http://www.faughaballagh.com/~ted/audio/duke.rm
The Irish just had a referendum on limiting immigration. It passed four to one. So a radio station in Ireland decided to prove it was all racist, so they called David Duke.
David cut them to pieces in seven minutes, though of course they scarcely let him get a word in.
Here it is:
http://www.faughaballagh.com/~ted/audio/duke.rm
Like O’Reilly, all they did was call him names.
In a fast and furious fight like this, David used my arguments. He used the word “genocide,” which is the argument I introduced.
David uses the talent he has around him. I am some of that talent. I have spent fifty years fighting nose-to-nose with these insulting anti-whites, and I know how to use every second while they rave.
http://www.faughaballagh.com/~ted/audio/duke.rm
Use FREE realPlayer to play this .ram (Real Audio Media file)
DOWNLOAD realPlayer
#1 by Don on 03/11/2005 - 4:50 pm
I did. They were. We need lots more of it.
Hone the arguments, people. Repeat them over and over, just like Bob says. They have given us the word “genocide”. Now let’s use it with avengeance. Over and over. Over and over.
#2 by willing on 03/11/2005 - 4:53 pm
The late Jim Martin researched the life of Raphael Lemkin,the inventor of the neologism “genocide”.”Genocide” doesn’t have any applicability to majority populations.The words and deeds of any political minority,as as defined by the acting government,can be considered an act of “genocide”.By this line of Talmudic reasoning,open-borders immigration into majority white countries is not “genocide”.A political organization that rallies against this invasion,however,is committing a form of “genocide”.The acting government often uses the term “hate crime” as a substitute for “genocide”.
Jim Martin always,and correctly,used quotation marks around “genocide”.
#3 by Stuka on 03/11/2005 - 9:08 pm
Well done, David Duke! I have to hand it to he guy, he’s doing a helluva job. I’m thinking of getting a “Duke for President” t-shirt.
And to think, I used to be a mainstream, National Review-reading, Rush Limbaugh-listening conservative just a few years ago…
#4 by Don on 03/12/2005 - 10:27 am
RE: And to think, I used to be a mainstream, National Review-reading, Rush Limbaugh-listening conservative just a few years ago…
Thank you for making my day!
#5 by Bedford on 03/14/2005 - 7:20 pm
Well, it was good to hear a little fire out of David – he is usually pretty low key. The only thing that David could have added was to ask the liberal fool why he did not emigrate to Uganda or the Congo if he is interested in their culture so much? The fellow on the radio is “Bush Limbow” – he is a Repub ( not a conservative) like Georgie W. and most of those around Georgie W. KKK yet again? Nathan Bedford Forrest was a member of the original KKK and he was one of the greatest if not the greatest natural military geniuses ever produced by this country – a man as remarkable as the phony mlk was unremarkable.