Jane Fonda, the darling of the 60s, shouted that she loved Communists and was “a friend of the working class.” She never had a serious talk with a working person in her life. Real working people despised Jane Fonda, but that never caused Hollywood or the media to ask her about all that “working class” crap.

Moore has his baseball cap and is a fat, unshaven slob, which is the media’s idea of a working man. All this is straight 60s crap, and as out of date as a dinosaur.

I don’t like looking at Michael Moore because he is so damn UGLY!

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

Supremacy or Survival?

Posted by Bob in Race Matters on 06/18/2004

One reader asked me how I could be so optimistic about a future in which whites are a threatened minority when the Afrikaners have made no resistance at all to black violence when they lost power in and are now a whiny subject people.

Here is my reply:

To start with, we South Carolinians DID toss out the black majority backed by Federal troops under Reconstruction after we lost power in the Civil War.

We South Carolinians did not follow our leaders like lambs to the slaughter. Afrikaners VOTED to turn their country over to the blacks! I was there, warning them. They are followers. Their Calvinist Leaders told them to give in, so they did. Now their Calvinist Leaders are getting Nobel Prizes, Board of Directors jobs, and getting the hell out of South Africa. Their followers are getting what all blind followers get in the end.

Preachers and politicians will always sell you out the minute they smell a profit in it.

Afrikaners now see themselves as Damsels in Distress, pure as the driven snow types who trusted in promises and were betrayed.

You can either learn from this that All Is Lost, or you can learn that we must dump our trust in leaders right now.

And, to be frank, they sound a lot like you, “Oh, God, it’s all HOPELESS! You can’t prove to me there’s any hope. All us tough, practical types can do is surrender!”

For me, the Boers (even the ones who live in Johannesburg call themselves that) present white optimists like me the same problem that the Chernobyl disaster did for the American nuclear power industry. It is simply not the same thing, but that is very hard to explain.

I am optimistic about the prospects of white racists becoming spokesmen for white people in America. That is because, in the next generation, non-whites leaders are going to become more and more restive in their role as Tonto to the liberal Lone Ranger, the faithful nonwhite companions of Kennedy and Company.

As long as non-whites are just automatic votes for Democrats, no one will pay them much attention except dumbass conservatives who think they can “appeal” to minorities.

So in a generation we will have accepted the idea that the rules are made by Hispanic spokesmen, Oriental spokesmen, and spokesmen for the relatively diminishing black minority. In that reality, there will be no place for “non-racial” spokesmen, whether they call themselves conservatives or liberals or vegetarians.

We will be forced to think racially. Mixed populations will be out in the cold. White enclaves will be white RACIST enclaves.

If you are after white supremacy, this outlook is awful. If you want white survival, this outlook is excellent.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments

A True Aristocrat

Posted by Bob in General on 06/18/2004

I wrote this in the “science” newsgroup in Stormfront.org, a white racist web location:

A True Aristocrat
——————————————————————————–

I am sure that everyone in this science newsgroup is familiar with Louis Andrews and his website, “Stalking the Wild Taboo.”

http://www.lrainc.com/swtaboo/swt_lra.html

There is nothing Louis Andrews does not know about biology and psychology that relates to race. The information on his website is vast and exhaustive, and if you need to know anything that can be of benefit to the white race, you can e-mail him personally. I am proud to say I have been working with Louis for decades.

But there is something else about Louis which makes me proud and that he never mentions. Louis is a true aristocrat, the kind of aristocrat who is respected by South Carolinians like me. He is the kind of man I would follow up any hill into any battle.

I told my brother once that Louis Andrews is a direct descendant of the Rutledge who was made Dictator of South Carolina after the British took Charleston in 1780. His family has been at the top of the Charleston aristocracy from the first.

My brother replied that that impressed him, but the fact that Louis never told anybody that impressed him even more.

Louis Rutledge Andrews could have sold out to the left and profited from it enormously. He did just the opposite, as so many of real Charleston Battery aristocrats have done. They don’t get mentioned anywhere.

Our folks are so busy whining and crying about betrayals that they don’t have time to notice the ones who do NOT betray us, because they are not mentioned in the media.

That is the strategy the leftist media depend on, and the whiners on our side are their best allies.

In his book, “Who Killed Society,” the leftist Cleveland Amory (from New York) declared that the only aristocracy left in America is that of the Charleston Battery.

The only Charleston Battery aristocrats anyone hears about are the ones who go over to the liberals, like so many whites with something to sell do.

But Louis is in there, fighting for us.

Other South Carolinians make jokes about Charleston:

“How many Charlestonians does it take to change a light bulb?”

“It takes three, one to screw it in and two to talk about how great the OLD light bulb was.”

But we South Carolinians are proud of our Battery aristocracy and we will follow them because, through it all, they have stood by our people, our race, the South, and liberal favor be damned.

I have bragged that, in fifty years of reading about people’s Confederate ancestors, I have concluded that my forefathers were the only PRIVATES in the entire Southern armed forces.

I would rather be a private following a Louis Andrews into battle than a general in any other army.

Bob Whitaker of WhitakerOnline.org

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

No Comments